Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T02:55:17.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shall evidence-based risk assessment be abandoned?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Grant T. Harris ,
Marnie E. Rice  and
Vernon L. Quinsey
Grant T. Harris
Affiliation:
Mental Health Center Penetanguishene, 500 Church Street, Penetanguishene, ON L9M 1G3, Canada. Email: gharris@mhcp.on.ca
Marnie E. Rice
Affiliation:
Mental Health Center Penetanguishene, Penetanguishene, Canada
Vernon L. Quinsey
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Columns
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 192 , Issue 2 , February 2008 , pp. 154
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008 

References

1 Hart, SD, Michie, C, Cooke, DJ. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments. Br J Psychiatry 2007; 190 (suppl 49): s60–5.Google Scholar
2 Quinsey, VL, Harris, GT, Rice, ME, Cormier, CA. Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk (2nd edn). American Psychological Association, 2006.Google Scholar
3 Harris, GT, Rice, ME. Characterising the value of actuarial violence risk assessment. Crim Justice Behav 2007; in press.Google Scholar
4 Grove, WM, Meehl, PE. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical–statistical controversy. Psychol Public Policy Law 1996; 2: 293–323.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.