Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:46:05.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Dangers of Targeting the Budget Deficit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2023

J.O.N. Perkins
J.O.N. Perkins*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper examines a number of the deficiencies of the use of the budget balance, or changes in it, as an intermediate target for macroeconomic policy. It draws attention to a number of defensible alternative definitions of ‘the budget deficit’ - which may give conflicting indications of the direction in which the budget balance is moving. It then outlines some of the ways in which alternative measures for effecting a given change in the budget balance may have different effects on the principal objectives of macroeconomic policy. It is pointed out that even if a reduction in the rate of increase in government debt is in itself desirable, it is only after consideration of the costs and benefits of alternative ways of achieving that aim that one can logically decide what policy measures - and what consequent change in the deficit - are appropriate. An appendix draws on some simulations for the UK economy and for the OECD to illustrate how different measures having the same effect on the PSBR may have different relative effects on the various macroeconomic objectives.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Economic and Labour Relations Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , June 1995 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1995

Footnotes

*

The author gratefully acknowledges comments from Max Corden, Ian McDonald, John Nevile and Neville Norman on earlier drafts, but none of them are responsible for remaining deficiencies.

References

Blanchard, O (1990) ‘Suggestions for a New Set of Fiscal Indicators’, OECD Department of Economics and Statistics Working Papers, No. 79, April 1990.Google Scholar
Brittan, S (1993) “What the Budget Could Look Like”, Financial Times, May 27th.Google Scholar
Church, K.B., Mitchell, P.R., Smith, P.N., Wallis, K.F. (1993) ‘Comparative Properties of Models of the UK Economy’, National Institute Economic Review, August.Google Scholar
Depta, Peter, Ravalli, Frank, Harding, Don (1994) ‘Extended Measures of Investment and Saving’, (Austraian) Treasury Research Paper, No. 8, February.Google Scholar
Dowrick, Steve (1994) ‘Fiscal Policy and Investment: The New Supply Side Economics’, Australian National University Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 322, April.Google Scholar
Knoester, Anthonie (1993) ‘The Inverted Haavelmo Effect and the Effects of Fiscal Policies in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and the Netherlands’ in Koestler, Anthonie (ed), Taxation in the United States and Europe, Macmillan, London, and St. Martin’s Press, New York; also re-published as Erasmus University of Rotterdam Research Centre for Economic Policy Reprint, No. 9401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibfritz, Willi, Roseveare, Deborah, van den Noord, Paul (1994) ‘Fiscal Policy, Government Debt and Economic Performance’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 144.Google Scholar
Otto, Glenn, Voss, Graham M. (1994) ‘Public Capital and Private Sector Productivity’, Economic Record, Vol. 70, No. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, J.O.N. (1990), A General Approach to Macroeconomic Policy, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Pete, Giorno, Claude, Thurman, Stephen (1994) ‘Macroeconomic Performance and Fiscal Policy Adjustments in the Medium Term: Alternative Medium-term Scenarios’, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 148.Google Scholar