Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:32:38.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Political Arts of Lord Liverpool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Extract

After her third consecutive election victory in 1987, Margaret Thatcher chose as her holiday reading Norman Gash's biography of Lord Liverpool. It was a fitting tribute from one remarkably durable prime minister to another. No one now thinks of Liverpool as a mediocrity, let alone an arch one, and the fact that many of his colleagues were more flamboyant than he was merely adds to his stature. His achievements as a statesman are emphasised by Gash, who depicts him as ‘one of the great through unacknowledged architects of the liberal, free trade Victorian state’, the first exponent of a public doctrine which, in both its economic and its moral components, would be taken up triumphantly by his successors—Peel, Gladstone, and (it might be argued) Thatcher. His achievements as a politician, meanwhile, can be measured by the fact that he sustained a fifteen year premiership, broken only by his stroke in February 1827, during a period of extreme social and economic difficulty. This seems all the more remarkable in view of the fact that the eighteenth century had seemed to demonstrate that in order to run a stable administration, a first lord of the treasury needed to be in the House of Commons.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gash, N., Lord Liverpool. The Life and Political Career of Robert Banks Jenkinson 2nd Earl of Liverpool 1770–1828 (1984), 251–4Google Scholar.

2 Brock, W. R., Lord Liverpool and Liberal Toryism 1820 to 1827 (1941: 2nd 1967 edition), 33, 75–6. 170Google Scholar.

3 Webster, C. K., The Foreign Policy of Castlereagh 1812–1815. Britain and the Reconstruction of Europe (1931), 35Google Scholar.

4 The Journal of Mrs Arbuthnot 1820–1832, ed. Bamford, F. and the duke of Wellington (2 vols., 1950), i. 121Google Scholar.

5 Charles Arbuthnot to Huskisson, Jan. 1823, Huskisson Papers, British Library, Additional MS 38744, fo. 57, quoted in Brock, 171.

6 Sydney Smith to Bishop Blomfield, 5 Sept. 1840, The Letters of Sydney Smith, ed. Smith, N. C. (2 vols, Oxford, 1953), ii. 709Google Scholar.

7 For recent expositions on these lines see Gash, N., Aristocracy and People. Britain 1815–1865 (1979), 112, 116—17Google Scholar; Evans, E.J., The Forging of the Modern State. Early Industrial Britain 1783–1870 (1983), 190–1, 198Google Scholar.

8 Hilton, B., Corn, Cash, Commerce. The Economic Policies of the Tory Governments 1815–1830 (Oxford, 1977), 40–8Google Scholar.

9 Though a case might be made for Sir Charles Wood, chancellor of the exchequer 1846–52. On the chancellorship see Matthew, H. C. G., Gladstone, 1809–1874 (Oxford, 1986), 110Google Scholar.

10 Wynn, to Buckingham, , 20 01 1823, Memoirs of the Court of George IV, 1820–1830, ed. Grenville, R., duke of Buckingham and Chandos (2 vols., 1859), i. 411Google Scholar.

11 Wynn, to Buckingham, , ?Nov.–Dec. 1822, Court of George IV, i. 398Google Scholar.

12 Hilton, , Corn, 71–5Google Scholar.

13 Liverpool to Huskisson, 11 April 1824, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38745, fo. 234.

14 Memorandum of 18 Feb. 1823, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38761, fos. 95–100.

15 Grenville to Huskisson, 27 Apr. 1825, Huskisson Papers, BL Add. MS 38746, fos. 186–7.

16 Gash, N., ‘After Waterloo: British society and the legacy of the Napoleonic wars’, T. R. H. S., 5th series, xxviii (1978), 145–57Google Scholar.

17 Hilton, , Corn, 173–5, 190–5Google Scholar.

18 Canning to Huskisson, 8 March 1821, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38742, fos. 187–97.

19 Hilton, , Corn, 96–7Google Scholar; Hilton, B., The Age of Atonement. The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1795–1865 (Oxford, 1988), 126–7Google Scholar.

20 Hilton, B., ‘Peel: a reappraisal’, Historical Journal, xxii (1979), 610Google Scholar.

21 Webster, C. K., The Foreign Policy of Castlereagh 1815–1822. Britain and the European Alliance (1925), 14Google Scholar.

22 Liverpool, in House of Lords, 24 07 1812, Hansard's Parliamentary Debates, xxiii, 1249Google Scholar.

23 Cookson, J. E., Lord Liverpool's Administration. The Crucial Years 1815–1822 (Edinburgh and London, 1975), 278Google Scholar.

24 Grenville to Sir John Newport, 17 October 1814, Bodleian Library, Eng. MS Letters, d. 80, fos. 103–6.

25 Huskisson to Canning, 20 April 1816, Canning Papers, Leeds Public Library MSS., 67/83.

26 George, IV's memorandum, 08 1827, The Letters of King George IV 1821–30, ed. Aspinall, A. (3 vols., Cambridge, 1938), iii. 291–2Google Scholar.

27 Aspinall, A., ‘The Cabinet Council, 1783–1835’, Proceedings of the British Academy, xxxviii (1952), 187–8Google Scholar.

28 On this ‘inner’ cabinet see Webster, , Castlereagh 1815–1822, 15Google Scholar.

29 Webster, , Castlereagh 1812–1815, 374Google Scholar.

30 Liverpool Papers. BL, Add. MS 38291, fo. 336, quoted in The Correspondence of Charles Arbuthnot, ed. Aspinall, A. (1941), 19nGoogle Scholar.

31 Huskisson to his wife, 3 Feb. 1819, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 39949, fos. 58–61.

32 Canning's diary, 2 and 3 April, 10 May, 1819, Canning Papers, 29 D.i.

33 Liverpool, to Eldon, , 10 05 1819, The Public and Private Life of Lord Chancellor Eldon with Selections from his Correspondence, ed. Twiss, H. (3 vols., 1844), ii. 329Google Scholar; Canning's diary, loc. cit..

34 Hilton, , Corn, 102–9, 149–56 269–78Google Scholar.

35 IV, George to Liverpool, , 6 11 1823, The Letters of King George IV 1812–1830 (3 vols., Cambridge, 1938), iii. 39Google Scholar.

36 Wellington, to Fremantle, , 3 12 1821, Memoirs of the Court of George IV, i. 237Google Scholar.

37 Redesdale, to Colchester, , 4 01 1820, The Diary and Correspondence of Charles Abbot, Lord Colchester, ed. Charles, , Colchester, Lord (3 vols., 1861), iii. 107–8Google Scholar; Fremantle, to Buckingham, , 9 02 1819, Memoirs of the Court of England during the Regency, 1811–1820 ed. Grenville, R., Buckingham, duke of and Chandos, (2 vols., 1856), ii. 301Google Scholar.

38 Gash, , Liverpool, 171Google Scholar.

39 Liverpool to Charles Bathurst, 29 December 1820, Liverpool Papers, BL, Add. MS 38288, fos. 386–8.

40 Fremantle's, W. H. report of a conversation with Lord Liverpool, 11 1821, Court of George IV, i. 232Google Scholar.

41 Liverpool to ?, 21 Nov. 1822, Liverpool Papers, BL, Add. MS 38291, fos. 174–8.

42 Huskisson to Liverpool, 12 May 1822, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fos. 148—51, quoted in The Huskisson Papers, ed. Melville, L. (1931), 137–9Google Scholar.

43 E. J. Littleton's diary, 20 Nov. 1821, Hatherton Papers, Staffordshire Record Office, D260/M/F/5/26/5/148–50.

44 Huskisson to Liverpool, 12 May 1822, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fos. 148–51; Huskisson Papers, 137–9. It is clear from such comments that Gash is mistaken in describing Huskisson as ‘curiously oblivious of his own unpopularity’. Gash, , Liverpool, 242Google Scholar.

45 Littleton's, diary, 20 11 1821, loc. cit.Google Scholar.

46 Huskisson to Liverpool, 14 November 1821, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fos. 13–14.

47 Huskisson to Liverpool, 11 Jan. 1822, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fos. 117–20; Huskisson Papers, 135.

48 Huskisson to Canning, November 1822, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS38743, fo221; Huskisson to Arbuthnot, 26 December 1822, ibid., fos. 285–6.

49 Canning to Huskisson, 3 October 1822, Huskisson papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fos. 217–20; Brock, , Liverpool and Liberal Toryism, pp. 163–4Google Scholar.

50 George IV to Liverpool, 2 Jan. 1823, Huskisson Papers, Add. MS. 38575, fos. 82–3. In November 1823 the king again made it clear that he had sanctioned Huskisson's admission to the cabinetas early as Canning's appointment to the foreign department. George, IV to Liverpool, 6 11 1823, loc. cit.Google ScholarIt was therefore remarkably disingenuous of Liverpool to complain that Huskisson was trying to push his way intothe cabinet ‘against the wishes of the King and his own friends’. Liverpool, to Arbuthnot, , 27 12 1822, Correspondence of Charles Arbuthnot, 37Google Scholar.

51 Canning, to Liverpool, , 18 01 1823, Canning Papers, 70Google Scholar.

52 Wallace, to Herries, , 8 08 1821, Herries Papers, British Library, Vol. xxxvi, fos. 105–7)Google Scholar.

53 Huskisson to Ellis, 29 Dec. 1822, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fos. 294–8.

54 Huskisson to Liverpool, 19 June 1823, Huskisson Papers, Add MS38744 ff. 229–31.

55 Huskisson to Canning, 25 Oct. 1822 and 25 July 1823, Canning Papers, 67/131, 68/20.

56 Journal of Mrs Arbuthnot, ii. 20.

57 Bathurst to Harrowby, 5 January 1823, Sandon Hall, Harrowby MS 1st series XIV, fo. 123.

58 Huskisson to Canning, 25 Oct 1822, Huskisson Papers, BL, Add. MS 38743, fo. 259; Cookson, , Liverpool's Administration, 386–7Google Scholar. In fact, Canning's reference to Huskisson's perverseness was in respect of a different matter. Canning to Liverpool, 28 December 1822, Canning Papers.

59 Canning to Huskisson, 3 Oct. 1822, loc. cit.

60 Liverpool to Earl Talbot, 27 May 1818, Liverpool Papers, BL, Add. MS 38272, fos. 34–7.

61 Parris, H., Constitutional Bureaucracy. The Development of British Public Administration since the Eighteenth Century (1969)Google Scholar; Aylmer, G. E., ‘From office-holding to civil service: the genesis of modern bureaucracy’, T.R.H.S., 5th series, xxx (1980), 91108Google Scholar; Chester, N., The English Administrative System 1780–1870 (Oxford, 1981)Google Scholar.

62 Goldman, L., ‘The Social Science Association, 1857–1886: a context for midVictorian liberalism’, English Historical Review, ci (1986), 95134CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Morgan, T. D. L., ‘All for a wise despotism? Robert Lowe and the politics of meritocracy 1852–1873’, unpublished Cambridge University Ph.D. (1982), 242–70Google Scholar.

64 Hilton, , ‘Peel’, loc. cit., 606–8Google Scholar.