Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:00:14.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Emergence of an Urban Ideology at Florence c. 1250–1450

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

George Holmes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Every city must in a sense have a city culture. Florence, however, was the only place in which there arose at the end of the Middle Ages what one might call a city ideology, that is to say a set of developed ideas as distinct from a way of living, which was particularly designed by and for city-dwellers. Much of the modern historical interest in Florence has centred around these ideas which emerged in the first half of the fifteenth century, the more so because even the innovations in the visual arts introduced at the same time by Donatello and his contemporaries are in part a by-product of them. The theme which I would like to develop in this paper therefore is the relationship between the city society and its ideology. This is of course a very old and well-worn theme. One of the common presuppositions of Renaissance historiography has been the understandable assumption that the ideology fitted the city, and a good deal of historical analysis has been applied to identifying the congruences between them and illustrating the growth of the humanist school out of the circumstances of Florentine life. The ideology, however, was created in the early fifteenth century, at the end of the period which I am going to discuss, when Florence had already been a great centre of industry and commerce and an independent republic for a very long time. Fruitful as it has been, this approach therefore leaves one with the disquieting feeling that a place which has been for so long and so conspicuously a centre of throbbing urban life ought to have had its ideological revolution much earlier, particularly since economic historians have emphasized the elements of commercial contraction rather than expansion in the early Renaissance period. Some historians have found themselves driven into the paradoxical position of regarding the early Renaissance as a symptom of economic decline. I would therefore like to look at the old theme obliquely by deflecting attention from the great innovations themselves and concentrating it on the factors which favoured or hindered ideological innovation in the century and a half before they appeared.

Type
Research Article
Information
Transactions of the Royal Historical Society , Volume 23 , January 1973 , pp. 111 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Notably Lopez, R. S., ‘Hard Times and Investment in Culture’, The Renaissance. A Symposium (New York, 1953)Google Scholar; Lopez, R. S. and Miskimin, H. A., ‘The Economic Depression of the Renaissance’, Economic History Review, ser. 2, xiv (1961–1962)Google Scholar.

2 An early expression of it is De Militia (c. 1421–27), ed. Bayley, C. C., War and Society in Renaissance Florence (Toronto, 1961)Google Scholar. The plainest statement is in Della Vita Civile (c. 1435–38), ed. Battaglia, F. (Bologna, 1944)Google Scholar, by Matteo Palmieri who was a second-rank amateur humanist. It was foreshadowed at the very beginning of the century in Bruni's Laudatio Florentinae Urbis. printed in Baron, H., From Petrarch to Leonardo Bruni (Chicago, 1968), pp. 232–63Google Scholar.

3 In De Re Aedificatoria (ed. Orlandi, G. and Portoghesi, P., Milan, 1966), c. 1444–50Google Scholar.

4 Aretino, Leonardo Bruni, Historiarum Florentini Populi Libri XII, ed. Santini, E. (Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, xix, iii) Bk. 12, c. 1440–44Google Scholar. Cf. Santini, E., ‘Leonardo Bruni Aretino e i suoi “Historiarum Florentini Populi Libri XII”‘, Annali della R. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Filosofia e Filologia, xxii (1910), 89Google Scholar. Poggii Historia Florentina (Venice, 1715), c. 1453–59Google Scholar.

5 Alberti, L. B., Opere Volgari, ed. Grayson, C., i (Bari, 1960), c. 1433–45Google Scholar.

6 De Avaritia (1428–29), De Nobilitate, De Infelicitate Principum (1440) in Opera (Basle, 1538)Google Scholar, reprinted Opera Omnia, i (Turin, 1964).

7 Full accounts in Walser, E., Poggius Florentinus (Berlin, 1914)Google Scholar, Mancini, G., Vita di L. B. Alberti (Florence, 1911)Google Scholar; cf. Grayson, C., Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, i (1960)Google Scholar.

8 The most convenient survey of the group remains that in Voigt, G., Die Wiederbelebung des Classischen Altertums, i (1893Google Scholar, reprinted Berlin, 1960). Among a mass of more recent studies the most comprehensive works are Baron, H., The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance (two editions, Princeton, 1955Google Scholar and 1960) and Martines, L., The Social World of the Florentine Humanists 1390–1460 (London, 1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Davidsohn, R., Geschichte von Florenz (Berlin, 1896–1927)Google Scholar; Italian translation, Storia di Firenze (Florence, 1956–1965)Google Scholar.

10 The early history of the order is summarized by Rossi, A. M., Manuale di Storia dell'Ordine dei Servi di Maria (Rome, 1956)Google Scholar. There is no detailed modern account to match the early work of Giani, A., Annales ordinis fratrum beatae Mariae virginis (Florence, 1618)Google Scholar. Recent specialized publications are to be found in Monumenta Ordinis Servorum Sanctae Mariae (Brussels, 1897–1930)Google Scholarand in the periodical Studi Storici dell' Ordine dei Servi di Maria.

11 Richa, G., Notizie Istoriche delle Chiese Florentine, viii (Florence, 1759), p. 29Google Scholar.

12 Piana, C., ‘Silloge di documenti dall'antico archivio di S. Francesco di Bologna. IV. La posizione giuridica del Terz' Ordine della penitenza a Firenze nel secolo XIV’, Arckivium Franciscanum Historicum, i (1957)Google Scholar.

13 Davidsohn, , Storia, vii, pp. 65–68Google Scholar.

14 Davidsohn, , Forschungen zur älteren Geschichte von Florenz, iv (Berlin, 1896–1908), pp. 429–30Google Scholar. The same account contains an early entry for oil for the lamp before Giotto's Crucifixion in the church; see references in Smart, A., The Assisi Problem and the Art of Giotto (Oxford, 1971), pp. 74–81Google Scholar.

15 Davidsohn, , Forschungen, iv, pp. 432—33Google Scholar.

16 Davidsohn, , Storia, iii, pp. 388–90Google Scholar; Forschungen, iv, pp. 435—36.

17 Istorie de Matteo Villani, in Muratori, L., Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, xiv (Milan, 1729), I, viiGoogle Scholar.

18 , W. and Paatz, E., Die Kirchen von Florenz, iv (Frankfurt am Main, 1952). PP. 500–3, 547–51Google Scholar.

19 Recently surveyed by Stephens, J. N., ‘Heresy in Medieval and Renaissance Florence’, Past and Present, 54 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 The story has been most recently told by Quilici, B., Il Vescovo Ardingo e la Chiesa di Firenze nel quarto e quinto Decennie del Secolo XIII (Florence, 1965). p. 37Google Scholarseq.

21 Becker, M. B., ‘Florentine Politics and the Diffusion of Heresy in the Trecento: a socioeconomic Inquiry’, Speculum, xxxiv (1959), pp. 70–72Google Scholar. The commune was more hostile to the Inquisition than before but that does not necessarily mean a sympathy with heresy.

22 Douie, D. C., The Nature and Effect of the Heresy of the Fraticelli (Manchester, 1932), pp. 89–90Google Scholar.

23 McNeil, M. G., Simone Fidati and his De Gestis Domini Salvatoris (Washington, 1951), pp. 20–27Google Scholar; Davidsohn, , Forschungen, iv, p. 422Google Scholar.

24 Archiv für Literatur und Kirchengeschichte des Mittelalters, iii (1887), p. 68Google Scholar.

25 Morçay, R., Saint Antonin Archévêque de Florence (1389–1459) (Paris, 1914), pp. 65–79Google Scholar.

26 Convivio, I, i.

27 Orlandi, S., La Biblioteca di S. Maria Novella in Firenze dal sec. XIV al sec, XIX (Florence, 1952)Google Scholar.

28 The Spanish Chapel frescoes were commissioned from Andrea da Firenze in 1365 (Paatz, , Kitchen von Florenz, iii, 1952, pp. 720–22, 814–16)Google Scholar, the Strozzi altarpiece from Orcagna in 1354(ibid., 713, 804).

29 Prediche del b. Giordano da Rivalto dell'Ordine de' Predicatori, ed. Manni, D. M. (Florence, 1739), p. 33Google Scholar. Other sermons are in Prediche di F. Giordano da Rivalto, ed. Moreni, E. (Florence, 1831)Google Scholarand Prediche Inedite del B. Giordano da Rivalto, ed. Narducci, E. (Bologna, 1867)Google Scholar. On Giordano see Davidsohn, , Storia, vii, pp. 128–42Google Scholar; Galletti, A., ‘Frà Giordano da Pisa Predicatore del secolo XIV’, Giornale Storico della letteratura Italiana, xxxi, xxxiii (1898–1899)Google Scholar.

30 ‘Perocchè la carità, si è forma nell'anima; forma, forse non intendete bene, forma non è pur quella del calzolaio o della birretta; ben sono queste alcun modo di forma; ma forma chiamano i savî quella virtù che è in tutte le cose, per le quali tutt e l'operazioni si fanno. Onde la forma del sole si è la luce, colla quale opera. Forma degli alberi si è la virtù loro, colla quale fa quelle frutto’ (Giornale Storico, xxxiii, p. 197).

31 Lo Specchio della vera penitenza, ed. Palidori, F. L. (Florence, 1863)Google Scholar. Cf. Monteverdi, A., ‘Gli Esempi dello “Specchio di vera penitenza”,’ Giornale Storico della letteratura Italiana, lxi, Ixiii (1913–1914)Google Scholar. For Passavanti's biography ”Necrologio” di S. Maria Novella, ed. Orlandi, S. (Florence, 1955), i, pp. 450–71Google Scholar.

32 Ser Lapo Mazzei. Lettere di un notario a un mercante del secolo XIV, ed. Guasti, C. (Florence, 1880), i, pp. 228, 316Google Scholar.

33 On Dominici's life Roesler, A., Cardinal Johannes Dominici, O. Pr. 135J–1419 (Freiburg-im-Breisgau, 1893)Google Scholar. His attacks on contemporary humanism are contained in Lucula Noctis, ed. Hunt, E. (University of Notre Dame Publications in Medieval Studies, no. 4, 1940)Google Scholarand Regola del Governo di cura familiare, ed. Salvi, D. (Florence, 1860)Google Scholar.

34 Minio-Paluello, L., ‘Remigio Girolami's De Bono Communi’, Italian Studies, xi (1956)Google Scholar; see further Davis, C. T., ‘An early Florentine political theorist: Frà Remigio de'; Girolami’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, civ (1960)Google Scholarand Salvadori, G. and Federici, V., ‘I sermoni d'occasione, le sequenze e i ritmi di Remigio Girolami fiorentino', Scritti vari di filologia a Ernesto Monad (Rome, 1901)Google Scholar.

35 ‘Legere et scrivere, ita quod convenienter sciat legere Psalterium, Donatum et instrumenta, et scrivere’, Debenedetti, S., ‘Sui più antichi “doctores puerorum” a Firenze’, Studi Medievali, ii, pp. 1906, 333, 344Google Scholar. Other general accounts of Florentine education in Davidsohn, , Storia, viiGoogle Scholar, ch. 3; Bee, C., Les marehands écrivains, affaires et humanisme à Florence 1375–1434 (Paris-the Hague, 1967), pp. 383–415Google Scholar; Davis, C. T., ‘Education in Dante's Florence’, Speculum, xl (1965)Google Scholar.

36 Historie Florentine di Giovanni Villani, in Muratori, , Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, xiii (Milan, 1728), XI, xciiiGoogle Scholar: “Troviano ch' e fanciulli e fanciulle, che stavano a leggere dalle otto mila a dieci mila. E i fanciulli che stavano ad apparare l'abbaco e algorismo in sei scuole, da mille in mille ducento. E quelli, che stavano ad apprendere Grammatica e loica in quattro grandi scuole da 550 in sei cento.’ Cf. Frugoni, A., ‘G. Villani. “Cronica” XI. 94’, Bullettino dell'Istituto Storico Italiano, lxxvii (1965), p. 251Google Scholar.

37 Giovanni di Pagolo Morelli, Ricordi, ed. Branca, V. (Florence, 1956), pp. 271–73Google Scholar.

38 Martines, L., Lawyers and Statecraft in Renaissance Florence (Princeton, 1968), p. 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Villani, XI, 113.

39 Martines, ibid., pp. 34–35, referring to the Statutes of 1344.

40 For Salutati see Ullman, B. L., The Humanism of Coluccio Salutati (Padua, 1963)Google Scholar, ch. 1; the early careers of Poggio and Bruni are sketched by Martines, , Social World of the Florentine Humanists, pp. 123–24, 166–67Google Scholar. The general importance of the connexion between law, rhetoric and culture is discussed by Seigel, J. E., Rhetoric and Philosophy in Renaissance Humanism (Princeton, 1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ch. 7, and by Wieruszowski, H., ‘Rhetoric and the Classics in Italian Education of the Thirteenth Century’, Politics and Culture in Medieval Spain and Italy (Rome, 1971)Google Scholar.

41 H. Wieruszowski, ‘Brunetto Latini als Lehrer Dantes und der Florentiner’, in Politics and Culture in Medieval Spain and Italy; Villani, VIII, x.

42 This aspect of the correspondence is analysed by Bee, , Marchands Écrivains, pp. 115–32Google Scholar.

43 The story up to 1359 is told by Davidsohn, , Storia, vii, pp. 269–79Google Scholar. For the later university, Gherardi, A., Statute della Università e Studio fiorentino (Florence, 1881)Google Scholar.

44 ‘Epycurum ac Democritum studiosissime urbium, Athene, famosos mundo accolas, sibi autem incognitos habuere; miremur si te mercatrix et lanifica nostra non noverit?’ (to Nelli, Francesco, Prior of Apostoli, Santi, Familiari, XVIII, 9)Google Scholar.

45 Weiss, R., ‘Lineamenti per una storia del primo umanesimo fiorentino’, Rivista Storica Italiana, lx (1948)Google Scholar.

46 Billanovich, G., I Primi Umanisti e le Tradizioni dei Classici Latini (Freiburg, 1953)Google Scholar.

47 On these two libraries see Mazza, A., ‘L'inventario della “parva libraria” di Santo Spirito e la Biblioteca del Boccaccio’, Italia Medioevale e Umanistica, ix (1966)Google Scholarand Ullman, B. L. and Stadter, P. A., The Public Library of Renaissance Florence: Niccolò Niccoli. Cosimo de' Medici and the Library of San Marco (Padua, 1970).Google Scholar

48 Convivio, IV; e.g. ‘che'l divino seme non cade in ischiatta, cioè in istirpe, ma cade ne le singulari persone, e, sì come di sotto si proverà, la stirpe non fa le singulari persone nobili, ma le singulari persone fanno la stirpe’ (IV, xx).

49 Epistola o sia Ragionamento di messer Lapo da Castiglionchio Cittadino Fiorentino, ed. Mehus, L. (Bologna, 1753), p. 6Google Scholar.

50 ‘… La nobiltà consiste e sta in questio cioè che il Superiore fa alcuno a se grato et accetto, come di sopra dissi. Ma insorge uno dubbio: perocchè in queste città che si reggono per popolo, coloro che si chiamano nobili, sono meno accetti, come appare nell'imporre delle pene, ove appare che è più punito il nobile, che lo ignobile. Apparisce ancora nel concedere di molti ufici, da' quali i nobili sono esclusi. E per questo appare che costoro non possono essere detti nobili, conciossia cosa che essi non sieno più accetti anzi meno. E secondo questo la diffinizione predetta della nobiltà non si confà a loro’ (op. cit., p. 26). The earlier part of Lapo's argument about nobility (pp. 11–17 ) is translated into Italian from a passage in Bartolus's De Dignitatibus. The passage is printed in Witte, K., Dante-Forschungen, i (Halle, 1869), pp. 462–71Google Scholar. Thereafter Lapo's argument becomes more original. Both Bartolo and Lapo appear to refer only to the Canzone and not to Dante's prose explanation.

51 Poggio, De Nobilitate, in Opera.

52 Laurentii de Rodulfis Civis Florentine de Vsuris, in Tractatus Illustrium in utraque turn pontificii, tum Caesarei iuris facilitate Iurisconsultorum, De Contractibus, et aliis illicitis, vii (Venice, 1584)Google Scholar, fos. 37v, 38v. For its place in the literature on usury see de Roover, R., L'Evolution de la Lettre de Change, XIVe–XVIIIe siècles (Paris, 1953), esp. P.197Google Scholar; Noonan, J. T., The Scholastic Analysis of Usury (Cambridge, Mass., 1957), pp. 69, 121–25, 185–87Google Scholar. Instances of hostility to ecclesiastical laws on usury in fourteenth century Florence are discussed by Becker, M. B., ‘Three Cases concerning the Restitution of Usury in Florence’, Journal of Economic History, xvii (1957)Google Scholar; ‘Some Economic Implications of the Conflict between Church and State in Trecento Florence’, Mediaeval Studies, xxi (1959)Google Scholar.

53 The extent to which attitudes in humanist dialogues are to be taken seriously is an interesting question. In this case there happens to be some information about the evolution of the dialogue into its final form which is revealing. See Harth, H., ‘Niccolò Niccoli als literarischer Zensor. Untersuchungen zur Textgeschichte von Poggios “De Avarita”’, Rinascimento, vii (1967)Google Scholar.

54 Villani, viii, 36.

55 Baron, H., The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance (Princeton, 1955), iGoogle Scholar, ch. 3; Rubinstein, N., ‘The Beginnings of Political Thought in Florence’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, v (1942)Google Scholar.

56 Rubinstein, N., ‘Florence and the Despots. Some Aspects of Florentine Diplomacy in the Fourteenth Century,’ Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th ser., ii (1952), especially pp. 29–32Google Scholar; Witt, R., ‘The Rebirth of the Concept of Republican Liberty in Italy’, Renaissance Studies in Honor of Hans Baron, ed Molho, A. and Tedeschi, J. A. (Dekalb, Illinois, 1971)Google Scholar.

57 ‘L'Istoria di Firenze’ di Gregorio Dati, ed. Pratesi, L. (Norcia, 1902), pp. 56–76Google Scholar.

58 Historiarum Florentini Populi Libri XII, Bk xii.

59 Other analyses of Dati and Bruni from a different point of view are in Baron, , Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance, iGoogle Scholar, ch. 8 and Bee, , Marchands Ēcrivains, pp. 151–73Google Scholar.

60 ‘Litterae quoque per huius belli intercapedines mirabile quantum per Italiam increvere, accedente tunc primum cognitione litterarum graecarum, quae septingentis iam annis apud nostros homines desierant esse in usu’ (Rerum suo termpore gestarum commentarius, ed. De Pierro, C., Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, xix. iii (Bologna, 1926), p. 431)Google Scholar.

61 The political explanation of the humanist revolution has been developed at length by H. Baron in The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance. One important part of his argument, the ascription of a primarily political inspiration to Bruni's early works, the Laudatio Florentinae Urbis and the Dialogi ad Petrum Paulum Istrum has been criticized by Seigel, J. E. ‘“Civic Humanism” or Ciceronian Rhetoric?’, Past and Present, no. 34 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; reply by Baron, , ‘Leonardo Bruni: “professional rhetorician” or “civic humanist”?’, no. 36 (1967)Google Scholar. Seigel rightly points out that Bruni was primarily a rhetorician. This does not necessarily reduce the importance of the political background, though it does change the nature of its impact on Bruni. Faith in republicanism is certainly an important element in Florentine humanism throughout the first half of the fifteenth century, but not a sufficient explanation for the prestige and success of the humanist school.

62 Charles of Valois's entry into Florence (see Davidsohn, , Storia, iv, 213–285)Google Scholaris described by Dino Compagni, one of the priors at the time, whose narrative vividly conveys the feeling of impotence in the city partly because of fear of papal and French power, partly because of political divisions within the city (Compagni, Dino, Cronica, Rerum Italicarum Scriptores, IX, ii, pp. 118–35)Google Scholar.

63 The best general account of the external history of the war remains that by Perrens, F. T., Histoire de Florence, v (Paris, 1880), pp. 96–181Google Scholar. It depends on the narrative and records published by Gherardi, A., ‘La Guerra dei fiorentini con papa Gregorio XI detto la guerra degli Otto Santi’, Archivio Storico Italiano, ser. 3, v–viii (1867–1868)Google Scholar. Some impression from the papal side of the activities of foreign troops in central Italy at this period can be obtained for example from Mirot, L., ‘Sylvestre Budes et les Bretons en Italie’, Bibliothèque de l'École des Chartes, lviii–lix (1897–1898)Google Scholar. The internal political history of Florence at this time has recently been described by Brucker, G. A., Florentine Politics and Society 1343–1378 (Princeton, 1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, chs 7–8.

64 I have sketched some aspects of the relations between Florence and the papacy at this period in The Florentine Enlightenment (1969).