Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:22:37.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transnational Environmental Law in a Transformed Environment – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Thijs Etty ,
Veerle Heyvaert ,
Cinnamon Carlarne ,
Bruce Huber ,
Jacqueline Peel  and
Josephine van Zeben
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum
Information
Transnational Environmental Law , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , E1
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

The original version of this article was published with some erroneous references. The correct versions of the affected references are shown below.

21 G. Samvel, ‘Non-Judicial, Advisory, Yet Impactful? The Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee as a Gateway to Environmental Justice’ (2020) 9(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 211–38.

22 I. Offor, ‘Animals and the Impact of Trade Law and Policy: A Global Animal Law Question’ (2020) 9(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 239–62.

23 A. Čavoški, ‘Science and Law in Environmental Law and Policy: The Case of the European Commission’ (2020) 9(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 263–95.

24 J. Ellis, ‘Calculative Practices in International Environmental Governance: In (Partial) Defence of Indicators’ (2020) 9(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 297–321.

25 S. Varvastian & F. Kalunga, ‘Transnational Corporate Liability for Environmental Damage and Climate Change: Reassessing Access to Justice after Vedanta v. Lungowe’ (2020) 9(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 323–45.

26 K. Bouwer, ‘Lessons from a Distorted Metaphor: The Holy Grail of Climate Litigation’ (2020) 9(2) Transnational Environmental Law, pp. 347–78.

30 Samvel, n. 21 above, p. 212.

31 Ibid., p. 232.

32 Offor, n. 22 above, p. 240.

33 Introduced briefly in Offor, ibid., p. 248 and discussed in detail in Offor, ibid., pp. 248–59.

34 Ibid., p. 260.

35 Ibid., p. 240 (‘This section uses empirical research to reveal the continued dominance of trade in European policymaking and its negative impact on animal welfare’).

36 Čavoški, n. 23 above, p. 263.

37 Ibid., p. 264.

39 Ibid., p. 293.

40 Ibid., p. 294.

41 Ibid., p. 295.

42 Ellis, n. 24 above, p. 297.

43 Ibid., p. 299.

44 Ibid., pp. 320–1.

55 Varvastian & Kalunga, n. 25 above, p. 323.

56 Ibid., p. 325.

57 Ibid., p. 326.

58 Ibid., pp. 326–7.

59 Ibid., p. 329.

60 Ibid., pp. 329–30.

62 Ibid., p. 332.

63 Ibid., p. 335.

65 Ibid., pp. 335–6.

66 Ibid., p. 342.

67 Ibid., p. 345.

69 Ibid., p. 344.

71 Ibid., p. 347.

72 Ibid., p. 356.

73 Ibid., p. 354.

74 Ibid., pp. 350–1.

75 Ibid., pp. 355–6.

76 Ibid., p. 368.

77 Ibid., p. 370.

79 Ibid., p. 373.

80 Ibid., p. 375.

81 Ibid., p. 378.

82 Ibid., p. 360.

The errors have been corrected in the online PDF and HTML versions of this article.

Cambridge University Press apologises for these errors.

References

Etty, T., Heyvaert, V., Carlarne, C., Huber, B., Peel, J., & Van Zeben, J. (2020). Transnational Environmental Law in a Transformed Environment. Transnational Environmental Law, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar