Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:19:11.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revolutions of the Ordinary: Victorian Studies and the Turn to Ordinary Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2019

Daniel Wright
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“To engage seriously with ordinary language philosophy,” Toril Moi tells us in the introduction to Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell, “is a little like undergoing psychoanalysis. Wittgenstein assumes that we don't begin doing philosophy just for the sake of it, but because something is making us feel confused, as if we had lost our way.” As Moi begins her project of explaining to an audience of literary critics the insights of ordinary-language philosophy, represented primarily by the work of Ludwig Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, and Stanley Cavell, and making a case for the value of their ideas for the practice we usually call close reading, this psychoanalytic metaphor makes a sudden turn to diagnosis, or to the initiation of a kind of therapeutic address that can feel coercive even in its charisma. You must recognize your sickness, Moi insists, before you can be receptive to the treatment. “Who wants to undergo philosophical therapy,” she goes on to ask, “if they feel that everything in their intellectual life is just fine as it is? Paradoxically, then, the best readers of the reputedly ‘conservative’ Wittgenstein might be those who genuinely feel the need for a change” (12). What kind of therapeutic project does Moi want to pursue in this book, which begins by distinguishing the best readers (the readiest patients) from those who think, conservatively, that everything is “just fine as it is”?

Type
Review
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , Summer 2019 , pp. 449 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ablow, Rachel. Victorian Pain. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor. “Commitment,” translated by McDonagh, Francis. New Left Review 87 (1974): 75–89.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. “A Plea for Excuses.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1956–57): 1–30.Google Scholar
Christoff, Alicia. “Alone with Tess.” Novel: A Forum on Fiction 48, no. 1 (2015): 18–44.Google Scholar
Eliot, George. “A Natural History of German Life.” In Selected Essays, Poems, and Other Writings, edited by Byatt, A. S. and Warren, Nicholas, 107–39. New York: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. “Remembering, Repeating, and Working-Through.” In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, edited and translated by Strachey, James, 12:145–56. London: Hogarth Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Audrey. The Victorian Novel Dreams of the Real: Conventions and Ideology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. The Burdens of Perfection: On Ethics and Reading in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Miller, Andrew H. “Response: Responsibility to the Present.” Victorian Studies 59, no. 1 (2016): 122–26.Google Scholar
Moi, Toril. Revolution of the Ordinary: Literary Studies after Wittgenstein, Austin, and Cavell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Russell, David. Tact: Aesthetic Liberalism and the Essay Form in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Wright, Daniel. Bad Logic: Reasoning about Desire in the Victorian Novel. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar