Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T09:28:12.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Critical Period of Weed Control in Lentil (Lens culinaris) in the Pacific Northwest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jamin A. Smitchger ,
Ian C. Burke  and
Joseph P. Yenish
Jamin A. Smitchger
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Johnson Hall 201, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
Ian C. Burke*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Johnson Hall 201, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
Joseph P. Yenish
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Johnson Hall 201, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: icburke@wsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The critical period of weed control (CPWC) for ‘Pardina’ and ‘Brewer’ lentil was determined in field experiments near Pullman, WA, in 2008 and 2009. Trial treatments were kept either weed free for periods of 0, 14, 25, 35, 45, 60, 75, or ∼90 d after emergence (DAE), or weeds were allowed to grow before removal for periods of 0, 14, 25, 35, 45, 60, 75, or ∼90 DAE. Averaged across varieties, lentil with season-long weed interference had 29.5 and 32% seed yield reduction compared to weed-free lentils in 2008 and 2009, respectively. When measured at crop maturity, a 1% loss in lentil seed yield resulted from each 5.68 g m−2 of dry weed biomass. Based on a 5% yield loss threshold, the CPWC for lentil was estimated to be from 270 to 999 growing degree days (GDD), 22 to 57 DAE, or crop growth stage (CGS) 7 to the early pod stage during 2008. In 2009, the CPWC was 624 to 650 GDD, with no occurrence of a CPWC when estimated using DAE and CGS. Spiny sowthistle emerged and competed with the lentil crop later in the growing season than mayweed chamomile, indicating that mayweed chamomile may be an earlier and stronger competitor than spiny sowthistle.

Keywords

Mayweed chamomile, Anthemis cotula Lprickly lettuce, Lactuca serriola Lspiny sowthistle, Sonchus asper (L.) Hilllentil, Lens culinaris Medik. ‘Pardina’and ‘Brewer’Critical period of weed removalcritical time of weed removalcritical weed free periodweed competitionweed interference
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 81 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Field Scientist, Dow AgroSciences, 1001 Calendula Circle, Billings, MT 59105.

References

Literature Cited

Ahmadvand, G., Mondani, F., and Golzardi, F. 2009. Effect of crop plant density on critical period of weed competition in potato. Sci. Hortic. Amsterdam. 121:249–254.Google Scholar
Al-Thahabi, S. A., Yasin, J. Z., Abu-Irmaileh, B. E., Haddad, N. I., and Saxena, M. C. 1994. Effect of weed removal on productivity of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 5:333–341.Google Scholar
Basler, F. 1981. Weeds and their control: lentil crop. Pages 143–154 in Webb, C. and Hawtin, G., eds. Lentils. Norwich, UK Page Bros.Google Scholar
Bosnic, A. C. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45:276–282.Google Scholar
Curran, W. S., Morrow, L. A., and Whitesides, R. E. 1987. Lentil (Lens culinaris) yield as influenced by duration of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference. Weed Sci. 35:669–672.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. New York J. Wiley. Pp. 33–42, 511.Google Scholar
Elkoca, E., Kantar, F., and Zengin, H. 2005. Weed control in lentil (Lens culinaris) in eastern Turkey. N. Z. J. Crop Hort. 33:223–231.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. H. and Barrett, S. 1994. Alternating temperatures and rate of seed germination in lentil. Ann. Bot. London. 74:519–524.Google Scholar
Erman, M., Tepe, I., Bukun, B., Yergin, R., and Taskesen, M. 2008. Critical period of weed competition in spring lentil (Lens culinaris) under un-irrigated rainfed conditions. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 78:893–896.Google Scholar
Erskine, W., Muehlbauer, F. J., and Short, R. W. 1990. Stages of development in lentil. Exp. Agric. 26:297–302.Google Scholar
Everman, W. J., Clewis, S. B., Thomas, W. E., Burke, I. C., and Wilcut, J. W. 2008. Critical period of weed interference in peanut. Weed Technol. 22:63–67.Google Scholar
Gulluoglu, L. and Arioglu, H. 2009. Effects of seed size and in-row spacing on growth and yield of early potato in a Mediterranean environment in Turkey. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 4:535–541.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.Google Scholar
Hawtin, G. C., Singh, K. B., and Saxena, M. C. 1980. Some recent developments in the understanding and improvement of Cicer and Lens . Pages 613–623 in Summerfield, R. J. and Bunting, A. H., eds. Advances in Legume Science. England London. Hobbs the Printers of Southhampton.Google Scholar
Hock, S. M., Knezevic, S. Z., Martin, A. R., and Lindquist, J. L. 2006. Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence weed competitiveness and competitive indices. Weed Sci. 54:38–46.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Evans, S. P., Blankenship, E. E., Van Acker, R. C., and Lindquist, J. L. 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50:773–786.Google Scholar
Knott, C. M. and Halila, H. M. 1986. Weeds in food legumes: problems, effects, control. Pages 343–345 in Summerfield, R. J., ed. World Crops: Cool Season Food Legumes. Dordrecht, the Netherlands Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Kropff, M. J., Weaver, S. E., and Smits, M. A. 1992. Use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference: relations amongst weed density, relative time of weed emergence, relative leaf area, and yield loss. Weed Sci. 40:296–301.Google Scholar
Marquardt, D. W. 1963. An algorithm for least squares estimation of parameters. J. Soc. Indus. Appl. Math. 11:431–441.Google Scholar
Martin, S. G., Van Acker, R. C., and Friesen, L. F. 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci. 49:326–333.Google Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153–155.Google Scholar
Meicenheimer, R. D. and Muehlbauer, F. J. 1982. Growth and developmental stages of Alaska peas. Exp. Agric. 18:17–27.Google Scholar
Mohamed, E. S., Nourai, A. H., Mohamed, G. E., Mohamed, M. I., and Saxena, M. C. 1997. Weeds and weed management in irrigated lentil in northern Sudan. Weed Res. 37:211–218.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2010. Crops, Field Crops, Lentils. http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/#0237B520-635E-3E50-9BB8-F269ACB483C0. Accessed: January 13, 2011.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Saxena, M. C., Abu-Irmaileh, B. E., Al-Thahabi, S. A., and Haddad, N. I. 1996. Estimation of the critical period of weed control. Weed Sci. 44:273–283.Google Scholar
Swanton, C., O'Sullivan, J., and Robinson, D. 2010. The critical weed-free period in carrot. Weed Sci. 58:229–233.Google Scholar
Van Acker, R. C., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1993. The critical period of weed control in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci. 41:194–200.Google Scholar
Yenish, J. 2009. Lentils. Pages 202–204 in Peachey, E., Ball, D., Parker, R., Yenish, J. P., Moroshita, D. W., and Hutchinson, P., eds. Pacific Northwest Weed Management Handbook. Moscow, ID Educational Publications.Google Scholar
Yenish, J., Brand, J., Pala, M., and Haddad, A. 2009. Weed Management in Lentil. Pages 326–342 in Erskine, W., Muehlbauer, F., Sarker, A., and Sharma, B., eds. The Lentil: Botany, Production and Uses. Wallingford, UK MPG Books Group.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1980. Weed Crop Competition. Corvallis, OR International Plant Protection Center. 24 p.Google Scholar