Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T02:18:44.146Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cinmethylin for Weed Control in Soybeans, Glycine max

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Prasanta C. Bhowmik*
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Univ. Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 3-yr study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and soybean tolerance of cinmethylin. Cinmethylin was applied preemergence alone at 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 kg ai/ha or in combination with metribuzin at 0.3 kg/ha. These treatments did not injure soybeans in field trials in 1984, 1985, and 1986. The combination of cinmethylin at 0.7 kg/ha and metribuzin at 0.3 kg/ha controlled more than 90% of large crabgrass, fall panicum, and yellow foxtail. Redroot pigweed and common lambsquarters control was also excellent. Residual control of all grass species was excellent for 8 weeks after preemergence application, followed by reduced control in two of the three grasses. The combination of cinmethylin and metribuzin at 0.7 and 0.3 kg/ha, respectively, significantly increased soybean yields compared to those of untreated plots. These yields were comparable with those obtained from the combination of alachlor and metribuzin at 2.0 and 0.3 kg/ha, respectively. Cinmethylin treatments had no adverse effects on soybean yield components including pods/plant, seed/pod, and seed weight. Cinmethylin shows potential as a preemergence herbicide for full-season weed control in soybean production.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl) - N - (methoxymethyl)acetamidecinmethylin, exo - 1 -methyl - 4 - (1 - methylethyl) - 2 - [(2 - methylphenyl)methoxy] -7-oxabicyclo[2.2-1]heptanemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onelarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. #3 DIGSAfall panicum, Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. # PANDIyellow foxtail, Setaria lutescens (Weigil) Hubb. # SETLUredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARTEcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #CHEALInjurycrop responsealachlormetribuzinChenopodium albumAmaranthus retroflexusDigitaria sanguinalisPanicum dichotomiflorumSetaria lutescensCHEALAMAREDIGSAPANDISETLU
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 678 - 682
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bhowmik, P. C. and McGlew, E. N. 1985. New herbicides for preemergence weed control in soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:14.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, A. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Soybean and weed yields as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12:109–112.Google Scholar
3. El-Deek, M. H. and Hess, F. D. 1986. Inhibited mitotic entry is the cause of growth inhibition by cinmethylin. Weed Sci. 34:684–688.Google Scholar
4. Gebhardt, M. R. 1981. Preemergence herbicides and cultivations for soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:165–168.Google Scholar
5. Forney, D. R. and Muirhead, P. A. 1986. Residual activity of cinmethylin. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 26:260.Google Scholar
6. Goss, J. R., Erickson, R. R., and May, J. W. 1985. Regional summary of cinmethylin (SD 95481) performance in U.S. soybean, cotton, and peanut herbicide field trials. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 25:298.Google Scholar
7. Hauser, E. W. and Marchant, W. H. 1969. Response of weeds and soybeans to amiben and naptalam individually and in mixtures with dinoseb. Weed Sci. 17:446–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. John, W. W., May, J. W., and Goss, J. R. 1985. Summary of cinmethylin (SD 95481) performance in U.S. soybean, cotton, and peanut herbicide trials. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 25:35.Google Scholar
9. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds: 13:331–334.Google Scholar
10. Long, J. H., May, J. W., and Goss, J. R. 1984. SD95481 – a new soil applied herbicide for use in broadleaved crops. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 24:261.Google Scholar
11. May, J. W. and Goss, J. R. 1984. SD95481, a new soil applied herbicide for use in soybeans, cotton, and peanuts. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 24:45.Google Scholar
12. Miller, G. R. 1974. Well-planned program necessary for soybean weed control. Weeds Today 5(2):6–7.Google Scholar
13. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 8:467–471.Google Scholar
14. Steele, R.G.D. and Torrie, T. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd. ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 683 pp.Google Scholar