Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:31:56.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporation Depths of Imazaquin, Metribuzin, and Chlorimuron for Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Control in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard A. Wesley Jr. ,
David R. Shaw  and
William L. Barrentine
Richard A. Wesley Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
William L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1986 and 1987 to evaluate the effect of herbicide incorporation to various depths on common cocklebur control with imazaquin, a tank mix of imazaquin and metribuzin, and a preformulated mixture of chlorimuron and metribuzin in soybeans. Herbicide rates included were two-thirds and the full registered rate. All treatments, except chlorimuron plus metribuzin (50 plus 320 g ai/ha, respectively), controlled more common cocklebur when incorporated to depths of 2.5 to 7.6 cm than when left unincorporated. Also, imazaquin at 90 g ai/ha and the tank mix of imazaquin plus metribuzin at 90 plus 280 g ai/ha, when incorporated, controlled more common cocklebur than higher rates of the same combination when not incorporated. Common cocklebur control was similar with 2.5-, 5.0-, and 7.6-cm soil incorporation depths.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoicic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl-5-oxo-1H-imdazol-2-yl]mzol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5-(4H)-onecommon cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. ♯3 XANSTsoybean, Glycine max (L.)MerrReduced rateXANST
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 4 , July 1989 , pp. 596 - 599
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baldwin, F. L. 1986. Extension's experiences with “New” soybean herbicides in Arkansas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:355.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–607.Google Scholar
3. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.Google Scholar
4. Basham, G. W., Lavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.Google Scholar
5. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1987. Sulfonyl urea herbicides. Pages 117–190 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
6. Bloomberg, J. R., Kirkpatrick, B. L., and Wax, L. M. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 30:507–513.Google Scholar
7. Davis, R. G., Johnson, W. C., and Wood, F. O. 1967. Weed root profiles. Agron. J. 59:555–558.Google Scholar
8. Elmore, C. D. 1983. Weed survey—southern states. Res. Rep., South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:136–158.Google Scholar
9. Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutchison, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:355–363.Google Scholar
10. Hayden, T. A. and Burnside, O. C. 1987. Effect of herbicide incorporation methods on shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 35:364–372.Google Scholar
11. Martin, J. R., Baldwin, F. L., and French, C. M. 1986. Extension's experience with “New” preemerge soybean herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:354.Google Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
13. O'Neil, J. B., Lignowski, E. M., Ogg, P. J., Rhodes, A. R., Robinson, P. A., and Stiffler, D. E. 1985. Imazaquin: Summary of 1985 EUP results. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:32.Google Scholar
14. Pepper, M. N., Walker, R. H., and Harris, J. R. 1985. Application methods and rate effects for DPX-F6025 and imazaquin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:71.Google Scholar
15. Shaner, D. H. and Robson, P. A. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AC 252,214 in soybeans (Glycine max), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 33:469–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Weaver, S. E. and Lechowicz, M. 1983. The biology of Canadian weeds. Xanthium strumarium L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:211–225.Google Scholar
17. Williams, C. S. and Gillham, L. B. 1986. Common cocklebur control in soybeans with Canopy and Classic. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:86.Google Scholar