Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:22:49.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Hoary Alyssum (Berteroa incana) on Quality of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Forage and Its Utilization by Goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gilles D. Leroux ,
R. Gordon Harvey ,
Neal A. Jorgensen  and
Michael Collins
Gilles D. Leroux
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Neal A. Jorgensen
Affiliation:
Dep. Dairy Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Michael Collins
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The chemical composition and the utilization by domestic goats (Capra hircus L. ‘Saanen’) of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) hay and silage that contained or did not contain hoary alyssum [Berteroa incana (L.) DC. ♯ BEFIN] was studied. Alfalfa was higher in quality than hoary alyssum; crude protein (CP) was 38% higher, and the neutral- and acid-detergent fiber (NDF and ADF) were 18 and 29% lower, respectively. Less CP and more ADF were found in weedy hay than in other forages. Animal utilization, as measured by the dry-matter intake, digestible dry-matter intake, relative intake, and nutritive value index were greater for weed-free than for weedy forages. Hoary alyssum was more deleterious in chopped silage than in long hay, because of selective refusal of the weed by goats that were fed hay. The presence of hoary alyssum in alfalfa decreased its utilization by ruminants.

Keywords

Forage qualityalfalfa hayalfalfa silageBEFIN
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , March 1985 , pp. 280 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. A.O.A.C. 1970. Official methods of analysis (11th ed.). Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. Cataldo, D. A., Schrader, L. E., and Youngs, V. L. 1974. Analysis by digestion and colorimetric assay of total nitrogen in plant tissues high in nitrate. Crop Sci. 14:854–856.Google Scholar
3. Coppock, C. E. 1976. Forage testing and feeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 59:175–181.Google Scholar
4. Crampton, E. W., Donefer, E., and Lloyd, L. E. 1960. A nutritive value index for forages. J. Anim. Sci. 19:538–544.Google Scholar
5. Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1972. Forage Fiber Analyses. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Handb. No. 379. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Goering, H. K., Eslick, R., and Brelsford, D. L. 1965. The composition of the oil of Berteroa incana and the potential value as cash crop in Montana. Econ. Bot. 19:44–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hastings, R. E. and Kust, C. A. 1970. Reserve carbohydrate storage and utilization by yellow rocket, white cockle and hoary alyssum. Weed Sci. 18:140–148.Google Scholar
8. Jones, G. M., Larsen, R. E., Javed, A. H., Donefer, E., and Gaudreau, J. M. 1972. Intake and digestibility by sheep of wilted alfalfa-timothy or corn silages ensiled at low and high dry matter levels. J. Anim. Sci. 34:830–838.Google Scholar
9. Kust, C. A. 1969. Selective control of hoary alyssum in alfalfa. Weed Sci. 17:99–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Malechek, J. C. and Leinweber, C. L. 1972. Forage selectivity by goats on lightly and heavily grazed range. J. Range Manage. 25:105–111.Google Scholar
11. Osbourn, D. R., Terry, R. A., Outen, G. E., and Cammel, S. B. 1974. The significance of determination of cell walls as the rational basis for the nutritive evaluation of forages. Proc. Int. Grassl. Congr. Moscow, USSR. Page 344.Google Scholar
12. Rohweder, D. A., Barnes, R. F., and Jorgensen, N. A. 1978. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. J. Anim. Sci. 47:747–759.Google Scholar
13. Smith, D. 1978. Legumes and grass silage. Pages 209–216 in Forage Management in the North (4th ed.). Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
14. Thomas, J. W., Brown, L. D., Emery, R. S., Benne, E. J., and Huber, J. T. 1969. Comparisons between alfalfa silage and hay. J. Dairy Sci. 52:195–204.Google Scholar
15. Tilley, J.M.A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18: 102–111.Google Scholar
16. Van Soest, P. J. 1965. Symposium on factors influencing the voluntary intake of herbage by ruminants: Voluntary intake in relation to chemical composition and digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 24:834–843.Google Scholar
17. Van Soest, P. J. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. O&B Books, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
18. Waldo, D. R. and Jorgensen, N. A. 1981. Forages for high animal production: Nutritional factors and effects of conservation. J. Dairy Sci. 64:1207–1229.Google Scholar