Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:33:43.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thidiazuron and Colletotrichum coccodes Effects on Ethylene Production by Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Prickly Sida (Sida spinosa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard H. Hodgson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Foreign Disease–Weed Sci. Res., Bldg. 1301, Ft. Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701
Robert H. Snyder
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Foreign Disease–Weed Sci. Res., Bldg. 1301, Ft. Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701

Abstract

The effects of the plant growth regulator thidiazuron and the plant pathogen Colletotrichum coccodes on ethylene synthesis by velvetleaf and prickly sida were investigated. Untreated velvetleaf seedlings produced 1.5 and 2.3 pmol ethylene/mg fresh weight 24 and 48 h after treatment. Treatment with thidiazuron at 200 g ai/ha or C. coccodes at 1 × 109 spores/m2 increased ethylene production by 4.9 and 3.5 pmol/mg, respectively, in 24 h; and by 10.6 and 15.8 pmol/mg, respectively, in 48 h. Combination treatments caused synergistic increases in ethylene production by velvetleaf seedlings of 17.7 and 49.6 pmol/mg in 24 and 48 h, respectively. Thidiazuron at 10 μM, combined with an extract of C. coccodes mycelia, increased ethylene synthesis by more than 4-fold in vacuum-infiltrated excised velvetleaf petioles within 48 h. Thidiazuron at 50 g/ha, combined with an extract of C. coccodes mycelium, increased ethylene synthesis 16-fold in prickly sida seedlings in 24 h. Aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid (ACC), a precursor of ethylene, stimulated ethylene production by velvetleaf petioles more than 8-fold when supplied at 0.75 mM; thidiazuron and the pathogen effects were not discernible in its presence. Aminoethoxyvinyl-glycine (AVG), an inhibitor of ACC synthase, inhibited overall ethylene production by velvetleaf seedlings more than 40% when supplied at 0.58 to 0.67 mM, without obscuring the stimulatory effects of thidiazuron and the pathogen. These results indicate that the growth regulator and the plant pathogen or an extract of the pathogen act in concert to increase ethylene synthesis in velvetleaf. Stimulation probably occurs before the synthesis of ACC in the ethylene biosynthetic pathway.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abeles, A. L. and Abeles, F. B. 1972. Biochemical pathway of stress-induced ethylene. Plant Physiol. 50:496498.Google Scholar
2. Batra, S.W.T. 1981. Biological control of weeds: Principles and prospects. Pages 4559 in Papavizas, G. C., ed. Biological Control in Crop Production. Symp. 5, Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research. Allanheld, Osmun & Co., Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
3. Blankendaal, M., Hodgson, R. H., Davis, D. G., Hoerauf, R. A., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1972. Growing plants without soil for experimental use. USDA Misc. Publ. 1251: 17 p.Google Scholar
4. Cohen, R., Riov, J., Lisker, N., and Katan, J. 1986. Involvement of ethylene in herbicide-induced resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis . Phytopathology 76:12811285.Google Scholar
5. Gotlieb, A. R., Watson, A. K., and Poirier, C. 1987. First report of Colletotrichum coccodes on velvetleaf. Plant Dis. 71:281.Google Scholar
6. Hatzios, K. K. 1984. Interactions between selected herbicides and protectants on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 32:5158.Google Scholar
7. Hodgson, R. H. and Snyder, R. H. 1988. Thidiazuron effects on Malvaceae; corn, (Zea mays); and soybean, (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 2:342349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hodgson, R. H., Wymore, L. A., Watson, A. K., Snyder, R. H., and Collette, A. 1988. Efficacy of Colletotrichum and thidiazuron for control of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 2:473480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Nash, R. G. 1981. Phytotoxic interaction studies—techniques for evaluation and presentation of results. Weed Sci. 29:147155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Pegg, G. F. 1976. The involvement of ethylene in plant pathogenesis. Pages 582591 in Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series. Physiological Plant Pathology, Vol. 4. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
11. Roby, D., Toppan, A., and Esquerre-Tugaye, M.-T. 1985. Cell surfaces in plant-microorganism interactions. V. Elicitors of fungal and plant origin trigger the synthesis of ethylene and of cell wall hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein in plants. Plant Physiol. 77:700704.Google Scholar
12. Snyder, R. H. and Hodgson, R. H. 1984. Thidiazuron modifies growth, anthesis, and seed production in velvetleaf. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:314. (Abstr.).Google Scholar
13. Suttle, J. C. 1984. Effects of the defoliant thidiazuron on leaf abscission and ethylene evolution from cotton seedlings. Pages 277278 in Fuchs, Y. and Chalutz, E., eds. Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects. Proc. Int. Symp., The Hague, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Suttle, J. C. 1985. Involvement of ethylene in the action of the cotton defoliant thidiazuron. Plant Physiol. 78:272276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Suttle, J. C. 1986. Cytokinin-induced ethylene biosynthesis in nonsenescing cotton leaves. Plant Physiol. 82:930935.Google Scholar
16. Suttle, J. C. 1988. Disruption of the polar auxin transport system in cotton seedlings following treatment with the defoliant thidiazuron. Plant Physiol. 86:241245.Google Scholar
17. Templeton, G. E. 1982. Status of weed control with plant pathogens. Pages 2944 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L. Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
18. Toppan, A. and Esquerre-Tugaye, M.-T. 1984. Cell surfaces in plant-microorganism interactions. IV. Fungal glycopeptides which elicit the synthesis of ethylene in plants. Plant Physiol. 75:11331138.Google Scholar
19. Toppan, A., Roby, D., and Esquerre-Tugaye, M.-T. 1982. Cell surfaces in plant-microorganism interactions. III. In vivo effect of ethylene on hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein accumulation in the cell wall of diseased plants. Plant Physiol. 70:8286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Walker, H. L. 1981. Fusarium lateritium: A pathogen of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 29:629631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Walker, H. L. and Sciumbata, G. L. 1979. Evaluation of Alternaria macrospora as a potential biocontrol agent for spurred anoda (Anoda cristata): host range studies. Weed Sci. 27:612614.Google Scholar
22. Watson, A. K. 1985. Host specificity of plant pathogens in biological weed control. Pages 577586 in Delfosse, E. S., ed. VI International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Ottawa.Google Scholar
23. Wymore, L. A., Watson, A. K., and Gotlieb, A. R. 1987. Interaction between Colletotrichum coccodes and thidiazuron for control of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 35:377383.Google Scholar
24. Wymore, L. A., Watson, A. K., Gotlieb, A. R., and Hodgson, R. H. 1986. Synergism between a plant growth regulator, thidiazuron, and the mycoherbicide Colletotrichum coccodes for control of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.). Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 53.Google Scholar