Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:17:50.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control With Reduced Rates of Four Soil Applied Soybean Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kilwake C. Muyonga ,
Michael S. Defelice  and
Barry D. Sims
Michael S. Defelice
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Barry D. Sims
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Missouri, Delta Center, Portageville, MO 63873
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted at two locations in Missouri in 1990 and 1991 to evaluate control of velvetleaf, ivyleaf morningglory, and cocklebur in soybean with label rates (1×) or reduced rates (0.5×) of four PPI herbicides followed with or without cultivation and POST application of one fourth (0.25×) the label rate of imazethapyr. Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rate of preplant clomazone, imazaquin, metribuzin, and metribuzin + chlorimuron followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr POST was equivalent to a 1× rate of the PPI herbicides followed by either cultivation or imazethapyr. Weed control and soybean yield with the 0.5× rates of the PPI herbicides without cultivation or POST imazethapyr were lower than with 1× rates of PPI herbicides.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidclomazone, 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinoneimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H- imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5- ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecommon cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L♯ XANSTivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. ♯ IPOHEvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti medicus. ♯ABUTHsoybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams 82’ and ‘DPL-415.’Clomazonechlorimuronimazaquinimazethapyrmetribuzintrifluralincultivationtillageweed densityABUTHIPOHEXANST
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 148 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Becker, S. A., O'Day, M. H., and Smith, G. S. 1993. Grain Crop Pesticide Use: Missouri, 1992. Pest. Impact Assess. Prog. U.S.D.A. Pub. ES92-EPIX-1-0069. Univ. of Missouri, Columbia. 40 p.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1992. Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron. J. 84: 973–978.Google Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L. and Ralston, D. F. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced bentazon rates and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41: 447–453.Google Scholar
4. Cantwell, J. k., Liebel, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Weed Technol., 3: 596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Carey, V. F. III. Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1992. Reduced and standard rates for grass control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 6: 409–414.Google Scholar
6. DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) with below label rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37: 365–374.Google Scholar
7. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24: 224–228.Google Scholar
8. Edwards, C. A. 1987. The concept of integrated systems in lower input/sustainable agriculture. Am. J. Alt. Agric. 2: 148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gebhardt, M. R. 1981. Cultural and chemical weed control systems in soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Weed Sci. 29: 133–138.Google Scholar
10. Klingaman, T. E., King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1992. Effect of application rate, weed species, and weed stage of growth on imazethapyr activity. Weed Sci. 40: 227–232.Google Scholar
11. Lanie, A. J. and Griffin, J. L. 1992. Reduced rate herbicide programs for Louisiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 74.Google Scholar
12. Lee, S. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds. Times and methods for application. Weed Sci. 30: 520–526.Google Scholar
13. McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1976. Bentazon applied postemergence for economical control of common cocklebur in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24: 391–396.Google Scholar
14. McWhorter, C. G. and Shaw, W. C. 1982. Research needs for integrated weed management systems. Weed Sci. 30: 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacings, cultivations, and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds. 13: 285–289.Google Scholar
16. Steckel, L. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1990. Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38: 541–545.Google Scholar
17. Vidrine, P. R., Reynolds, D. B., and Griffin, J. L. 1993. Weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with lactofen plus chlorimuron. Weed Technol. 7: 311–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Wesley, R. A. Jr., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1989. Application timing of metribuzin + chlorimuron. and imazaquin for common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control. Weed Technol. 3: 364–368.Google Scholar