Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T18:00:04.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivar, Tillage, and Rye (Secale cereale) Mulch on Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donn G. Shilling
Affiliation:
Dep. Agronomy, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Barry J. Brecke
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. & Educ. Cent., Jay, FL 32565
Clifton Hiebsch
Affiliation:
Dep. Agronomy, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Gregory MacDonald
Affiliation:
Dep. Agronomy, Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to determine the effect of soybean cultivar, tillage, and rye mulch on sicklepod growth. Early-season sicklepod height was not affected by tillage or mulch. Sicklepod was tallest when grown with ‘Centennial’ or ‘Biloxi,’ the tallest cultivars, and shortest when grown with a dwarf isoline of ‘Tracy M,’ the shortest cultivar. Soybean competition reduced early-season weed density by 30 to 50%, depending on the cultivar. Centennial and dwarf Tracy M caused a 30% reduction in early-season sicklepod biomass while ‘Sharkey’ and Biloxi reduced sicklepod growth by 40%. By late-season, sicklepod biomass reduction ranged from 18% (Tracy M) to 55% (Biloxi) and was directly related to soybean cultivar height. Mulch or no-tillage independently reduced sicklepod biomass.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1983. Rye residues contribute weed suppression in no-tillage cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:10451057.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, J. P. and Putnam, A. R. 1986. Evidence of allelopathy by residues and aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale) . Weed Sci. 34:384390.Google Scholar
3. Barnes, J. P., Putnam, A. R., and Burke, B. A. 1986. Allelopathic activity of rye (Secale cereale L.). p. 271286 in Putnam, A. R. and Tang, C. S., eds. The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York, NY.Google Scholar
4. Boza, R. C., Oliver, L. R., and Driver, T. L. 1989. Intraspecific and interspecific sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference. Weed Sci. 37:670673.Google Scholar
5. Bumside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27:562565.Google Scholar
6. Callaway, M. B. 1993. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. Am. J. Sustainable Agric. 7:169180.Google Scholar
7. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southeastern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:392407.Google Scholar
8. Facelli, J. M. and Pickett, S.T.A. 1991. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot. Rev. 57:132.Google Scholar
9. Froud-Williams, R. J., Chancellor, R. J., and Drennan, S.S.H. 1981. Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regions. Weed Res. 21:99109.Google Scholar
10. James, K. L., Banks, P. A., and Karnok, K. J. 1988. Interference of soybean, Glycine max, cultivars with sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia . Weed Technol. 2:404409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Jordan, N. 1992. Differential interference between soybean (Glycine max) varieties and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium): a path analysis. Weed Sci. 40:614620.Google Scholar
12. Lewis, W. M. 1985. Weed control in reduced-tillage soybean production. p. 4150 in Wiese, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited-Tillage Systems. Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
13. Liebl, R., Simmons, F. W., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1992. Effect of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:838846.Google Scholar
14. Mohler, C. L. 1991. Effects of tillage and mulch on weed biomass and sweet corn yield. Weed Technol. 5:545552.Google Scholar
15. Monks, D. W. and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Interactions between soybean (Glycine max) cultivars and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 36:770774.Google Scholar
16. Phillips, R. E., Blevins, R. L., Thomas, G. W., Frye, W. H., and Phillips, S. H. 1980. No-tillage agriculture. Science 208:11081113.Google Scholar
17. Putnam, A. R., Defrank, J., and Barnes, J. B. 1983. Exploitation of allelopathy for weed control in annual and perennial cropping systems. J. Chem. Ecol. 9:10011010.Google Scholar
18. Shilling, D. G., Jones, L. A., Worsham, A. D., Parker, C. E., and Wilson, R. F. 1986. Isolation and identification of some phytotoxic compounds from aqueous extracts of rye (Secale cereale L.). J. Agric. Food Chem. 34:633638.Google Scholar
19. Shilling, D. G., Liebl, R. A., and Worsham, D. 1985. Rye (Secale cereale L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) mulch: The suppression of certain broadleaved weeds and the isolation and identification of phytotoxins. p 243271 in Thompson, A. C., ed. The Chemistry of Allelopathy. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
20. Sims, B. D. and Guethle, D. R. 1992. Herbicide programs in no-tillage and conventional-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) double cropped after wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 40:255263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Teasdale, J. R., Beste, C. E., and Potts, W. E. 1991. Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 39:195199.Google Scholar
22. Thomas, A. G. and Frick, B. L. 1993. Influence of tillage systems on weed abundance in southwestern Ontario. Weed Technol. 7:699705.Google Scholar
23. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379384.Google Scholar
24. Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Van Doren, D. M. Jr. 1977. Agriculture without tillage. Sci. Am. 236:2833.Google Scholar