Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:31:53.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Methodology for Establishing Witchweed (Striga asiatica) in Research Plots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joel K. Ransom ,
Robert E. Eplee ,
Marion A. Langston  and
Rebecca S. Norris
Joel K. Ransom
Affiliation:
CIMMYT, P.O. Box 25171, Nairobi, Kenya
Robert E. Eplee
Affiliation:
Whiteville Methods Dev. Cent., USDA APHIS, Sci. Technol., P.O. Box 279, Whiteville, NC 28472
Marion A. Langston
Affiliation:
Whiteville Methods Dev. Cent., USDA APHIS, Sci. Technol., P.O. Box 279, Whiteville, NC 28472
Rebecca S. Norris
Affiliation:
Whiteville Methods Dev. Cent., USDA APHIS, Sci. Technol., P.O. Box 279, Whiteville, NC 28472
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in North Carolina and South Carolina, 1989, to evaluate methods of infesting research plots with witchweed. At both locations sowing witchweed (mixed with very fine sand) in or beneath the maize planting hole resulted in more rapid attachment of witchweed than other methods. Sowing witchweed only in the maize planting hole increased significantly witchweed attachment compared to the control late in the season at Evergreen, NC. At Dillon, SC, in fumigated soil, sowing witchweed seeds to the side of the maize row in a band or in planting holes or broadcasting and incorporating with a hoe increased witchweed attack. Broadcasting and raking was ineffective.

Keywords

Maize, Zea mays L.witchweed, Striga asiatica (L.) Ktze. ♯3 STRLUArtificial infestation of weedsZea mays
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 581 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bebawi, F. F., and Abdelaziz, A. H. 1983. Effects of cultivar mixture, fertilizer, and plant density on grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)/Striga hermonthica relations. Weed Sci. 31:552–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bebawi, F.F., and Farah, A. F. 1981. Effects of parasitic and non-parasitic weeds on sorghum. Exp. Agric. 17:415–418.Google Scholar
3. Doggett, H. 1984. Striga biology and control–an overview, p. 27–36 in Ayensu, E. S., Doggett, H., Keynes, H. P., Monton-Lefene, J., Musselman, L. J., Parker, C., and Pickering, A., ed., Striga Biology and Control. Int. Counc. Scientific Unions, Paris.Google Scholar
4. Ogborn, J. 1984. Striga: Research priorities with specific reference to agronomy, p. 195–209 in Ayensu, E. S., Doggett, H., Keynes, H. P., Monton-Lefene, J., Musselman, L. J., Parker, C., and Pickering, A., ed., Striga Biology and Control. Int. Counc. Scientific Unions, Paris.Google Scholar
5. Ogborn, J.E.A. 1987. Striga control under peasant farming conditions. p. 145–158 in Musselman, L. J., ed., Parasitic Weeds in Agriculture, Vol. 1, Striga. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
6. Parker, C. 1976. The influence of the parasite Striga species on the host crops sorghum and maize. Ann. Appl. Biol. 83:330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Patterson, D. T. 1987. Environmental factors affecting witchweed growth and development, p. 27–41 in Musselman, L. J., ed., Parasitic Weeds in Agriculture, Vol. 1, Striga. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
8. Wilson, A. K., and Parker, C. 1984. Techniques for setting up pot experiments involving the parasitic weed Striga. In Parker, C., Musselman, L. J., Polhill, R. M., and Wilson, A. K., ed., Proc. Third Int. Symp. Parasitic Weeds. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.Google Scholar