Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T20:14:58.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ragweed Parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) Control with Preemergence and Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Krishna N. Reddy ,
Charles T. Bryson  and
Ian C. Burke
Krishna N. Reddy*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
Charles T. Bryson
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
Ian C. Burke
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: krishna.reddy@ars.usda.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted during 2005 and 2006 at Stoneville, MS, to determine control of ragweed parthenium with several preemergence (PRE) and postemergence (POST) herbicides registered for use in corn, cotton, peanut, rice, and soybean. Norflurazon, pendimethalin, clomazone, diuron, fluometuron, pyrithiobac, dimethenamid, flumetsulam, imazaquin, s-metolachlor, metribuzin, chlorimuron, atrazine, simazine, flumioxazin, and quinclorac were applied PRE. Ragweed parthenium control was highest with norflurazon (100%) and clomazone (100%) followed by fluometuron (96%), metribuzin (90%), diuron (87%), flumioxazin (84%), chlorimuron (77%), and quinclorac (67%) at 6 wk after treatment (WAT) under greenhouse conditions. Control of ragweed parthenium was less than 58% with all other herbicides. Ragweed parthenium appears to be highly sensitive to pigment and photosynthetic inhibitors compared to herbicides with other modes of action. Glyphosate, glufosinate, paraquat, bentazon, acifluorfen, chlorimuron, halosulfuron, MSMA, bromoxynil, atrazine, 2,4-D, flumioxazin, trifloxysulfuron, and clomazone were applied POST to field-grown rosette and bolted plants. Glyphosate, glufosinate, chlorimuron, and trifloxysulfuron applied at rosette stage provided greater than 93% control of ragweed parthenium at 3 WAT. Halosulfuron, MSMA, bromoxynil, 2,4-D, and flumioxazin controlled 58 to 90% rosette ragweed parthenium at 3 WAT. Ragweed parthenium control with all other POST herbicides was less than 38%. At bolted stage, glyphosate, glufosinate, and trifloxysulfuron controlled 86 to 95% ragweed parthenium and control was 61 to 70% with chlorimuron, halosulfuron, and 2,4-D 3 WAT. Overall, efficacy of POST herbicides was better on rosette plants than on bolted plants. Amino acid synthesis and glutamine synthase inhibitors were more active than herbicides with other modes of action. These results indicate that norflurazon, clomazone, fluometuron, flumioxazin, halosulfuron, chlorimuron, and trifloxysulfuron could provide effective control of ragweed parthenium.

Keywords

Acifluorfenatrazinebentazonbromoxynilchlorimuronclomazone2,4-Ddimethenamiddiuronflumetsulamflumioxazinfluometuronglufosinateglyphosatehalosulfuronimazaquins-metolachlormetribuzinMSMAparaquatquincloracsimazinetrifloxysulfuronragweed parthenium, Parthenium hysterophorus L. PTNHYcorn, Zea mays L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.peanut, Arachis hypogaea L.rice, Oryza sativa L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrBiologydistributioninvasivemanagement
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 982 - 986
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2004. Challenges, opportunities and strategies – parthenium weed management. Queensland, Australia Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. 82.Google Scholar
Batish, D. R., Singh, H. P., Kohli, R. K., Johar, V., and Yadav, S. 2004. Management of invasive exotic weeds requires community participation. Weed Technol. 18:1445–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, H. C. 1997. Parthenium hysterophorus: a review of its weed status and the possibilities for biological control. Biocontrol News and Information 18:89N–98N.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. 2006. Weed control and grain sorghum tolerance to flumioxazin. Crop Prot. 25:174–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, R. K., Batish, D. R., Singh, H. P., and Dogra, K. S. 2006. Status, invasiveness and environmental threats of three tropical American invasive weeds (Parthenium hysterophorus L., Ageratum conyzoides L., Lantana camara L.) in India. Biol. Invasions 8:1501–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navie, S. C., Panetta, F. D., McFadyen, R. E., and Adkins, S. W. 1998. Behavior of buried and surface-sown seeds of Parthenium hysterophorus . Weed Res. 38:335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navie, S. C., Panetta, F. D., McFadyen, R. E., and Adkins, S. W. 2004. Germinable soil seedbanks of central Queensland rangelands invaded by the exotic weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. Weed Biol. Manag. 4:154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, D. K., Palni, L. M. S., and Joshi, S. C. 2003. Growth, reproduction, and photosynthesis of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus). Weed Sci. 51:191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Bryson, C. T. 2005. Why ragweed parthenium is not a pernicious weed in the continental USA. Pages 61–64. in. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Parthenium Management. Bangalore, India University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Rosales-Robles, E., Sanchez-de-la-Cruz, R., Salinas-Garcia, J., and Pecina-Quintero, V. 2005. Broadleaf weed management in grain sorghum with reduced rates of postemeregnce herbicides. Weed Technol. 19:385–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 2006. SAS 9.1. Windows version 5.1.2600. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Singh, S., Yadav, A., Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., and Singh, M. 2004. Control of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) and associated weeds. Weed Technol. 18:658–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T. and Milberg, P. 2000. Weed flora in arable fields of eastern Ethiopia with emphasis on the occurrence of Parthenium hysterophorus . Weed Res. 40:507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T. and Milberg, P. 2004. Control of parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in the smallholder farming system in eastern Ethiopia. Weed Technol. 18:100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T., Schütz, W., and Milberg, P. 2002. Germination ecology of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus in eastern Ethiopia. Ann. Appl. Biol. 140:263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyson, R. V. and Bryan, H. H. 1987. Screening pre and postemergence herbicides for parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:131–136.Google Scholar
[USDA-NRCS] United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service 2007. Plants Database, Distribution Update. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed: March 22, 2007.Google Scholar