Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:06:39.574Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Early-Maturing Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata) to Metolachlor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. R. Bellinder
Affiliation:
Veget. Crops. Dep., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
D. Wilcox-Lee
Affiliation:
Veget. Crops. Dep., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
A. Senesac
Affiliation:
Veget. Crops. Dep., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327
D. T. Warholic
Affiliation:
Veget. Crops. Dep., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853-0327

Abstract

The effect of three rates of metolachlor on ‘Prime Time’ and ‘Tastie’, early maturing, fresh-market cabbage was evaluated in two geographically distinct regions of New York in 1986 and 1987. Metolachlor, when applied at 1.1, 1.7, and 2.2 kg ai/ha either pretransplant or 48 h after transplanting, caused no observable negative effects on either cabbage variety in either year when grown on sandy loam soils on Long Island. On a central New York silt loam soil, injury from metolachlor at 1.7 and 2.2 kg/ha applied post-transplant was negligible and transient. Metolachlor applied post-transplant caused a delay in maturity of Tastie cabbage in both years but not Prime Time; however, total yields equalled those of the weed-free controls with both varieties. Metolachlor applied pretransplant frequently caused excessive and persistent injury and often reduced cabbage yields.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bellinder, R. R., and Warholic, D. T. 1988. Evaluation of acetanilide injury to cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) and potential for yield reduction. Weed Technol. 2:350354.Google Scholar
2. Cornelius, A. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1985. Activity of acetanilide herbicides on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 33:721723.Google Scholar
3. Kee, W. E. 1985. Herbicide evaluation for spring and fall cole crops. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:142146.Google Scholar
4. Marion, G. R., Ilnicki, R. D., Kupatt, C., and Vitolo, D. B. 1985. Weed control in transplanted cole crops with some new herbicides. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 39:147150.Google Scholar
5. Sieczka, J. B., Creighton, J. F., and Sanok, W. J. 1984. Results of crucifer weed control studies on Long Island – 1983. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:113114.Google Scholar
6. Sieczka, J. B., Senesac, A. F., and Creighton, J. F. 1986. Weed control programs in transplanted crucifers. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:139143.Google Scholar
7. Stamm, G. K., and Ashley, R. A. 1980. Weed control in transplanted cabbage, cauliflower, and broccoli. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:201203.Google Scholar
8. Stillwell, E. K., and Sweet, R. D. 1975. Galinsoga control in cabbage and broccoli. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. 29:239243.Google Scholar
9. Sweet, R. D., Bonanno, A. R., Warholic, D. T., and Minotti, P. L. 1980. Alachlor for transplanted vegetables. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 34:170.Google Scholar