Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:16:42.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rice (Oryza sativa) Cultivar Tolerance to Clomazone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric F. Scherder ,
Ronald E. Talbert  and
Shawn D. Clark
Eric F. Scherder*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Shawn D. Clark
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: escherd@uark.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1999 and 2000 at the Rice Research and Extension Center at Stuttgart, AR, on a DeWitt silt loam and at the Pine Tree Branch Experiment Station near Colt, AR, on a Calloway silt loam to evaluate the tolerance of 14 rice cultivars and four experimental cultivar lines to clomazone at 0.34 and 0.67 kg ai/ha applied preemergence. Early-season chlorosis 14 days after emergence (DAE) ranged from 1 to 21% in 1999 and 3 to 40% in 2000 when averaged over herbicide rate. The experimental cultivar line RU961096 was slightly more susceptible to clomazone than other cultivars and lines. However, RU9701041 was more tolerant to clomazone at 0.67 kg/ha 14 DAE than other cultivars and lines. By 28 DAE, all cultivars had <13% chlorosis in 1999 and <8% in 2000. The experimental cultivar line RU9601096 and cultivar Koshihikari did not recover as quickly as the other 16 cultivars and cultivar lines. Early-season chlorosis had no effect on days to 50% heading or yield for any of the cultivars evaluated.

Keywords

Clomazonerice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Ahrent’, ‘Bengal’, ‘Cocodrie’, ‘Cypress’, ‘Drew’, ‘Jefferson’, ‘Kaybonnet’, ‘Koshihikari’, ‘Lemont’, ‘LaGrue’, ‘Madison’, ‘Mars’, ‘Priscilla’, ‘RU9601096’, ‘RU9701041’, ‘RU9801081’, ‘RU9801148’, and ‘Wells’Rice cultivar tolerancerice injuryDAE, days after emergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2004 , pp. 140 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ackley, J. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 1998. Weed management in transplanted bell pepper (Capsicum frutescens) with clomazone and rimsulfuron. Weed Technol. 12:458–462.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002. Crop Protection Reference. 18th ed. New York: Chemical and Pharmaceutical Press. Pp. 453–455.Google Scholar
Baldwin, F. L. and Dillon, T. L. 1998. A summary of selected 1997 rice weed control studies. in Norman, R. J. and Johnston, T. H., eds. B. R. Wells Rice Research Studies 1997. Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station Research Series 460. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Pp. 16–23.Google Scholar
Bollich, P. K., Jordan, D. L., Walker, D. M., and Burns, A. B. 2000. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to the microencapsulated formulation of clomazone. Weed Technol. 14:89–93.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., and NeSmith, D. S. 2001. Response of several transplanted pepper cultivars to variable rates and methods of application of clomazone. Hort. Sci 36:104–106.Google Scholar
Griffin, B., Scherder, E., and Talbert, R. 2000. Use of clomazone on cut soil in rice production. Abstract. Ark. Crop Prot. Assoc 4:2.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Baker, J. B. 1990. Tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars to fenoxaprop, sethoxydim, and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 38:528–531.Google Scholar
Herbert, J. H., Hughes, R. L., and Michaelis, B. A. 1993. Selectivity among cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) cultivars by clomazone. Weed Technol. 7. 471–477.Google Scholar
Hines, T. E. and Wilson, H. P. 1992. Varietal response to clomazone. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc 46:27.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1997. Efficacy of reduced rates of quinclorac applied with propanil or propanil plus molinate in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 45:824–828.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Bollich, P. K., Burns, A. B., and Walker, D. M. 1998a. Rice (Oryza sativa) response to clomazone. Weed Sci. 46:374–380.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Kendig, J. A. 1998. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with postemergence applications of propanil and clomazone in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 12:537–541.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Miller, D. K., and Crawford, S. H. 1998b. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with soil-applied and postemergence herbicide programs. Weed Technol. 12:69–73.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Sanders, D. E., Linscombe, S. D., and Williams, B. J. 1998c. Response of four rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars to triclopyr. Weed Technol. 12. 254–257.Google Scholar
Keifer, D. W. 1989. Tolerance of corn (Zea mays) lines to clomazone. Weed Sci. 37:622–628.Google Scholar
Linscombe, S. D., Jodari, F., McKenzie, K. S., Bollich, P. K., White, L. M., Groth, D. E., and Dunand, R. T. 1993. Registration of ‘Bengal’ rice. Crop Sci 33:645–646.Google Scholar
Majek, B. A. 1992. Influence of pea variety and seed treatment on clomazone phytotoxicity. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc 46:79.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. R. and Gage, E. V. 1999. Command 3 ME: weed control in southern rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:186.Google Scholar
Moldenhauer, K. A., Gravois, K. A., and Lee, F. N. et al. 1998. Registration of ‘Drew’ rice. Crop Sci 38:896–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantone, D. J. and Baker, J. B. 1992. Varietal tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa) to bromoxynil and triclopyr at different growth stages. Weed Technol. 6:968–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., Lovelace, M. L., and Buehring, N. W. 2001. Control of propanil-resistant and -susceptible barnyardgrass in rice. in Norman, R. J. and Meullenent, J. F., eds. B. R. Wells Rice Research Studies 2000. Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station Research Series 485. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Pp. 86–98.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. 1968. Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci. 16:252–255.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:686–692.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E. and Street, J. E. 1987. Rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 35:401–406.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E., Street, J. E., and Boykin, D. L. 1987. Influence of flood interval and cultivar on rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 35. 842–845.Google Scholar
Stall, W. M. 1991. Cucumber tolerance to selected herbicides and herbicide combinations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 44:203.Google Scholar
Street, J. E. and Mueller, T. C. 1993. Rice (Oryza sativa) weed control with soil applications of quinclorac. Weed Technol. 7:600–604.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M., Sneller, C. H., and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance. Weed Sci. 46:271–277.Google Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Schmidt, L. A., Norsworthy, J. K., Rutledge, J. S., and Fox, W. L. 1998. Confirmation of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass and strategies for control. in Norman, R. J. and Johnston, T. H., eds. B. R. Wells Rice Research Studies 1997. Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station Research Series 460. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station. Pp. 80–90.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Baldwin, F. L., and Dillon, T. L. 1999. The potential for clomazone use in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 13:390–393.Google Scholar