Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:38:43.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soybean (Glycine Max) Tolerance and Sicklepod (Cassia Obtusifolia) Control with AC 263,222

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James L. Griffin ,
Daniel B. Reynolds ,
P. Roy Vidrine  and
Stacey A. Bruff
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., 302 Life Sci. Bldg., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Daniel B. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Northeast Res. Stn., St. Joseph, LA 71366
P. Roy Vidrine
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Research Stn., Alexandria, LA 71302
Stacey A. Bruff
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Crop Physiol., Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field studies conducted under weed-free conditions, soybean yield was not adversely affected with POST applications of AC 263,222 at 18 g ha−1. At 36 g ha−1, soybean height at maturity was reduced in three of five studies and soybean yield in two of five studies. Application of 9 g ha−1 of AC 263,222 to sicklepod at cotyledon to four-leaf (early POST) or at a maximum size of five-leaf (late POST) provided 30 to 48% control. Control was 54 to 73% with AC 263,222 at 9 g ha−1 applied early POST followed by late POST. Regardless of application rate or timing, sicklepod control with AC 263,222 generally was inferior to the standard treatments of pendimethalin plus imazaquin PPI followed by imazaquin late POST or pendimethalin PPI and metribuzin PRE followed by chlorimuron late POST. Compared with the weed-free check, soybean yield was reduced when AC 263,222 was applied at 9 g ha−1 early POST followed by late POST in one of two studies and in two of three studies when applied at 18 g ha−1 early POST.

Keywords

AC 263,222, (±)-2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-methyl-3-pyrindinecarboxylic acidchlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]-carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onependimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminesicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Crop toleranceherbicide injuryacifluorfenchlorimuronimazaquinlactofenmetribuzinpendimethalinCASOB
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 331 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Elmore, C. D. 1989. Weed Survey-Southern States. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:408.Google Scholar
2. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. D. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop Sci. 11:25–26.Google Scholar
3. Griffin, J. L. and Habetz, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:459–462.Google Scholar
4. Miller, D. K. and Griffin, J. L. 1992. Soybean varietal response to Cadre application and moisture regime. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:69.Google Scholar
5. Newsom, L. J., Shaw, D. R., and Hydrick, D. E. 1992. Cultivar response of soybean to AC 263,222 as influenced by soil moisture. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:53.Google Scholar
6. Shaw, D. R. 1987. Sicklepod control in soybeans with Canopy, Scepter, and Classic. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol. 12, No. 20.Google Scholar
7. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicide and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187–190.Google Scholar
8. Teem, D. W., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis): geographic distributions, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:68–71.Google Scholar
9. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Willard, T. S., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Habetz, R. J. 1990. Evaluation of AC 263,222 in soybeans in Louisiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:29.Google Scholar
11. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1990. Development of AC 263,222 as a postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:46.Google Scholar
12. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Differential response of soybean (Glycine max) cultivars to AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:430–433.Google Scholar
13. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Use of AC 263,222 for sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) control in soybean. Weed Technol. 5:434–438.Google Scholar
14. Wixson, M. B. and Shaw, D. R. 1991. Effect of adjuvants on weed control and soybean (Glycine max) tolerance with AC 263,222. Weed Technol. 5:817–822.Google Scholar