Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T02:36:12.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Control with Herbicides and Cultivation in Onion (Allium cepa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rick A. Boydston*
Affiliation:
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Prosser, WA 99350-9687
Marcus D. Seymour
Affiliation:
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Prosser, WA 99350-9687
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: boydston@pars.ars.usda.gov

Abstract

Volunteer potatoes are difficult to control in onions and can greatly reduce onion growth and yield. Herbicides and cultivation were evaluated for control of simulated volunteer potatoes in onions in 1996 and 2000. Three interrow cultivations did not control potatoes in the onion row and the remaining plants reduced onion yield 50 and 73% compared with the hand-weeded checks. Three applications of oxyfluorfen (0.2 + 0.17 + 0.17 kg ai/ha) or bromoxynil plus oxyfluorfen (0.2 + 0.17 kg ai/ha) at the two-, three-, and four- to five-leaf stages of onions followed by a cultivation after each application reduced potato tuber weight 69 to 96% and tuber number 32 to 86% compared with cultivation alone and prevented onion yield loss associated with potatoes. Ethofumesate applied preemergence at 0.6 kg/ha followed by postemergence ethofumesate plus bromoxynil and cultivation reduced potato tuber weight 90% and tuber number 68% compared with cultivation alone, and onions yielded equal to hand-weeded checks. Two applications of fluroxypyr (0.3 kg ai/ha) plus bromoxynil (0.2 kg ai/ha) at the two- and three-leaf stages of onions followed by a cultivation after each application reduced potato tuber weight by greater than 90%, but onion yields were reduced 38 to 66%.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bevis, A. J. and Jewell, S. N. 1986. Preliminary results from the use of chemicals or cultivations to control potato groundkeepers. Asp. Appl. Biol. 13: 201208.Google Scholar
Bolter, C. J., Dicke, M., Van Loop, J. J. A., Visser, J. H., and Posthumus, M. A. 1997. Attraction of Colorado potato beetle to herbivore-damaged plants during herbivory and after its termination. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 10031023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, W. 1993. Evaluation of ioxynil, fluroxypyr and clopyralid for the control of volunteer potato in vegetable crops. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35: 123130.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A. 1994. Clopyralid persistence in spearmint (Mentha cardiaca) hay injures potato (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Technol. 8: 296298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, R. A. 2001. Volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) control with herbicides and cultivation in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15: 461466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleal, R. 1994. Volunteer potatoes; testing strategies for a perennial problem. Br. Sugar Beet Rev. 62: 2024.Google Scholar
Cleal, R. A. E., Hayward, C. F., and Rawlings, P. J. 1993. Integrated control of volunteer potatoes in cereals and sugar beet. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35: 139148.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Fletcher, F. N. 1993. Broadleaf weed control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with postemergence directed herbicides. Weed Technol. 7: 298303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, P. J., Tumlinson, J. H., and Alborn, D. H. 1999. Attraction of Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to damaged and chemically induced potato plants. Environ. Entomol. 28: 973978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumkes, L. M. 1974. Research on the control of volunteer potatoes in the Netherlands. Proc. Br. Weed Contr. Conf. 12: 10311040.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. 1977. Investigations into some aspects of the biology of potatoes as weeds. Weed Res. 17: 123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, J. J. and Hilton, J. G. 1993. Control of volunteer potatoes in sugar beet. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35: 8996.Google Scholar
Oglivy, S. E., Cleal, R. A. E., and Rogers-Lewis, D. S. 1989. The control of potato groundkeepers in cereal crops. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf., Weeds 1: 205212.Google Scholar
Perombelon, M. C. M. 1975. Observations on the survival of potato groundkeepers in Scotland. Potato Res. 18: 205215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runham, S. R., Davies, J. S., Bond, W., and Leatherland, M. J. 1993a. Weed control strategies for volunteer potatoes in leeks (Allium porri). Asp. Appl. Biol. 35: 105112.Google Scholar
Runham, S. R., Davies, J. S., and Leatherland, M. J. 1993b. Weed control strategies for volunteer potatoes in onions. Asp. Appl. Biol. 35: 113121.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. E. 1983. Sources and dissemination of potato viruses in the Columbia Basin of the Northwestern United States. Plant Dis. 67: 744747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, L. D., Mitsui, B., and Tillett, T. C. 1986. The effect of spray volume on the postemergence activity of oxyfluorfen and glyphosate combinations. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 39: 219.Google Scholar
Williams, M. M. II and Boydston, R. A. Effect of shoot removal during tuberization on volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuber production. Weed Technol.: 618620.Google Scholar
Wright, G. C. and Bishop, G. W. 1981. Volunteer potatoes as a source of potato leafroll virus and potato virus X. Am. Potato J. 58: 603609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zandstra, B. H. and Wallace, T. F. Jr. 1989. Postemergence weed control in onions (Allium cepa) with air-assisted, flat fan, rotary nozzles. Weed Technol. 3: 467471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar