Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:53:25.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Imazethapyr and Paraquat-Based Weed Control Systems in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Timothy L. Grey ,
Glenn R. Wehtje ,
Robert H. Walker  and
Krishna P. Paudel
Timothy L. Grey
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, and Grad. Res. Asst. Dep. Agric. Econ. Rural Sociol. and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Glenn R. Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, and Grad. Res. Asst. Dep. Agric. Econ. Rural Sociol. and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, and Grad. Res. Asst. Dep. Agric. Econ. Rural Sociol. and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Krishna P. Paudel
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. Soils, and Grad. Res. Asst. Dep. Agric. Econ. Rural Sociol. and Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted from 1991 through 1993 to compare Weed control, peanut tolerance, yield, and net return from imazethapyr applied alone or in combination with paraquat. Sicklepod and Florida beggarweed were controlled with paraquat early POST followed by a POST application of either paraquat with 2,4-DB or paraquat with 2,4-DB and bentazon. Imazethapyr-based early POST treatments offered no improvement. An early POST application of paraquat with bentazon or imazethapyr was required for maximum control of bristly starbur. Imazethapyr applied alone early POST, with no further treatment, provided optimum yellow nutsedge control. Maximum yield and net return were associated with any paraquat-containing early POST-applied treatment followed by one of the tank mixed POST options.

Keywords

Bentazon, 3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxideimazethapyr, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methyethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridineearboxylic acidparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidbristly starbur, Acanthospermum hispidum DC. # ACNHIFlorida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC. # DEDTOsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia L. # CASOByellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPESpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘Florunner.’Net returnweed managementbentazon2,4-DBAcanthospermum hispidumCyperus esculentusDesmodium tortuosumSenna obtusifoliaACHNICASOBCYPESDEDTO
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 813 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1992. Environmental Protection Agency: Reference Dose Tracking Report. Office of Pesticide Programs. RFD Tracking Report.Google Scholar
2. Brecke, B. J. and Colvin, D. L. 1988. Influence of paraquat timing of application on peanut (Arachis hypogaea) tolerance and weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:62.Google Scholar
3. Cole, T. A., Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., Hicks, T. V. 1989. Behavior of imazethapyr in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:639–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Grey, T. L., Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, G. R. 1992. Weed control in peanuts utilizing imazethapyr, bentazon, and paraquat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:105.Google Scholar
5. Hauser, E. W., Cecil, S. R., and Dowler, C. C. 1973. Systems of weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 21:176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hauser, E. W. and Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Control of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) and sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with dinoseb. Peanut Sci. 1:40–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wehtje, Glenn R. 1993. Toxicity of imazethapyr to purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedges (C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 7:900–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rud, O. E. and Chappell, W. E. 1959. The performance of DNBP in weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 12:5.Google Scholar
9. Swann, C. W. 1994. Imazethapyr, AC-263,222 and metolachlor systems for control of nutsedges in peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:29.Google Scholar
10. Swann, C. W. 1993. An evaluation of imazethapyr systems for control of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in peanut. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:73.Google Scholar
11. Wehtje, G. R., McGuire, J. A., Walker, R. H., and Patterson, M. G. 1986. Texas panicum (Panicum texanum) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with paraquat. Weed Sci. 34:308–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wehtje, G. R. and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Performance of various herbicide combinations with paraquat for weed control in peanuts. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:22.Google Scholar
13. Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and McGuire, J. A. 1992. Influence of bentazon on the phytotoxicity of paraquat. Weed Sci. 40:90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Cole, T. A., Hicks, T. V., and McGuire, J. A. 1989. Postemergence weed control systems without dinoseb for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 37:385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Hicks, T. V., and Cole, T. A. 1990. Postemergence weed management systems for peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 4:239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Wilcut, J. W., Walls, F. R. Jr., and Horton, D. N. 1991. Imazethapyr for broadleaf weed control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 18:26–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Wilcut, J. W., York, A. C., and Wehtje, G. R. 1993. The control and interaction of weeds in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Rev. Weed Sci. 6:151–176.Google Scholar