Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:22:30.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dragged-Rail Treatments for Reducing Cholla Infestation in Southeast New Mexico, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert D. Cox*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box 42125, Lubbock, TX 79409
Braden G. Johns
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Box 42125, Lubbock, TX 79409
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: robert.cox@ttu.edu.

Abstract

Cholla infestations can be problematic on rangelands in North America, Australia, Africa, and Europe, and treatment options for this plant are limited because of its ability to resprout from broken stem fragments. We investigated dragged-rail treatments, where iron rails are dragged across the rangeland by tractor and knock plants over while uprooting them, as a treatment option for tree cholla in southeast New Mexico. Railing effectively controlled tree cholla plants over 0.5 m tall, but did not effectively control plants smaller than 0.5 m. Nevertheless, treatment did effectively reduce overall cholla density: Treated areas averaged 40 to 50 plants ha−1, whereas nontreated areas averaged over 350 plants ha−1. Railing can be an effective means of cholla control, especially if followed by another treatment, such as prescribed fire, that is known to be effective against the smaller sizes of cholla.

Las infestaciones de Cylindropuntia imbricata pueden ser problemáticas en los campos de pastoreo en Norte América, Australia, África y Europa, y las opciones de tratamiento para esta planta son limitadas debido a su habilidad de rebrotar a partir de fragmentos del tallo. Investigamos tratamientos de arrastre de rieles, en los cuales rieles de hierro fueron arrastrados con un tractor a lo largo de campos de pastoreo para volcar las plantas y sacar las raíces del suelo, como una opción de tratamiento de C. imbricata en el sureste de New Mexico. El arrastre de rieles controló efectivamente plantas de C. imbricata de más de 0.5 m de altura, pero no controló efectivamente plantas de menos de 0.5 m de altura. Sin embargo, el tratamiento redujo efectivamente la densidad de C. imbricata: las áreas tratadas tuvieron un promedio de 40 a 50 plantas ha−1, mientras que las no-tratadas promediaron más de 350 plantas ha−1. El arrastre de rieles puede ser un medio efectivo de control de C. imbricata, especialmente si es seguido de otro tratamiento, como quema dirigida, la cual se sabe es efectiva contra plantas de C. imbricata de menor tamaño.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, LJS, Allen, EJ, Kunst, CRG, Sosebee, RE (1991) A diffusion model for dispersal of Opuntia imbricata (cholla) on rangeland. J Ecol 79:11231135 Google Scholar
Chuk, M (2010) Invasive cacti—a threat to the range-lands of Australia. In: Eldridge, DJ, Waters, C, eds. Proceedings of the 16th Biennial Conference of the Australian Rangeland Society, Perth, Bourke. Perth, Australia: Australian Rangeland Society http://www.austrangesoc.com.au/site/conference_papers.php. Accessed August 1, 2013Google Scholar
Daehler, CC (1998) The taxonomic distribution of invasive angiosperm plants: ecological insights and comparison to agricultural weeds. Biol Conserv 84:167180 Google Scholar
Essl, F, Kobler, J (2009) Spiny invaders—patterns and determinants of cacti invasion in Europe. Flora 204:485494 Google Scholar
Fraser, JG, Pieper, RD (1972) Growth characteristics of Opuntia imbricata [Haw.] DC. in New Mexico. Southwest Nat 17:229237 Google Scholar
Herrick, JE, Van Zee, JW, Havstad, KM, Burkett, LM, Whitford, WG (2005) Monitoring Manual for Grassland, Shrubland and Savanna Ecosystems, Volume I. Las Cruces, NM: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Jornada Experimental Range. 36 pGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, F, Martin, M, Cox, JR, Prieto, S (1985) Is walkingstick cholla control worthwhile in Mexico? Rangelands 7:6669 Google Scholar
Kinraide, TB (1978) The ecological distribution of cholla cactus (Opuntia imbricata (Haw.) DC.) in El Paso County, Colorado. Southwest Nat 23:117133 Google Scholar
Kunst, CRG (1988) Carbohydrate Trends. in Opuntia imbricata (Haw.) DC. (Cholla). . Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University. 111 pGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, K (2009) Control cholla cactus. New Mexico State University Cooperative Extension Service Guide B-804. Pages 2 ppGoogle Scholar
McGinty, A, Ueckert, D (2005) Brushbusters: how to take care of prickly pear and other cacti. Texas Agrilife Extension L-5171 Google Scholar
Miller, TEX, Lauda, SM, Rose, KA, Eckberg, JO (2009) Impacts of insect herbivory on cactus population dynamics: experimental demography across an environmental gradient. Ecol Monogr 79:155172 Google Scholar
Moran, VC, Zimmermann, HG (1984) The biological control of cactus weeds: achievements and prospects. Biocontrol News Inf 5:297320 Google Scholar
Moran, VC, Zimmermann, HG (1991) Biological control of cactus weeds of minor importance in South Africa. Agr Ecosyst Environ 37:3755 Google Scholar
Parmenter, RR (2008) Long-term effects of a summer fire on desert grassland plant demographics in New Mexico. Rangeland Ecol Manage 61:156168 Google Scholar
Pieper, RD (1971) Blue grama vegetation responds inconsistently to cholla cactus control. J Range Manage 24:5254 Google Scholar
Sanz-Elorza, M, Dana Sanchez, ED, Vesperinas, ES (2006) Further naturalized Cactaceae in northeastern Iberian Peninsula. Anales del Jardin Botanico de Madrid. 63:711 Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2010) JMP 9.0.0. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc Google Scholar
Vásquez-Méndez, R, Ventura-Ramos, E, Oleschko, K, Hernández-Sandoval, L, Parrot, JF, Nearing, MA (2010) Soil erosion and runoff in different vegetation patches from semiarid central Mexico. Catena 80:162169 Google Scholar