Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:21:08.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Bensulfuron-Methyl on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Growth and Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. Dale Monks ,
Michael G. Patterson  and
Malcolm Pegues
C. Dale Monks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils and Alabama Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils and Alabama Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Malcolm Pegues
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils and Alabama Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in Alabama from 1992 through 1994 to evaluate the potential of the methyl ester of bensulfuron applied at sublethal rates as a plant growth regulator for reducing plant height and boll rot in cotton. Bensulfuron at 0.017 and 0.034 g ai/ha or mepiquat chloride at 10 g ai/ha was applied POST alone at the pinhead square or early-bloom stage of cotton growth or sequentially at 0.017 followed by (fb) 0.017 g/ha, 0.034 fb 0.034 g/ha of bensulfuron and 5 fb 5, 10 fb 10, 10 fb 20, or 20 fb 20 g/ha of mepiquat chloride. Mepiquat chloride had no effect on yield in 1992 and 1994 but decreased yield when applied sequentially in 1993. Bensulfuron was generally detrimental to first position fruit retention, and it delayed maturity. Treatments that reduced plant height did not reduce boll rot. Bensulfuron treatments that reduced plant height also reduced yield; therefore, the potential for its use as a growth regulator in cotton appears limited.

Keywords

Bensulfuron-methyl, 2-[[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]methyl] benzoic acidmepiquat chloride, N,N-dimethyl-piperidinium chloridecotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Growth responseplant growth regulatorsplant mappingsulfonylurea herbicides
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 851 - 855
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, P. C. and Hibberd, K. A. 1985. Evidence for the interaction of an imidazolinone herbicide with leucine, valine, and isoleucine metabolism. Weed Sci. 33:479–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Aguilera, A. 1989. New trends in rice weed control with a bensulfuron methyl formulation. Proc. Weed Problems in Mediterr. Climates Symp. 2:427–138.Google Scholar
3. Arle, H. F. and Hamilton, K. C. 1976. Over-the-top applications of herbicides in cotton. Weed Sci. 24:166–169.Google Scholar
4. Bourland, F. M. and Watson, C. E. 1990. COTMAP, a technique for evaluating structure and yield of cotton plants. Crop Sci. 30:224–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 33:270–276.Google Scholar
6. Cathey, G. W. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1988. Cotton response to planting date and mepiquat chloride. Agron. J. 80:463–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Guthrie, D. S. 1989. Evaluation of mepiquat chloride low-rate multiple applications. p. 71–72 in Brown, J. M. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 3–6, 1989. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
8. Hodges, H. F., Reddy, V. R., and Reddy, K. R. 1991. Mepiquat chloride and temperature effects on photosynthesis and respiration of fruiting cotton. Crop Sci. 31:1302–1308.Google Scholar
9. Jenkins, J. N., McCarthy, J. C. Jr., and Parrott, W. L. 1990. Effectiveness of fruiting sites in cotton: Yield. Crop Sci. 30:365–369.Google Scholar
10. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993a. DPX-PE350 does not interact with early-season insecticides in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 7:92–96.Google Scholar
11. Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993b. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to DPX-PE350 applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 7:159–162.Google Scholar
12. Kerby, T. A., Hake, K., and Keeley, M. 1986. Cotton fruiting modification with mepiquat chloride. Agron. J. 78:907–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Langeland, K. A. and Laroche, F. B. 1994. Persistence of bensulfuron methyl and control of hydrilla is shallow ponds. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 32:12–14.Google Scholar
14. McCarty, W. H., Blaine, A., and Varner, D. 1989. Effect of PIX on cotton fruiting characteristics and yield. p. 72–73 in Brown, J. M. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Nashville, TN. Jan. 3–6, 1989. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
15. Pacheco, J. L. and Jarrett, D. S. 1989. Late post application timing of bensulfuronmethyl in California's water-seeded rice. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 42:194.Google Scholar
16. Patterson, M. G., Monks, C. D., Rayburn, T., and Wehtje, G. 1990. Effects of chlorimuron applied postemergence to cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 4:314–317.Google Scholar
17. Peterson, L. W., Reed, W. T., and Yamaguchi, T. 1990. Bensulfuron methyl, metsulfuron methyl and their combination for weed control in rice. Proc. Pest Manage, in Rice Conf., London, England. 37:358–367.Google Scholar
18. Peudpaichit, S., Tongchairawewat, P., and Simagrai, M. 1987. Londax + BAS 514H: a broadspectrum weed control treatment in rice. Proc. 11th Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. 2:437–448.Google Scholar
19. Pinckard, J. A., Ashworth, L. J. Jr., Snow, J. P., Russell, T. E., Roncadori, R. W., and Sciumbato, G. L. 1981. Boll rots, p. 20–24 in Compendium of Cotton Diseases. Am. Phytopathol. Soc., St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
20. Ray, T. B. 1982. The mode of action of chlorsulfuron: a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:10–17.Google Scholar
21. Rost, T. L. 1984. The comparative cell cycle and metabolic effects of chemical treatments on root tip meristems. III. Chlorsulfuron. J. Plant Growth Regul. 3:51–63.Google Scholar
22. Shaw, B. W., Parnell, C. B. Jr., and Childers, R. E. Jr. 1990. Effect of plant growth regulators and GOSSYM recommendations on cotton fiber quality. p. 101–106 in Brown, J. M. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Las Vegas, NV. Jan. 8–13, 1990. Natl. Cotton Counc. Am., Memphis, TN.Google Scholar
23. Snipes, C. E. and Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1994. The influence of fluometuron and MSMA on cotton yield and fruiting characteristics. Weed Sci. 42:210–215.Google Scholar
24. Tracy, P. W. and Sappenfield, W. P. 1992. Integrated management influence on short-season cotton yield in the northern Mississippi Delta. J. Prod. Agric. 5:551–555.Google Scholar
25. Wallace, T. P., Snipes, C. E., and White, B. W. 1993. Effect of single and multiple applications of mepiquat chloride on Mississippi cotton. Res. Rep. Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn. No. 18. 5 p.Google Scholar