Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:23:18.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Field Survey to Determine Distribution and Frequency of Glyphosate-Resistant Horseweed (Conyza Canadensis) in Indiana

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Vince M. Davis ,
Kevin D. Gibson  and
William G. Johnson
Vince M. Davis
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
Kevin D. Gibson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
William G. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: wgj@purdue.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In-field surveys, which directly estimate weed population densities, typically utilize either random or nonrandom field selection methods. We used both methods to characterize the distribution and frequency of glyphosate-resistant (GR) horseweed populations and other late-season soybean weed escapes and to develop a database for tracking weed shifts, control failures, and the presence of other herbicide-resistant biotypes over time in Indiana. In-field surveys were conducted in a total of 978 Indiana soybean fields during September and October of 2003, 2004, and 2005. Information from fields with horseweed was obtained from 158 sites (19%) sampled through a systematic random site selection method and 128 fields through a nonrandom site selection method. When present, horseweed seed was collected and germinated in the greenhouse; rosettes 5 to 10 cm wide were sprayed with 1.72 kg ae/ha of glyphosate. Populations with less than 60% control at 28 d after treatment were determined to be glyphosate resistant. A selected subset of glyphosate-resistant populations was confirmed resistant by subsequent glyphosate dose response experiments. All populations in the subset with less than 60% control at the 1.72 kg ae/ha rate of glyphosate demonstrated 4- to 110-fold levels of resistance (R : S ratios). Glyphosate-resistant populations were found in all regions of Indiana; however, the highest frequencies were in the southeastern (SE) region with 38% of fields sampled and only 1, 2, and 2% of fields sampled in the northwestern (NW), northeastern (NE), and southwestern (SW) regions, respectively. Information gathered in this survey can assist in the development of applied research, as well as reactive glyphosate-resistant horseweed management education in the SE region of the state. Moreover, detecting resistance at low frequencies can direct proactive resistance education to farmers and practitioners in the other regions of the state as a means of providing an early warning system to address glyphosate resistance in weeds.

Keywords

Glyphosate, horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICAsoybean, Glycine max L. MerrWeed surveyglyphosate resistancegeographical information system
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 331 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barnes, J., Johnson, B., Gibson, K., and Weller, S. 2004. Crop rotation and tillage system influence late-season incidence of giant ragweed and horseweed in Indiana soybean. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/2004.asp. Accessed: February 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. W., Johnson, W. G., and Gibson, K. D. 2003. Developing a field survey for the estimation of glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Indiana. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:176.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, J. R., Al-Khatib, K., and Currie, R. S. 1999. Survey of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) resistance to imazethapyr and chlorimuron in northeast Kansas. Weed Technol. 13:510–514.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Heap, I. M., Smeda, R. J., and Hall, L. M. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Technol. 14:428–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., and Légère, A. 1999. Nature, occurrence, and cost of herbicide-resistant green foxtail (Setaria viridis) across Saskatchewan ecoregions. Weed Technol. 13:626–631.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J., Thomas, A. G., and Stevenson, F. C. 2001. Survey of herbicide-resistant wild oat (Avena fatua) in two townships in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:463–471.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997a. Mapping risk areas for resistance to ACCase inhibitor herbicides in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L. and Morrison, I. N. 1997b. A survey of ACCase inhibitor resistant wild oat in a high risk township in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourgeois, L., Morrison, I. N., and Kelner, D. 1997. Field and producer survey of ACCase resistant wild oat in Manitoba. Can. J. Plant Sci. 77:709–715.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:642–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Owen, M. D. K. 1997. Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci. 45:98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dauer, J. T., Mortensen, D. A., and Humston, R. 2006. Controlled experiments to predict horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dispersal distances. Weed Sci. 54:484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, V. M. and Johnson, W. G. 2007. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed emergence, survival, and seed production in no-till soybean. Weed Sci. 56:231–236.Google Scholar
Falk, J. S., Shoup, D. E., Al-Khatib, K., and Peterson, D. E. 2005. Survey of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) response to protox- and ALS-inhibiting herbicides in northeast Kansas. Weed Technol. 19:838–846.Google Scholar
Gibson, K. D., Johnson, W. G., and Hillger, D. E. 2005. Farmer perceptions of problematic corn and soybean weeds in Indiana. Weed Technol. 19:1065–1070.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2007. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. 2007.http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: September.Google Scholar
Johnson, B., Barnes, J., Gibson, K., and Weller, S. 2004. Late-season weed escapes in Indiana soybean fields. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/cm/2004.asp. Accessed: February 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Légère, A., Beckie, H. J., Stevenson, F. C., and Thomas, A. G. 2000. Survey of management practices affecting the occurrence of wild oat (Avena fatua) resistance to acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Technol. 14:366–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, R. S. and Powles, S. B. 2001. High levels of herbicide resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in the wheat belt of Western Australia. Weed Technol. 15:242–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, C. M. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in full-season no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4:814–818.Google Scholar
Regehr, D. L. and Bazzazz, F. A. 1979. The population dynamics of Erigeron canadensis, a successional winter annual. J. Ecol. 67:923–933.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationships. Weed Technol. 19:218–227.Google Scholar
Shields, E. J., Dauer, J. T., VanGessel, M. J., and Neumann, G. 2006. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci. 54:1063–1067.Google Scholar
Tucker, K. P., Morgan, G. D., Senseman, S. A., Miller, T. D., and Bauman, P. A. 2006. Identification, distribution, and control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) ecotypes with varying levels of sensitivity to triasulfuron in Texas. Weed Technol. 20:745–750.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Delaware. Weed Sci. 49:703–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., and Majek, B. A. 2001. Glyphosate in full season no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean: role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol. 15:714–724.Google Scholar
Walsh, M. J., Duane, R. D., and Powles, S. B. 2001. High frequency of chlorsulfuron-resistant wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) populations across the Western Australian wheatbelt. Weed Technol. 15:199–203.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E. 2001. The biology of Canadian weeds. 115. Conyza canadensis . Can. J. Plant Sci. 81:867–875.Google Scholar
Westhoven, A. M. 2008. Distribution, Biology, and Management of Glyphosate-Tolerant Common Lambsquarters. M.S. Thesis. West Lafayette, IN Purdue University. 223.Google Scholar
Westhoven, A. M., Davis, V. M., Kruger, G. R., Mock, V. A., and Johnson, W. G. 2007. Can glyphosate-resistant horseweed be used as an indicator for other species difficult to control with glyphosate. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 62:192.Google Scholar
Zelaya, I. A., Owen, M. D. K., and VanGessel, M. J. 2004. Inheritance of evolved glyphosate resistance in Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110:58–70.Google Scholar