Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:33:49.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Mixtures in Water-Seeded Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice (Oryza sativa)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kristie J. Pellerin ,
Eric P. Webster ,
Wei Zhang  and
David C. Blouin
Kristie J. Pellerin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, 104 Sturgis Hall, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, 45 Agriculture Administration Building, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: ewebster@agcenter.lsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Imazethapyr-based weed control treatments were evaluated in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant (IR) rice in Louisiana in 2000 and 2001. Treatments included imazethapyr applied to soil before seedling flood (surface [SURF] applied) or no soil application (no SURF), followed by imazethapyr applied postemergence (POST). Averaged over SURF application treatments (SURF, no SURF), all imazethapyr mixtures increased control of barnyardgrass at 14 and 42 d after POST treatment (DAT) compared with imazethapyr alone. Treatments containing imazethapyr-applied SURF followed by POST treatments controlled red rice 90 to 96% at 21 DAT. Alligatorweed and hemp sesbania control increased with POST mixtures compared with imazethapyr-only treatments at 35 DAT. Rice yield increased with imazethapyr applied SURF compared with no SURF application, averaged over POST applications. Other herbicides will be required to control troublesome weeds such as hemp sesbania and alligatorweed in an IR rice production system.

Keywords

Imazethapyralligatorweed, Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. #3 ALRPHbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCGhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A.W. Hill # SEBEXred rice, Oryza sativa L. # ORYSArice, Oryza sativa L. ‘93 AS-3510’, ‘CL 121’Acetolactate synthaseClearfield riceherbicide mixturesALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)DAT, days after postemergence treatmentIR, imidazolinone-resistantPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergenceSURF, surface
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 2003 , pp. 836 - 841
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arnold, R. N., Murray, M. W., Gregory, E. J., and Smeal, D. 1993. Weed control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with imazethapyr combinations. Weed Technol. 7:361–364.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1995. Response of selected weed species to postemergence imazethapyr and bentazon. Weed Technol. 9:236–242.Google Scholar
Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croughan, T. P. 1994. Application of tissue culture techniques to the development of herbicide resistant rice. La. Agric 3:25–26.Google Scholar
Dillon, T. L., Baldwin, F. L., and Talbert, R. E. 1999. Control of red rice and other difficult weeds in imidazolinone tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:15.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R. and Black, H. L. 1999. Effect of imazethapyr on several red rice (Oryza sativa L.) accessions and rice lines. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:211.Google Scholar
Hager, A. and Renner, K. 1994. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) control in soybean (Glycine max) with bentazon as influenced by imazethapyr or thifensulfuron tank-mixes. Weed Technol. 8:766–771.Google Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8:129–133.Google Scholar
Judd, W. S., Campbell, C. S., Kellogg, E. A., and Stevens, P. F. 1999. Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. Pp. 283–288.Google Scholar
Liscano, J. F. and Williams, B. J. 1999. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded imidazolinone tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:13.Google Scholar
Lorenzi, H. J. and Jeffery, L. S. 1987. Weeds of the United States and Their Control. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 355 p.Google Scholar
Masson, J. A. and Webster, E. P. 2001. Use of imazethapyr in water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 15:103–106.Google Scholar
Masson, J. A., Webster, E. P., and Williams, B. J. 2001. Flood depth, application timing, and imazethapyr activity in imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol. 15:315–319.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. R. and Gage, E. V. 1999. Utilization of aim for broadleaf weed control in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:186–187.Google Scholar
Richard, E. P. Jr. and Street, J. E. 1984. Herbicide performance in rice (Oryza sativa) under three flooding conditions. Weed Sci. 32:157–162.Google Scholar
Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Wiley, G. L. 1995. AC 263,222 and imazethapyr rates and mixtures for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 9:801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D. G. and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) control with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 3:95–98.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1234 p.Google Scholar
Scherder, E. F., Talbert, R. E., Lovelace, M. L., and Buehring, N. W. 2001. Weed control programs in herbicide-tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 54:39–40.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. Jr. and Khodayari, K. 1985. Herbicide treatments for control of weeds in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 33:686–692.Google Scholar
Starke, R. J. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 46:652–660.Google Scholar
Steele, G. L., Chandler, J. M., and McCauley, G. N. 2002. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in imidazolinone-tolerant rice (O. sativa). Weed Technol. 16:627–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stidham, M. A. and Singh, B. K. 1991. Imidazolinone-acetohydroxyacid synthase interactions. in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L., eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC. Pp. 71–90.Google Scholar
Wall, D. A. 1995. Bentazon tank-mixtures for improved redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 9:610–616.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P. and Masson, J. A. 2001. Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Sci. 49:652–657.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Zhang, W., Lanclos, D. Y., Masson, J. A., and Morris, S. N. 1999. Experimental herbicides for weed control in rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 52:16–17.Google Scholar
Zhang, W., Webster, E. P., and Selim, H. M. 2001. Effect of soil moisture on efficacy of imazethapyr in greenhouse. Weed Technol. 15:355–359.Google Scholar