Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:26:06.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Off-Site Runoff Losses of Metolachlor and Metribuzin Applied to Differing Soybean (Glycine max) Production Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric P. Webster  and
David R. Shaw
Eric P. Webster
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi Slate Univ., Mississippi Slate, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi Slate Univ., Mississippi Slate, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three soybean production systems coupled with conventional tillage (CT) or no-tillage (NT) were evaluated for metolachlor and metribuzin loss in water from runoff. Metolachlor and metribuzin concentrations were similar in runoff from CT or NT soybean following winter wheat, with stubble burned, and CT or NT monocrop soybean. However, metolachlor and metribuzin concentrations were higher in runoff water from the CT doublecrop soybean planted into winter wheat stubble than NT. In all 3 yr of the study, the majority of total losses occurred in the first three runoff events. Total loss of metolachlor in runoff from the doublecrop system with winter wheat stubble present was 0.6% in 1991 to 1.1% in 1990 from CT, and 0.2% in 1990 to 0.6% in 1991 from the NT. Similar results were observed from the CT and NT doublecrop with burned winter wheat stubble and the monocrop systems. Metribuzin loss patterns were similar to metolachlor, but the fraction lost was slightly higher. Multi-variate regression was used to describe and predict herbicide losses, and R2values ranged from 0.66 to 0.98 for both metolachlor and metribuzin.

Keywords

Metolachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamidemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onesoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 515’winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Pioneer 2548.’Herbicide lossherbicide movementsurface water
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 556 - 564
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baker, J. L., Laflen, J. M., and Johnson, H. P. 1978. Effect of tillage systems on runoff losses of pesticides, a rainfall simulation study. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 21:886–892.Google Scholar
2. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164–168.Google Scholar
3. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1984. The fate of oryzalin applied to straw-mulched and nonmulched soils. Weed Sci. 32:269–272.Google Scholar
4. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1986. Soil reception and activity of acetochlor, alachlor, and metolachlor as affected by wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw and irrigation. Weed Sci. 34:607–611.Google Scholar
5. Brent, F. V. 1986. Soil Survey of Noxubee County, Mississippi. USDA-SCS. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C. 198 p.Google Scholar
6. Bubenzer, G. D. 1979. Inventory of rainfall simulators. Proc. Rainfall Simulator Workshop. USDA-SEA. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C. ARS-W. 10:120–130.Google Scholar
7. Coupe, R., Shaw, D. R., and Murphy, G. P. 1994. Simulation and field verification of herbicide losses in runoff. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:253.Google Scholar
8. Edwards, N. and Morrison, E. G. 1982. Effect of straw management, tillage and planter design on yield of soybeans planted after wheat—a progress report. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep., Vol. 7, no. 12. 4 p.Google Scholar
9. Edwards, W. M., Triplett, G. B. Jr., and Kramer, R. M. 1980. A watershed study of glyphosate transport in runoff. J. Environ. Qual. 9:661–665.Google Scholar
10. Felsot, A. S., Mitchell, J. K., and Kenimer, A. L. 1990. Assessment of management practices for reducing pesticide runoff from sloping cropland in Illinois. J. Environ. Qual. 19:539–545.Google Scholar
11. Griffith, D. R., Mannering, J. V., and Box, J. E. 1986. Soil and moisture management with reduced tillage, p. 19–57 in Sprague, M. A. and Triplett, G. B. eds. No-Tillage and Surface-Tillage Agriculture. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
12. Hairston, J. E., Sanford, J. O., Hayes, J. C., and Reinschmiedt, L. L. 1984. Crop yield, soil erosion, and net returns from five tillage systems in the Mississippi blackland prairie. J. Soil Water Conserv. 39:391–395.Google Scholar
13. Hall, J. K., Pawlus, M., and Higgins, E. R. 1972. Losses of atrazine in runoff water and soil sediment. J. Environ. Qual. 1:172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Helling, C. S. 1987. Effect of conservation tillage on pesticide dissipation. p. 179–187 in Logan, T. J., Davidson, J. M., Baker, J. L., and Overcash, M., eds. Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality, Nitrates and Pesticides. Lewis Publishers, Chelesa, MI.Google Scholar
15. Myers, R. H. 1989. The multiple linear regression model. p. 82–163 in Myers, R. H., Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. PWS-Kent Publishing, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
16. Peterson, R. B., Shea, P. J., and Wicks, G. A. 1988. Acetanilide activity and dissipation as influenced by formulation and wheat stubble. Weed Sci. 37:243–249.Google Scholar
17. Ritter, W. F., Johnson, H. P., Lovely, W. G., and Malnua, M. 1974. Atrazine, propachlor, and diazinon residues on small agricultural watersheds; runoff losses, persistence, and movement. Environ. Sci. Technol. 8:38–42.Google Scholar
18. Shaw, D. R. and Rainero, H. P. 1990. Weed control in soybean under different cropping and tillage systems. J. Prod. Agric. 3:453–460.Google Scholar
19. Shaw, D. R., Smith, C. A., and Hairston, J. E. 1992. Impact of rainfall and tillage systems on off-site herbicide movement. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 23:1843–1858.Google Scholar
20. Shelton, C. H., von Bernuth, R. D., and Rajbhandari, S. P. 1985. A continuous-application rainfall simulator. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 28:1115–1119.Google Scholar
21. Spurlock, S. R. and Misra, S. K. 1989. Acreage allocated to conservation tillage practices in Mississippi. Mississippi Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Bull. 957. 8 p.Google Scholar
22. Sukolapong, W., Whatley, L. L., and Snipes, C. E. 1985. Herbicide runoff with different tillage systems. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:443.Google Scholar
23. Triplett, G. B. Jr., Conner, B. J., and Edwards, W. M. 1978. Transport of atrazine and simazine in runoff from conventional and no-tillage corn. J. Environ. Qual. 7:77–84.Google Scholar
24. Weed Science Society of America Herbicide Handbook Committee. 1994. Herbicide Handbook of the Weed Science Society of America, 7th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, III. 352 p.Google Scholar