Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:15:20.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum) Tolerance to Several Postemergence Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Drew J. Lyon  and
David D. Baltensperger
Drew J. Lyon
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebr., Scottsbluff, NE 69361
David D. Baltensperger
Affiliation:
Univ. Nebr., Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The tolerance of two proso millet cultivars to atrazine preemergence and postemergence applications of bromoxynil, clopyralid, dicamba, or metsulfuron plus amine formulations of 2,4-D was studied in the field. Proso millet grain yield, test weight, seed weight, moisture content, and plant height at harvest were not affected by any of the herbicide treatments, despite some early-season injury observed in 1990.

Keywords

Atrazine, 6-chloro-N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diaminebromoxynil, 3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrileclopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic aciddicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid2,4-D, (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acidmetsulfuron, 2-[[[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino]-carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidproso millet Panicum miliaceum L.Sensitivityatrazinebromoxynilclopyraliddicambametsulfuron2,4-D
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 230 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. L. and Greb, B. W. 1987. Residual herbicides for weed control in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Crop Prot. 6:61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anderson, R. L. 1990. No-till proso millet production. Agron. J. 82: 577–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Briggs, L. J. and Schantz, H. L. 1913. The water requirements of plants. I. Investigations in the Great Plains. U.S. Dep. Agric.—Bur. Plant Ind. Bull. 285. Bureau of Plant Industry, U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4. Conover, W. J. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY. p. 213–337.Google Scholar
5. Grabouski, P. H. 1971. Selective control of weeds in proso millet with herbicides. Weed Sci. 19:207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Nelson, L. A. and Fenster, C. R. 1983. Seedbed preparation and planter comparisons for proso millet following wheat. Agron. J. 75:9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Nelson, L. A. 1990. Influence of planting dates, seeding rates, and cultivars on grain yield and other agronomic traits of proso millet. J. Prod. Agric. 3:184–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Robinson, R. G. 1973. Proso millet date of planting and tolerance to atrazine. Weed Sci. 21:260–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Shanahan, J. F., Anderson, R. L., and Greb, B. W. 1988. Productivity and water use of proso millet grown under three crop rotations in the central Great Plains. Agron. J. 80:487–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Wietgrefe, G. W. 1990. U.S. millet introduction and distribution. p. 5–6 in Wietgrefe, G. W., ed. How To Produce Proso Millet: A Farmer's Guide. G. W. Wietgrefe, Pierre, SD.Google Scholar