Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:35:53.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-Seeding Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Following Preplant Treatments of Atrazine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Floyd E. Bolton
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Ore. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Arnold P. Appleby
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Ore. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331
Scott Case
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop Soil Sci., Ore. State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331

Abstract

When applied correctly, atrazine can be used safely in certain areas of the United States for weed control in winter wheat, but persistence in the soil may injure wheat replanted after crop failure. Studies were conducted at Moro, OR, in 1989–90 and 1990–91 to determine the effect of September preplant applications of atrazine at 0.56, 1.12, and 2.24 kg a.i. ha-1 (1X, 2X, and 4X label rates) on wheat seeded at that time and on wheat re-seeded 2 or 6 mo later. Yield of winter wheat re-seeded in November following September atrazine applications was not reduced at any rate. The September-planted wheat was killed with glyphosate in the spring to simulate winter killing, then plots were re-seeded to spring wheat. The commercial rate of atrazine, 0.56 kg ha-1, caused only minor injury to spring wheat, but injury at the 2X and 4X rates was excessive.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., and Wicks, G. A. 1963. Dissipation and leaching of monuron, simazine, and atrazine in Nebraska soils. Weeds 11:209213.Google Scholar
2. Platte Chemical Co., Inc. Label for Cheat Stop −90WDG. Fremont, NB 68025.Google Scholar
3. Rydrych, D. J. 1989. New concepts in weed control. Ore. Wheat 40(3):9.Google Scholar