Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:01:08.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Durum Wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) Cultivars to Imazamethabenz and PP-604

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jaime Lloveras*
Affiliation:
Centre UdL (Universitat de Lleida)-IRTA, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
Jose Garcia Baudin
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Vegetal. INIA, Crta. La Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Josep M. Balague
Affiliation:
Centre UdL (Universitat de Lleida)-IRTA, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
Marta Serrano
Affiliation:
Centre UdL (Universitat de Lleida)-IRTA, Rovira Roure 177, 25198 Lleida, Spain
*
Corresponding author: J. Lloveras

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in the Mediterranean conditions of the Ebro Valley, Spain during 1995 to 1996 and 1996 to 1997 to determine the effects of imazamethabenz and PP-604 on selected durum wheat Triticum turgidum var. durum cultivars grown under irrigation. Herbicides were applied at their recommended rates of 600 g ai/ha for imazamethabenz and 375 g ai/ha for PP-604 and at twice these rates. Herbicide treatment reduced the average wheat height in three of four trials. Wheat treated with imazamethabenz was almost 2 cm shorter than wheat treated with PP-604 and almost 3 cm shorter than untreated control plants. However, durum wheat yields were not significantly reduced by treatment with imazamethabenz or PP-604 in any of the four trials, and no visible plant injury was observed. These results differ from reported yield reductions under Mediterranean dryland conditions, suggesting that durum wheat can be affected by imazamethabenz and PP-604 but irrigation enhances recovery from herbicide injury.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

[AETC] Asociacion Española de Técnicos Cerealistas. 1999. Encuesta de Calidad de los trigos españoles. Cosecha 1999. Madrid: Asociacion Española de Tecnicos Cérealistas. 10 p.Google Scholar
Aibar, J., Cambra, J. A., Fortanete, J., Sopeña, J. M., and Zaragoza, C. 1996. Ensayos de selectividad de herbicidas aplicados en postemergencia precoz sobre trigos duros y cebadas de dos carreras. Badajoz. Spain: Actas XV Reunión del Grupo de Trabajo de Malas Hierbas y Herbicidas: 15-18. Junta de Extremadura. 163 p.Google Scholar
Aibar, J., Cambra, J. A., Zaragoza, C., Fortanete, J., and Perez, M. 1997. Ensayos de selectividad de herbicidas en trigos duros y cebadas de dos carreras en Aragón (1995-1996). Pamplona. Spain: Actas XVI Reunión del Grupo de Trabajo de Malas Hierbas y Herbicidas: 13-16. ITGA. 123 p.Google Scholar
Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., and Panwar, R. S. 1991. Susceptibility of wheat cultivars to PP-604. Ann. Appl. Biol. 12 (Suppl. Test of Agrochemicals and Cultivars): 118.Google Scholar
Cavero, J., Zaragoza, C., Aibar, J., Cambra, J., Vega, C., Cadarso, A., Fortanete, J., and Campos, J. 1994. Ensayos de selectividad de herbicidas aplicados en postemergencia precoz sobre trigos duros y cebadas de dos carreras. Gobierno de Aragón. Informaciones Técnicas 1/94. 4 p.Google Scholar
Efthimiadis, P., Skorda, E. A., and Adamis, T. 1991. The reaction of cereal cultivars to herbicides in two seasons differing in weather conditions. Meddelingen. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 56: 727734.Google Scholar
Garcia Baudin, J. M. 1982. Importancia de las ‘avenas locas’ en España. Bol. Serv. Plagas. 8: 3542.Google Scholar
Garcia Baudin, J. M. and Salto, T. 1979. Distribucón e importancia del Género Avena, como planta adventicia en España. Anales INIA Ser. Prod. Prot. Vegetal. 10: 147156.Google Scholar
Kirkland, K. and Shafer, N. F. 1982. AC 222,293 a new postemergence herbicide for cereals: field studies. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. 1: 3338.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A. and Peeper, T. 1997. Herbicides for winter-hardy wild oat (Avena fatua) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 11: 3538.Google Scholar
Lemerle, D., Leys, A. R., Hinkley, R. B., Fisher, J. A., and Culis, B. 1985. Tolerances of wheat cultivars to post-emergence wild oat herbicides. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 25: 677682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madin, R. W. and Martin, R. J. 1990. The Effect of Timing and Rate of Application of PP-604 on Wild Oat and Ryegrass Control and Crop Tolerance in Wheat. Proceedings of the 9th Australian Weeds Conference, Adelaide. pp. 7377.Google Scholar
Monteiro, A. and Moreira, I. 1992. Selectivity and Metabolism of the Herbicide PP-604 in Wheat. Proceedings of the Congress of the Weed Society of Spain, Lleida. pp. 297300.Google Scholar
Royo, C. 1997. El trigo duro en España. Vida Rural. 48 (Julio): 2832.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1989. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Siebel, W. 1995. Wheat usage in Western Europe. In Faridi, H. and Faubiom, J., eds. Wheat End Uses Around the World. St. Paul. MN: American Society of Cereal Chemistry. pp. 93125.Google Scholar
Warner, R. B., Watson, K., and Bird, G. 1987. PP-604. A new post emergence cereal selective graminicide. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds. 2-1:2126.Google Scholar
Xie, H. S., Quick, W. A., and Hsiao, A. I. 1994. Spring cereal response to imazamethabenz and fenoxaprop-p-ethyl as influenced by environment. Weed Technol. 8: 713716.Google Scholar
Zadocks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415421.Google Scholar