Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:17:29.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sulfonylurea Herbicides Applied during Early Establishment of Seeded Bermudagrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John B. Willis*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 435 Old Glade Road, Blacksburg, VA 24060
Daniel B. Ricker
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 435 Old Glade Road, Blacksburg, VA 24060
Shawn D. Askew
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 435 Old Glade Road, Blacksburg, VA 24060
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jbwillis@vt.edu

Abstract

Much research has evaluated herbicide safety on established bermudagrass turf, but information is lacking on seedling response to herbicides. Three field experiments were conducted in Blacksburg, VA, to assess turfgrass and smooth crabgrass response to selected sulfonylurea herbicides during seedling bermudagrass establishment. Herbicides injured bermudagrass 9 wk after treatment in the following order from most to least injurious: flazasulfuron = trifloxysulfuron > rimsulfuron > metsulfuron = sulfosulfuron > foramsulfuron. Herbicides applied 3 wk after seeding (WAS) were generally more injurious than when applied 1 WAS. Flazasulfuron and trifloxysulfuron-sodium controlled smooth crabgrass greater than 90% at 6 WAS, and metsulfuron and rimsulfuron suppressed smooth crabgrass 76 and 84%, respectively. Foramsulfuron, metsulfuron, and sulfosulfuron appear safe to apply 1 and 3 WAS, causing very little chlorosis and no reduction in turf cover. Rimsulfuron is injurious when applied at those timings; however, long-term cover is not reduced. Flazasulfuron and trifloxysulfuron-sodium are not safe to use 1 and 3 WAS unless weed pressure is extreme, and a delay in bermudagrass cover is acceptable.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, J., Taliaferro, C., and Martin, D. 2002. Freeze tolerance of bermudagrasses: Vegetatively propagated cultivars intended for fairway and putting green use, and seed-propagated cultivars. Crop Sci. 42:975977.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2004. Drive™ 75 DF herbicide product label. Research Triangle Park, NC BASF Corporation. 8. EPA Registration No. 7969-130.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2003. Monument™ 75 WG herbicide product label. Greensboro, NC Syngenta Crop Protection. 8. EPA Registration No. 100-1134.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2005. Quicksilver™ T&O herbicide label. Philadelphia FMC Corporation, Agricultural Products Group. 4. EPA Registration No. 279-3265.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Beam, J. B., and Barker, W. L. 2004. Weed Control during bermudagrass seedling establishment. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:117.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J., Unruh, J. B., Powell, A. J., and Davis, S. D. 2004. Warm-season turfgrass tolerance and weed control with ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:92.Google Scholar
Busey, P. 2004. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control with foramsulfuron in bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) turf. Weed Technol. 18:634640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christians, N. E. 2004. Fundamentals of Turfgrass Management, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ J. Wiley. 7585.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. H. and Diesburg, K. 2004. Turf Management in the Transition Zone. Hoboken, NJ J. Wiley. 259260.Google Scholar
Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 3738. in Camper, N.D. ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1972. Development of Cynodon dactylon . Weed Res. 12:207220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1987. Turfgrass species response to herbicides applied postemergence. Weed Technol. 1:305311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keese, R. D., Spak, D., and Sain, C. 2005. New tools for the golf course superintendent. U.S. Golf Assoc Green Sect. Rec. July/August:1618.Google Scholar
Martin, D. L., Bell, G. E., Baird, J. H., Taliaferro, C. M., Tisserat, N. A., Kuzmic, R. M., Dobson, D. D., and Anderson, J. A. 2001. Spring dead spot resistance and quality of seeded bermudagrasses under different mowing heights. Crop Sci. 41:451465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCalla, J. H., Richardson, M. D., Karcher, D. E., and Boyd, J. W. 2004. Tolerance of seedling bermudagrass to postemergence herbicides. Crop Sci. 44:13301336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, L. B. and Estes, A. J. 2007. Alternative dallisgrass control options without organic arsenicals. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:194.Google Scholar
McCarty, L. B. and Higingbottom, J. K. 2002. Evaluation of experimental sulfonylurea herbicides in turfgrass. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:5253.Google Scholar
McCarty, L. B., Miller, L. C., and Colvin, D. L. 1991. Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) cultivar response to diclofop, MSMA, and metribuzin. Weed Technol. 5:2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, S. M., Breeden, G. K., Yelverton, F. H., Gannon, T. W., Askew, S. D., and Derr, J. D. 2005. Response of four improved seeded bermudagrass cultivars to postemergence herbicides during seeded establishment. Weed Technol. 19:979985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, S. M., Yelverton, F. H., Gannon, T. W., and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Foliar vs. soil exposure of green kyllinga (Kyllinga brevifolia) and false-green kyllinga (Kyllinga gracillima) to postemergence treatments of CGA-362622, halosulfuron, imazaquin, and MSMA. Weed Technol. 18:145151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphree, T. A., Rodgers, C. A., Umeda, K., and Towers, G. W. 2006. Postemergent herbicide effects on establishment of seeded bermudagrass turf. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:110.Google Scholar
[NTEP] National Turfgrass Evaluation Program 2007. NTEP bermudagrass tests—Virginia. http://www.ntep.org. Accessed: February 28, 2007.Google Scholar
Patton, A. J., Hardebeck, G. A., Williams, D. W., and Reicher, Z. J. 2004. Establishment of bermudagrass and zoysiagrass by seed. Crop Sci. 44:21602167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. D., Karcher, D. E., Boyd, J. W., McCalla, J. H., and Landreth, J. W. 2005. July. Tolerance of ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass to MSMA tank-mixtures with postemergence herbicides during establishment from seed. Plant Management Network: Appl. Turfgrass Sci. [Online journal]. DOI:10.1094/ATS-2005-0718-01-RS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. A. and Moore, K. J. 1999. Switchgrass morphological development predicted from day of the year or degree day models. Agron. J. 91:732734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaver, B. R., Richardson, M. D., McCalla, J. H., Karcher, D. E., and Berger, P. J. 2006. Dormant seeding bermudagrass cultivars in a transition-zone environment. Crop Sci. 46:17871792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taliaferro, C. M., Martin, D. L., Anderson, J. A., Anderson, M. P., and Guenzi, A. C. 2004. Broadening the horizons of turf bermudagrass. U.S. Golf Assoc. Turfgrass Environ. Res. Online 3:19.Google Scholar
Warren, L. S., Gannon, T. W., and Yelverton, F. H. 2005. Efficacy of recently registered sulfonylurea herbicides for broadleaf weed control in warm season turf. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:115.Google Scholar
Willis, J. B., Compton, B. W., and Askew, S. D. 2007. Environmental influence on efficacy of flazasulfuron, foramsulfuron, and trifloxysulfuron for perennial ryegrass control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:162.Google Scholar