Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:07:01.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) Response to Simulated Drift from Selected Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kassim Al-Khatib
Affiliation:
N. W. Res. Ext. Cent., Wash. State Univ., Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
Robert Parker
Affiliation:
Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Cent., Wash. State Univ., Prosser, WA 99350
E. Patrick Fuerst
Affiliation:
Dep. Crop and Soils, Wash. State Univ., Pullman, WA 99163

Abstract

This study evaluated the response of sweet cherry to different herbicides applied at rates simulating drift. Chlorsulfuron, thifensulfuron, bromoxynil, 2,4-D, glyphosate, and a combination of 2,4-D and glyphosate were applied on one side of one- and two-year-old established cherry trees at 1/3, 1/10, 1/33, and 1/100 of the maximum rate for small grain production. The order of herbicide phytotoxicity was chlorsulfuron > 2,4-D > glyphosate > 2,4-D + glyphosate > thifensulfuron > bromoxynil. Trees recovered from injury caused by all treatments except higher rates of chlorsulfuron, 2,4-D, and glyphosate. The herbicides caused characteristic symptoms, but some resembled disease, mineral deficiency, and environmental stress symptoms. Therefore, any allegations about herbicide drift based on chronic symptoms should be supported by analysis of plant tissue.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, J. L. 1989. Effect of repeat annual applications of preemergence herbicides on sour cherry orchard weed control. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 42:209210.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1981. Mode of Action of Herbicides, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 525.Google Scholar
3. Clay, D. V. 1984. Evaluation of the tolerance of cherry and plum trees to root application of herbicides using a sand culture method. Aspects Appl. Biol. 8:7586.Google Scholar
4. Childers, N. F. 1973. Modern Fruit Science. 5th ed. Hort. Pub. New Brunswick, NJ. p. 413448.Google Scholar
5. Crip, C. M., Clay, D. V., and Atkinson, D. 1984. The safety and efficacy of some residual herbicides on young plum and cherry trees. Aspects Appl. Biol. 8:8799.Google Scholar
6. Hasslen, D. A. and McCall, J. 1990. Washington Agricultural Statistics. Washington Agriculture Statistics Service, Tumwater, Washington. p. 140.Google Scholar
7. Lange, A. H., Elmore, C. L., Fisher, B. B., Swanson, F. H., and Donaldson, D. R. 1973. Glyphosate for perennial weed control in trees and vines. Prog. Rep. MA-63, Univ. Calif. Ext. Serv. p. 20.Google Scholar
8. Lord, W. J., Murphy, M. L., and Green, D. W. 1975. Glyphosate phytotoxicity to clonal apple rootstocks and ‘McIntosh’ apple trees. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:319323.Google Scholar
9. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. W., Kutner, M. H. 1985. Residual analysis. p. 609615 in Applied Linear Statistical Models, Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Irwin, Inc., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
10. Putnam, A. R. 1976. Fate of glyphosate in deciduous fruit trees. Weed Sci. 24:425430.Google Scholar
11. Ogg, A. G. Jr., Ahmedullah, A. M., and Wright, G. M. 1991. Influence of repeated application of 2,4-D on yield and juice of Concord grapes (Vitis labruscana). Weed Sci. 39:284295.Google Scholar
12. Welker, W. V. and Monaco, T. J. 1989. Herbicide injury that resembles virus diseases. p. 238243 in Fridlund, P. R., ed. Virus and Viruslike Diseases of Pome Fruits and Simulating Noninfections Disorders. Co. Exten. Wash. State Univ. Pullman, WA.Google Scholar