Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:55:28.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Ground Water Monitoring Data for Pesticide Regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael R. Barrett ,
W. Martin Williams  and
David Wells
Michael R. Barrett
Affiliation:
U. S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC
W. Martin Williams
Affiliation:
Clendenin Consulting and Remediation Group, Leesburg, VA
David Wells
Affiliation:
U. S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Growing public concern for pesticide residues in drinking water has resulted in tighter federal and state regulations to prevent ground-water contamination. There are many uncertainties in estimating human exposure risk, yet standards are being set to protect human health. In the last several years, drinking water health standards have been developed for a number of pesticides, often at levels of a few μg L−1 or less. Ground-water monitoring studies, first required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in 1984, have now become an integral requirement to support registration of pesticides shown to have leaching potential. Regulators are now faced with deciding the extent to which pesticides can still be used while continuing to meet legal requirements to protect the public and preserve ground-water resources. The implications are that pesticide use may be severely limited in regions with ground-water resources considered especially vulnerable to contamination, dramatically affecting the type of agricultural practices and crops grown in these regions.

Keywords

Health Advisoryground-water contaminationleachingMaximum Contaminant Level
Type
Regulatory
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 238 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrett, M. R. and Williams, W. M. 1989. The occurrence of atrazine in groundwater as a result of agricultural use. p. 39–61 in: Weigmann, D. L., ed. Pesticides in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments—Proceedings of a Research Conference. Va. Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg.Google Scholar
2. Behl, E. and Eiden, C. A. 1991. Field-scale monitoring studies to evaluate mobility of pesticides in soils and groundwater. p. 27–47 in Nash, R. G. and Leslie, A. R., eds. Groundwater Residue Sampling Design Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 465, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
3. Cohen, S. Z., Creeger, S. M., Carsel, R. F., and Enfield, C. G. 1984. Potential pesticide contamination of groundwater from agricultural uses. p. 297–325 in Kruegar, R. F., and Seiber, J. N., eds. Treatment and Disposal of Wastes. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 259, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4. Cowell, S. E. and LeMasters, G. 1992. Follow Up to the Grade A Dairy Farm Well Water Survey. Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, Madison, WI. 23 p. plus appendix. PUBL-WR 301–92.Google Scholar
5. Creeger, S. M. 1986. Considering pesticide potential for reaching ground water in the registration of pesticides. p. 548–557 in Garner, W. Y., Honeycutt, R. C., and Nigg, H. N., eds. Evaluation of Pesticides in Ground Water. Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 315, Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
6. Hassett, Beth M., Cote, I., Bayard, S., and Ris, C. 1987. Qualitative and quantitative carcinogenic risk assessment p. 3–14 to 3–32, 5-1 to 5-7. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington. DCN No. 87-239-001-13–12; EPA 450/5-87-003.Google Scholar
7. Holden, L. R. and Graham, J. A. 1992. Results of the national alachlor well water survey. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26:935–943.Google Scholar
8. Holden, L. R., Whitmore, R. W., and Graham, J. A. 1988. The national alachlor well water survey: statistical design and current status. p. 237–254 in Natl. Water Well Assoc., ed. Proc. Agricultural Impacts on Ground Water—A Conference. Natl. Water Well Assoc., Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar
9. Holden, P. W. 1986. Pesticides and Ground Water Quality: Issues and Problems in Four States. National Research Council, National Academy Press, New York. 124 p.Google Scholar
10. Junk, G. A., Spalding, R. F., and Richard, J. J. 1980. Areal, vertical, and temporal differences in ground water chemistry: II. Organic constituents. J. Environ. Qual. 9:479–483.Google Scholar
11. Kross, B. C., Halberg, G. R., Bruner, D. R., Libra, R. D., Rex, K. D., Weih, L.M.B., Vermace, M. E., Burmeister, L. F., Hall, N. H., Cherryholmes, K. L., Johnson, J. K., Selim, M. I., Nations, B. K., Seigley, L. S., Quade, D. J., Dudler, A. G., Sesker, K. D., Culp, M. A., Lynch, C. F., Nicholson, H. F., and Hughes, J. P. 1990. p. 54 in The Iowa State-Wide Rural Well-Water Survey Water Quality Data: Initial Analysis. Iowa Dep. of Natural Resources, Des Moines. Tech. Inf. Ser. 19.Google Scholar
12. LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J. 1982. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
13. Lorber, M. N., Cohen, S. Z., Noren, S. E., and DeBuchananne, G. D. 1989. A national evaluation of the leaching potential of aldicarb: Part 1. An integrated assessment methodology. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 9: 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Lorber, M. N., Cohen, S. Z., and DeBuchananne, G. D. 1990. A national evaluation of the leaching potential of aldicarb: Part 2. An evaluation of ground water monitoring data. Ground Water Monit. Rev. 10:127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Mason, R. E., Piper, L. L., Alexander, W. J., Pratt, R. W., Liddle, S. K., Lessler, J. T., and Ganley, M. C. 1988. Pesticide Survey Pilot Evaluation Technical Report. Prepared by Research Triangle Institute for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Contract 68-01-7350.Google Scholar
16. McKenna, D. P., Chou, S.F.J., Griffin, R. A., Valkenburg, J., Spencer, L. L., and Gilkeson, J. L. 1988. Assessment of the occurrence of agricultural chemicals in groundwater in a part of Mason Country, Illinois. p. 389–406 in Natl. Water Well Assoc., ed. Proc. Agricultural Impacts on Ground Water Conference held March 21–23, 1988, Natl. Well Water Assoc., Dublin, OH.Google Scholar
17. Rao, P.S.C., Hornsby, A. G., and Jessup, R. E. 1985. Indices for ranking the potential for pesticide contamination of groundwater. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 44:1–8.Google Scholar
18. Richard, J. J., Junk, G. A., Avery, M. J., Nehring, N. L., Fritz, J. S., and Svec, H. J. 1975. Analysis of various Iowa waters for selected pesticides: atrazine, DDE, and dieldrin—1974. Pestic. Monit. J. 9:117–123.Google Scholar
19. Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., and Lichenstein, S. 1980. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. p. 181–216 in Schwig, R. C., and Albers, W. A., eds. Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough? Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
20. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Drinking Water Health Advisory: Pesticides. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI 819 p.Google Scholar
21. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Primary and secondary drinking water regulations: Proposed rule. Federal Register 54(87):22062–22160.Google Scholar
22. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1990. National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells Phase I Report. Office of Water and Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC. EPA 570/9-90-015.Google Scholar
23. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. Pesticides and Ground Water Strategy. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC. 78 p. EPA 21T-1022.Google Scholar
24. United States Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Another Look: National Survey of Pesticides in Drinking Water Wells Phase II Report. Office of Water and Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Environ. Prot. Agency, Washington, DC. EPA 579/09-91-020.Google Scholar
25. Wauchope, R. D., Buttler, T. M., Hornsby, A. G., Augustin-Beckers, P.W.M., and Burt, J. P. 1992. The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database for environmental decision-making. J. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. vol. 123. 164 p. Springer Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
26. Weaver, M. F., Cohen, S. Z., and Pignatello, J. J. 1988. Environmental chemistry of ethylene bromide. p. 169–190 in Natl. Water Well Assoc., ed. Agricultural Impacts on Ground Water—A Conference. Natl. Water Well Assoc., Dublin, OH.Google Scholar
27. Wehjte, G., Leavitt, J.R.C., Spalding, R. F., Mielke, L. N., and Schepers, J. S. 1981. Atrazine contamination of groundwater in the Platte River Valley of Nebraska from non-point sources. Sci. Total Environ. 21:47–51.Google Scholar
28. Williams, W. M., Holden, P. W., Parsons, D. W., and Lorber, M. N. 1988. Pesticides in Ground Water Data Base: 1988 Interim Report. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
29. Zaki, M. H., Moran, D., and Harris, D. 1982. Pesticides in groundwater: The aldicarb story in Suffolk County, NY. Am. J. Public Health 72: 1391–1395.Google Scholar