Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:25:28.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy by Dani Rodrik Princeton University Press, 2018

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2020

Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III
Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III*
Affiliation:
Doctoral School of Political Science, International Relations & Public Policy Central European University, Vienna, Austria
*
Email: Alcazar_Antonio@phd.ceu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 485 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For example, Rodrik raises the following questions (173): ‘Does the economy work better under laissez-faire or planning? Are economic growth and development more rapid under free trade or under protection? Does macroeconomic stability require Keynesian countercyclical policies or Hayekian nonintervention?’

2 The author cites, inter alia, the decision of the Japanese ruling class to promote industrialization and economic development in the post-Meiji restoration period (185) and the Chinese invention of special economic zones to participate in the global economy without full liberalization and whilst protecting state-owned enterprises (187).

3 Mazzucato, M. (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London and New York: Anthem Press.

4 Evans, P. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

5 Stiglitz, J. and Charlton, A. (2005) Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; Stiglitz, J. (2003) Globalization and its discontents. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company Ltd.

6 Streeck, W. (2014) ‘How will capitalism end?’ New Left Review 87: 35–64.

7 Gil-Pareja, S., Llorca-Vivero, R. and Martinez-Serrano, J.A. (2017) ‘The Effect of Nonreciprocal Preferential Trade Agreements on Benefactors’ Exports’. Empirical Economics 52(1): 143–154; Herz, B. and Wagner, M. (2011) ‘The Dark Side of the Generalized System of Preferences’. Review of International Economics 19(4): 763–775.

8 European Commission (2018) Mid-Term Evaluation of the EU's Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP). https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/October/tradoc_157434.pdf.

9 Young, A. (2015) ‘Liberalizing trade, not exporting rules: the limits to regulatory co-ordination in the EU's “new generation” preferential trade agreements’. Journal of European Public Policy 22(9): 1253–1275.

10 Meissner, K. and McKenzie, L. (2019) ‘The paradox of human rights conditionality in EU trade policy: when strategic interests drive policy outcomes’. Journal of European Public Policy 26(9): 1273–1291.

11 Hall, P. (2016) ‘The Euro Crisis and the Future of European Integration’. In Search of Europe. Madrid: BBVA, 47–67.

12 Wainright, J. and Mann, G. (2013) ‘Climate Leviathan’. Antipode 45(1): 1–22.