Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:44:50.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leishmania donovani development in Phlebotomus argentipes: comparison of promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2016

JOVANA SADLOVA*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
JITKA MYSKOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
TEREZA LESTINOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
JAN VOTYPKA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
MATTHEW YEO
Affiliation:
Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HTLondon, UK
PETR VOLF
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic. E-mail: sadlovaj@natur.cuni.cz

Summary

Leishmania parasites alternate in their life cycle between promastigote stages that develop in the gut of phlebotomine sand flies and amastigotes residing inside phagocytic cells of vertebrate hosts. For experimental infections of sand flies, promastigotes are frequently used as this way of infection is technically easier although ingestion of promastigotes by sand flies is unnatural. Here we aimed to answer a critical question, to what extent do promastigote-initiated experimental infections differ from those initiated with intracellular amastigotes. We performed side-by-side comparison of Leishmania development in Phlebotomus argentipes females infected alternatively with promastigotes from log-phase cultures or amastigotes grown ex vivo in macrophages. Early stage infections showed substantial differences in parasite load and representation of morphological forms. The differences disappeared along the maturation of infections; both groups developed heavy late-stage infections with colonization of the stomodeal valve, uniform representation of infective metacyclics and equal efficiency of transmission. The results showed that studies focusing on early phase of Leishmania development in sand flies should be initiated with intracellular amastigotes. However, the use of promastigote stages for sand fly infections does not alter significantly the final outcome of Leishmania donovani development in P. argentipes and their transmissibility to the vertebrate host.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

INTRODUCTION

Leishmania parasites (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae), causative agents of leishmaniases, alternate in their life cycle between intracellular amastigote stages in vertebrate hosts and extracellular promastigote forms in phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae). In sand flies, Leishmania undergo a complex development through several morphologically and functionally distinct forms (Bates, Reference Bates2007; Dostalova and Volf, Reference Dostalova and Volf2012). Sand fly females ingest blood containing macrophages infected with Leishmania amastigotes. In the abdominal midgut, the bloodmeal in engorged flies is encapsulated within the peritrophic matrix, a chitinous envelope secreted by midgut epithelial cells (Lehane, Reference Lehane1997). In this endoperitrophic space, amastigotes transform into procyclic promastigotes that multiply within the bloodmeal. During degeneration of the peritrophic matrix, procyclic promastigotes differentiate into elongated nectomonads, which escape into the ectoperitrophic space (Sadlova and Volf, Reference Sadlova and Volf2009). Nectomonads first attach to the midgut epithelium, preventing excretion via defecation by the sand fly, later moving anteriorly to the thoracic midgut. Here they give rise to leptomonads which multiply and produce promastigote secretory gel, which fills the thoracic midgut and plays significant role in parasite transmission (Stierhof et al. Reference Stierhof, Bates, Jacobson, Rogers, Schlein, Handman and Ilg1999; Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Chance and Bates2002). Finally, leptomonads either attach to the chitin layer of the stomodeal valve and differentiate into haptomonads or transform into small, highly motile infective metacyclics adapted for transmission to the next mammalian host (Sacks and Perkins, Reference Sacks and Perkins1985; Bates, Reference Bates2007).

Under laboratory conditions, either Leishmania amastigotes or promastigotes can be used for the initiation of experimental infection in sand flies. While promastigotes can be simply cultivated in vitro and infection is fast and uncomplicated, ingestion of promastigote forms by sand fly females is unnatural. In contrast, amastigote-initiated infections are more natural, but technically difficult and associated with ethical and safety concerns, which make their usage unfavourable. Assessing amastigote dose by direct feeding on infected hosts is difficult and those derived from organs of infected animals requires frequent animal sacrifice and are unavoidably contaminated with host material. Despite cultivation of axenic amastigote-like forms being relatively easy for some Leishmania species (Bates, Reference Bates1993; Gupta et al. Reference Gupta, Goyal and Rastogi2001), a large number of studies indicate considerable differences when comparing axenic amastigotes with intracellular ones on both genomic and proteomic levels (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, McMaster and Forney2006; Rochette et al. Reference Rochette, Raymond, Corbeil, Ouellette and Papadopoulou2009; Pescher et al. Reference Pescher, Blisnick, Bastin and Späth2011). For these reasons, the cultivation of amastigotes inside macrophages or macrophage-like cell lines is considered the best choice although it is relatively laborious and time consuming (Chang, Reference Chang1980).

In our study, we aimed to answer the crucial question; to what extent promastigote-initiated experimental infections in sand flies differ from those initiated with amastigotes? If the pattern of development does not differ significantly then infection via promastigotes would be legitimate. Direct comparisons between these two methods are scarce and effects of this factor on transmission potential have not been compared. There is only a single similar study on Leishmania infantum–Lutzomyia longipalpis parasite–vector model (Freitas et al. Reference Freitas, Parreiras, Duarte, Secundino and Pimenta2012) which was, however, performed using axenic amastigotes that may substantially differ from intracellular ones due to the loss of important factors during a long-term in vitro culture (Pescher et al. Reference Pescher, Blisnick, Bastin and Späth2011). Here we compared Leishmania donovani infection in its natural vector Phlebotomus argentipes using culture form promastigotes and amastigotes grown ex vivo in bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMM). We published previously (Pruzinova et al. Reference Pruzinova, Sadlova, Seblova, Homola, Votypka and Volf2015) that the Ethiopian L. donovani strain (GR374) used in the present study develops similarly in both African and Indian vector species – Phlebotomus orientalis and Phlebotomus argentipes, respectively. Additionally, for the first time, the transmission potential of parasites to the vertebrate host was assessed which is the most significant marker of successful Leishmania development in the vector.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sand flies and Leishmania

A laboratory colony of P. argentipes (originating from India) was maintained in the insectary of the Charles University in Prague under standard conditions (at 26 °C fed on 50% sucrose with a 14 h light/10 h dark photoperiod) as described previously (Volf and Volfova, Reference Volf and Volfova2011).

Amastigote Leishmania stages were grown in BMMs differentiated from precursor cells of BALB/c mice in the presence of L929 fibroblast cell culture supernatant as a source of macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF). Leishmania donovani (MHOM/ET/2010/GR374) promastigotes transfected with green fluorescence protein as described in Sadlova et al. (Reference Sadlova, Yeo, Seblova, Lewis, Mauricio, Volf and Miles2011) were cultured in M199 medium (Sigma) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibson) supplemented with 1% BME vitamins (Basal Medium Eagle, Sigma), 2% sterile urine, 250 µg mL−1 amikacin (Amikin, Bristol-Myers Squibb) and 150 µg mL−1 selective antibiotic G 418 (Sigma). Macrophages were exposed to stationary-phase parasites at a parasite-to-macrophage ratio of eight promastigotes to one macrophage. Both infected and uninfected macrophages were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma) containing 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum), 20% L929 cell culture supernatant, 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Sigma), 2 mm of L-glutamine (Sigma) and 0·05 mm of β-mercapto-ethanol at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

Sand fly infections

To obtain amastigote stages, L. donovani were co-cultivated with BMM for 72 h and non-internalized parasites were removed by washing 3–5 times with preheated culture medium. Numbers of amastigotes per macrophages were counted by fluorescent microscopy of live macrophages. The infected macrophages were removed from the culture plates using trypsin–EDTA solution (Sigma), centrifuged at 300  g for 10 min and resuspended in heat-inactivated rabbit blood for sand fly infections at the concentration of 106 amastigotes mL−1.

For promastigote-initiated infections, promastigotes from log-phase cultures (day 3–4 post-inoculation) were resuspended in heat-inactivated rabbit blood at concentration of 106 promastigotes mL−1.

Sand fly females (5–9 days old) were pooled and infected by feeding through a chick-skin membrane either on amastigote- or on promastigote-containing suspension. Engorged sand flies were maintained under standard conditions. Females were dissected at days 1, 2, 4 and 8 post bloodmeal (PBM), and the abundance and location of Leishmania infections in the sand fly digestive tract was examined by fluorescent microscopy. Parasite loads were graded as light (<100 parasites per gut), moderate (100–500 parasites per gut) and heavy (>500 parasites per gut) based on Myskova et al. (Reference Myskova, Votypka and Volf2008). Experiments were performed in duplicate.

Transmission by bite and collection of samples for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR)

BALB/c mice were offered to experimentally infected P. argentipes at various time intervals PBM (from days 7–10 PBM). Sand flies (usually 10 females) were placed in a cage (20 × 20 cm2) and allowed to feed on the single mouse anaesthetized with ketamin/xylazin (150 mg and 15 mg kg−1, respectively) for approximately 1 h. Location of biting of each feeding female was recorded by drawing into the schematic picture of mouse body and engorged flies were collected by an aspirator immediately after terminating their bloodmeal. After exposure, mice were sacrificed by injecting them an overdose of ketamin/xylazin and localized tissue excised at the bite location. For sand flies which moved during the feeding, all feeding places were collected into one pooled sample. All samples (skin biopsies and corresponding fed sand flies) were stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction for qPCR.

qPCR

Extraction of total DNA from rodent tissues and sand flies was performed using a DNA tissue isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The qPCR for detection and quantification of Leishmania parasites was performed in Bio-Rad iCycler & iQ Real-Time PCR Systems using the SYBR Green detection method (iQ SYBR Green Supermix, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as described previously (Myskova et al. Reference Myskova, Votypka and Volf2008) using the kinetoplast primers (forward primer 5′-CTTTTCTGGTCCTCCGGGTAGG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-CCACCCGGCCCTATTTTACACCAA-3′) (Mary et al. Reference Mary, Faraut, Lascombe and Dumon2004).

Morphometry of parasites

Midgut smears of sand flies infected with L. donovani were fixed with methanol, stained with Giemsa, examined by light microscopy with an oil immersion objective and photographed (Olympus DP70). Body length, flagellar length and body width of 120 randomly selected promastigotes from four females/smears were measured for each time-point PBM and both modes of infection using Image-J software. Four morphological forms were distinguished (Fig. 1), based on the criteria of Sadlova et al. (Reference Sadlova, Price, Smith, Votypka, Volf and Smith2010) and Rogers et al. (Reference Rogers, Chance and Bates2002): (a) procyclic promastigotes, PP, flagellum < body length and body length < 14 µm, present before defecation; (b) elongated nectomonads, EN, body length ⩾14 µm; (c) metacyclic promastigotes, MP, flagellar length >2 times body length and body length < 14 µm, present post defecation, and (d) short promastigotes, SP, body length <14 µm and flagellar length ⩽2 times body length. The term ‘short promastigotes’ is derived from the terminology of Walters (Reference Walters1993) (short nectomonad promastigotes), which is the older synonym of leptomonads (leptomonad promastigotes) proposed by Rogers et al. (Reference Rogers, Chance and Bates2002). Haptomonads were not distinguished in this study as they may remain attached to the gut and can be underrepresented on gut smears.

Fig. 1. Morphological forms of L. donovani distinguished in this study based on criteria described in the Materials and Methods section. Parasites from midgut smears of infected sand flies were fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. (A) Procyclic promastigote; (B) short promastigote; (C) elongated nectomonad; (D) metacyclic promastigote. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Statistical analysis

Differences in intensities of infections, percentage of morphological forms found in infected flies and transmission efficiency were applied to Chi-square (χ 2) tests. Differences between parasite loads, in sand flies and mice tissues respectively, were tested by non-parametric Mann–Whitney test. All statistical analysis was performed with the statistical software package SPSS version 23.

Animal experimentation guidelines

Animals were maintained and handled in the animal facility of Charles University in Prague in accordance with institutional guidelines and Czech legislation (Act No. 246/1992 and 359/2012 coll. on Protection of Animals against Cruelty in present statutes at large), which complies with all relevant European Union and international guidelines for experimental animals. Female BALB/c mice were housed in standard plastic T3 cages (Velaz) in groups of six animals with ad libitum access to water and complete feed mixture ST-1 (Velaz). All the experiments were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Laboratory Experiments of the Charles University in Prague and were performed under permissions no. MSMT-31114/2013-13 and MSMT-10270/2015-6 of the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic. Investigators are certificated for experimentation with animals by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Minimum numbers of animals to produce statistically reproducible results were used.

RESULTS

Development of parasites in P. argentipes females

During the first four days PBM, infections initiated with amastigote forms of L. donovani showed significantly lower intensity than promastigote-initiated ones (Fig. 2). The difference was most pronounced in very early infection, while infections initiated with promastigotes progressed quickly (72% of females showed heavy infection by 24 h PBM), ingested amastigotes underwent a substantial reduction in numbers before parasite load increased (only 2% of females showed heavy infections at 24 h PBM).

Fig. 2. Infection rates (percent of females infected) and intensities of L. donovani infections in P. argentipes. Parasite load was estimated by fluorescent microscopy: light infections, <100 parasites per gut; moderate infections, 100–500 parasites per gut; heavy infections, >500 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are shown above bars. PRO, promastigote-initiated infections; AMA, amastigote-initiated infections; PBM, post bloodmeal. Differences between groups were evaluated using Chi-square test: day 1 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ 2 = 65·737, d.f. = 3; day 2 PBM, P = 0·021, χ 2 = 9·743, d.f. = 3; day 4 PBM, P = 0·036, χ 2 = 8·518, d.f. = 3; days 8–9 PBM, P = 0·203, χ 2 = 1·6202, d.f. = 1.

Morphological differences between parasites in both groups were also most significant at 24 h PBM: procyclic promastigotes were most abundant in amastigote-initiated infections while short promastigotes dominated in promastigote-initiated infections (Fig. 3). By day 2 PBM, increased prevalence of elongated nectomonads in both groups was observed while procyclic forms were still present only in amastigote-initiated infections. Following sand fly defecation by day 4 PBM no substantial morphological differences were detected (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Morphological forms of L. donovani during development in P. argentipes. The guts of infected females were sampled at 1, 2, 4 and 8–9 days PBM and parasite morphometry was determined as described in methods. The percentage of each form found in infected flies at each time point is shown. PRO, promastigote-initiated infections; AMA, amastigote-initiated infections; PBM, post bloodmeal; PP, procyclic promastigotes; EN, elongated nectomonads; SP, short promastigotes; MP, metacyclic promastigotes. Differences between groups were tested by Chi-square test: day 1 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ 2 = 68·115, d.f. = 3, day 2 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ 2 = 22·581, d.f. = 3, day 4 PBM, P = 0·058, χ 2 = 5·707, d.f. = 2, day 8–9 PBM, P = 0. 034, χ 2 = 6·786, d.f. = 2.

Interestingly, localization of infections did not differ significantly. In both groups, leishmania development was rapid; parasites escaped from the endoperitrophic space within 24 h PBM, by 48 h PBM parasites had reached the thoracic midgut, including cardia region and by day 4 PBM colonized the stomodeal valve in more than 60% of sand flies in both groups (Figs 4 and 5).

Fig. 4. Location of L. donovani in infected P. argentipes. AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; SV, stomodeal valve. Differences between groups were evaluated using χ 2 test: day 1 PBM, P = 0·134, χ 2 = 2·247, d.f. = 1; day 2 PBM, P = 0·436, χ 2 = 1·661, d.f. = 2; day 4 PBM, P = 0·616, χ 2 = 0·970, d.f. = 2; day 8–9 PBM, P = 0·473, χ 2 = 1·497, d.f. = 2.

Fig. 5. Images from fluorescent microscope showing amastigote-initiated (A) and promastigote-initiated (B) L. donovani infections in P. argentipes females by day 4 PBM. Parasites (transfected with GFP) are present in both abdominal and thoracic parts of the midgut and the stomodeal valve is colonized. AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; SV, stomodeal valve. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Late-stage development of parasites showed only minor differences between amastigote- and promastigote-initiated infections. All mature infections (by days 8–9 PBM) had heavy parasite load, including colonization of the stomodeal valve in more than 80% of sand flies in both groups (Figs 2, 4). Elongated nectomonads prevailed in amastigote-initiated infections, but short promastigotes in promastigote-initiated infections, however differences in presence of metacyclic promastigotes between the groups were insignificant (Fig. 3; P = 0·518, χ 2 = 0·417, d.f. = 1).

Transmission by bite on BALB/c mice

The qPCR proved that in both sand fly groups, more than 70% of females allowed a second feed on mice were infected with Leishmania parasites (Table 1) and that parasite loads in sand flies did not differ significantly between the groups (N = 117, Mann–Whitney U = 1600·0, Z = −0·369, P = 0·712). From Leishmania-positive flies, 42 and 56% delivered parasites into the skin of the mice in promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections, respectively. This apparent difference in transmission efficiency is not statistically significant (P = 0·270, χ 2 = 1·750, d.f. = 1). Numbers of parasites detected in mice tissues by qPCR were slightly higher in the group where sand flies were infected with amastigotes, but not statistically significant (Mann–Whitney U = 138·0, Z = −1·695, P = 0·090).

Table 1. Transmission efficiency of Leishmania donovani on BALB/c mice using Phlebotomus argentipes females

Parasite numbers were detected using qPCR.

DISCUSSION

The results show that mature infections of L. donovani in P. argentipes initiated with promastigotes did not differ significantly from amastigote initiated infections in the context of parasite load, colonization of the stomodeal valve, presence of infective metacyclic stages and transmission efficiency. In both the compared groups, the development of L. donovani was rapid; parasites escaped from the endoperitrophic space before 24 h PBM and reached the cardia by day 2 PBM with colonization of the stomodeal valve by day 4 PBM. This rapid progress is typical for P. argentipes and is caused by very fast bloodmeal digestion followed by degradation of the peritrophic matrix and defecation of blood remnants by day 3 PBM (Pruzinova et al. Reference Pruzinova, Sadlova, Seblova, Homola, Votypka and Volf2015). In contrast there was a pronounced difference between promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections observed during the first days PBM in both morphology of parasites and kinetics of population growth. Therefore, the use of promastigotes is not recommended for studies on early-stage Leishmania development in sand flies.

As expected, both experimental groups differed in the context of morphological forms in early-stage sand fly infections. While procyclic promastigotes prevailed in amastigote-initiated infection, short promastigotes were predominant in promastigote-initiated infection. However, elongated nectomonads appeared at the same rate in both groups. Interestingly, localization of infections in sand fly midguts did not differ between the groups, as for example in the rate of parasite escape from the peritrophic matrix into the ectoperitrophic space of the abdominal midgut. The fact that the peritrophic matrix was degraded at the same time in both groups, independently of the prevailing parasite forms present, confirms previous findings on Leishmania majorPhlebotomus duboscqi interactions where a ‘sit and wait strategy’ was proposed for Leishmania parasites in natural vectors (Sadlova and Volf, Reference Sadlova and Volf2009) and supports the idea that this process is mediated by sand-fly derived chitinases (Ramalho-Ortigão and Traub-Csekö, Reference Ramalho-Ortigão and Traub-Csekö2003; Ramalho-Ortigão et al. Reference Ramalho-Ortigão, Kamhawi, Joshi, Reynoso, Lawyer, Dwyer, Sacks and Valenzuela2005) and not substantially influenced by the parasite itself.

In amastigote-initiated infection, substantial reduction of parasite numbers was initially observed, followed by recovery and number increase. The average blood volume ingested by P. argentipes females feeding through a chick skin membrane on rabbit blood was 0·6 µL (Pruzinova et al. Reference Pruzinova, Sadlova, Seblova, Homola, Votypka and Volf2015), representing an initial inoculum of about 600 parasites. However, initial numbers of parasites in amastigote-initiated infections were <500 in 98% of females falling to <100 in 39% of females by 24 h PBM (>80% reduction). The early reduction of parasite numbers in infections initiated with lesion-derived amastigotes has been repeatedly described in Leishmania mexicana-infected L. longipalpis (reduction to 88 and 66% by 6 and 24 h PBM, respectively (Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Chance and Bates2002) or reduction to 98–99% during the first 24 h PBM (Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Hajmova, Joshi, Sadlova, Dwyer, Volf and Bates2008) and in L. major-infected P. papatasi [almost 50% reduction by 4 h PBM (Pimenta et al. Reference Pimenta, Modi, Pereira, Shahabuddin and Sacks1997)]. This loss of parasites has been attributed to early attack by digestive proteases in the sand fly gut (Borovsky and Schlein, Reference Borovsky and Schlein1987; Schlein and Jacobson, Reference Schlein and Jacobson1998).

The course of the experimental sand fly infections is influenced with the amount of parasites in the initial infective dose. Although in natural vectors even 1–2 parasites are sufficient for successful establishment of infection (Seblova et al. Reference Seblova, Volfova, Dvorak, Pruzinova, Votypka, Kassahun, Gebre-Michael, Hailu, Warburg and Volf2013; Pruzinova et al. Reference Pruzinova, Sadlova, Seblova, Homola, Votypka and Volf2015) higher infective doses, which are commonly used, are more efficient in producing higher infection rates in sand flies (Anjili et al. Reference Anjili, Langat, Lugalia, Mwanyumba, Ngumbi, Mbati, Githure and Tonui2006; Seblova et al. Reference Seblova, Volfova, Dvorak, Pruzinova, Votypka, Kassahun, Gebre-Michael, Hailu, Warburg and Volf2013; Pruzinova et al. Reference Pruzinova, Sadlova, Seblova, Homola, Votypka and Volf2015). Higher initial doses of L. major promastigotes are known to increase parasite loads in P. duboscqi and result in a higher percentage of metacyclic forms and increased transmission frequency with more severe pathology in mice (Maia et al. Reference Maia, Seblova, Sadlova, Votypka and Volf2011).

Stamper et al. (Reference Stamper, Patrick, Fay, Lawyer, Elnaiem, Secundino, Debrabant, Sacks and Peters2011) showed that percentage of metacyclics in sand flies is one of the most important parameters predicting successful Leishmania transmission to the host. In the same study, authors did not find difference in frequency of metacyclics between L. major promastigote- and amastigote-infected P. duboscqi. Accordingly, our experiments with L. donovani showed similar numbers of metacyclic forms in mature infections as well as comparable transmission efficiency in amastigote- and promastigote-initiated P. argentipes infections. Different results were reported with late stage infections of L. infantum chagasi in L. longipalpis (Freitas et al. Reference Freitas, Parreiras, Duarte, Secundino and Pimenta2012). Here metacyclics were 10 times less represented in amastigote-initiated infections compare to promastigote-initiated infection. However, in this case axenic amastigotes were used and efficiency of transmissions on the host was not evaluated. Axenic amastigotes are not adequate alternative to intracellular amastigotes (Holzer et al. Reference Holzer, McMaster and Forney2006; Rochette et al. Reference Rochette, Raymond, Corbeil, Ouellette and Papadopoulou2009; Pescher et al. Reference Pescher, Blisnick, Bastin and Späth2011). The study provided by Pescher et al. (Reference Pescher, Blisnick, Bastin and Späth2011) revealed important differences in intracellular survival and animal infection of axenic L. donovani amastigotes compared with host-derived ones. Axenic amastigotes differed in cell size and other attributes like expression of the A2 protein representing amastigote-specific marker (Charest and Matlashewski, Reference Charest and Matlashewski1994) responsible for protection of L. donovani from a variety of stresses (McCall and Matlashewski, Reference McCall and Matlashewski2012). Axenic amastigotes were less resistant to nutritional stress compared with splenic-derived ones, which resulted in strong attenuation in establishment of hamster infection (Pescher et al. Reference Pescher, Blisnick, Bastin and Späth2011).

Importantly the transmission efficiency in our experiments was comparable for both modes of infection (42 and 56% in promastigote and amastigote initiated infections, respectively). Previous experiments with L. infantum suggest that the transmission rate is to a large degree influenced by the parasite species or even strain. Using the same methodologies Maia et al. (Reference Maia, Seblova, Sadlova, Votypka and Volf2011) demonstrated that 58% of Phlebotomus perniciosus and 65% of L. longipalpis transmitted L. infantum CUK3 strain, while only 33% of P. perniciosus and 14% of L. longipalpis transmitted L. infantum IMT373 strain. Additionally, the number of transmitted parasites has been reported as highly variable among individual females in several Leishmania/vector combinations; females typically transmit tens or hundreds of leishmania parasites but some individuals can deliver several thousand parasites (Warburg & Schlein, Reference Warburg and Schlein1986; Kimblin et al. Reference Kimblin, Peters, Debrabant, Secundino, Egen, Lawyer, Fay, Kamhawi and Sacks2008; Maia et al. Reference Maia, Seblova, Sadlova, Votypka and Volf2011). In the current study, however, all the females transmitted <600 parasites, we did not find individuals transmitting exceptionally high parasite load.

We conclude that regardless of the early decline in abundance of parasites in amastigote initiated infections and initial differences in representation of morphological forms, the L. donovani development ultimately results in equivalent pattern of infections in both experimental groups. Following defecation by female sand flies we did not find any significant differences in either course of infections or in the representation of metacyclics. Most importantly, sand flies of both experimental groups transmitted equivalent numbers of parasites to mammalian hosts. In summary, using promastigote stages for experimental infections of sand flies does not significantly alter the final outcome of leishmanial development in the vector and can be recommended for this purpose as the most technically convenient and appropriate method. However, for studies concerning early stage infection and development in sand flies (e.g. resistance of Leishmania to proteolytic enzymes or their escape from the peritrophic matrix), intracellular amastigotes are recommended for initiation of infections.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Helena Kulikova, Lenka Zitkova and Jana Glogarova for their invaluable technical expertise and administrative support.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This study was funded by Czech Science Foundation GACR (grant number 13-07 500S). J.M. was partially supported by project UNCE 204017/2012.

References

REFERENCES

Anjili, C., Langat, B., Lugalia, R., Mwanyumba, P., Ngumbi, P., Mbati, P. A., Githure, J. and Tonui, W. K. (2006). Estimation of the minimum number of Leishmania major amastigotes required for infecting Phlebotomus duboscqi (Diptera: Psychodidae). East African Medical Journal 83, 6871.Google ScholarPubMed
Bates, P. A. (1993). Axenic culture of Leishmania amastigotes. Parasitology Today 9, 143146.Google Scholar
Bates, P. A. (2007). Transmission of Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by phlebotomine sand flies. International Journal for Parasitology 37, 10971106.Google Scholar
Borovsky, D. and Schlein, Y. (1987). Trypsin and chymotrypsin-like enzymes of the sandfly Phlebotomus papatasi infected with Leishmania and their possible role in vector competence. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 1, 235242.Google Scholar
Chang, K. P. (1980). Human cutaneous leishmania in a mouse macrophage line: propagation and isolation of intracellular parasites. Science 209, 12401242.Google Scholar
Charest, H. and Matlashewski, G. (1994). Developmental gene expression in Leishmania donovani: differential cloning and analysis of an amastigote-stage-specific gene. Molecular and Cellular Biology 14, 29752984.Google Scholar
Dostalova, A. and Volf, P. (2012). Leishmania development in sand flies: parasite–vector interactions overview. Parasites & Vectors 5, 276.Google Scholar
Freitas, V. C., Parreiras, K. P., Duarte, A. P., Secundino, N. F. and Pimenta, P. F. (2012). Development of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum chagasi in its natural sandfly vector Lutzomyia longipalpis . The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 606612.Google Scholar
Gupta, N., Goyal, N. and Rastogi, A. K. (2001). In vitro cultivation and characterization of axenic amastigotes of Leishmania . Trends in Parasitology 17, 150153.Google Scholar
Holzer, T. R., McMaster, W. R. and Forney, J. D. (2006). Expression profiling by whole-genome interspecies microarray hybridization reveals differential gene expression in procyclic promastigotes, lesion-derived amastigotes, and axenic amastigotes in Leishmania mexicana . Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 146, 198218.Google Scholar
Kimblin, N., Peters, N., Debrabant, A., Secundino, N., Egen, J., Lawyer, P., Fay, M. P., Kamhawi, S. and Sacks, D. (2008). Quantification of the infectious dose of Leishmania major transmitted to the skin by single sand flies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 1012510130.Google Scholar
Lehane, M. J. (1997). Peritrophic matrix structure and function. Annual Review of Entomology 42, 525550.Google Scholar
Maia, C., Seblova, V., Sadlova, J., Votypka, J. and Volf, P. (2011). Experimental transmission of Leishmania infantum by two major vectors: a comparison between a viscerotropic and a dermotropic strain. PLoS Neglected Tropical Disieses 5, e1181.Google Scholar
Mary, C., Faraut, F., Lascombe, L. and Dumon, H. (2004). Quantification of Leishmania infantum DNA by a real-time PCR assay with high sensitivity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42, 52495255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCall, L. I. and Matlashewski, G. (2012). Involvement of the Leishmania donovani virulence factor A2 in protection against heat and oxidative stress. Experimental Parasitology 132, 109115.Google Scholar
Myskova, J., Votypka, J. and Volf, P. (2008). Leishmania in sand flies: comparison of quantitative polymerase chain reaction with other techniques to determine the intensity of infection. Journal of Medical Entomology 45, 133138.Google Scholar
Pescher, P., Blisnick, T., Bastin, P. and Späth, G. F. (2011). Quantitative proteome profiling informs on phenotypic traits that adapt Leishmania donovani for axenic and intracellular proliferation. Cellular Microbiology 13, 978991.Google Scholar
Pimenta, P. F., Modi, G. B., Pereira, S. T., Shahabuddin, M. and Sacks, D. L. (1997). A novel role for the peritrophic matrix in protecting Leishmania from the hydrolytic activities of the sand fly midgut. Parasitology 115, 359369.Google Scholar
Pruzinova, K., Sadlova, J., Seblova, V., Homola, M., Votypka, J. and Volf, P. (2015). Comparison of bloodmeal digestion and the peritrophic matrix in four sand fly species differing in susceptibility to Leishmania donovani . PLoS ONE 10, e0128203.Google Scholar
Ramalho-Ortigão, J. M. and Traub-Csekö, Y. M. (2003). Molecular characterization of Llchit1, a midgut chitinase cDNA from the leishmaniasis vector Lutzomyia longipalpis . Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33, 279287.Google Scholar
Ramalho-Ortigão, J. M., Kamhawi, S., Joshi, M. B., Reynoso, D., Lawyer, P. G., Dwyer, D. M., Sacks, D. L. and Valenzuela, J. G. (2005). Characterization of a blood activated chitinolytic system in the midgut of the sand fly vectors Lutzomyia longipalpis and Phlebotomus papatasi . Insect Molecular Biology 14, 703712.Google Scholar
Rochette, A., Raymond, F., Corbeil, J., Ouellette, M. and Papadopoulou, B. (2009). Whole-genome comparative RNA expression profiling of axenic and intracellular amastigote forms of Leishmania infantum . Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 165, 3247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, M. E., Chance, M. L. and Bates, P. A. (2002). The role of promastigote secretory gel in the origin and transmission of the infective stage of Leishmania mexicana by the sandfly Lutzomyia longipalpis . Parasitology 124, 495507.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. E., Hajmova, M., Joshi, M. B., Sadlova, J., Dwyer, D. M., Volf, P. and Bates, P. A. (2008). Leishmania chitinase facilitates colonization of sand fly vectors and enhances transmission to mice. Cellular Microbiology 10, 13631372.Google Scholar
Sacks, D. L. and Perkins, P. V. (1985). Development of infective stage Leishmania promastigotes within phlebotomine sand flies. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 34, 456459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlein, Y. and Jacobson, R. L. (1998). Resistance of Phlebotomus papatasi to infection with Leishmania donovani is modulated by components of the infective bloodmeal. Parasitology 117, 467473.Google Scholar
Seblova, V., Volfova, V., Dvorak, V., Pruzinova, K., Votypka, J., Kassahun, A., Gebre-Michael, T., Hailu, A., Warburg, A. and Volf, P. (2013). Phlebotomus orientalis sand flies from two geographically distant Ethiopian localities: biology, genetic analyses and susceptibility to Leishmania donovani . PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2187.Google Scholar
Stamper, L. W., Patrick, R. L., Fay, M. P., Lawyer, P. G., Elnaiem, D. E., Secundino, N., Debrabant, A., Sacks, D. L. and Peters, N. C. (2011). Infection parameters in the sand fly vector that predict transmission of Leishmania major . PLoS Neglected Tropical Disieses 5, e1288.Google Scholar
Stierhof, Y. D., Bates, P. A., Jacobson, R. L., Rogers, M. E., Schlein, Y., Handman, E. and Ilg, T. (1999). Filamentous proteophosphoglycan secreted by Leishmania promastigotes forms gel-like three-dimensional networks that obstruct the digestive tract of infected sandfly vectors. European Journal of Cell Biology 78, 675689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadlova, J. and Volf, P. (2009). Peritrophic matrix of Phlebotomus duboscqi and its kinetics during Leishmania major development. Cell and Tissue Research 337, 313325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadlova, J., Price, H. P., Smith, B. A., Votypka, J., Volf, P. and Smith, D. F. (2010). The stage-regulated HASPB and SHERP proteins are essential for differentiation of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major in its sand fly vector, Phlebotomus papatasi . Cellular Microbiology 12, 17651779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadlova, J., Yeo, M., Seblova, V., Lewis, M. D., Mauricio, I., Volf, P. and Miles, M. A. (2011). Visualisation of Leishmania donovani fluorescent hybrids during early stage development in the sand fly vector. PLoS ONE 6, e19851.Google Scholar
Volf, P. and Volfova, V. (2011). Establishment and maintenance of sand fly colonies. Journal of Vector Ecology 36, S1S9.Google Scholar
Walters, L. L. (1993). Leishmania differentiation in natural and unnatural sand fly hosts. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 40, 196206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warburg, A. and Schlein, Y. (1986). The effect of post-bloodmeal nutrition of Phlebotomus papatasi on the transmission of Leishmania major . The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 35, 926930.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Morphological forms of L. donovani distinguished in this study based on criteria described in the Materials and Methods section. Parasites from midgut smears of infected sand flies were fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. (A) Procyclic promastigote; (B) short promastigote; (C) elongated nectomonad; (D) metacyclic promastigote. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Infection rates (percent of females infected) and intensities of L. donovani infections in P. argentipes. Parasite load was estimated by fluorescent microscopy: light infections, <100 parasites per gut; moderate infections, 100–500 parasites per gut; heavy infections, >500 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are shown above bars. PRO, promastigote-initiated infections; AMA, amastigote-initiated infections; PBM, post bloodmeal. Differences between groups were evaluated using Chi-square test: day 1 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ2 = 65·737, d.f. = 3; day 2 PBM, P = 0·021, χ2 = 9·743, d.f. = 3; day 4 PBM, P = 0·036, χ2 = 8·518, d.f. = 3; days 8–9 PBM, P = 0·203, χ2 = 1·6202, d.f. = 1.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Morphological forms of L. donovani during development in P. argentipes. The guts of infected females were sampled at 1, 2, 4 and 8–9 days PBM and parasite morphometry was determined as described in methods. The percentage of each form found in infected flies at each time point is shown. PRO, promastigote-initiated infections; AMA, amastigote-initiated infections; PBM, post bloodmeal; PP, procyclic promastigotes; EN, elongated nectomonads; SP, short promastigotes; MP, metacyclic promastigotes. Differences between groups were tested by Chi-square test: day 1 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ2 = 68·115, d.f. = 3, day 2 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ2 = 22·581, d.f. = 3, day 4 PBM, P = 0·058, χ2 = 5·707, d.f. = 2, day 8–9 PBM, P = 0. 034, χ2 = 6·786, d.f. = 2.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Location of L. donovani in infected P. argentipes. AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; SV, stomodeal valve. Differences between groups were evaluated using χ2 test: day 1 PBM, P = 0·134, χ2 = 2·247, d.f. = 1; day 2 PBM, P = 0·436, χ2 = 1·661, d.f. = 2; day 4 PBM, P = 0·616, χ2 = 0·970, d.f. = 2; day 8–9 PBM, P = 0·473, χ2 = 1·497, d.f. = 2.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Images from fluorescent microscope showing amastigote-initiated (A) and promastigote-initiated (B) L. donovani infections in P. argentipes females by day 4 PBM. Parasites (transfected with GFP) are present in both abdominal and thoracic parts of the midgut and the stomodeal valve is colonized. AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; SV, stomodeal valve. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5

Table 1. Transmission efficiency of Leishmania donovani on BALB/c mice using Phlebotomus argentipes females