Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:36:48.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recurrent Abducens Palsy in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2020

Sanskriti Sasikumar*
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Chantal Roy-Hewitson
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
Caroline Geenen
Affiliation:
Markham Stouffville Hospital, Markham, Ontario, Canada
Dale Robinson
Affiliation:
Markham Stouffville Hospital, Markham, Ontario, Canada St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Felix Tyndel
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Sanskriti Sasikumar, Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, St. Michael’s Hospital 30 Bond St., 3 Shuter, Office 3-040 (3rd floor), Toronto, OntarioM5B 1W8, Canada. Email: sanskriti.sasikumar@mail.utoronto.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated demyelinating and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. The relapsing-remitting phenotype of MS is characterized by episodic relapses with complete or near-complete recovery between events. Oculomotor disorders can present as isolated events in MS relapses, most commonly as internuclear ophthalmoplegia, gaze-evoked nystagmus, and saccadic hypermetria.Reference Niestroy, Rucker and Leigh1 Isolated cranial nerve palsies, however, are rare. In a study of 1489 individuals with MS, isolated cranial nerve palsies were the presenting symptom in 14 patients, and the only sign of disease relapse in 10 patients.Reference Thömke, Lensch, Ringel and Hopf2 The abducens nerve is the third most commonly affected cranial nerve (1–1.6%), after the trigeminal (4.8%) and facial (3.7%) nerves.Reference Barr, Kupersmith, Turbin, Bose and Roth3,Reference Bet-Shlimon and Etienne4 To our knowledge, there are no accounts of recurrent abducens palsy in the MS population. We report a case of recurrent, isolated left abducens palsy in relapsing-remitting MS.

A 51-year-old woman presented with horizontal binocular diplopia, worse on leftward gaze. She has had 12, stereotyped episodes like this in the past 6 years, with near-complete recovery between episodes. However, there has been an accumulation of deficit after her most recent two episodes. Occasionally, the diplopia is preceded by 1–2 days of ipsilateral or holocephalic headaches that she describes as an aching, 7/10 pain that is accompanied by nausea. On examination, she had a left head turn and left eye esotropia of 18 prism diopters in primary gaze. Left eye abduction was limited to 80% of normal. Pupils were symmetrical to light and accommodation, visual fields were intact to confrontation, visual acuity was 20/20 (corrected with glasses), and fundoscopy revealed normal optic discs and retinas. Facial movement and sensation were symmetrical bilaterally. The tongue was midline and the palate elevated equally. On motor exam, bulk and tone were normal. Power was 5/5 in all major muscle groups. Reflexes were diffusely hyperreflexic (3+). Plantar response was flexor. Sensory examination was intact to pin-prick, vibration, and proprioception. There were no cerebellar signs or involuntary movements. Her gait was narrow-based, with normal velocity and stride length. Tandem gait was intact. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was 2.

She was diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS 3 years after the onset of the diplopic episodes. The diagnosis was made based on multiple clinical episodes of abducens palsy over 6 years (dissemination in time), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealing multifocal punctate T2 lesions in the brain (periventricular, juxtacortical, and infratentorial) and cervical spinal cord (fulfilling the criteria for dissemination in space), as well as cerebrospinal fluid positivity for oligoclonal bands (77). Over the course of her care, we had considered the diagnosis of recurrent painful ophthalmoplegic neuropathy (previously known as ophthalmoplegic migraine), but this is a diagnosis of exclusion and was dismissed after disseminated radiological lesions and oligoclonal bands suggested a diagnosis of MS instead. Tolosa–Hunt syndrome was another possibility but pain, when present, preceded ophthalmoplegia, repeated MRI did not reveal pathology in the cavernous sinus, and there was no clinical improvement with corticosteroid therapy offered at initial presentation.

Anti-nuclear antibodies, rheumatoid factor, and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were negative. Inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein) were normal. Visual-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials were normal. Vascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension) were absent. She had no other medical conditions. Her mother had had rheumatoid arthritis. There were no MRI lesions corresponding to possible localizations of a left abducens palsy. Despite subclinical radiological progression of demyelination, her EDSS score remained at 2. She was prescribed minocycline, but because of severe headache and recurrence of diplopia, she stopped the medication after 1 week. She declined further disease-modifying therapy.

The abducens nerve is susceptible to injury at several points: within the pons, as it exits the pons anteriorly, traverses the subarachnoid space, passes through Dorello’s canal underneath the petroclinoid ligament, enters the cavernous sinus, and enters the orbit. In addition to demyelination, it is susceptible to vascular injury, compression by tumor, changes in intracranial pressure, infection, and neoplastic infiltration.Reference Elder, Hainline, Galetta, Balcer and Rucker5 However, recurrent isolated abducens palsy narrows the etiology further. In a retrospective review of 782 patients, aged >50 years, with chronic, recurrent abducens nerve palsy, 57% had structural lesions of the petrous apex and cavernous sinus, 14.29% had recurrent painful ophthalmoplegic neuropathy, 14.29% had an internal carotid artery aneurysm, and 14.29% had microvascular disease.Reference Chan and Albretson6 Recurrent abducens palsy has also been reported in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.Reference Al-Bustani and Weiss7 Because of focal demyelination, an MRI brain is a useful tool to detect associated features such as cranial nerve hypertrophy, contrast enhancement, or signal change.Reference Kuwabara, Nakajima, Matsuda and Hattori8

The case discussed here is unique for several reasons. The patient’s clinical relapses manifested only as recurrent left abducens nerve palsy, despite radiological progression of MS lesions. She had no features associated with the horizontal binocular diplopia apart from an occasional tension headache that would disappear with the onset of her oculomotor symptoms. Her diplopia would then resolve without intervention over the course of several weeks, albeit longer with each relapse. Multiple MRIs of her brain, with and without gadolinium, did not demonstrate demyelination along the path of the abducens nerve, nor did it reveal any smaller pontine lesions that could otherwise explain her presentation. However, only one MRI scan was obtained during a relapse.

This case demonstrates recurrent isolated abducens nerve palsy as a rare presentation of MS relapse and shows that although spontaneous recovery is possible, disability may accumulate over time. In the absence of MRI evidence of demyelination, it is a diagnosis of exclusion and patients need to be worked up for other pathologies.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Statement of Authorship

SS: execution and write-up of first draft of the manuscript; CR-H: reviewing the manuscript; CG: reviewing the manuscript; DR: reviewing the manuscript; FT: conception of research subject and reviewing the manuscript.

References

Niestroy, A, Rucker, JC, Leigh, RJ. Neuro-ophthalmologic aspects of multiple sclerosis: using eye movements as a clinical and experimental tool. Clin Ophthalmol. 2007;1(3):267.Google ScholarPubMed
Thömke, F, Lensch, E, Ringel, K, Hopf, HC. Isolated cranial nerve palsies in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63(5):682–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, D, Kupersmith, MJ, Turbin, R, Bose, S, Roth, R. Isolated sixth nerve palsy: an uncommon presenting sign of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2000;247(9):701–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bet-Shlimon, S, Etienne, M. Isolated abducens palsy as the first presenting sign of multiple sclerosis. Case Rep Neurol. 2016;8(3):272–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder, C, Hainline, C, Galetta, SL, Balcer, LJ, Rucker, JC. Isolated abducens nerve palsy: update on evaluation and diagnosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16(8):69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, JW, Albretson, J. Causes of isolated recurrent ipsilateral sixth nerve palsies in older adults: a case series and review of the literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Bustani, N, Weiss, MD. Recurrent isolated sixth nerve palsy in relapsing-remitting chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;17(1):1821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuwabara, S, Nakajima, M, Matsuda, S, Hattori, T. Magnetic resonance imaging at the demyelinative foci in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology. 1997;48(4):874–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed