Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:45:16.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antimicrobial susceptibility and genetic characteristics of Haemophilus influenzae isolated from patients with respiratory tract infections between 1987 and 2000, including β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2006

L. QIN
Affiliation:
Department of Social Environment Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
H. WATANABE*
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
N. ASOH
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
K. WATANABE
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
K. OISHI
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
T. MIZOTA
Affiliation:
Department of Social Environment Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
T. NAGATAKE
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr H. Watanabe, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan. (Email: h-wata@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of five antibiotics and the presence of resistance genes was determined in 163 Haemophilus influenzae isolates collected over 13 years (1987–2000) in four two-yearly sampling periods from patients with respiratory tract infections. The prevalence of β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-susceptible strains was approximately 80% over the sampling period although fewer strains (65·9%) were recovered in the period 1995–1997. TEM-1 type β-lactamase-producing strains were less frequent starting at 15·6% and declining to 2·2% in the final sampling period. Low-β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) strains were uncommon in 1987–1989 (2·2%), peaked to 19·5% in 1995–1997, but fell back to 11·1% by 2000. Fully BLNAR strains were not detected until the last sampling period (6·7%). The MICs of ampicillin, levofloxacin, cefditoren and ceftriaxone remained stable but there was an eight-fold increase in the MIC of cefdinir over the sampling period. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA digests showed that three representative BLNAR strains were genetically distinct and 11 DNA profiles were identified among 17 low-BLNAR strains. These data suggest that the number of genetically altered BLNAR and low-BLNAR strains are increasing in Japan.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Haemophilus influenzae can cause a variety of infections, including otitis media, bronchitis, pneumonia and meningitis [Reference Murphy and Apicella1, Reference Saito2]. In the past, the activity of two β-lactamases, TEM-1 and ROB-1, accounted for almost all isolates with decreased susceptibility to ampicillin [Reference Felmingham and Washington3]. At present, the global prevalence of β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) H. influenzae remains low [Reference Karlowsky4, Reference Hoban and Felmingham5], but the proportion of clinical BLNAR isolates is rapidly increasing, and has now reached more than 20% in Japan [Reference Suzuki, Nishimura and Baba6]. The characteristics of antimicrobial resistance of these strains are a serious concern for clinical prescribing. BLNAR strains have a resistance mechanism that decreases the affinity of ampicillin for penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) [Reference Ubukata7]. The resistance phenotypes are classified according to substitutions at three positions of the ftsI gene which mediates septal peptidoglycan sysnthesis allowing the classification of strains as BLNAR or low-BLNAR by PCR [Reference Hasegawa8].

In total, 163 strains of H. influenzae were isolated from sputum from patients with respiratory tract infections in Nagasaki University and its affiliated hospitals. These strains were selected at random and were divided into four groups, 45 strains between 1987 and 1989, 32 between 1991 and 1993, 41 between 1995 and 1997, and 45 between 1998 and 2000. Strains were capsule typed by slide agglutination with antisera (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) and β-lactamase production was detected using a nitrocefin-impregnated disk (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of five antibiotics was determined by the agar dilution method according to the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [9]. The antibiotics were: ampicillin (Meiji Seika Kaisha, Tokyo, Japan), levofloxacin (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo), cefditoren (Meiji Seika Kaisha), cefdinir (Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo) and ceftriaxone (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo).

PCR was performed to identify resistance genes using a multiplex assay as described previously [Reference Hasegawa8]. Four sets of primers were obtained from Wakunaga Pharmaceutical Co. (Hiroshima, Japan): P6 primers to amplify the P6 gene which encodes the P6 membrane protein specific for H. influenzae; TEM-1 primers to amplify a part of the bla TEM-1 gene; PBP3-S primers to identify an Asn526→Lys amino-acid substitution in the ftsI gene; and PBP3-BLN primers to identify an Asn526→Lys and Ser385→Thr amino-acid substitution in the ftsI gene.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed as described previously [Reference Yano10] using SmaI digestion (Takara Shuzo Co., Shiga, Japan) and electrophoresis in a CHEF Mapper PFGE system (Bio-Rad Life Science Group, Hercules, CA, USA) was carried out at 6 V/cm with switch times of 0·47 and 63 s, and a run-time of 20 h. After staining with ethidium bromide, the interpretation of PFGE patterns was based on the criteria described by Tenover et al. [Reference Tenover11]. Briefly, PFGE patterns were classified into four groups: identical in profile=indistinguishable; 1–3 bands difference=closely related; 4–6 bands difference=possibly related; and >7 bands difference=different.

The Table shows that of the 45 strains isolated from 1987 to 1989, 37 (82·2%) were classified as β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-susceptible (BLNAS) strains, seven strains produced TEM-1-type β-lactamase and were ampicillin resistant (BLPAR) and one strain was classified as low-BLNAR by PCR. The proportion of BLNAS strains fell in the ensuing two sampling periods but recovered in the final time period to 80%. The frequency of BLPAR strains fluctuated from 15·6% in the initial period through 6·3% and 12·2% to 2·2% in the final sampling period. Similar variation was observed for low-BLNAR strains with just 2·2% of strains expressing this phenotype in the first period but rising to almost 20% in the third period before falling back to 11%. Three BLNAR strains (6·7%) were detected only in the fourth sampling period. The respective MIC80 values (μg/ml) for the four periods against the strain collection is also shown in the Table. The NCCLS susceptibility/resistant break-points for H. influenzae are 1 μg/ml for ampicillin, 2 μg/ml for levofloxacin, 1 μg/ml for cefdinir, and 2 μg/ml for ceftriaxone. The MIC of ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefditoren and levofloxacin remained constant or within one doubling concentration over the years but resistance to cefdinir increased by eight-fold over the sampling period (Table).

Table. Annual changes of the prevalence of each resistance class and antimicrobial susceptibility to five antibiotics

a β-lactamase-negative ampicillin susceptible strains.

b β-lactamase-producing ampicillin-resistant (TEM-1 type) strains.

c Low β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains.

d β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains.

e Ampicillin.

f Ceftriaxone.

g Cefdinir.

h Cefditoren.

i Levofloxacin.

The three BLNAR strains gave distinct DNA profiles in PFGE while 11 profiles were distinguished among the 17 low-BLNAR strains. Two of these profiles exhibited some similarities to profiles found in fully BLNAR strains. Three pairs of strains each exhibited similar patterns and four strains were grouped within the same pattern (Fig.). All but two of the 20 strains were non-typable with capsular antisera.

Fig. PFGE patterns of SmaI-digested DNA from three BLNAR and 17 low-BLNAR H. influenzae strains. Lanes 1–3, BLNAR strains; lanes 4–20, low-BLNAR strains. Coding of the PFGE patterns depicting group and subgroups and serotype status. N, Non-typable.

H. influenzae is one of the important pathogens associated with respiratory tract infections and thus acquisition of antimicrobial resistance raises concern. The prevalence of BLNAR strains was reported to be 2·4% in the United States between 2002 and 2003 [Reference Heilmann12], 1·3% in France in 1999 [Reference Dabernat13], and 9·3% in Spain between 1998 and 1999 [Reference Marco14]. Nevertheless, their global prevalence remains relatively low. However, BLNAR strains are spreading rapidly with increasing frequency in Japan with reported prevalence rates of 14·9% between 1996 and 1997 [Reference Seki15], and 23·1% between 1998 and 1999 [Reference Suzuki, Nishimura and Baba6], although BLNAR was identified by only MIC in these reports. We report here a prevalence of BLNAR strains of 6·7% by PCR between 1998 and 2000. An understanding of the characteristics of antimicrobial resistance of H. influenzae, especially BLNAR strains, is important not only for prescribing clinicians but also for formulation of practicable chemotherapy guidelines. Although H. influenzae strains are generally susceptible to the early cephalosporins [Reference Hoban and Felmingham5, Reference Heilmann12], the BLNAR and low-BLNAR strains recovered here showed a marginal increase in MIC to two of the three cephalosporins tested and an eight-fold increase in MIC of cefdinir which is consistent with a previous report from Japan [Reference Suzuki, Nishimura and Baba6].

PFGE of DNA macrorestriction fragments is a sensitive fingerprinting method for H. influenzae and this method was used by Karlowsky et al. [Reference Karlowsky4] to demonstrate clonal dissemination of BLNAR strains in the United States between 2000 and 2001. However, the BLNAR and low-BLNAR strains found here displayed a variety of genetic backgrounds. It has previously been reported that H. influenzae, including resistant strains, can be transmitted at day-care centres or in the home [Reference Dabernat13, Reference Watanabe16], and this may be one reason for the spread of BLNAR strains in Japan. We did observe that some low-BLNAR strains isolated from different patients had similar PFGE patterns and therefore must consider that such strains could potentially spread in a community. Ongoing monitoring of H. influenzae resistance determinants is thought to be important and may help to predict how this organism responds to current antimicrobial regimens [Reference Rennie and Ibrahim17]. Despite the limitations of this pilot study, particularly the small sample size, it shows the value of surveillance of antimicrobial resistance levels and their genetic determinants in H. influenzae and further surveys specifically of BLNAR strains in the wider Japanese community should be undertaken to inform antimicrobial prescribing policy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Akihiro Wada (Department of Bacteriology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Japan), Chieko Shimauchi (Miyazaki Prefectural Nursing University, Japan) and Matsuhisa Inoue (Kitasato University School of Medicine, Japan) for their help in completing the PFGE studies. The study was supported by U.S.–Japan Cooperative Medical Science Program, Acute Respiratory Infections Panel.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Murphy, TF, Apicella, MA. Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: a review of clinical aspects, surface antigens, and the human immune response to infection. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1987; 9: 115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Saito, M, et al. . Clonal spread of an invasive strain of Haemophilus influenzae type b among nursery contacts accompanied by a high carriage rate of non-disease-associated strains. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2000; 49: 845847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Felmingham, D, Washington, J. Trends in the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial respiratory tract pathogens – findings of the Alexander Project 1992–1996. Journal of Chemotherapy 1999; 11: 521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Karlowsky, JA, et al. . Antimicrobial surveillance of Haemophilus influenzae in the United States during 2000–2001 leads to detection of clonal dissemination of a beta-lactamase-negative and ampicillin-resistant strain. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2002; 40: 10631066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hoban, D, Felmingham, D. The PROTEKT surveillance study: antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis from community-acquired respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2003; 50: 4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Suzuki, K, Nishimura, T, Baba, S. Current status of bacterial resistance in the otolaryngology field: results from the Second Nationwide Survey in Japan. Journal of Incfection and Chemotherapy 2003; 9: 4652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Ubukata, K, et al. . Association of amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3 with beta-lactam resistance in beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2001; 45: 16931699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Hasegawa, K, et al. . Rapidly increasing prevalence of β-lactamase-nonproducing, ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae type b in patients with meningitis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2004; 48: 15091514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1998.Google Scholar
10. Yano, H, et al. . Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of nasopharyngeal flora in children attending a day care center. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2000; 38: 625629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Tenover, FC, et al. . Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1995; 33: 22332239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Heilmann, KP, et al. . Decreasing prevalence of beta-lactamase production among respiratory tract isolates of Haemophilus influenzae in the United States. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2005; 49: 25612564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Dabernat, H, et al. . Haemophilus influenzae carriage in children attending French day care centers: a molecular epidemiological study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 16641672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Marco, F, et al. . Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,730 Haemophilus influenzae respiratory tract isolates in Spain in 1998–1999. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2001; 45: 32263228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Seki, H, et al. . Increasing prevalence of ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae in children in Japan. Chemotherapy 1999; 45: 1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Watanabe, H, et al. . Possible high rate of transmission of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae, including β-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains, between children and their parents. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2004; 42: 362365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Rennie, RP, Ibrahim, KH. Antimicrobial resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: how can we prevent the inevitable? Commentary on antimicrobial resistance in H. influenzae based on data from the TARGETed surveillance program. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2005; 41 (Suppl. 4): S234S238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table. Annual changes of the prevalence of each resistance class and antimicrobial susceptibility to five antibiotics

Figure 1

Fig. PFGE patterns of SmaI-digested DNA from three BLNAR and 17 low-BLNAR H. influenzae strains. Lanes 1–3, BLNAR strains; lanes 4–20, low-BLNAR strains. Coding of the PFGE patterns depicting group and subgroups and serotype status. N, Non-typable.