Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 June 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Seneca's CharactersFictional Identities and Implied Human Selves, pp. 350 - 373Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Abrahamsen, L. (1999) ‘Roman Marriage Law and the Conflict of Seneca’s Medea’ QUCC 62: 107–21.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. (1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. D. Heller-Roazen. Stanford.Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. A. (1998) ‘Seneca’s Thyestes and the Poetics of Multiple Transgression’ Hellenika 48: 231–53.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. (1986) Seneca: Trojan Women. Translated and with an Introduction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. (2008) Two Faces of Oedipus. Sophocles’ Oedipus Tyrannus and Seneca’s Oedipus. Translated and with an Introduction. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Armisen-Marchetti, M. (1989) Sapientiae facies: étude sur les images de Sénèque. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmis, E. (1990) ‘Seneca’s “On the Happy Life” and Stoic Individualism’ Apeiron 23: 219–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aygon, J.-P. (2016) Ut scaena, sic vita: mise en scène et dévoilement dans les oeuvres philosophiques et dramatiques de Sénèque. Paris.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. (2002) ‘Matricide Revisited: Dramatic and Rhetorical Allusion in Tacitus, Suetonius and Cassius Dio’ Anticthon 30: 30–40.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1993) ‘Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion in Ovid’s Heroides’ HSCPh 95: 333–65.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2009) ‘Exemplarity: Between Practice and Text’ in Maes, Y., Papy, J., and Verbaal, W. (eds) Appropriation and Latin Literature. Latinitas Perennis vol. 2. Leiden: 41–62.Google Scholar
Baroin, C. (2010) ‘Remembering One’s Ancestors, Following in their Footsteps, Being Like Them: The Role and Forms of Family Memory in the Building of Identity’ in Dasen, V. and Späth, T. (eds) Children, Memory, and Family Identity in Roman Culture. Oxford: 19–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, W. S. (1964) Euripides: Hippolytos. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1972) ‘The Face of Garbo’ in Barthes, R Mythologies. Trans. A Lavers. London: 61–3.Google Scholar
Barton, T. (1994) ‘The inventio of Nero: Suetonius’ in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds) Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 48–63.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, S. (2009) ‘Senecan Metaphor and Stoic Self-Instruction’ in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds) Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: 188–217.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S., and Wray D. (eds) Seneca and the Self. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bassi, K. (2017) ‘Mimêsis and Mortality: Reperformance and the Dead among the Living in Hecuba and Hamlet’ in Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds) Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. Cambridge: 138–59.Google Scholar
Beare, W. (1945) ‘Plays for Performance and Plays for Recitation: A Roman Contrast’ Hermathena 65: 8–19.Google Scholar
Bell, S. (2008) ‘Introduction: Role Models in the Roman World’ in Bell, S (ed.) Role Models in the Roman World: Identity and Assimilation. Memoirs of the American Academy at Rome Supplementary Volume 7: 1–39.Google Scholar
Bellardi, G. (1974) ‘Gli exitus illustrium virorum e il l. XVI degli Annali tacitani’ A&R 19: 129–37.Google Scholar
Belsey, C. (1985) The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama. London.Google Scholar
Benton, C. (2002) ‘Split Vision: The Politics of the Gaze in Seneca’s Troades’ in Fredrick, D. (ed.) The Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body. Baltimore: 31–56.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1983) ‘L’arcobaleno, l’incesto e l’enigma: a proposito dell’Oedipus di Seneca’ Dioniso 54: 137–53.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1984) ‘Lettura divinatoria di un incesto (Seneca Oed. 366ss.)’ MD 12: 145–59.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1996) ‘Guardarsi in faccia a Roma. Le parole dell’apparenza fisica nella cultura Latina’ Parolechiave 10–11: 175–95.Google Scholar
Bexley, E. M. (2011) ‘Show or Tell? Seneca’s and Sarah Kane’s Phaedra Plays’ TIC 3: 365–93.Google Scholar
Bexley, E. M. (2016) ‘Doubtful Certainties: The Politics of Reading in Seneca’s Oedipus’ in Mitsis, P. and Ziogas, I. (eds) Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin: 355–76.Google Scholar
Bexley, E. M. (2017) ‘Double Act: Reperforming History in the Octavia’ in Hunter, R. and Uhlig, A. (eds) Imagining Reperformance in Ancient Culture: Studies in the Traditions of Drama and Lyric. Cambridge: 160–83.Google Scholar
Bieber, M. (1954) ‘Wurden die Tragödien des Seneca in Rom aufgeführt?’ Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 60–61: 100–6.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, M. (1999) Seneca Hercules. Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar. Leiden.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. D. (1972) ‘Seneca’s Troades: Dissolution of a Way of Life’ RhM 115: 329–37.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. D. (1985) Seneca’s Daggered Stylus: Political Code in the Tragedies. Königstein.Google Scholar
Blau, H. (1982/3) ‘Universals of Performance; or, Amortizing Play’ SubStance 37–38: 140–61.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1983) ‘Hic Epulis Locus: The Tragic Worlds of Seneca’s Agamemnon and Thyestes’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick: 199–228.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1985) ‘In Nature’s Bonds: A Study of Seneca’s Phaedra’ ANRW 32.2: 1284–1347.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1987) Seneca’s Phaedra. Introduction, Text, Translation, and Notes. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1994) Seneca’s Troades. Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leeds.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1997) Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. London/New York.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2008) Octavia: Attributed to Seneca. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford/New York.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2011) Seneca: Oedipus. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford/New York.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2014) Seneca: Medea. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford/New York.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (2017) Seneca: Thyestes. Edited with Introduction, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford/New York.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. (2007) ‘Physiognomy and Ancient Psychological Theory’ in Swain, S. (ed.) Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford: 19–124.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1970) ‘The Rhetoric and Psychology of Power in the Dramas of Seneca’ Arion 9: 5–41.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1984) ‘Senecan Tragedy and the Renaissance’ Illinois Classical Studies 9: 277–92.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1985) Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege. New Haven/London.Google Scholar
Braden, G. (1990) ‘Herakles and Hercules: Survival in Greek and Roman Tragedy (with a Coda on King Lear)’ in Scodel, R. (ed.) Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor: 245–64.Google Scholar
Braun, L. (1982) ‘Sind Senecas Tragödien Bühnenstücke oder Rezitationsdramen?’ RPL 5: 43–52.Google Scholar
Brower, R. A. (1971) Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Greco-Roman Heroic Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Büchner, K. (1967) Studien zur römischen Literatur, 6: Resultate römischen Lebens in römischen Schriftwerken. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Burchell, D. (1998) ‘Civic Personae: MacIntyre, Cicero and Moral Personality’ History of Political Thought 19: 101–18.Google Scholar
Busch, A. (2007) ‘Versane natura est? Natural and Linguistic Instability in the Extispicium and Self-Blinding of Seneca’s Oedipus’ CJ 102: 225–67.Google Scholar
Cairns, D (2011) ‘Veiling Grief on the Tragic Stage’ in Munteanu, D. (ed.) Emotion, Genre and Gender in Classical Antiquity. London: 15–33.Google Scholar
Calabrese, E. (2017) Aspetti dell’identità relazionale nelle tragedie di Seneca. Bologna.Google Scholar
Calder, W. M. (1983) ‘Secreti Loquimur: an Interpretation of Seneca’s Thyestes’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick: 184–98.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. M. (2019) ‘Medea’s Sol-Ipsism: Language, Power, and Identity in Seneca’s Medea’ Ramus 48: 22–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cancik, H. (1998) ‘Persona and Self in Stoic Philosophy’ in Baumgarten, A. I., Assman, J., and Stroumsa, G. G. (eds) Self, Soul and Body in Religious Experience. Leiden: 335–46.Google Scholar
Castagna, E. (1991) ‘Storia e storiografia nel pensiero di Seneca’ in Setaioli, A. (ed.) Seneca e la cultura. Naples: 91–117.Google Scholar
Cattin, A. (1956) ‘L’âme humaine et la vie future dans les texts lyriques des tragédies de Sénèque’ Latomus 15: 359–65 and 544–50.Google Scholar
Cave, T. (2008) ‘Singing with Tigers: Recognition in Wilhelm Meister, Daniel Deronda, and Nights at the Circus’ in Kennedy, P. F and Lawrence, M (eds) Recognition: The Poetics of Narrative. Interdisciplinary Studies on Anagnorisis. New York: 115–34.Google Scholar
Chatman, S. (1978) Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. J. (1996) ‘Monster Culture (Seven Theses)’ in Cohen, J. J (ed.) Monster Theory: Reading Culture. Minneapolis: 3–25.Google Scholar
Connors, C. (1994) ‘Famous Last Words: Authorship and Death in the Satyricon and Neronian Rome’ in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds) Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. London: 225–35.Google Scholar
Costa, C. D. N. (1973) Seneca: Medea: Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coupland, J., and Gwyn, R. (2003) ‘Introduction’ in Coupland, J. and Gwyn, R (eds) Discourse, the Body, and Identity. Basingstoke: 1–16.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. (2011) ‘Sinon and the Case of the Hypermetric Oracle’ Phoenix 65: 361–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R. (2013) ‘Haven’t I Seen You before Somewhere? Optical Allusions in Republican Tragedy’ in Harrison, G. and Liapis, V. (eds) Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre. Leiden: 311–42.Google Scholar
Croisille, J. M. (1964) ‘Le Personnage de Clytemnestre dans l’Agamemnon de Sénèque’ Latomus 23: 464–72.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. London.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. (1983) ‘Vindicat Omnes Natura Sibi: A Reading of Seneca’s Phaedra’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays in Senecan Drama. Berwick: 114–27.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. (1991) ‘Fate and Human Responsibility in Seneca’s Oedipus’ Latomus 50: 150–63.Google Scholar
Davis, P. J. (2012) ‘Reception of Elegy in Augustan and Post-Augustan Poetry’ in Gold, B. K. (ed.) A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, MA: 443–58.Google Scholar
DeBrohun, J. B. (2017) ‘Tragic Contaminatio and Polluted Sacrifice in Seneca’s Oedipus’ Ramus 46: 35–57.Google Scholar
Degl’Innocenti, Pierini, R. (2014) ‘Freedom in Seneca: Some Reflections on the Relationship between Philosophy and Politics, Public and Private Life’ in Wildberger, J. and Colish, M. L. (eds) Seneca Philosophus. Berlin: 167–87.Google Scholar
De Temmerman, K. (2014) Crafting Characters: Heroes and Heroines in the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford.Google Scholar
Docherty, T. (1983) Reading (Absent) Character: Towards a Theory of Characterization in Fiction. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, E. (2010) ‘Rending Others: Ethical contagio in Seneca’s Thyestes’ Museion 10: 45–68.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, E. (2011) ‘Performing the “Unperformable” Extispicy Scene in Seneca’s Oedipus Rex’ Didaskalia 8.27: 179–84.Google Scholar
Dodson-Robinson, E. (2019) Revenge, Agency, and Identity from European Drama to Asian Film. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. 2012. ‘“You Must Change Your Life”: Metaphor and Exemplum, Theory and Practice, in Seneca’s Prose’ Helios 39.2: 45–92.Google Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1952) The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton.Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. (2007) The Ghosts of the Past: Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Duff, J. W. (1964) A Literary History of Rome in the Silver Age: from Tiberius to Hadrian. New York.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. (1995) Les monstres de Sénèque: Pour une dramaturgie de la tragédie romaine. Paris.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. (1990) ‘Constructing Character in Greek Tragedy’ in Pelling, C. (ed.) Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford: 83–99.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. (1993) ‘Gods on Stage in Greek tragedy’ in Dalfen, J., Petersmann, G., and Schwarz, F. F. (eds) Religio Graeco-Romana: Festschrift für Walter Pötscher. Grazer Beiträge Suppl. 5. Graz: 77–86.Google Scholar
Easterling, P. (1997) ‘Form and Performance’ in Easterling, P (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy. Cambridge: 151–77.Google Scholar
Eder, J., Jannidis, F., and Schneider, R. (2010) ‘Characters in Fictional Worlds: An Introduction’ in Eder, J, Jannidis, F., and Schneider, R (eds) Characters in Fictional Worlds: Understanding Imaginary Beings in Literature, Film, and Other Media. Berlin: 3–58.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997a) ‘Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca’s Letters’ G&R 44: 23–38.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997b) ‘Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome’ in Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. (eds) Roman Sexualities. Princeton: 66–95.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2002) ‘Acting and Self-Actualisation in Imperial Rome: Some Death Scenes’ in Easterling, P. and Hall, E. (eds) Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession Cambridge: 377–94.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2009) ‘Free Yourself! Slavery, Freedom, and the Self in Seneca’s Letters’ in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds) Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: 139–59.Google Scholar
Egermann, F. (1972) [1940] ‘Seneca als Dichterphilosoph’ in Lefèvre, E (ed.) Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: 33–57.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1999a) [1927] ‘Seneca in Elizabethan Translation’ in Eliot, T. S. Selected Essays. London: 65–105.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1999b) [1927] ‘Shakespeare and the Stoicism of Seneca’ in Eliot, T. S. Selected Essays. London: 126–40.Google Scholar
Faber, R. A. (2007) ‘The Description of the Palace in Seneca’s Thyestes 641–82 and the Literary Unity of the Play’ Mnemosyne 60: 427–42.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1982) Seneca’s Troades. A Literary Introduction with Text, Translation, and Commentary. Princeton.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1986) ‘Andromache’s Child in Euripides and Seneca’ in Cropp, M., Fantham, E., and Scully, S. E. (eds) Greek Tragedy and its Legacy. Essays presented to D. J. Conacher. Calgary: 267–80.Google Scholar
Ferri, R. (1998) ‘Octavia’s Heroines: Tacitus Annales 14.63–4 and the Praetexta Octavia’ HSCPh 98: 339–56.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (1979) ‘Pectus o nimium ferum: Act V of Seneca’s Hercules’ Hermes 107: 240–8.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (1981) ‘Sense-Pauses and Relative Dating in Seneca, Sophocles and Shakespeare’ AJP 102: 289–307.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (1987) Seneca’s Hercules. A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G. (2000) ‘Playing Seneca?’ in Harrison, G. M. W (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 1–12.Google Scholar
Fitch, J. G., and McElduff, S. (2002) ‘Construction of the Self in Senecan Drama’ Mnemosyne 55.1: 18–40.Google Scholar
Flemming, R. (2005) ‘Suicide, Euthanasia and Medicine: Reflections Ancient and Modern’ Economy and Society 34: 295–321.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (1995) ‘Fabulae praetextae in Context: When Were Plays on Contemporary Subjects Performed in Republican Rome?’ CQ 45: 170–90.Google Scholar
Fortey, S., and Glucker, J. (1975) ‘Actus Tragicus: Seneca on the Stage’ Latomus 34: 699–715.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1986) The Care of the Self. The History of Sexuality: 3. Trans. R. Hurley. London.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. (2003) Literary Character: The Human Figure in Early English Writing. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Frank, M. (1995) ‘The Rhetorical Use of Family Terms in Seneca’s Oedipus and Phoenissae’ Phoenix 49: 121–30.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2007) ‘A Notion of a Person in Epictetus’ in Scaltsas, T. and Mason, A. S. (eds) The Philosophy of Epictetus. Oxford/New York: 153–68.Google Scholar
Fyfe, H. (1983) ‘An Analysis of Seneca’s Medea’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays in Senecan Drama. Berwick: 77–93.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (1972) The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garber, M. (1988) Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality. New York.Google Scholar
Gärtner, H. A. (1974) Cicero und Panaitios: Beobachtungen zu Ciceros De officiis. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Geiger, J. (1979) ‘Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger’ Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2007) Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, and Ovid’s ‘Ars Amatoria’ BICS Suppl. London.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1987) ‘Two Monologues of Self-Division: Euripides, Medea 1021–80 and Seneca, Medea 893–977’ in Whitby, M., Whitby, M, and Hardie, P. (eds) Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol: 25–37.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1988) ‘Personhood and Personality: The Four-Personae Theory in Cicero De Officiis 1’ OSAPh 6: 169–99.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1994) ‘Peace of Mind and Being Yourself: Panaetius to Plutarch’ ANRW II.36.7: 4599–640.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (1996) Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy and Philosophy: The Self in Dialogue. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2009) ‘Seneca and Selfhood: Integration and Disintegration’ in Bartsch, S and Wray, D (eds) Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: 65–83.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. (1990) ‘The Semiotics of Gender. Physiognomy and Self-Fashioning in the Second Century C.E.’ in Halperin, D. E., Winkler, J. J., and Zeitlin, F. (eds) Before Sexuality: The Construction of Erotic Experience in the Ancient Greek World. Princeton: 389–415.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Gloyn, E. (2014) ‘My Family Tree Goes Back to the Romans: Seneca’s Approach to the Family in the Epistulae Morales’ in Wildberger, J and Colish, M. L (eds) Seneca Philosophus. Berlin: 229–68.Google Scholar
Goar, R. J. (1987) The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century B.C. to the Fifth Century A.D. Brussels.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. (2000) ‘Going for Baroque: Seneca and the English’ in Harrison, G. M. W. (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 209–31.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. M., and Manuwald, G. (2018) Fragmentary Republican Latin: Ennius Dramatic Fragments, Minor Works. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1990) ‘Character and Action, Representation and Reading: Greek Tragedy and its Critics’ in Pelling, C. (ed.) Characterization and Individuality in Greek Literature. Oxford: 100–27.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1994) ‘The Failure of Exemplarity’ in De Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P. (eds) Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature. Leiden: 51–73.Google Scholar
Gould, J. P. (1978) ‘Dramatic Character and “Human Intelligibility” in Greek Tragedy’ PCPhS 24: 43–67.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2016) ‘Noises Off: The Thyestes Theme in Tacitus’ Dialogus’ in Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. J., and Manuwald, G. (eds) Roman Drama and its Contexts. Berlin: 555–71.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Graver, M. R. (1998) ‘The Manhandling of Maecenas: Senecan Abstractions of Masculinity’ AJPh 119: 607–32.Google Scholar
Gray, P. (2016) ‘Shakespeare vs. Seneca: Competing Visions of Human Dignity’ in Dodson-Robinson, E. (ed.) Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy: Scholarly, Theatrical and Literary Receptions. Leiden: 203–30.Google Scholar
Gray, P. (2018) Shakespeare and the Fall of the Roman Republic: Selfhood, Stoicism and Civil War. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. (1987) On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory. Trans. and ed. P. J. Perron and F. H. Collins. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1963) ‘L’originalité de Sénèque dans la tragédie de “Phèdre”’ REL 41: 197–314.Google Scholar
Guastella, G. (2001) ‘Virgo, Coniunx, Mater: The Wrath of Seneca’s Medea’ CA 20: 197–220.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (2000) ‘Seneca’s Renown: Gloria, Claritudo and the Replication of the Roman Elite’ CA 19: 264–303.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. (1995) Philosophy as a Way of Life: Spiritual Exercises from Socrates to Foucault. Davidson, A. I. (ed.). Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. M. W. (2000) ‘Semper ego auditor tantum? Performance and Physical Setting of Seneca’s Plays’ in Harrison, G. M. W Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 137–49.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. M. W. (2014a). ‘Characters’ in Damschen, G. and Heil, A. (eds) Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden: 593–613.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. M. W. (2014b) ‘Themes’ in Damschen, G. and Heil, A. (eds) Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden: 615–38.Google Scholar
Heier, E. (1976) ‘The Literary Portrait as a Device of Characterization’ Neophilologus 60: 321–33.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (1983) ‘Poetic Technique and Rhetorical Amplification: Seneca Medea 579–669’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays in Senecan Drama. Berwick: 94–113.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2004) Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1965) ‘The Futility of Action: A Study of Seneca’s Hercules’ CP 60: 11–22.Google Scholar
Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1967) ‘Loss of Identity: Medea superest? A Study of Seneca’s Medea’ CP 62: 169–81.Google Scholar
Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1983) ‘The Oedipus of Seneca: An Imperial Tragedy’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick: 128–39.Google Scholar
Henry, D., and Walker, B. (1985) The Mask of Power: Seneca’s Tragedies and Imperial Rome. Warminster.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D. (1931) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Vol 2. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hill, T. (2004) Ambitiosa Mors: Suicide and Self in Roman Thought and Literature. London.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1993) ‘Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine’ MD 30: 9–47.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hine, H. M. (1981) ‘The Structure of Seneca’s Thyestes’ Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3: 259–75.Google Scholar
Hine, H. M (2000) Seneca: Medea. With an Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Warminster.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1996) ‘Exempla und mos maiorum: Überlegungen zum kollektiven Gedächtnis der Nobilität’. In Gehrke, H.-J. and Möller, A. (eds) Vergangenheit und Lebenswelt: Soziale Kommunikation, Traditionsbildung und historisches Bewusstsein. Tübingen: 301–38.Google Scholar
Hook, B. S. (2000) ‘“Nothing within Which Passeth Show”: Character and color in Senecan Tragedy’, in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 53–71.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1995) ‘Politics and Paradox in Seneca’s de Beneficiis’ in Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds) Justice and Generosity. Cambridge: 241–65.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1997) ‘Why Do Fools Fall in Love?’ in Sorabji, R. (ed.) Aristotle and After. BICS Suppl. London: 55–69.Google Scholar
Jahn, M. (2001) ‘Narrative Voice and Agency in Drama: Aspects of a Narratology of Drama’ NLH 32: 659–79.Google Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1967) The Tragedies of Ennius: The Fragments. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1992) ‘Reflections on Inner Life: Masks and Masked Acting in Ancient Greek Tragedy and Japanese Noh Drama’ Modern Drama 35: 20–34.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1988) ‘Medea nunc sum: The Close of Seneca’s Version’ in Pucci, P. (ed.) Language and the Tragic Hero: Essays on Greek Tragedy in Honor of Gordon M. Kirkwood. Atlanta: 85–102.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. F., and Lawrence, M. (eds) (2008) Recognition: The Poetics of Narrative. Interdisciplinary Studies on Anagnorisis. New York.Google Scholar
Kennerly, M. (2018) Editorial Bodies: Perfection and Rejection in Ancient Rhetoric and Poetics. Columbia, SC.Google Scholar
Ker, J. (2012) ‘Seneca in Tacitus’ in Pagán, V. E. (ed.) A Companion to Tacitus. Malden, MA: 305–29.Google Scholar
Ker, J. (2015) ‘Seneca and Augustan Culture’ in Schiesaro, A. and Bartsch, S. (eds) Cambridge Companion to Seneca. Cambridge: 109–21.Google Scholar
Kiernan, M. (ed.) (1985) Francis Bacon: The Essayes Or Counsels, Civill and Morall. Edited with Introduction, Notes, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2013) Lehrreiche Trugbilder: Senecas Tragödien und die Rhetorik des Sehens. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2017) ‘Constructing Oneself in Horace and Seneca’ in Stöckinger, M., Winter, K., and Zanker, A. T. (eds) Horace and Seneca: Interactions, Intertexts, Interpretations. Berlin: 265–86.Google Scholar
Klein, J. (2015) ‘Making Sense of Stoic Indifferents’ in Inwood, B (ed.) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49. Oxford: 227–81.Google Scholar
Knights, L. C. (1979) [1933] ‘How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?’ in Knights, L. C. (ed.) ‘Hamlet’ and other Shakespearean Essays. Cambridge: 270–308.Google Scholar
Knoche, U. (1972) [1941] ‘Senecas Atreus. Ein Beispiel’ in Lefèvre, E (ed.) Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: 477–89.Google Scholar
Kokolakis, M. M. (1976) Τὸ δρᾶμα τοῦ βίου εἰς τὸν Ἐπίκτητον. Φιλολογικὰ Μελετήματα εἰς τὴν Ἀρχαίαν Ἑλληνικὴν Γραμματείαν. Athens.Google Scholar
Kragelund, P. (2002) ‘Historical Drama in Ancient Rome: Republican Flourishing and Imperial Decline?’ SO 77: 5–51, 88–102.Google Scholar
Kragelund, P. (2016) Roman Historical Drama: The Octavia in Antiquity and Beyond. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. (2005) ‘From Exempla to Exemplar? Writing History around the Emperor in Imperial Rome’ in Edmondson, J. (ed.) Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome. Oxford: 181–200.Google Scholar
Labate, M. (1984) L’arte de farsi amore: Modelli culturale e progetto didascalico nell’elegia ovidiana. Pisa.Google Scholar
Lacey, D. N. (1978–79) ‘Like Father, Like Son: Comic Themes in Plautus’ Bacchides’ CJ 74: 132–5.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2008) ‘Reading for the Moral in Valerius Maximus: The Case of Severitas’ CCJ 54: 160–87.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2011) ‘Roman Exempla and Situation Ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero de Officiis’ JRS 101: 100–22.Google Scholar
Langlands, R. (2015) ‘Roman Exemplarity: Mediating between General and Particular’ in Lowrie, M. and Lüdemann, S. (eds) Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London: 68–80.Google Scholar
Lavery, G. B. (1980) ‘Metaphors of War and Travel in Seneca’s Prose Works’ G&R 27: 147–57.Google Scholar
Lawall, G. (1983) ‘Virtus and Pietas in Seneca’s Hercules’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays in Senecan Drama. Berwick: 6–26.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1972) [1969] ‘Quid ratio possit? Senecas Phaedra als stoisches Drama’ in Lefèvre, E (ed.) Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: 343–75.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1981) ‘A Cult without God or the Unfreedom of Freedom in Seneca Tragicus’ CJ 77: 32–6.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1985) ‘Die philosophische Bedeutung der Seneca-Tragödie am Beispiel des Thyestes’ ANRW 2.32.2: 1263–83.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1997a) ‘Die Transformation der griechischen durch die römische Tragödie am Beispiel von Senecas Medea’ in Flashar, H. (ed.) Tragödie, Idee und Transformation. Colloquium Rauricum 5. Stuttgart/Leipzig: 65–83.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1997b) ‘Seneca Atreus – die Negation des stoischen Weisen?’ in Axer, J. and Görler, W. (eds) Scaenica Saravi-Varsoviensia. Warsaw: 57–74.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. (1997) ‘Varius Rufus, Thyestes, and the Appetites of Antony’ PCPhS 42: 171–97.Google Scholar
Leppin, H. (1992) Histrionen: Untersuchungen zur sozialen Stellung von Bühnenkünstlern im Westen des römischen Reiches zur Zeit der Republik und des Principats. Bonn.Google Scholar
Litchfield, H. W. (1914) ‘National Exempla Virtutis in Roman Literature’ HSCPh 25: 1–71.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. (2004) Self-Representation and Illusion in Senecan Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. A. J. (2008) ‘Gender and Power in Seneca’s Thyestes’ in Fitch, J. G. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Seneca. Oxford: 244–63.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996) [1971] ‘The Logical Basis of Stoic Ethics’ in Long, A. A (ed.) Stoic Studies. Cambridge: 134–55.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2007) ‘Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus’ in Heyworth, S. J., Fowler, P. G., and Harrison, S. J. (eds) Classical Constructions. Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean. Oxford: 91–112.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M., and Lüdemann, S (eds) (2015) Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London/ New York.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. D. (1989) Exemplum: The Rhetoric of the Example in Early Modern France and Italy. Princeton.Google Scholar
MacMullen, R. (1966) Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mader, G. (2014) ‘Hoc quod volo / me nolle: Counter-Volition and Identity Management in Senecan tragedy’ Pallas 95: 125–61.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2001) Fabulae praetextae. Spuren einer literarischen Gattung der Römer. Munich.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (2013) ‘Medea: Transformations of a Greek Figure in Latin Literature’ G&R 60: 114–35.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2000) ‘Location! Location! Location!’ in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 27–51.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2002) ‘Chorus, Metatheatre, and Menander Dyskolos 427–41’ Scholia 11: 3–17Google Scholar
Marshall, C. W. (2012) ‘Sophocles Didaskalos’ in Ormand, K. (ed.) Blackwell Companion to Sophocles. Malden, MA: 187–203.Google Scholar
Marx, F. A. (1937) ‘Tacitus und die Literatur der exitus illustrium virorum’ Philologus 92: 83–103.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. J. (1970) ‘Seneca’s Oedipus: The Drama in the Word’ TAPA 101: 291–315.Google Scholar
Mastronarde, D. J. (2010) The Art of Euripides: Dramatic Technique and Social Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. (1991) ‘Roman Historical Exempla in Seneca’ in Grimal, P. (ed.) Sénèque et la prose latine. Geneva: 141–76.Google Scholar
McAuley, M. (2016) Reproducing Rome: Motherhood in Virgil, Ovid, Seneca, and Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar
Meineck, P. (2018) Theatrocracy: Greek Drama, Cognition, and the Imperative for Theatre. London.Google Scholar
Michelon, F. (2015) La scena dell’inganno finzioni tragiche nel teatro di Seneca. Turnhout.Google Scholar
Miola, R. S. (1992) Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca. Oxford.Google Scholar
Morelli, A. M. (1995) ‘Le preghiere di Fedra. Modelli della seduzione nella “Phaedra” senecana’ MD 35: 77–89.Google Scholar
Morford, M. (2000) ‘Walking Tall: The Final Entrance of Atreus in Seneca’s Thyestes’ Syllecta Classica 11: 162–77.Google Scholar
Most, G. (1992) ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’ in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds) Innovations in Antiquity. New York: 391–419.Google Scholar
Motto, A. L., and Clark, J. R. (1981) ‘Maxima virtus in Seneca’s Hercules’ CP 76: 101–17.Google Scholar
Motto, A. L., and Clark, J. R. (1994) ‘The Monster in Seneca’s Hercules 926–39’ CP 89: 269–72.Google Scholar
Mowbray, C. (2012) ‘Captive Audience? The Aesthetics of nefas in Senecan Drama’ in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds) Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 393–420.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. (2018) Making Men Ridiculous: Juvenal and the Anxieties of the Individual. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Nédoncelle, M. (1948) ‘Πρόσωπον et persona dans l’antiquité classique. Essai de bilan linguistique’ Revue des sciences religieuses 22: 277–99.Google Scholar
Nikolsky, B. (2015) Misery and Forgiveness in Euripides: Meaning and Structure in the Hippolytus. Trans. M. Nikolsky. Swansea.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) ‘The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus, Platonist Stoic and Roman’ in Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. (eds) The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago and London: 283–326.Google Scholar
Oakley, S. P. (1997) A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X, vol. 1: Introduction and Book VI. Oxford.Google Scholar
OKell, E. R. (2005) ‘Hercules and Nero: The didactic purpose of Senecan tragedy’ in Rawlings, L. and Bowden, H. (eds) Herakles and Hercules: Exploring a Graeco-Roman Divinity. Swansea: 185–204.Google Scholar
Opeku, F. (1979) ‘Physiognomy in Apuleius’ in Deroux, C (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 1. Brussels: 467–74.Google Scholar
Oshana, M. A. L. (2005) ‘Autonomy and Free Agency’ in Taylor, J. S. (ed.) Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: 183–204.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, T. M. (2009) ‘Death ante ora parentum in Virgil’s Aeneid’ TAPA 139: 447–86.Google Scholar
Owen, W. H. (1968) ‘Commonplace and Dramatic Symbol in Seneca’s Tragedies’ TAPA 99: 291–313.Google Scholar
Paratore, E. (1966) ‘Il prologo dello Hercules di Seneca e l’Eracle di Euripide’ Quaderni della RCCM 9: 1–39.Google Scholar
Petrone, G. (1988) ‘Nomen/omen: poetica e funzione dei nomi (Plauto, Seneca, Petronio)’ MD 20–21: 33–70.Google Scholar
Phelan, J. (1989) Reading People, Reading Plots: Character, Progression, and the Interpretation of Narrative. Chicago/London.Google Scholar
Plass, P. (1995) The Game of Death in Ancient Rome: Arena Sport and Political Suicide. Madison.Google Scholar
Poe, J. P. (1983) ‘The Sinful Nature of the Protagonist of Seneca’s Oedipus’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick: 140–58.Google Scholar
Poe, J. P. (1996) ‘The Supposed Conventional Meanings of Dramatic Masks: A Re-examination of Pollux 4.133–54’ Philologus 140: 306–28.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1934) Antikes Führertum: Cicero De Officiis und das Lebensideal des Panaitios. Leipzig/Berlin.Google Scholar
Pohlenz, M. (1965) ‘τὸ πρέπον. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Griechischen Geistes’ in Dörrie, H. (ed.) Max Pohlenz: Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim: 100–39.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2017) ‘Time for Foucault? Reflections on the Roman Self from Seneca to Augustine’ Foucault Studies 22: 113–33.Google Scholar
Pöschl, V. (1977) ‘Bemerkungen zum Thyest des Seneca’ in Kraus, W., Primmer, A., and Schwabl, H. (eds) Latinität und alte Kirche. Festschrift für Rudolf Hanslik zum 70. Geburtstag. Vienna: 224–34.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1995) Virgil’s Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill/London.Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton.Google Scholar
Raby, G. (2000) ‘Seneca’s Trojan Women: Identity and Survival in the Aftermath of War’ in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 173–95.Google Scholar
Regenbogen, O. (1927/28) ‘Schmerz und Tod in den Tragödien Senecas’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg 7: 167–218.Google Scholar
Repath, I. (2007a) ‘Anonymus Latinus, Book of Physiognomy’ in Swain, S (ed.) Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford: 549–636.Google Scholar
Repath, I (2007b) ‘The Physiognomy of Adamantius the Sophist’ in Swain, S (ed.) Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford: 487–548.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar
Richardson-Hay, C. (2006) First Lessons: Book 1 of Seneca’s Epistulae Morales – A Commentary. Bern.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2012) ‘The Labour of Empire: Womb and World in Seneca’s Medea’ SIFC 105: 211–37.Google Scholar
Ringer, M. (1998) Electra and the Empty Urn: Metatheatre and Role Playing in Sophocles. Chapel Hill/London.Google Scholar
Robin, D. (1993) ‘Film Theory and the Gendered Voice in Seneca’ in Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A. (eds) Feminist Theory and the Classics. New York/London: 102–21.Google Scholar
Roisman, H. (2000) ‘A New Look at Seneca’s Phaedra’ in Harrison, G. W. M (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 73–86.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2004) ‘Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Case of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia’ CP 99: 1–56.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2015) ‘Between Unique and Typical: Senecan exempla in a List’ in Lowrie, M. and Lüdemann, S. (eds) Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London/New York: 81–95.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. (2018) Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1993) ‘Seneca’s Oedipus and Performance: The Manto Scene’ in Scodel, R. (ed.) Theatre and Society in the Classical World. Ann Arbor: 235–44.Google Scholar
Ruch, M. (1964) ‘La langue de la psychologie amoureuse dans la Phèdre de Sénèque’ LEC 32: 356–63.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1989) Horace Epistles Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (‘Ars Poetica’). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rudich, V. (1997) Dissidence and Literature under Nero: The Price of Rhetoricization. London/New York.Google Scholar
Santoro L’Hoir, F. (2006) Tragedy, Rhetoric, and the Historiography of Tacitus’ Annales. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (1997) ‘Passions, Reason and Knowledge in Seneca’s Tragedies’ in Braund, S. M and Gill, C (eds) The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge: 89–111.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A (2003) The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A (2009) ‘Seneca and the Denial of the Self’ in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds) Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: 221–35.Google Scholar
Schlegel, A. W. (1972) [1809] ‘Senecas Tragödien’ in Lefèvre, E (ed.) Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: 13–14.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1982) ‘Nomen Sacrum: Medea and Other Names in Seneca Tragedy’ Maia 34: 241–46.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1988) ‘Confusion and Concealment in Euripides’ Hippolytus: Vision, Hope, and Tragic Knowledge’ Metis 3: 263–82.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1992) ‘Signs, Magic and Letters in Euripides’ Hippolytus’ in Hexter, R. and Selden, D. (eds) Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 420–56.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1993) Oedipus Tyrannus: Tragic Heroism and the Limits of Knowledge. New York.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (1969) Die Gesprächsverdichtung in den Tragödien Senecas. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (1985) ‘Maius solito: Senecas Thyestes und die tragoedia rhetorica’ Antike und Abendland 31: 116–36.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, B. (2008) ‘Character and Characterization in Greek Tragedy’ in Revermann, M. and Wilson, P. (eds) Performance, Iconography, Reception: Studies in Honour of Oliver Taplin. Oxford: 333–46.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. (2007) ‘Seneca and the Divine: Stoic Tradition and Personal Developments’ IJCT 13: 333–68.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. (1975) ‘Problems of Time in Seneca’s Hercules and Thyestes’ CSCA 8: 257–69.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. (1978) Seneca’s Hercules: Theme, Structure and Style. Hypomnemata 50. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Shelton, J.-A. (2000) ‘The Spectacle of Death in Seneca’s Troades’ in Harrison, G. W. M (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 87–118.Google Scholar
Sissa, G. (2006) ‘A Theatrical Poetics: Recognition and the Structural Emotions of Tragedy’ Arion 14: 35–92.Google Scholar
Skidmore, C. (1996) Practical Ethics for Roman Gentlemen: The Work of Valerius Maximus. Exeter.Google Scholar
Slaney, H. (2013) ‘Seneca’s Chorus of One’ in Billings, J., Budelmann, F., and Macintosh, F. (eds) Choruses Ancient and Modern. Oxford: 99–116.Google Scholar
Smith, M. (2010) ‘Engaging Characters: Further Reflections’ in Eder, J., Jannidis, F., and Schneider, R. (eds) Characters in Fictional Worlds. Berlin: 232–58.Google Scholar
Smith, R. S. (2014) ‘Physics I: Body and Soul’ in Heil, A. and Damschen, G. (eds) Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden: 343–61.Google Scholar
Solimano, G. (1991) La prepotenza dell’ occhio: riflessioni sull’opera di Seneca. Genoa.Google Scholar
Star, C. (2012) The Empire of the Self: Self-Command and Political Speech in Seneca and Petronius. Baltimore.Google Scholar
States, B. O. (1985b) Great Reckonings in Little Rooms: On the Phenomenology of Theatre. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. (2018) ‘Senecan Meta-Stoicality: in the Cognitive Grasp of Atreus’ CQ 68: 573–90.Google Scholar
Stöckinger, M., Winter, K., and Zanker, A. T. (eds) (2017) Horace and Seneca: Interactions, Intertexts, Interpretations. Berlin.Google Scholar
Storm, W. (2014) ‘Troas’ in Damschen, G. and Heil, A. (eds) Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden: 435–47.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. (2004) Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1984) ‘La découpe du poème. Notes sur les origins sacrificielles de la poétique grecque’ Poétique 58: 215–32.Google Scholar
Swain, S. (ed.) (2007) Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford.Google Scholar
Swain, S (2007) ‘Appendix: The Physiognomy Attributed to Aristotle’ in Swain, S (ed.) Seeing the Face, Seeing the Soul: Polemon’s Physiognomy from Classical Antiquity to Medieval Islam. Oxford: 637–62.Google Scholar
Tadic-Gilloteaux, N. (1963) ‘Sénèque face au suicide’ L’antiquité classique 32: 541–51.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1985) Seneca’s Thyestes. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2006) ‘Seeing Seneca Whole?’ in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds) Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. Leiden: 1–17.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. (1988) ‘Thersites: Comedy, Scapegoats and Heroic Ideology in the Iliad’ TAPA 118: 1–28.Google Scholar
Thévanaz, P. (1944) ‘L’interiorité chez Sénèque’ in Mélanges offerts à M. Max Niedermann Recueil de travaux 22, Université de Neuchâtel: 189–94.Google Scholar
Tietze Larson, V. (1989) ‘Seneca’s Epic Theatre’ in Deroux, C. (ed.) Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History V. Brussels: 279–304.Google Scholar
Tietze Larson, V. (1994) The Role of Description in Senecan Tragedy. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Töchterle, K. (1994) Lucius Annaeus Seneca Oedipus Kommentar mit Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Todorov, T. (1966) (ed.) Théorie de la literature: texts des formalists russes. Paris.Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1981) ‘Seneca Thyest. 713 S. Mactet Sibi o Sibi Dubitat? Un Recupero Esegetico’ Maia 33: 151–3Google Scholar
Trinacty, C. (2014) Senecan Tragedy and the Reception of Augustan Poetry. Oxford/ New York.Google Scholar
Trinacty, C. (2016) ‘Imago res mortua est: Senecan Intertextuality’ in Dodson-Robinson, E. (ed.) Brill Companion to the Reception of Senecan Tragedy: Scholarly, Literary and Theatrical Receptions. Leiden: 11–33.Google Scholar
Trinacty, C. (2017) ‘Retrospective Reading in Senecan Tragedy’ Ramus 46: 175–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinacty, C. (2018) ‘Nulla res est quae non eius quo nascitur notas reddat (Nat. 3.21.2): Intertext to Intratext in Senecan Prose and Poetry’ in Harrison, S, Frangoulidis, S, and Papanghelis, T (eds) Intratextuality and Latin Literature. Berlin: 309–24.Google Scholar
Turner, B. S. (2012) ‘Introduction: The Turn of the Body’ in Turner, B. S. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Body Studies. Abingdon: 1–17.Google Scholar
Turpin, W. (2008) ‘Tacitus, Stoic Exempla, and the Praecipuum Munus Annalium’ CA 27: 359–404.Google Scholar
Van Der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (2003) Seneca: The Life of a Stoic. Trans. D. Sullivan. New York and London.Google Scholar
Viansino, G. (1993) Lucio Anneo Seneca. Teatro. Testo critico, traduzione e commento. Milan.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2009) ‘Sons of the Earth: Are the Stoics Metaphysical Brutes?’ Phronesis 54: 136–54.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2000) ‘Putting Andromacha on Stage: A Performer’s Perspective’ in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.) Seneca in Performance. Swansea: 197–208.Google Scholar
Volk, K., and Williams, G. (eds) Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Von Glinski, M. L. (2017) ‘All the World’s Offstage: Metaphysical and Metafictional Aspects in Seneca’s Hercules’ CQ 67: 210–27.Google Scholar
Waldenfels, B. (2015) ‘For Example’ in Lowrie, M. and Lüdemann, S. (eds) Exemplarity and Singularity: Thinking through Particulars in Philosophy, Literature, and Law. London/New York: 36–45.Google Scholar
Weiler, I. (1996) ‘Physiognomische Überlegungen zu mens sana in corpore sano’ in Klodt, C (ed.) Satura Lanx: Festschift Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag. Hildesheim: 153–68.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. (2006) ‘Exemplary Grief: Gender and Virtue in Seneca’s Consolations to Women’ Helios 33: 73–100.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. (2008) ‘Nature’s Monster: Caligula as Exemplum in Seneca’s Dialogues’ in Rosen, R. and Sluiter, I. (eds) Kakos: Badness and Anti-value in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 451–75.Google Scholar
Wiles, D. (1991) The Masks of Menander: Sign and Meaning in Greek and Roman Performance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. (2012) The Cosmic Viewpoint: A Study in Seneca’s Natural Questions. Oxford/New York.Google Scholar
Wilshire, B. (1977) ‘Role Playing and Identity: The Limits of the Theatrical Metaphor’ Cultural Hermeneutics 4: 199–207.Google Scholar
Wilshire, B. (1982) Role Playing and Identity: The Limits of Theatre as Metaphor. Bloomington.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1983) ‘The Tragic Mode of Seneca’s Troades’ in Boyle, A. J. (ed.) Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick: 27–60.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (1997) ‘The Subjugation of Grief in Seneca’s Epistles’ in Braund, S. and Gill, C. (eds) The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge: 48–67.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1968) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woloch, A. (2003) The One vs. The Many: Minor Characters and the Space of the Protagonist in the Novel. Princeton.Google Scholar
Worthen, W. B. (1984) The Idea of the Actor: Drama and the Ethics of Performance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Wyles, R. (2013) ‘Heracles’ Costume from Euripides’ Heracles to Pantomime Performance’ in Harrison, G. W. M. and Liapis, V. (eds) Performance in Greek and Roman Theatre. Leiden: 181–98.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1990) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Trans. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Zanobi, A. (2008) ‘The Influence of Pantomime on Seneca’s Tragedies’ in Hall, E and Wyles, R (eds) New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford: 227–57.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (2012) ‘A Study in Form: Recognition Scenes in the Three Electra Plays’ Lexis 30: 361–78.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. (1990) ‘Seneca und der Pantomimus’ in Vogt-Spira, G. (ed.) Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur. Tübingen: 161–7.Google Scholar
Zintzen, C. (1972) [1971] ‘Alte virtus animosa cadit: Gedanken zur Darstellung des Tragischen in Senecas Hercules’ in Lefèvre, E (ed.) Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: 49–209.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O (1978) ‘Die Tragik in den Medea-Dramen’ Literaturwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch 19: 27–63.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access