INTRODUCTION
Bermuda sea chub Kyphosus saltatrix (Linnaeus, 1758) (last synonym: K. sectator), is a fish species widely distributed in the western Atlantic, extending from Canada in the north (Scott & Scott, Reference Scott and Scott1988) to Brazil in the south (Robins & Ray, Reference Robins and Ray1986), including the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea (Cervigón, Reference Cervigón1993). It is a gregarious shallow water herbivorous species with distinct dentition (hockey-stick shaped incisor-like teeth), which presents squamation on the soft parts of the dorsal, anal and caudal fins. It is also found in the eastern Atlantic, its northern distribution there being along the south Moroccan Atlantic coasts, extending southwards to the Gulf of Guinea (Desoutter, Reference Desoutter, Quero, Hureau, Karrer, Post and Saldanha1990). It is sporadically found in the Canary Islands, Azores and Madeira Islands (Almada et al., Reference Almada, Henriques, Conçalves, Almada, Oliviera and Conçalves1999). Up to date, there have been only five verified sightings north of the Atlantic Moroccan coasts: one sighting off the coast of the Algarve (Canas et al., Reference Canas, Vasconcelos, Lino and Santos2005), one sighting in Galician waters (Bañon, Reference Bañón2004) and three sightings in the Bay of Biscay (references in Quéro et al., Reference Quéro, Spitz, Vayne, Auby, Casamajor, Leaute, Marie, Monhurel and Quinquis2009). In the Mediterranean Sea it is quite rare (Tortonese, Reference Tortonese, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureau, Nielsen and Tortonese1986), with its first validated record coming from a museum specimen caught in 1846 near Trieste (northern Adriatic). Its identity was confirmed by Dulčić & Ahnelt (Reference Dulčić and Ahnelt2006). Since 1846 there have been another five validated records along the northern Mediterranean coasts (Doderlein, Reference Doderlein1884; Ariola, Reference Ariola1904; Merella et al., Reference Merella, Massutí and Deudero1998; Francour & Mouine, Reference Francour and Mouine2008; Ligas et al., Reference Ligas, Sartor, Sbrana and Ranieri2011), and two records from the coasts of North Africa, one in Algeria (Hemida et al., Reference Hemida, Kanoun, Golani, Souissi, Guélorget and Capapé2004) and one in Tunisia (Hattour, Reference Hattour2006).
On 20 January 2011, a single specimen of K. saltatrix was caught in the Ionian Sea (western Greece). It is the first time this species has been detected in Greek waters and this constitutes its most eastern verified distribution in the basin to date. In this work we present its morphological and biological data, along with mtDNA analysis for future comparison with other specimens that may be found, or have been found, in other Mediterranean and north-eastern Atlantic areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Morphology
The specimen (Figure 1) was spearfished in the Strofades Islands (Figure 2) around midday. It was detected at about 16 m depth over rocky substratum covered with phaeophyceae, moving in midwater. Measurement of its morphometric characters and counting of its meristics were conducted while the fish was fresh. All measurements were conducted on the left side of the body and they represent the direct distances between points in accordance with Hubbs & Lagler (Reference Hubbs and Lagler1958). Apart from the overall length measurements that were recorded to the nearest mm, all other measurements were recorded to the nearest 0.1 mm using callipers. Afterwards, the fish was dissected for further analysis. Stomach distension and perivisceral fat deposits were recorded and viscera were removed in order to examine stomach and intestine contents. The degree of stomach distension and perivisceral fat deposits were ranked according to the subjective indices of Lebedev (Reference Lebedev1946) and Prozorovskaya (Reference Prozorovskaya1952) respectively. Gonad tissue was removed in order to verify its sex microscopically and otoliths were also removed for age determination. Age reading was conducted on the left sagitta, using reflected light against a dark background. Finally, after extracting tissue for DNA analysis, the specimen was immersed in a 4% formaldehyde solution for a couple of days and finally preserved in 70% alcohol.
Extraction of total DNA and amplification of mtDNA genes
Genomic DNA was isolated from muscle tissue, by standard proteinase K digestion, following the salting out procedure as described in Miller et al. (Reference Miller, Dykes and Polesky1988). The DNA concentration was adjusted to approximately 30 ng μl−1 through dilution with distilled water. Three mtDNA segments were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using universal primers for cytochrome b (L14841-H15149; Kocher et al., Reference Kocher, Thomas, Meyer, Edwards, Paabo, Villablanca and Wilson1989), 12S rRNA (12SAL-12SBH; Palumbi et al., Reference Palumbi, Martin, Romano, Mcmillan, Stice and Grabowski1991) and 16S rRNA (16SarL-16SbrH; Palumbi et al., Reference Palumbi, Martin, Romano, Mcmillan, Stice and Grabowski1991) segments. All PCRs were performed in 10 µl volumes containing 0.04 units μl−1 of Taq polymerase (FINNZYMES, Espoo, Finland), 1× Taq buffer (magnesium free), 0.2 mM dNTPs mix, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µM of each forward and reverse primer, and approximately 30 ng of template DNA. Cycling conditions for PCR amplifications consisted of an initial 95°C denaturation step for 3 minutes followed by 35 cycles of 60 seconds at 94°C, 60 seconds at 54°C (for cytochrome b and 12S rRNA) or 55°C (for 16S rRNA), and 60 seconds at 72°C, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. The resulting amplified DNA fragments were purified with the NucleoSpin® Extract II Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The purified PCR products were sequenced (VBC-BIOTECH GmbH, Austria) and the sequences were deposited in GenBank with the Accession nos: JN007798, JN007799 and JN007800 for 12S, 16S and cytochrome b, respectively. Finally, the sequences were submitted to the BLAST program in GenBank to compare them with other sequences deposited in public databases (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Schwartz, Wagner and Miller2000).
RESULTS
Morphology
The meristics of our specimen were in accordance with those described by Tortonese (Reference Tortonese, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureau, Nielsen and Tortonese1986) for this species and they were within the range of counts given by other authors for their specimens, except for the number of anal fin rays: 10 in our specimen as compared to the 11 rays counted in all other specimens caught in the Mediterranean. The coloration of the specimen was dark-brown to olive in the upper half part of the body and lighter-brown in the lower half with faint yellow stripes along the scale series. The total length of the fish was 265 mm and it weighed 352.2 grams. Description of the meristics and values of the morphometric parameters examined are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2 respectively. Body and head measurements are presented both as direct measurements and as percentages of the standard length (SL) and head length (HL) respectively.
In the upper jaw, besides the well formed regularly spaced incisor-like teeth, there were also two other tooth types in the posterior margins of the premaxillar bones that were not included in the counting. The first type comprised six polycuspid incisor-like teeth irregularly arranged in the left premaxillary, next to the row of the regular teeth. The second type comprised very small conically pointed teeth embedded in the skin, irregularly spaced in the outer margins of the premaxillar bones. There were seven such teeth on each side. A band of such teeth was also observed behind the front row of the hockey-stick shaped regular teeth. None of the above irregular tooth types were detected on the dentary.
The stomach of the specimen was quite distended (degree 3 in Lebedev's scale: stomach filled in about half its maximum distension ability), containing exclusively plant material. The largest proportion of the stomach content was undigested, providing evidence that the fish foraged during daytime and the existence of exclusively plant material in the stomach proves that the specific individual had fully adopted a benthic lifestyle. Its intestine was quite long (572 mm, 2.74 times its SL), a typical trait of herbivorous species, and fully digested material was found all along its length.
Perivisceral fat deposition was in the form of a long strip, spreading from the anus to the entire length of the intestine, ranked as unit 2 in Prodorovskaya's fat-deposition grading scale. Microscopic inspection of the gonad revealed that the specimen was an immature male (maturity Stage I, after the classification proposed by Nikolsky (Reference Nikolsky1963)).
Reading on the left sagitta of the specimen revealed four completed translucent bands (representing periods of slow growth), indicating an age of 4+. Due to the lack of other specimens we were unable to conduct marginal increment analysis in order to verify the periodicity of the ring formation, so at the moment we consider that the detected rings represent annual rings, which is the most common case for fish living in the Mediterranean.
Sequence alignment and comparisons
The length of the amplified product was 390, 460, and 690 bp for cytochrome b, 12S and 16S rRNA, respectively. The query length was 307 bp, 396 bp and 570 bp for cytochrome b, 12S and 16S rRNA, respectively, after the sequences read from both sides were aligned and trimmed of primers.
There was no other sequence deposited in GenBank for Kyphosus saltatrix. However, there were a limited number of sequences deposited for blue sea chub Kyphosus cinerascens (Forsskål, 1775), for brassy chub Kyphosus vaigiensis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1825) and for blue-bronze sea chub Kyphosus analogus (Gill, 1862), for these three mitochondrial genes. For the cytochrome b the similarity was 94% with K. cinerascens (1 sequence deposited). For the 12S rRNA gene the similarity was 97–98% with K. cinerascens (2 sequences deposited) and 94–97% with K. vaigiensis (3 sequences deposited). Finally, the similarity for the 16S rRNA gene was 98% with K. cinerascens (3 sequences deposited), 97% with K. vaigiensis (3 sequences deposited) and 94–97% with K. analogus (2 sequences deposited).
DISCUSSION
Despite its abundance in tropical and subtropical Atlantic areas, K. saltatrix is not very well studied and few data on its biology and ecology are provided (Merella et al., Reference Merella, Massutí and Deudero1998). Examination of our specimen revealed some of its biological aspects which we state only as indicating information since they are derived from a single specimen. Nevertheless, they provide useful information regarding the physical status of the specimen and help us state certain assumptions regarding its presence in the area.
Our specimen was found to be in good condition with no signs of starvation or stress-induced feeding suspension, as the large amount of food in its stomach and the existence of fatty tissue in the abdominal cavity revealed. This situation evidences favourable environmental conditions for the fish, also supported by the age of the specimen, since it is unlikely for a fish to survive for several years and retain a good condition in a stressful environment. This should also apply for the other three specimens caught in Annaba (Hemida et al., Reference Hemida, Kanoun, Golani, Souissi, Guélorget and Capapé2004), in St Tropez (Francour & Mouine, Reference Francour and Mouine2008) and in the Ligurian Sea (Ligas et al., Reference Ligas, Sartor, Sbrana and Ranieri2011), considering that they entered the Mediterranean during their juvenile stage. These specimens were not aged; however, since they were almost twice as large as our specimen we expect them to have been correspondingly older. Therefore, we could presume that this species presents no adaptation problems in the recent Mediterranean environment, at least regarding food acquisition and so, one of the fundamental prerequisites for its establishment in the area (i.e. food acquisition ability), is probably met.
Regarding the second prerequisite for the establishment of a self-sustained population in an area, i.e. successful spawning, our data are not sufficient to support any assumption. The gonads of our specimen were not developed and this could be either because the fish was far from its spawning period or due to its inability to spawn under the recent environmental conditions of the Mediterranean. Since there are no reproduction data for this species from any place of its natural distribution, at the moment we cannot hypothesize as to which of the above assumptions holds true. More specimens or future works on the reproduction of this species are needed to shed more light on this.
Regarding the origin of our individual, we consider three possibilities: (i) its presence is completely accidental and the fish has reached the area following the route of floating debris or algae during its early juvenile stage and settled in the vicinity of the area where it was caught, since the juveniles of this species are initially pelagic (Sgano, Reference Sgano and Fischer1978) and are often related to flotsam (Tortonese, Reference Tortonese, Whitehead, Bauchot, Hureau, Nielsen and Tortonese1986; Bauchot, Reference Bauchot, Fischer and Bauchot1987; Castro et al., Reference Castro, Santiago and Hernández-García1999); (ii) the specimen belongs to a population established on the north African Mediterranean coasts; (Hemida et al., Reference Hemida, Kanoun, Golani, Souissi, Guélorget and Capapé2004) reported a large number of specimens fished in Annaba), members of which occasionally move northwards, or the whole population is expanding northwards (such example of northward expansion of a south Mediterranean fish species is provided by Francour et al. Reference Francour, Boudouresque, Harmelin, Harmelin-Vivien and Quignard1994); or (iii) the specimen is a member of a small population already established in the area it was caught, or in an adjacent area. Verification of any of the above assumptions requires a more elaborate examination of the recent physicochemical conditions of the Mediterranean. Future sightings would contribute greatly and DNA comparisons could provide valuable evidence regarding the origin or the affinity of the specimens caught in different areas. Yet, whatever the origin of the specimens detected in the Mediterranean, the fact of the increased frequency of detections in the basin since 1996 stands out. Evidence for the warming of the waters in the Mediterranean over the last decades and a shifting towards a more tropical regime has been provided by different authors (e.g. Schiano et al., Reference Schiano, Sparnocchia, Cappa and Bozzano2005; Vargas-Yáñez et al., Reference Vargas-Yáñez, Moya, Tel, García-Martínez, Guerber and Bourgeon2009). At the same time, increased frequency of detections of thermophilic Mediterranean species previously rare or absent in the colder north-western parts of the basin, has been recorded (Francour et al., Reference Francour, Boudouresque, Harmelin, Harmelin-Vivien and Quignard1994), along with a constantly increasing number of detections of alien species that enter the basin through the Suez Canal and the Gibraltar Strait (Quignard & Tomasini, Reference Quignard and Tomasini2000; Ben Rais Lasram & Mouillot, Reference Ben Rais Lasram and Mouillot2009). Notably, these detections present an increasing trend, with the rate of lessepsian fish introduction during 2000–2006 representing the highest value since the opening of the Suez Canal (Ben Rais Lasram & Mouillot, Reference Ben Rais Lasram and Mouillot2009). In that sense, we could also consider the occurrence of this species in the Mediterranean and its eastern-wards range expansion in the basin as an indirect consequence of this tropicalization process, while the recently increased frequency of detections should also raise our awareness towards evidence that confirms the establishment of a population of this species in the basin.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors express their gratitude to Theodoros Margaris and Nikolaos Spyropoulos for providing the specimen and Dimitris Christodoulou for providing the detailed map of the area. We also thank Nota Peristraki for her valuable comments on the manuscript.