Undernutrition
Problems and solutions
Madam
In a recent editorial you wondered whether 2009 would be the ‘year of solutions’. You stated that ‘the journal can… lobby for investment in more action-oriented research on solutions to today’s food and nutrition problems’(Reference Yngve1). Last year a group of scholars called for improved nutrition operations in response to The Lancet Child Survival series(Reference Sheeran2). They stated: ‘We are convinced the key will be to translate the understanding of undernutrition into practical interventions’. This call for an important shift from traditional thought to practical interventions is echoed in your editorial quoting World Food Programme Executive Director Josette Sheeran and stating, ‘we can defeat hunger, if we pull together and act now’.
Nutrition is critical to long-term economic, societal and overall human development. Evidence of this is abundant in meetings of the G8 Summit in Tokyo (undernutrition), in London (obesity) and in Seattle, where WHO, UNICEF, the Gates Foundation and other non-governmental organisations (NGO) all highlighted the need for reinvigorated approaches to nutrition science(3). Further, the newly formed United Nations High Level Task Force on the Global Food Crisis has called for unprecedented action to address the current and impending nutrition crises during the recent Rome Summit(4). The Task Force unambiguously stated that ‘hunger and undernutrition are the greatest threats to public health, killing more people than HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB combined. Each day, 25,000 people, including 10,000 children, die from hunger and its related cause’.
Many solutions are being proposed. Most tend to focus on the critical task of providing food to those in need. Few organisations, however, highlight the important need for investment in nutrition science. One exception came from the editor of Nature who, earlier this year, called for greater investment in science to tackle the twin nutrition problems of ‘feasting and fasting’(5).
To date, insufficient investments in nutrition science have been made in emerging economies beset by dual burdens of over- and undernutrition. Evidence of this weak capacity is obvious when examining the focus and quantity of nutrition research output with research by emerging economies in leading medical and nutrition journals. We reviewed the proportion of full-length publications in leading science and medical journals (based on ISI citation indexes) by country of the first author, nutrition topic and year from 1991 to 2007 (D Yach, unpublished results). Objectives were to assess trends in nutrition science publications, examine changes in topics being published and establish a baseline with regard to authors’ origin in order to assess national capacities in nutrition science. For the last two years, 83 % of articles were on overweight/obesity, and only some 5 % of first authors for any nutrition category were from India and or China – two countries that comprise 40 % of the total world population (Table 1). Trends over time have improved very slightly in favour of India and China; however, developed nations, particularly the USA, continue to dominate contributions to nutrition science publications.
Table 1 Full-length publications in leading nutrition journals, 2006–2007 (total = 1716)
We believe there is a need for centres of excellence and impact in nutrition science to be based in emerging markets to initiate and strengthen research in a number of strategic areas, including Fe deficiency and stunting in children, weight management/satiety in adults, and muscle mass and improved memory/thoughts in older people. Such centres could contribute to resolving community-based nutrition needs by directing and managing a small grants programme aimed at executing short- and medium-term applied actions in their regions. Centres could pioneer new approaches and ideas about optimal nutrition and physical activity by considering how to bridge the fields of under- and overnutrition and activity from a research-and-action perspective.
Such an approach has been followed in other areas of science and health where human resources, especially related to research, have been a key constraint to progress. Examples include WHO support for reproductive health research, Rockefeller Foundation support for parasitology, the National Institutes of Health Fogarty Centers’ approach to long-term capacity development in health science, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation support for neglected tropical diseases. In each case, investments have led to new products and health-care solutions, scientists with fresh ideas and innovative private–public partnerships(Reference Yngve1). The key was the need to commit for 5–10 years to a small core of outstanding and action-oriented scientists. Centres for excellence could employ this same commitment by engaging global nutrition and international development experts, as well as by involving consortia of corporations, major foundations, UN agencies, leading NGO (such as the International Union of Nutritional Sciences) and government development agencies.
The Lancet paper(Reference Sheeran2) states that ‘the intricacy of undernutrition as a global problem seems to defy simple, directed and uniform programmes. We will not effectively improve child survival unless we untangle this web [of interactions]’. The authors call for a ‘knowledge base on the necessary support and institutional capacity that enables these interventions to work and improve child survival’.
If the global burden of undernutrition is to be combated successfully and in ways that link its solution to avoiding a worsening of the crises in overweight and obesity, the need for strong public–private partnerships to support practical interventions at the population level is not only necessary, but critically urgent.
