Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:16:11.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Increasing the scope of virtual reality in palliative care: Insights and future directions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2024

Lena Marianti*
Affiliation:
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
Rikas Saputra
Affiliation:
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
Arizona
Affiliation:
Universitas PGRI Palembang, Palembang, Indonesia
Siti Arifah
Affiliation:
Universitas Darul Ulum Jombang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Hartika Utami Fitri
Affiliation:
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
Bela Janare Putra
Affiliation:
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
*
Corresponding author: Lena Marianti; Email: lenamarianti_uin@radenfatah.ac.id
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letter to the Editor
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Dear Editor,

I read the groundbreaking article by Corvin et al. (Reference Corvin, Hoskinson and Mozolic-Staunton2024) on “Effects of a VirtualReality Intervention on Work participation and Distress from Symptoms in Palliative Care Patients: A Pilot Study” published in Palliative and Supportive Care (Corvin et al. Reference Corvin, Hoskinson and Mozolic-Staunton2024). The authors have not only significantly advanced the field of VR in palliative care but also illuminated the transformative potential of virtual reality (VR) interventions (Corvin et al. Reference Corvin, Hoskinson and Mozolic-Staunton2024). Their research sparks further discussion and potential areas for more profound exploration, paving the way for revolutionary applications of this technology in palliative settings.

Various studies, including a longitudinal study at Mount Sinai in New York, have resoundingly demonstrated the effectiveness of VR interventions in reducing pain and anxiety (Berrocal et al. Reference Berrocal, Darr and Fisher2020). The results showed a significant reduction in stress and discomfort parameters for patients using VR compared to conventional ones (Ding et al. Reference Ding, Hua and Zhu2020). This promising data from palliative care facilities in California, where VR has been integrated into regular therapy, not only underscores the potential of this technology but also instils hope for improved patient experiences and reduced healthcare costs (Cruz Reference Cruz2022).

Personalization of VR content is proving to be highly effective, as demonstrated by a Stanford University program that incorporates elements of patients’ memories and relaxation (Won et al. Reference Won, Bailey and Bailenson2017). The program was specifically designed to help patients better cope with end-of-life stress, highlighting the importance of creating content that can adapt to the patient’s emotional and physical state in real time (Guo et al. Reference Guo, Xu and Liu2024).

However, VR in palliative care raises ethical questions, especially about patient privacy and comfort (Akdeniz et al. Reference Akdeniz, Yardımcı and Kavukcu2021). Research at the University of California, San Francisco, underlines that while patients benefit from the VR experience, aspects of patient privacy and comfort, given the sensitivity of their condition, must also be considered (Rocque and Leanza Reference Rocque and Leanza2015).

Going forward, more extensive and diverse research is needed to understand VR’s full potential in palliative care (Saputra et al. Reference Saputra, Setyorini and Rasmanah2024). Multisite studies with more extensive and varied samples can provide deeper insights into the logistical and technical challenges of implementing VR in various care environments (Unertl et al. Reference Unertl, Fair and Favours2018). This will help determine the best protocols for personalizing content and interventions, ensuring that VR can be effectively integrated into existing palliative care workflows.

Undoubtedly, establishing a robust ethical framework for the use of VR is of paramount importance (Garcia Valencia et al. Reference Garcia Valencia, Suppadungsuk and Thongprayoon2023). This involves not only developing clear guidelines regarding when and how VR should be used but also assessing potential risks and ensuring that the use of this technology aligns with overarching care goals and respects patient rights and preferences (Mentzelopoulos et al. Reference Mentzelopoulos, Couper and Van de Voorde2021). By emphasizing these ethical considerations, we can ensure that our use of VR in palliative care is not only innovative but also responsible and patient-centric.

In conclusion, the study conducted by Corvin et al. (Reference Corvin, Hoskinson and Mozolic-Staunton2024) is a commendable step forward in integrating VR into palliative care. It not only demonstrates the feasibility of such an intervention but also highlights VR’s immense potential to improve the quality of life of patients facing life-limiting illnesses (Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Gomez and Carpenter2011). Findings from various studies suggest that VR not only improves the patient care experience but also opens up new opportunities for further research and practical applications that can improve palliative care globally (Brungardt et al. Reference Brungardt, Wibben and Tompkins2021).

Funding

This research has received no specific grants from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Competing interests

The authors state there are none.

References

Akdeniz, M, Yardımcı, B and Kavukcu, E (2021) Ethical considerations at the end-of-life care. SAGE Open Medicine 9, . doi:10.1177/20503121211000918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrocal, Y, Darr, A, Fisher, J, et al. (2020) Poster presentations abstracts, 24th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Medical Science Educators, June 15-18, 2020. Medical Science Educator 30(S1), 1967. doi:10.1007/s40670-020-01154-1Google Scholar
Brungardt, A, Wibben, A, Tompkins, AF, et al. (2021) Virtual reality-based music therapy in palliative care: A pilot implementation trial. Journal of Palliative Medicine 24(5), 736742. doi:10.1089/jpm.2020.0403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corvin, J, Hoskinson, Z, Mozolic-Staunton, B, et al. (2024) The effects of virtual reality interventions on occupational participation and distress from symptoms in palliative care patients: A pilot study. Palliative and Supportive Care 22, 18. doi:10.1017/S1478951524000245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, TM (2022) The social life of biomedical data: Capturing, obscuring, and envisioning care in the digital safety-net. Social Science & Medicine 294, . doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114670CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ding, L, Hua, H, Zhu, H, et al. (2020) Effects of virtual reality on relieving postoperative pain in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery 82(August), 8794. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.033CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia Valencia, OA, Suppadungsuk, S, Thongprayoon, C, et al. (2023) Ethical implications of chatbot utilization in nephrology. Journal of Personalized Medicine 13(9), . doi:10.3390/jpm13091363CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, J, Xu, X, Liu, C, et al. (2024) Perspectives of telemedicine-based services among family caregivers of patients with end-of-life cancer: A qualitative study in mainland China. BMC Palliative Care 23(1), 19. doi:10.1186/s12904-024-01347-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mentzelopoulos, SD, Couper, K, Van de Voorde, P, et al. (2021) European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Ethics of resuscitation and end of life decisions. Resuscitation 161, 408432. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocque, R and Leanza, Y (2015) A systematic review of patients’ experiences in communicating with primary care physicians: Intercultural encounters and a balance between vulnerability and integrity. PLoS ONE 10(10), 131. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, SK, Gomez, CF, Carpenter, P, et al. (2011) Quality of life for children with life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses: Description and evaluation of a regional, collaborative model for pediatric palliative care. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 28(3), 161170. doi:10.1177/1049909110380594CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saputra, R, Setyorini, , Rasmanah, M, et al. (2024) Spiritual embrace: A source of strength for caregivers in a mental health crisis. Palliative and Supportive Care, 12. doi:10.1017/S1478951524000270Google Scholar
Unertl, KM, Fair, AM, Favours, JS, et al. (2018) Clinicians’ perspectives on and interest in participating in a clinical data research network across the Southeastern United States. BMC Health Services Research 18(1), 110. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3399-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Won, AS, Bailey, J, Bailenson, J, et al. (2017) Immersive virtual reality for pediatric pain. Children 4(7), 115. doi:10.3390/children4070052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed