Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:58:17.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

[No Title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rameez Zafar*
Affiliation:
Peter Hodgkinson Centre, Lincoln LN2 5UA, e-mail: Rameez.Zafar@lpt.nhs.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2006

I fully agree with the views expressed by Dr Khan and I appreciate the comments made by Professor Bhugra (Psychiatric Bulletin, January 2006, 30, 3-6). It is heartening to note that the College is striving hard to maintain the highest standards of training and ethics and that certain steps are being taken to establish new guidelines and criteria to uphold these standards across the board. MRCPsych is undoubtedly the most prestigious qualification and therefore it should not be awarded to those who fail to meet its standards.

Professor Bhugra mentions two groups of people who could be awarded this qualification without examination. However, there is another group which he fails to mention. Under Article 14, the Postgraduate Medical and Education Training Board (PMETB) can now consider the applications of many middle grade doctors for specialist registration who do not have the accredited higher specialist training or who have previously been unsuccessful in the MRCPsych examination. If some of these applicants are successful, then they will move on to the specialist register of the General Medical Council, thereby automatically qualifying for Membership of the College.

I suggest that the College sets up a tier system whereby these potential awardees, before being granted Membership, either take some form of modular examination or undergo a series of training workshops and courses. By implementing such a system the College will be able to appraise the knowledge and skills of these doctors objectively. It will also enable these doctors to match the standards achieved by those who acquire MRCPsych through normal means. If this is not possible then the College should seriously consider amending the Bye-Laws once again.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.