Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:24:52.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2022

Emily Postan
Emily Postan
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh

Summary

A summary is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Chapter
Information
Embodied Narratives
Protecting Identity Interests through Ethical Governance of Bioinformation
 , pp. 264 - 286
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Ajana, Btihaj. (2010) ‘Recombinant Identities: Biometrics and Narrative Bioethics’. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (2): 237–58.Google Scholar
Ajana, Btihaj. (2020) ‘Personal Metrics: Users’ Experiences and Perceptions of Self-Tracking Practices and Data’. Social Science Information 59 (4): 654–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akandji-Kombe, Jean-François. (2007) Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights: A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Handbooks (No. 7). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Alaimo, Stacy, and Hekman, Susan J. (2008) ‘Introduction: Emerging Models of Materiality in Feminist Theory’. In Material Feminisms, edited by Alaimo, Stacy and Hekman, Susan J. Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 1–22.Google Scholar
Alpert, Sheri. (2012) ‘The Specter of Commercial Neuroimaging’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 56–8.Google Scholar
Anderson, James A, and Illes, Judy. (2012) ‘Neuroimaging and Mental Health: Drowning in a Sea of Acrimony’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 42–3.Google Scholar
Anderson, James A, Mizgalewicz, Ania, and Illes, Judy. (2013) ‘Triangulating Perspectives on Functional Neuroimaging for Disorders of Mental Health’. BMC Psychiatry 13 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Andorno, Roberto. (2004) ‘The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach’. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5): 435–9.Google Scholar
Annas, George J, and Elias, Sherman. (2014) ‘23andMe and the FDA’. New England Journal of Medicine 370 (11): 985–8.Google Scholar
Appleby, John. (2018) ‘Should Mitochondrial Donation Be Anonymous?’. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43 (2): 261–80.Google Scholar
Appleby, John B, Blake, Lucy, and Freeman, Tabitha. (2012) ‘Is Disclosure in the Best Interests of Children Conceived by Donation?’. In Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics, edited by Richards, Martin, Pennings, Guido and Appleby, John B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 231–49.Google Scholar
Ashida, Sato, Koehly, Laura M, Roberts, J Scott et al. (2010) ‘The Role of Disease Perceptions and Results Sharing in Psychological Adaptation after Genetic Susceptibility Testing: The REVEAL Study’. European Journal of Human Genetics 18 (12): 1296–301.Google Scholar
Atkins, Emily R, and Panegyres, Peter K. (2011) ‘The Clinical Utility of Gene Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease’. Neurology International 3 (1): 1–3.Google Scholar
Atkins, Kim. (2008) ‘Narrative Identity and Practical Continuity’. In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Atkins, Kim. New York: Routledge: 78–98.Google Scholar
Barclay, Linda. (2000) ‘Autonomy and the Social Self’. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 52–71.Google Scholar
Baylis, Françoise. (2012) ‘The Self in Situ: A Relational Account of Personal Identity’. In Being Relational: Reflections on Relational Theory and Health Law, edited by Downie, Jocelyn and Llewellyn, Jennifer J. Vancouver: UBC Press: 109–31.Google Scholar
Beeson, Diane R, Jennings, Patricia K, and Kramer, Wendy. (2011) ‘Offspring Searching for Their Sperm Donors: How Family Type Shapes the Process’. Human Reproduction 26 (9): 2415–24.Google Scholar
Bemelmans, Sonja, Tromp, Krista, Bunnik, Eline et al. (2016) ‘Psychological, Behavioral and Social Effects of Disclosing Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers to Research Participants: A Systematic Review’. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy 8 (1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Ben-David, Shelly, and Kealy, David. (2020) ‘Identity in the Context of Early Psychosis: A Review of Recent Research’. Psychosis 12 (1): 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, Benjamin E, Hull, Sara Chandros, and Eckstein, Lisa. (2014) ‘The Unintended Implications of Blurring the Line between Research and Clinical Care in a Genomic Age’. Personalized Medicine 11 (3): 285–95.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha. (2007) ‘Enforcing the Child’s Right to Know Her Origins: Contrasting Approaches under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Convention on Human Rights’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21 (2): 137–59.Google Scholar
Blake, Lucy, Jadva, Vasanti, and Golombok, Susan. (2014) ‘Parent Psychological Adjustment, Donor Conception and Disclosure: A Follow-up over 10 Years’. Human Reproduction 29 (11): 2487–96.Google Scholar
Blauwhoff, Richard J. (2008) ‘Tracing Down the Historical Development of the Legal Concept of the Right to Know One’s Origins: Has “to Know or Not to Know” Ever Been the Legal Question?’. Utrecht Law Review 4 (2): 99–116.Google Scholar
Blyth, Eric. (2012) ‘Genes R Us? Making Sense of Genetic and Non-Genetic Relationships Following Anonymous Donor Insemination’. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 24 (7): 719–26.Google Scholar
Blyth, Eric, and Frith, Lucy. (2009) ‘Donor-Conceived People’s Access to Genetic and Biographical History: An Analysis of Provisions in Different Jurisdictions Permitting Disclosure of Donor Identity’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23 (2): 174–91.Google Scholar
Borgelt, Emily L, Buchman, Daniel Z, and Illes, Judy. (2011) ‘“This Is Why You’ve Been Suffering”: Reflections of Providers on Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care’. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1): 15–25.Google Scholar
Borgelt, Emily L, Buchman, Daniel Z, and Illes, Judy. (2012) ‘Neuroimaging in Mental Health Care: Voices in Translation’. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6: 293–7.Google Scholar
Borry, Pascal, Schotsmans, Paul, and Dierickx, Kris. (2004) ‘What Is the Role of Empirical Research in Bioethical Reflection and Decision-Making? An Ethical Analysis’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1): 41–53.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, Lisa. (2013) ‘The Relative Importance of Undesirable Truths’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4): 683–90.Google Scholar
Brandeis, Louis, and Warren, Samuel. (1890) ‘The Right to Privacy’. Harvard Law Review 4 (5): 193–220.Google Scholar
Brandon, Priscilla. (2016) ‘Body and Self: An Entangled Narrative’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 15 (1): 67–83.Google Scholar
British Medical Association. (2019) Access to Health Records. www.bma.org.uk/media/2821/bma-access-to-health-records-june-20.pdf.Google Scholar
Bryman, Alan. (2016) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. (1988) ‘Advance Directives and the Personal Identity Problem’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 17 (4): 277–302.Google ScholarPubMed
Buchman, Daniel Z, Borgelt, Emily L, Whiteley, Louise, and Illes, Judy. (2013) ‘Neurobiological Narratives: Experiences of Mood Disorder through the Lens of Neuroimaging’. Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (1): 66–81.Google Scholar
Bulgin, Dominique, Tanabe, Paula, and Jenerette, Coretta. (2018) ‘Stigma of Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review’. Issues in Mental Health Nursing 39 (8): 675–86.Google Scholar
Bunnik, Eline M, Janssens, A Cecile JW, and Schermer, Maartje HN. (2014) ‘Personal Utility in Genomic Testing: Is There Such a Thing?’. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4): 322–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Bunnik, Eline M, Schermer, Maartje HN, and Janssens, A Cecile JW. (2011) ‘Personal Genome Testing: Test Characteristics to Clarify the Discourse on Ethical, Legal and Societal Issues’. BMC Medical Ethics 12 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Butow, Phyllis N, Lobb, Elizabeth A, Barratt, Alexandra, Meiser, Bettina, and Tucker, Katherine M. (2003) ‘Psychological Outcomes and Risk Perception after Genetic Testing and Counselling in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review’. Medical Journal of Australia 178 (2): 77–81.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Cheshire. (2000) ‘Losing Oneself’. In Relational Autonomy, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 193–211.Google Scholar
Callus, Thérèse. (2004) ‘Tempered Hope? A Qualified Right to Know One’s Genetic Origin: Odièvre v France’. The Modern Law Review 67 (4): 658–69.Google Scholar
Camporesi, Silvia. (2019) ‘When Does an Advantage Become Unfair? Empirical and Normative Concerns in Semenya’s Case’. Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (11): 700–4.Google Scholar
Carel, Havi. (2011) ‘Phenomenology and Its Application in Medicine’. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (1): 33–46.Google Scholar
Carel, Havi. (2016) Phenomenology of Illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, Pam, Laurie, Graeme T, and Dixon-Woods, Mary. (2015) ‘The Social Licence for Research: Why Care.Data Ran into Trouble’. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (5): 404–9.Google Scholar
Cassam, Quassim. (2011) ‘The Embodied Self’. In The Oxford Handbook of the Self, edited by Gallagher, Shaun. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 139–56.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Ruth, Levitt, Mairi, and Shickle, Darren. (2014) The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Sarah, Cunningham-Burley, Sarah, de Togni, Giulia et al. (2020) ‘Beyond Binaries: Dissolving the Empirical/Normative Divide’. AJOB Empirical Bioethics 11 (1): 17–19.Google Scholar
Chan, Sarah W, Tulloch, Ed, Cooper, E Sarah et al. (2017) ‘Montgomery and Informed Consent: Where Are We Now?’. BMJ 357–9.Google Scholar
Chilibeck, Gillian, Lock, Margaret, and Sehdev, Megha. (2011) ‘Postgenomics, Uncertain Futures, and the Familiarization of Susceptibility Genes’. Social Science & Medicine 72 (11): 1768–75.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kurt D, Karlawish, Jason, Roberts, J Scott et al. (2020) ‘Disclosing Genetic Risk for Alzheimer’s Dementia to Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment’. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 6 (1): e12002.Google Scholar
Christensen, Kurt D, Roberts, J Scott, Uhlmann, Wendy R, and Green, Robert C. (2011) ‘Changes to Perceptions of the Pros and Cons of Genetic Susceptibility Testing after APOE Genotyping for Alzheimer Disease Risk’. Genetics in Medicine 13 (5): 409–14.Google Scholar
Christman, John, ed. (1989) The Inner Citadel: Essays on Individual Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christman, John, (1991) ‘Autonomy and Personal History’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Christman, John, (2004) ‘Narrative Unity as a Condition of Personhood’. Metaphilosophy 35 (5): 695–713.Google Scholar
Christman, John, (2015) ‘Telling Our Own Stories: Narrative Selves and Oppressive Circumstance’. In The Philosophy of Autobiography, edited by Cowley, Christopher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 122–40.Google Scholar
Cohn, Simon. (2010) ‘Picturing the Brain Inside, Revealing the Illness Outside: A Comparison of the Different Meanings Attributed to Brain Scans by Scientists and Patients’. In Technologized Images, Technologized Bodies, edited by Edwards, Jeanette, Harvey, Penelope, and Wade, Peter. New York: Berghahn Books: 65–84.Google Scholar
Cooper, Deborah, Limet, Natalie, McClung, Ian, and Lawrie, Stephen M. (2013) ‘Towards Clinically Useful Neuroimaging in Psychiatric Practice’. The British Journal of Psychiatry 203 (4): 242–4.Google Scholar
Corsico, Paolo. (2021) ‘“It’s All About Delivery”: Researchers’ and Health Professionals’ Views on the Moral Challenges of Accessing Neurobiological Information in the Context of Psychosis’. BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2016) International Ethical Guidelines for Health-Related Research Involving Humans. www.cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdfGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, Marilyn, and Daniels, Ken. (2019) ‘Revisiting the Use of “Counselling” as a Means of Preparing Prospective Parents to Meet the Emerging Psychosocial Needs of Families That Have Used Gamete Donation’. Families, Relationships and Societies 8 (3): 395–409.Google Scholar
d’Agincourt-Canning, Lori. (2006) ‘Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Responsibility and Choice’. Qualitative Health Research 16 (1): 97–118.Google Scholar
Daniels, Ken R., Grace, Victoria M., and Gillett, Wayne R.. (2011) ‘Factors Associated with Parents’ Decisions to Tell Their Adult Offspring About the Offspring’s Donor Conception’. Human Reproduction 26 (10): 2783–90.Google Scholar
Davis, Dena S. (1997) ‘Genetic Dilemmas and the Child’s Right to an Open Future’. Hastings Center Report 27 (2): 7–15.Google Scholar
Davis, Nicola (2020) ‘Long-Term Offenders Have Different Brain Structure, Study Says’. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/science/2020/feb/17/long-term-offenders-have-different-brain-structure-study-says#:~:text=Now%20researchers%20say%20they%20have,who%20transgressed%20only%20as%20adolescentsGoogle Scholar
de Melo‐Martín, Inmaculada. (2014) ‘The Ethics of Anonymous Gamete Donation: Is There a Right to Know One’s Genetic Origins?’. Hastings Center Report 44 (2): 28–35.Google Scholar
de Melo-Martín, Inmaculada. (2016) ‘How Best to Protect the Vital Interests of Donor-Conceived Individuals: Prohibiting or Mandating Anonymity in Gamete Donations?’ Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online 3: 100–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003.Google Scholar
De Winter, Jan. (2016) Interests and Epistemic Integrity in Science: A New Framework to Assess Interest Influences in Scientific Research Processes. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, David. (2005) Human Identity and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2001) Donor Information Consultation: Providing Information About Gamete and Embryo Donors.Google Scholar
Department of Health. (2014) Mitochondrial Donation: Government Response to the Consultation on Draft Regulations to Permit the Use of New Treatment Techniques to Prevent the Transmission of a Serious Mitochondrial Disease from Mother to Child. www.assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332881/Consultation_response.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dove, Edward S, Chico, Vicky, Fay, Michael et al. (2019) ‘Familial Genetic Risks: How Can We Better Navigate Patient Confidentiality and Appropriate Risk Disclosure to Relatives?’. Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (8): 504–7.Google Scholar
Dubov, Alex, and Shoptawb, Steven. (2020) ‘The Value and Ethics of Using Technology to Contain the Covid-19 Epidemic’. The American Journal of Bioethics 20 (7): W7–W11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dumit, Joseph. (2003) ‘Is It Me or My Brain? Depression and Neuroscientific Facts’. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (1): 35–47.Google Scholar
Dumit, Joseph. (2004) Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald. (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Susan Larusse, Katzen, Heather, Roberts, J Scott et al. (2006) ‘Recall of Disclosed Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Lifetime Risk Estimate for Alzheimer’s Disease: The REVEAL Study’. Genetics in Medicine 8 (12): 746–51.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Lisa, Garrett, Jeremy R, and Berkman, Benjamin E. (2014) ‘A Framework for Analyzing the Ethics of Disclosing Genetic Research Findings’. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42 (2): 190–207.Google Scholar
Edelman, Marian Wright. (2015) ‘It’s Hard to Be What You Can’t See’. Huffington Post, 21 August. www.huffpost.com/entry/its-hard-to-be-what-you-c_b_8022776.Google Scholar
Eijkholt, Marleen. (2010) ‘Sterilisation and the Birth of a Right: Effective Access to Medical Records’. Medical Law Review 18 (1): 96–102.Google Scholar
Esplen, Mary Jane, Stuckless, Noreen, Hunter, Jonathan et al. (2009) ‘The BRCA Self-Concept Scale: A New Instrument to Measure Self-Concept in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers’. Psycho-Oncology 18 (11): 1216–29.Google Scholar
Etkin, Amit. (2019) ‘A Reckoning and Research Agenda for Neuroimaging in Psychiatry’. American Journal of Psychiatry 176 (7): 507–11.Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J. (2014) ‘Brain Images, Babies, and Bathwater: Critiquing Critiques of Functional Neuroimaging’. Hastings Center Report 44 (s2): S19–S30.Google Scholar
Farah, Martha J, and Gillihan, Seth J. (2012) ‘The Puzzle of Neuroimaging and Psychiatric Diagnosis: Technology and Nosology in an Evolving Discipline’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 31–41.Google Scholar
Farrer, Lindsay A, Cupples, L Adrienne, Haines, Jonathan L et al. (1997) ‘Effects of Age, Sex, and Ethnicity on the Association between Apolipoprotein E Genotype and Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-Analysis’. JAMA 278 (16): 1349–56.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. (1984) Harm to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fenech, Matthew, Strukelj, Nika, and Buston, Olly. (2018) Ethical, Social, and Political Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Health. London: Wellcome Trust & Future Advocacy.Google Scholar
Floridi, Luciano. (2019) ‘Semantic Conceptions of Information’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N. www.plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/information-semantic/.Google Scholar
Fortin, Jane. (2011) ‘Children’s Right to Know Their Origins – Too Far, Too Fast?’. Child and Family Law Quarterly 21 (3): 336–55.Google Scholar
Foster, Morris W, Mulvihill, John J, and Sharp, Richard R. (2009) ‘Evaluating the Utility of Personal Genomic Information’. Genetics in Medicine 11 (8): 570–4.Google Scholar
Freeman, Tabitha. (2014) ‘Introduction’. In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Freeman, Tabitha, Graham, Susanna, Ebtehaj, Fatemeh and Richards, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 1–18.Google Scholar
Freeman, Tabitha. (2015) ‘Gamete Donation, Information Sharing and the Best Interests of the Child: An Overview of the Psychosocial Evidence’. Monash Bioethics Review 33 (1): 45–63.Google Scholar
Freeman, Tabitha, Bourne, Kate, Vasanti, Jadva, and Smith, Venessa. (2014) ‘Making Connections: Contact between Sperm Donor Relations’. In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Freeman, Tabitha, Graham, Susanna, Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, and Richards, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 270–95.Google Scholar
Freeman, Tabitha, and Golombok, Susan. (2012) ‘Donor Insemination: A Follow-up Study of Disclosure Decisions, Family Relationships and Child Adjustment at Adolescence’. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 25 (2): 193–203.Google Scholar
Frith, Lucy, Blyth, Eric, Crawshaw, Marilyn, and van den Akker, Olga. (2018a) ‘Searching for “Relations” Using a DNA Linking Register by Adults Conceived Following Sperm Donation’. BioSocieties 13 (1): 170–89.Google Scholar
Frith, Lucy, Blyth, Eric, Crawshaw, Marilyn, and van den Akker, Olga. (2018b) ‘Secrets and Disclosure in Donor Conception’. Sociology of Health & Illness 40 (1): 188–203.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. (2006) How the Body Shapes the Mind. Wotton-under-Edge:Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J, and Gergen, Mary M. (1988) ‘Narrative and the Self as Relationship’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 21 (1): 17–56.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Sahra. (2007) ‘Charity, Breast Cancer Activism and the Iconic Figure of the BRCA Carrier’. In Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities, edited by Gibbon, Sahra and Novas, Carlos. Abingdon: Routledge: 19–37.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Sahra, and Novas, Carlos. (2007) ‘Introduction’. In Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities, edited by Gibbon, Sahra and Novas, Carlos. London: Routledge: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Lorna M, Littlejohns, Thomas J, Adamska, Ligia et al. (2017) ‘Impact of Detecting Potentially Serious Incidental Findings During Multi-Modal Imaging’. Wellcome Open Research 2: 114.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Frederic. (2015) ‘A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants’. AJOB Neuroscience 6 (4): 4–11.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Frederic, Cook, Mark, O’Brien, Terrence, and Illes, Judy. (2019) ‘Embodiment and Estrangement: Results from a First-in-Human “Intelligent BCI” Trial’. Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (1): 83–96.Google Scholar
Giordano, James. (2012) ‘Neuroimaging in Psychiatry: Approaching the Puzzle as a Piece of the Bigger Picture(S)’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 54–6.Google Scholar
Glannon, Walter. (2009) ‘Our Brains Are Not Us’. Bioethics 23 (6): 321–9.Google Scholar
Glover, Jonathan. (1988) I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Golombok, Susan. (2017) ‘Disclosure and Donor-Conceived Children’. Human Reproduction 32 (7): 1532–6.Google Scholar
Golombok, Susan, Brewaeys, Anne, Giavazzi, Michele T. et al. (2002) ‘The European Study of Assisted Reproduction Families: The Transition to Adolescence’. Human Reproduction 17 (3): 830–40.Google Scholar
Gooding, Holly C, Linnenbringer, Erin L, Burack, Jeffrey et al. (2006) ‘Genetic Susceptibility Testing for Alzheimer Disease: Motivation to Obtain Information and Control as Precursors to Coping with Increased Risk’. Patient Education and Counseling 64 (1–3): 259–67.Google Scholar
Green, Robert C, and Farahany, Nita A. (2014) ‘Regulation: The FDA Is Overcautious on Consumer Genomics’. Nature News 505 (7483): 286.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (1995) ‘The Looping Effect of Human Kinds’. In Causal Cognition: A Multi-Disciplinary Debate, edited by Sperber, Dan, Premack, David and Premack, A James. New York: Oxford University Press: 351–83.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. (2004) ‘Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between Discourse in the Abstract and Face-to-Face Interaction’. Economy and Society 33 (3): 277–302.Google Scholar
Hallowell, Nina. (1999) ‘Doing the Right Thing: Genetic Risk and Responsibility’. Sociology of Health & Illness 21 (5): 597–621.Google Scholar
Hallowell, Nina, Cooke, Sarah, Crawford, Gillian et al. (2010) ‘An Investigation of Patients’ Motivations for Their Participation in Genetics-Related Research’. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Hallowell, Nina, Foster, Claire, Eeles, Rosalind, et al. (2004) ‘Accommodating Risk: Responses to BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing of Women Who Have Had Cancer’. Social Science & Medicine 59 (3): 553–65.Google Scholar
Hallowell, Nina, Foster, Claire, Eeles, Ros et al. (2003) ‘Balancing Autonomy and Responsibility: The Ethics of Generating and Disclosing Genetic Information’. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2): 74–9.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. (2006) ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’. In International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments, vol. 1, edited by Weiss, Joel, Nolan, Jason, Hunsinger, Jeremy and Trifonas, Peter. New York: Springer: 117–58.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, Valerie Gray. (2008) Constructing the Self. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harper, Joyce C, Kennett, Debbie, and Reisel, Dan. (2016) ‘The End of Donor Anonymity: How Genetic Testing Is Likely to Drive Anonymous Gamete Donation out of Business’. Human Reproduction 31 (6): 1135–40.Google Scholar
Harris, John, and Keywood, Kirsty. (2001) ‘Ignorance, Information and Autonomy’. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (5): 415–36.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. (2009) ‘Family, Ancestry and Self: What Is the Moral Significance of Biological Ties?’. Adoption & Culture 2: 91–122.Google Scholar
Hauskeller, Christine. (2004) ‘Genes, Genomes and Identity. Projections on Matter’. New Genetics and Society 23 (3): 285–99.Google Scholar
Hauskeller, Christine. (2006) ‘Human Genomics as Identity Politics.’ Award Paper for Young Scholar Conference, Cornell University, 7–9 April. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.571.6238&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Google Scholar
Hedgecoe, Adam M. (2004) ‘Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics’. Bioethics 18 (2): 120–43.Google Scholar
Henschke, Adam. (2010) ‘Did You Just Say What I Think You Said? Talking About Genes, Identity and Information’. Identity in the Information Society 3 (3): 435–56.Google Scholar
Henschke, Adam (2017) Ethics in an Age of Surveillance: Personal Information and Virtual Identities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heshka, Jodi T, Palleschi, Crystal, Howley, Heather, Wilson, Brenda, and Wells, Philip S. (2008) ‘A Systematic Review of Perceived Risks, Psychological and Behavioral Impacts of Genetic Testing’. Genetics in Medicine 10 (1): 19–32.Google Scholar
Hesse-Biber, Sharlene, and An, Chen. (2016) ‘Genetic Testing and Post-Testing Decision Making among BRCA-Positive Mutation Women: A Psychosocial Approach’. Journal of Genetic Counseling 25 (5): 978–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewitt, Geraldine. (2002) ‘Missing Links: Identity Issues of Donor Conceived People’. Journal of Fertility Counselling 9: 14–19.Google Scholar
Hickey, Blake Anthony, Chalmers, Taryn, Newton, Phillip et al. (2021) ‘Smart Devices and Wearable Technologies to Detect and Monitor Mental Health Conditions and Stress: A Systematic Review’. Sensors 21 (10): 3461.Google Scholar
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. (2021) Direct-to-Consumer Genomic Testing. www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5802/cmselect/cmsctech/94/9403.htmGoogle Scholar
Huckvale, Kit, Venkatesh, Svetha, and Christensen, Helen. (2019) ‘Toward Clinical Digital Phenotyping: A Timely Opportunity to Consider Purpose, Quality, and Safety’. npj Digital Medicine 2 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2019) HFEA Code of Practice, 9th ed. www.portal.hfea.gov.uk/media/1605/2019-12-03-code-of-practice-december-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Hurley, Ann C, Harvey, Rose, Roberts, J Scott et al. (2005) ‘Genetic Susceptibility for Alzheimer’s Disease: Why Did Adult Offspring Seek Testing?’. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 20 (6): 374–81.Google Scholar
Husted, Jørgen. (2014) ‘Autonomy and a Right Not to Know’. In The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility, edited by Chadwick, Ruth, Levitt, Mairi, and Shickle, Darren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 24–38.Google Scholar
Ienca, Marcello, and Andorno, Roberto. (2017) ‘Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology’. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Ilioi, Elena, Blake, Lucy, Jadva, Vasanti, Roman, Gabriela, and Golombok, Susan. (2017) ‘The Role of Age of Disclosure of Biological Origins in the Psychological Wellbeing of Adolescents Conceived by Reproductive Donation: A Longitudinal Study from Age 1 to Age 14’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 58 (3): 315–24.Google Scholar
Ilioi, Elena Cristiana, and Golombok, Susan. (2015) ‘Psychological Adjustment in Adolescents Conceived by Assisted Reproduction Techniques: A Systematic Review’. Human Reproduction Update 21 (1): 84–96.Google Scholar
Illes, Judy, Lombera, Sofia, Rosenberg, Jarett, and Arnow, Bruce. (2008) ‘In the Mind’s Eye: Provider and Patient Attitudes on Functional Brain Imaging’. Journal of Psychiatric Research 43 (2): 107–14.Google Scholar
Jadva, Vasanti, Freeman, Tabitha, Kramer, Wendy, and Golombok, Susan. (2009) ‘The Experiences of Adolescents and Adults Conceived by Sperm Donation: Comparisons by Age of Disclosure and Family Type’. Human Reproduction 24 (8): 1909–19.Google Scholar
Jain, Sachin H, Powers, Brian W, Hawkins, Jared B, and Brownstein, John S. (2015) ‘The Digital Phenotype’. Nature Biotechnology 33 (5): 462–3.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard. (2014) Social Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnston, Carolyn, and Kaye, Jane. (2004) ‘Does the UK Biobank Have a Legal Obligation to Feedback Individual Findings to Participants?’. Medical Law Review 12 (3): 239–67.Google Scholar
Joyce, Kelly. (2005) ‘Appealing Images: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge’. Social Studies of Science 35 (3): 437–62.Google Scholar
Kamenova, Kalina, Reshef, Amir, and Caulfield, Timothy. (2014) ‘Angelina Jolie’s Faulty Gene: Newspaper Coverage of a Celebrity’s Preventive Bilateral Mastectomy in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom’. Genetics in Medicine 16 (7): 522–8.Google Scholar
Kay, Jackie. (2011) Red Dust Road: An Autobiographical Journey. London: Atlas.Google Scholar
Kellmeyer, Philipp. (2017) ‘Ethical and Legal Implications of the Methodological Crisis in Neuroimaging’. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (4): 530–54.Google Scholar
Kellmeyer, Philipp. (2021) ‘Big Brain Data: On the Responsible Use of Brain Data from Clinical and Consumer-Directed Neurotechnological Devices’. Neuroethics 14 (1): 83–98.Google Scholar
Kenett, Jeanette, and Matthews, Steve. (2008) ‘Normative Agency’. In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Atkins, Kim. New York: Routledge: 212–31.Google Scholar
Kirkman, Maggie. (2003) ‘Parents’ Contributions to the Narrative Identity of Offspring of Donor-Assisted Conception’. Social Science & Medicine 57 (11): 2229–42.Google Scholar
Kirkman, Maggie. (2004) ‘Genetic Connection and Relationships in Narratives of Donor Assisted Conception’. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 2 (1). www.hdl.handle.net/11343/33590Google Scholar
Klitzman, Robert. (2009) ‘“Am I My Genes?”: Questions of Identity among Individuals Confronting Genetic Disease’. Genetics in Medicine 11 (12): 880–9.Google Scholar
Konrad, Monica. (2005) Narrating the New Predictive Genetics: Ethics, Ethnography, and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. (1996) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine. (2009) Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreitmair, Karola, and Cho, Mildred. (2017) ‘The Neuroethical Future of Wearable and Mobile Health Technology’. In Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future, edited by Illes, Judy. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 80–107.Google Scholar
Kreitmair, Karola V. (2019) ‘Dimensions of Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Neurotechnologies’. AJOB Neuroscience 10 (4): 152–66.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 50th Anniversary ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laurie, Graeme. (2002) Genetic Privacy: A Challenge to Medico-Legal Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laurie, Graeme. (2004) ‘The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach – A Response to Andorno’. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5): 439–40.Google Scholar
Laurie, Graeme. (2009) ‘Personality, Privacy and Autonomy in Medical Law’. In Rights of Personality in Scots Law: A Comparative Perspective, edited by Whitty, Niall R and Zimmermann, Reinhard. Dundee: Dundee University Press: 453–83.Google Scholar
Laurie, Graeme. (2014a) ‘Privacy and the Right Not to Know: A Plea for Conceptual Clarity’. In The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know: Genetic Privacy and Responsibility, edited by Chadwick, Ruth, Levitt, Mairi and Shickle, Darren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 38–51.Google Scholar
Laurie, Graeme. (2014b) ‘Recognizing the Right Not to Know: Conceptual, Professional, and Legal Implications’. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42 (1): 53–63.Google Scholar
Laurie, Graeme, Harmon, Shaun, and Dove, Edward. (2019) Mason and Mccall Smith’s Law and Medical Ethics, 11th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrie, Stephen M, Fletcher-Watson, Sue, Whalley, Heather C, and McIntosh, Andrew M. (2019) ‘Predicting Major Mental Illness: Ethical and Practical Considerations’. BJPsych Open 5 (2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Lawton, Georgina. (2021) Raceless: In Search of Family, Identity, and the Truth About Where I Belong. London: Sphere.Google Scholar
Lebowitz, Matthew S. (2014) ‘Biological Conceptualizations of Mental Disorders among Affected Individuals: A Review of Correlates and Consequences’. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 21 (1): 67–83.Google Scholar
Lennon, Kathleen. (2019) ‘Feminist Perspectives on the Body’. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall ed., edited by Zalta, Edward N. www.plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/feminist-body/Google Scholar
Lennon, Kathleen, Gonzalez-Arnal, Stella, and Jagger, Gill. (2012) ‘Introduction’ In Embodied Selves, edited by Gonzalez-Arnal, Stella, Jagger, Gill, and Lennon, Kathleen. Palgrave Macmillan: 1–11.Google Scholar
Levy-Lahad, Ephrat, Catane, Raphael, Eisenberg, Shlomit et al. (1997) ‘Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Ashkenazi Jews in Israel: Frequency and Differential Penetrance in Ovarian Cancer and in Breast-Ovarian Cancer Families’. American Journal of Human Genetics 60 (5): 1059.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, Hallvard. (2014) ‘Who Cares Where You Came From? Cultivating Virtues of Indifference’. In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Freeman, Tabitha, Graham, Susanna, Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, and Richards, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 97–112.Google Scholar
Lim, Jacqueline, Macluran, Mariette, Price, Melanie, Bennett, Barbara, and Butow, Phyllis. (2004) ‘Short-and Long-Term Impact of Receiving Genetic Mutation Results in Women at Increased Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer’. Journal of Genetic Counseling 13 (2): 115–33.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Hilde. (2016) Holding and Letting Go: The Social Practice of Personal Identities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Hilde. (2001) Damaged Identities, Narrative Repair. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lineweaver, Tara T, Bondi, Mark W, Galasko, Douglas, and Salmon, David P. (2014) ‘Effect of Knowledge of APOE Genotype on Subjective and Objective Memory Performance in Healthy Older Adults’. American Journal of Psychiatry 171 (2): 201–8.Google Scholar
Littlejohns, Thomas J, Holliday, Jo, Gibson, Lorna M et al. (2020) ‘The UK Biobank Imaging Enhancement of 100,000 Participants: Rationale, Data Collection, Management and Future Directions’. Nature Communications 11 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Genevieve. (2003) Being in Time: Selves and Narrators in Philosophy and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret. (2008) ‘Biosociality and Susceptibility Genes: A Cautionary Tale’. In Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities, edited by Gibbon, Sahra and Novas, Carlos. London: Routledge: 56–78.Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret, Cunningham-Burley, Sarah, Franklin, Sarah et al. (2005) ‘Eclipse of the Gene and the Return of Divination 1’. Current Anthropology 46 (S5): S47–S70.Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret, Freeman, Julia, Chilibeck, Gillian et al. (2007) ‘Susceptibility Genes and the Question of Embodied Identity’. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 21 (3): 256–76.Google Scholar
Lock, Margaret, Freeman, Julia, Sharples, Rosemary, and Lloyd, Stephanie. (2006) ‘When It Runs in the Family: Putting Susceptibility Genes in Perspective’. Public Understanding of Science 15 (3): 277–300.Google Scholar
Loughlin, Michael, Lewith, George, and Falkenberg, Torkel. (2013) ‘Science, Practice and Mythology: A Definition and Examination of the Implications of Scientism in Medicine’. Health Care Analysis 21 (2): 1–16.Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. (2013) ‘Quantifying the Body: Monitoring and Measuring Health in the Age of Mhealth Technologies’. Critical Public Health 23 (4): 393–403.Google Scholar
Lynch, Henry T, Snyder, Carrie, Lynch, Jane F et al. (2006) ‘Patient Responses to the Disclosure of BRCA Mutation Tests in Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Families’. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 165 (2): 91–7.Google Scholar
Machado, Helena, and Granja, Rafaela. (2020) ‘Emerging DNA Technologies and Stigmatization’. In Forensic Genetics in the Governance of Crime, edited by Machado, Helena and Granja, Rafaela. Singapore: Palgrave Pivot: 85–104.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair C. (1985) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, 2nd ed. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. (2000) ‘Imagining Oneself Otherwise’. In Relational Autonomy, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 124–51.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. (2007) ‘Bare Personhood? Velleman on Selfhood’. Philosophical Explorations 10 (3): 263–81.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. (2008a) ‘Introduction: Practical Identity and Narrative Agency’. In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Atkins, Kim. London: Routledge: 1–28.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. (2008b) ‘Imagination, Identity, and Self-Transformation’. In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency, edited by Atkins, Kim and Mackenzie, Catriona. London: Routledge: 121–45.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona. (2009) ‘Personal Identity, Narrative Integration, and Embodiment’. In Embodiment and Agency, edited by Campbell, Sue, Maynell, Letitia, and Sherwin, Susan. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press: 100–25.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Poltera, Jacqui. (2010) ‘Narrative Integration, Fragmented Selves, and Autonomy’. Hypatia 25 (1): 31–54.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Poltera, Jacqui. (2011) ‘Narrative Identity and Autonomy: Reply to Commentaries’. MIT Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy 7 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Scully, Jackie Leach. (2007) ‘Moral Imagination, Disability and Embodiment’. Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 (4): 335–51.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie. (2000) ‘Introduction: Autonomy Reconfigured’. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 3–31.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Walker, Mary. (2015) ‘Neurotechnologies, Personal Identity and the Ethics of Authenticity’. In Handbook of Neuroethics, edited by Clausen, Jens and Levy, Neil. Dordrecht: Springer: 373–92.Google Scholar
Mahlstedt, Patricia P, LaBounty, Kathleen, and Kennedy, William Thomas. (2010) ‘The Views of Adult Offspring of Sperm Donation: Essential Feedback for the Development of Ethical Guidelines within the Practice of Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States’. Fertility and Sterility 93 (7): 2236–46.Google Scholar
Marshall, Jill. (2014) Human Rights Law and Personal Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, Emily. (2010) ‘Self-Making and the Brain’. Subjectivity 3 (4): 366–81.Google Scholar
McConkie‐Rosell, Allyn, and DeVellis, Brenda M. (2000) ‘Threat to Parental Role: A Possible Mechanism of Altered Self‐Concept Related to Carrier Knowledge’. Journal of Genetic Counseling 9 (4): 285–302.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Sheelagh, Koops, Bert-Jaap, and Asscher, Eva. (2010) ‘Genetics, Information and Identity’. Identity in the Information Society 3 (3): 415–21.Google Scholar
McMillan, Catriona, Dove, Edward, Laurie, Graeme et al. (2021) ‘Beyond Categorisation: Refining the Relationship between Subjects and Objects in Health Research Regulation’. Law, Innovation and Technology 13 (1): 194–222.Google Scholar
Mella, Sara, Muzzatti, Barbara, Dolcetti, Riccardo et al.(2017) ‘Emotional Impact on the Results of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genetic Test: An Observational Retrospective Study’. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice 15 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (1962) Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meyers, Diana T. (2000) ‘Intersectional Identity and the Authentic Self? Opposites Attract’. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Automony, Agency, and the Social Self, edited by Mackenzie, Catriona and Stoljar, Natalie. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 151–80.Google Scholar
Miller, Franklin G, Mello, Michelle M, and Joffe, Steven. (2008) ‘Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: What Do Investigators Owe Research Participants?’. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2): 271–9.Google Scholar
Miller, Sarah Clark. (2013) The Ethics of Need: Agency, Dignity, and Obligation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Molewijk, Bert, Stiggelbout, Anne M, Otten, Wilma et al. (2004) ‘Scientific Contribution. Empirical Data and Moral Theory. A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics’. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1): 55–69.Google Scholar
Mozersky, Jessica, and Joseph, Galen. (2010) ‘Case Studies in the Co-Production of Populations and Genetics: The Making of “at Risk Populations” in BRCA Genetics’. BioSocieties 5 (4): 415–39.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. (2013) The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013, updated 2019) Guidelines: Familial Breast Cancer: Classification and Care of People at Risk of Familial Breast Cancer and Management of Breast Cancer and Related Risks in People with a Family History of Breast Cancer (Cg164). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg164Google Scholar
Nazroo, James Y, Bhui, Kamaldeep S, and Rhodes, James. (2020) ‘Where Next for Understanding Race/Ethnic Inequalities in Severe Mental Illness? Structural, Interpersonal and Institutional Racism’. Sociology of Health & Illness 42 (2): 262–76.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alondra. (2008) ‘Bio Science: Genetic Genealogy Testing and the Pursuit of African Ancestry’. Social Studies of Science 38 (5): 759–83.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alondra. (2016) The Social Life of DNA: Race, Reparations, and Reconciliation after the Genome. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jamie Lindemann. (1992) ‘Genetic Narratives: Biology, Stories, and the Definition of the Family’. Health Matrix 2: 71.Google Scholar
Niedenthal, Paula M. (2007) ‘Embodying Emotion’. Science 316 (5827): 1002–5.Google Scholar
Nordgren, Anders, and Juengst, Eric T.. (2009) ‘Can Genomics Tell Me Who I Am? Essentialistic Rhetoric in Direct-to-Consumer DNA Testing’. New Genetics and Society 28 (2): 157–72.Google Scholar
Novas, Carlos, and Rose, Nikolas. (2001) ‘Genetic Risk and the Birth of the Somatic Individual’. Economy and Society 29 (4): 485–513.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. (2013) Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing. www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/donor-conceptionGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha Craven. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Cliodhna, and Joffe, Helene. (2013) ‘How Has Neuroscience Affected Lay Understandings of Personhood? A Review of the Evidence’. Public Understanding of Science 22 (3): 254–68.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Cliodhna, Rees, Geraint, and Joffe, Helene. (2012) ‘Neuroscience in the Public Sphere’. Neuron 74 (2): 220–6.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora. (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics: Gifford Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parens, Erik, and Appelbaum, Paul S. (2019) ‘On What We Have Learned and Still Need to Learn About the Psychosocial Impacts of Genetic Testing’. Hastings Center Report 49 (S1): S2–S9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1011.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Michael, and Lucassen, Anneke M. (2004) ‘Genetic Information: A Joint Account?’. BMJ 329 (7458): 165–7.Google Scholar
Parry, Bronwyn. (2013) ‘Knowing Mycellf™: Personalized Medicine and the Economization of Prospective Knowledge About Bodily Fate’. In Knowledge and the Economy, edited by Meusburger, Peter, Glückler, Johannes, and el Meskioui, Martina. Knowledge and Space (Klaus Tschira Symposia). Dordrecht: Springer: 157–71.Google Scholar
Peake, Jonathan M, Kerr, Graham, and Sullivan, John P. (2018) ‘A Critical Review of Consumer Wearables, Mobile Applications, and Equipment for Providing Biofeedback, Monitoring Stress, and Sleep in Physically Active Populations’. Frontiers in Physiology 9: 743.Google Scholar
Pennings, Guido. (2017) ‘Disclosure of Donor Conception, Age of Disclosure and the Well-Being of Donor Offspring’. Human Reproduction 32 (5): 969–73.Google Scholar
Pickersgill, Martyn. (2011) ‘“Promising” Therapies: Neuroscience, Clinical Practice, and the Treatment of Psychopathy’. Sociology of Health & Illness 33 (3): 448–64.Google Scholar
Pickersgill, Martyn, Cunningham-Burley, Sarah, and Martin, Paul. (2011) ‘Constituting Neurologic Subjects: Neuroscience, Subjectivity and the Mundane Significance of the Brain’. Subjectivity 4 (3): 346–65.Google Scholar
Pinto-Basto, Jorge, Guimarães, Bárbara, Rantanen, Elina et al. (2010) ‘Scope of Definitions of Genetic Testing: Evidence from a Eurogentest Survey’. Journal of Community Genetics 1 (1): 29–35.Google Scholar
Postan, Emily. (2016) ‘Defining Ourselves: Personal Bioinformation as a Tool of Narrative Self-Conception’. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 13 (1): 133–51.Google Scholar
Postan, Emily. (2021) ‘Narrative Devices: Neurotechnologies, Information, and Self-Constitution’. Neuroethics 14: 231–251.Google Scholar
Postan, Emily. (2021) ‘Changing Identities in Disclosure of Research Findings’. In The Cambridge Handbook of Health Research Regulation, edited by Laurie, Graeme, Dove, Edward, Ganguli-Mitra, Agomoni et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. (2010) ‘Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality’. Politix 90(2): 21–46.Google Scholar
Racine, Eric, Bar-Ilan, Ofek, and Illes, Judy. (2005) ‘fMRI in the Public Eye’. Nature Review Neuroscience 6 (2): 159–64.Google Scholar
Racine, Eric, Waldman, Sarah, Rosenberg, Jarett, and Illes, Judy. (2010) ‘Contemporary Neuroscience in the Media’. Social Science & Medicine 71 (4): 725–33.Google Scholar
Raghupathi, Wullianallur, and Raghupathi, Viju. (2014) ‘Big Data Analytics in Healthcare: Promise and Potential’. Health Information Science and Systems 2 (1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Ramos, Renato T. (2012) ‘The Conceptual Limits of Neuroimaging in Psychiatric Diagnosis’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 52–3.Google Scholar
Ravelingien, An, Provoost, Veerle, and Pennings, Guido. (2013) ‘Donor-Conceived Children Looking for Their Sperm Donor: What Do They Want to Know?’. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn 5 (4): 257–64.Google Scholar
Ravitsky, Vardit. (2010) ‘“Knowing Where You Come From”: The Rights of Donor-Conceived Individuals and the Meaning of Genetic Relatedness’. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 11 (2): 655–84.Google Scholar
Ravitsky, Vardit. (2014) ‘Autonomous Choice and the Right to Know One’s Genetic Origins’. Hastings Center Report 44 (2): 36–7.Google Scholar
Ravitsky, Vardit. (2016) ‘Donor Conception and Lack of Access to Genetic Heritage’. American Journal of Bioethics 16 (12): 45–6.Google Scholar
Ravitsky, Vardit, and Wilfond, Benjamin S. (2006) ‘Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants’. American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6): 8–17.Google Scholar
Read, John. (2007) ‘Why Promoting Biological Ideology Increases Prejudice against People Labelled “Schizophrenic”’. Australian Psychologist 42 (2): 118–28.Google Scholar
Readings, Jennifer, Blake, Lucy, Casey, Polly et al. (2011) ‘Secrecy, Disclosure and Everything in-Between: Decisions of Parents of Children Conceived by Donor Insemination, Egg Donation and Surrogacy’. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 22 (5): 485–95.Google Scholar
Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph. (2009) ‘Allowing Agency: An Ethical Model for Communicating Personal Genetic Information’. In Disclosure Dilemmas: Ethics of Genetic Prognosis after the ‘Right to Know/Not to Know’ Debate, edited by Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph and Müller, Hansjakob. Farnham: Ashgate: 242–73.Google Scholar
Richards, Martin. (2014) ‘A British History of Collaborative Reproduction and the Rise of the Genetic Connection’. In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction, edited by Freeman, Tabitha, Graham, Susanna, Ebtehaj, Fatemeh, and Richards, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 21–43.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. (1992) Oneself as Another, translated by Kathleen Blamey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riessman, Catherine Kohler. (2008) Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Roberts, J Scott. (2012) ‘Genetic Testing for Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease: Benefit or Burden?’. Neurodegenerative Disease Management 2 (2): 141–4.Google Scholar
Roberts, J Scott, Christensen, Kurt D, and Green, Robert C. (2011) ‘Using Alzheimer’s Disease as a Model for Genetic Risk Disclosure: Implications for Personal Genomics’. Clinical Genetics 80 (5): 407–14.Google Scholar
Roberts, J Scott, Cupples, L Adrienne, Relkin, Norman R et al. (2005) ‘Genetic Risk Assessment for Adult Children of People with Alzheimer’s Disease: The Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer’s Disease (Reveal) Study’. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 18 (4): 250–5.Google Scholar
Roberts, J Scott, and Uhlmann, Wendy R. (2013) ‘Genetic Susceptibility Testing for Neurodegenerative Diseases: Ethical and Practice Issues’. Progress in Neurobiology 110: 89–101.Google Scholar
Roberts, Scott J, LaRusse, Susan A, Katzen, Heather et al. (2003) ‘Reasons for Seeking Genetic Susceptibility Testing among First‐Degree Relatives of People with Alzheimer Disease’. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 17 (2): 86–93.Google Scholar
Roe, David, and Davidson, Larry. (2005) ‘Self and Narrative in Schizophrenia: Time to Author a New Story’. Medical Humanities 31 (2): 89–94.Google Scholar
Rogers, Wendy, Mackenzie, Catriona, and Dodds, Susan. (2012) ‘Why Bioethics Needs a Concept of Vulnerability’. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2): 11–38.Google Scholar
Rose, Diana, Papoulias, Constantina, MacCabe, James, and Walke, Jennifer. (2015) ‘Service Users’ and Carers’ Views on Research Towards Stratified Medicine in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study’. BMC Research Notes 8 (1): 1–9.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas. (2007) Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rose, Nikolas S, and Abi-Rached, Joelle M. (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roskies, Adina L. (2008) ‘Neuroimaging and Inferential Distance’. Neuroethics 1 (1): 19–30.Google Scholar
Rowbottom, Darrell P. (2019) ‘Scientific Realism: What It Is, the Contemporary Debate, and New Directions’. Synthese 196 (2): 451–84.Google Scholar
Rowley, Jennifer. (2007) ‘The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW Hierarchy’. Journal of Information Science 33 (2): 163–80.Google Scholar
Royal, Charmaine D, Novembre, John, Fullerton, Stephanie M et al. (2010) ‘Inferring Genetic Ancestry: Opportunities, Challenges, and Implications’. The American Journal of Human Genetics 86 (5): 661–73.Google Scholar
The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust. (2016) Patient Information: A Beginner’s Guide to BRCA1 and BRCA2. www.patientinfolibrary.royalmarsden.nhs.uk/brca1brac2Google Scholar
Sabatello, Maya, and Juengst, Eric. (2019) ‘Genomic Essentialism: Its Provenance and Trajectory as an Anticipatory Ethical Concern’. Hastings Center Report 49: S10–S18.Google Scholar
Saini, Angela. (2019) Superior: The Return of Race Science. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Saks, Elyn R. (2007) The Centre Cannot Hold. London: Virago.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. (1975) ‘Thomson on Privacy’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 (4): 315–22.Google Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas. (1998) What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. (1996) The Constitution of Selves. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. (2007) ‘Stories, Lives, and Basic Survival: A Refinement and Defense of the Narrative View’. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 60: 155–78.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. (2012) ‘Making the Truth: Self-Understanding, Self-Constitution, Neuroscience, and Narrative’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 75–6.Google Scholar
Schechtman, Marya. (2014) Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheib, Joanna E, Riordan, Maura, and Rubin, Susan. (2003) ‘Choosing Identity‐Release Sperm Donors: The Parents’ Perspective 13–18 Years Later’. Human Reproduction 18 (5): 1115–27.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, Anne, Bos, Henny, van Rooij, Floor et al. (2019) ‘Being a Donor-Child: Wishes for Parental Support, Peer Support and Counseling’. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology 40 (1): 29–37.Google Scholar
Scott, Susie, Prior, Lindsay, Wood, Fiona, and Gray, Johnathan. (2005) ‘Repositioning the Patient: The Implications of Being “at Risk”’. Social Science & Medicine 60 (8): 1869–79.Google Scholar
Scully, Jackie Leach. (2008) Disability Bioethics: Moral Bodies, Moral Difference. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Scully, Jackie Leach. (2009) ‘Receiving and Interpreting Information: A Joint Enterprise’. In Disclosure Dilemmas: Ethics of Genetic Prognosis after the ‘Right to Know/Not to Know’ Debate, edited by Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph and Hansjakob, Müller. Farnham: Ashgate: 216–29.Google Scholar
Scully, Jackie Leach. (2017) ‘A Mitochondrial Story: Mitochondrial Replacement, Identity and Narrative’. Bioethics 31 (1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Sharon, Tamar. (2017) ‘Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare’. Philosophy & Technology 30 (1): 93–121.Google Scholar
Sharon, Tamar, and Lucivero, Federica. (2019) ‘Introduction to the Special Theme: The Expansion of the Health Data Ecosystem – Rethinking Data Ethics and Governance’. Big Data and Society 6 (2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Shaw, Alison. (2006) ‘The Contingency of the “Genetic Link” in the Construction of Kinship and Inheritance: An Anthropological Perspective’. In Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice, edited by Spencer, John R and Du Bois-Pedain, Antje. London: Hart Publishing: 73–90.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. (2005) ‘Introduction: Beyond the Body of Bioethics’. In Ethics of the Body: Postconventional Challenges, edited by Shildrick, Margrit and Mykitiuk, Roxanne. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 1–24.Google Scholar
Skinner, David. (2020) ‘Forensic Genetics and the Prediction of Race: What Is the Problem?’. BioSocieties 15 (3): 329–49.Google Scholar
Skirton, Heather, Goldsmith, Lesley, Jackson, Leigh, and O’Connor, Anita. (2012) ‘Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review of Position Statements, Policies and Recommendations’. Clinical Genetics 82 (3): 210–18.Google Scholar
Solove, Daniel J. (2002) ‘Conceptualizing Privacy’. California Law Review 90: 1087.Google Scholar
Somers, Margaret R. (1994) ‘The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach’. Theory and Society 23: 605–49.Google Scholar
Staudt, Michael D, Herring, Eric Z, Gao, Keming, Miller, Jonathan P, and Sweet, Jennifer A. (2019) ‘Evolution in the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders: From Psychosurgery to Psychopharmacology to Neuromodulation’. Frontiers in Neuroscience 13: 1–10.Google Scholar
Stewart, George. (1992) ‘Interpreting the Child’s Right to Identity in the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child’. Family Law Quarterly 26: 221–4.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen. (2008) ‘Against Narrativity’. In Real Materialism and Other Essays, edited by Strawson, Galen. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 189–208.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. (1996) ‘On the Expressive Function of Law’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (5): 2021–53.Google Scholar
Tallandini, Maria Anna, Zanchettin, Liviana, Gronchi, Giorgio et al. (2016) ‘Parental Disclosure of Assisted Reproductive Technology (Art) Conception to Their Children: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review’. Human Reproduction 31 (6): 1275–87.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. (1992) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Mark. (2012) Genetic Data and the Law: A Critical Perspective on Privacy Protection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thom, Robyn, and Farrell, Helen M. (2019) ‘Neuroimaging in Psychiatry: Potentials and Pitfalls’. Current Psychiatry 18 (12): 27–34.Google Scholar
Topol, Eric. (2018) ‘Blood, Sweat and Tears in Biotech: The Theranos Story’. Nature 557 (7706): 306–8.Google Scholar
Turkmendag, Ilke. (2012) ‘The Donor‐Conceived Child’s “Right to Personal Identity”: The Public Debate on Donor Anonymity in the United Kingdom’. Journal of Law and Society 39 (1): 58–75.Google Scholar
Turner, Amanda J, and Coyle, Adrian. (2000) ‘What Does It Mean to Be a Donor Offspring? The Identity Experiences of Adults Conceived by Donor Insemination and the Implications for Counselling and Therapy’. Human Reproduction 15 (9): 2041–51.Google Scholar
UK National Screening Committee. (2015) Criteria for Appraising the Viability, Effectiveness and Appropriateness of a Screening Programme. www.gov.uk/government/publications/evidence-review-criteria-national-screening-programmes/criteria-for-appraising-the-viability-effectiveness-and-appropriateness-of-a-screening-programme.Google Scholar
Underhill, Meghan L, Lally, Robin M, Kiviniemi, Marc T, Murekeyisoni, Christine, and Dickerson, Suzanne S. (2012) ‘Living My Family’s Story: Identifying the Lived Experience in Healthy Women at Risk for Hereditary Breast Cancer’. Cancer Nursing 35 (6): 493.Google Scholar
Van Assche, Kristof, Gutwirth, Serge, and Sterckx, Sigrid. (2013) ‘Protecting Dignitary Interests of Biobank Research Participants: Lessons from Havasupai Tribe v Arizona Board of Regents’. Law, Innovation and Technology 5 (1): 54–84.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980) The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vayena, Effy. (2015) ‘Direct-to-Consumer Genomics on the Scales of Autonomy’. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (4): 310–14.Google Scholar
Vayena, Effy, Blasimme, Alessandro, and Cohen, I Glenn. (2018) ‘Machine Learning in Medicine: Addressing Ethical Challenges’. PLOS Medicine 15 (11): e1002689.Google Scholar
Velleman, J David. (1996) ‘Self to Self’. The Philosophical Review 105 (1): 39–76.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. (2005a) ‘Self as Narrator’. In Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, edited by Christman, John and Anderson, Joel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 56–76.Google Scholar
Velleman, J David. (2005b) ‘Family History’. Philosophical Papers 34 (3): 357–78.Google Scholar
Velleman, J David. (2006) Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, David. (2008) ‘The Gift of Life’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 36 (3): 245–66.Google Scholar
Vodermaier, Andrea, Esplen, Mary Jane, and Maheu, Christine. (2010) ‘Can Self-Esteem, Mastery and Perceived Stigma Predict Long-Term Adjustment in Women Carrying a BRCA1/2-Mutation? Evidence from a Multi-Center Study’. Familial Cancer 9 (3): 305–11.Google Scholar
Wachbroit, Robert. (2002) ‘Genetic Determinism, Genetic Reductionism, and Genetic Essentialism’ In Encyclopedia of Ethical, Legal and Policy Issues in Biotechnology, edited by Thomas H. Murray and Maxwell J. Mehlman. New York: John Wiley: 352–6.Google Scholar
Wade, Christopher H. (2019) ‘What Is the Psychosocial Impact of Providing Genetic and Genomic Health Information to Individuals? An Overview of Systematic Reviews’. Hastings Center Report 49 (S1): S88–S96. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1021Google Scholar
Walker, Mary Jean. (2012) ‘Neuroscience, Self-Understanding, and Narrative Truth’. AJOB Neuroscience 3 (4): 63–74.Google Scholar
Walker, Mary Jean. (2019) ‘Two Senses of Narrative Unification’. Philosophical Explorations 22 (1): 78–93.Google Scholar
Walker, Mary Jean, and Rogers, Wendy A. (2017) ‘Diagnosis, Narrative Identity, and Asymptomatic Disease’. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (4): 307–21.Google Scholar
Weiner, Kate, Martin, Paul, Richards, Martin, and Tutton, Richard. (2017) ‘Have We Seen the Geneticisation of Society? Expectations and Evidence’. Sociology of Health & Illness 39 (7): 989–1004.Google Scholar
Widdows, Heather. (2013) The Connected Self: The Ethics and Governance of the Genetic Individual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Widmer, Pierre. (1994) Human Rights Issues in Research on Medical Genetics. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. (2002) ‘Six Views of Embodied Cognition’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (4): 625–36.Google Scholar
Wilson, Sarah. (1997) ‘Identity, Genealogy and the Social Family: The Case of Donor Insemination’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 11 (2): 270–97.Google Scholar
Wisdom, Jennifer P., Bruce, Kevin, Saedi, Goal Auzeen, Weis, Teresa, and Green, Carla A. (2008) ‘“Stealing Me from Myself”: Identity and Recovery in Personal Accounts of Mental Illness’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 42 (6): 489–95.Google Scholar
Witz, Anne. (2000) ‘Whose Body Matters? Feminist Sociology and the Corporeal Turn in Sociology and Feminism’. Body & Society 6 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
Wolf, Susan M, Lawrenz, Frances P, Nelson, Charles A et al. (2008) ‘Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations’. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2): 219–48.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2021) Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/gs4dhdaa2a9f352b0445bafbc79ca799dce4d.pdfGoogle Scholar
Xafis, Vicki, Schaefer, G Owen, Labude, Markus K et al. (2019) ‘An Ethics Framework for Big Data in Health and Research’. Asian Bioethics Review 11 (3): 227–54.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. (2005) ‘Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment Motility and Spatiality’. In On Female Body Experience: ‘Throwing Like a Girl’ and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 27–45.Google Scholar
Young, Robert. (1982) ‘The Value of Autonomy’. The Philosophical Quarterly 32 (126): 35–44.Google Scholar
Zadeh, Sophie, Ilioi, Elena, Jadva, Vasanti, and Golombok, Susan. (2018) ‘The Perspectives of Adolescents Conceived Using Surrogacy, Egg or Sperm Donation’. Human Reproduction 33 (6): 1099–106.Google Scholar
Zeiler, Kristin. (2009) ‘Symposium on Genetics, Identity and Ethics’. New Genetics and Society 28 (2): 153–6.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Emily Postan, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: Embodied Narratives
  • Online publication: 02 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652599.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Emily Postan, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: Embodied Narratives
  • Online publication: 02 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652599.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Emily Postan, University of Edinburgh
  • Book: Embodied Narratives
  • Online publication: 02 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108652599.010
Available formats
×