Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:09:14.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Construct Validity in Automated Counter-Terrorism Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2024

Adrian K. Yee*
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Department of Philosophy, Hong Kong Catastrophic Risk Centre, adrianyee@ln.edu.hk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Governments and social scientists are increasingly developing machine learning methods to automate the process of identifying terrorists in real-time and predict future attacks. However, current operationalizations of ‘terrorist’ in artificial intelligence are difficult to justify given three issues that remain neglected: insufficient construct legitimacy, insufficient criterion validity, and insufficient construct validity. I conclude that machine learning methods should be at most used for the identification of singular individuals deemed terrorists and not for identifying possible terrorists from some more general class, nor to predict terrorist attacks more broadly, given intolerably high risks that result from such approaches.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Philosophy of Science Association