Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T02:01:11.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Survey on the occurrence of Brachyspira species and Lawsonia intracellularis in children living on pig farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2006

M. JACOBSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Uppsala, Sweden
T. RÅSBÄCK
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Uppsala, Sweden
H. FLÖISTRUP
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
M. BENZ
Affiliation:
Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital, University Children's Hospital, München, Germany
C. BRAUN-FAHRLÄNDER
Affiliation:
Department of Environment and Health Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland
J. RIEDLER
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital Schwarzach, Schwarzach, Salzburg, Austria
D. SCHRAM-BIJKERK
Affiliation:
Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands
C. FELLSTRÖM
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Uppsala, Sweden
*
*Author for correspondence: Dr M. Jacobson, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, PO Box 7018, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden. (Email: Magdalena.Jacobson@kv.slu.se)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The occurrence of Brachyspira species and Lawsonia intracellularis was investigated by PCR analyses of faeces from 60 children living on European pig farms. In addition, 60 other children were included as controls. Two samples were positive for B. aalborgi but B. pilosicoli and L. intracellularis were not demonstrated.

Type
Short Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Two species of the genus Brachyspira, B. aalborgi and B. pilosicoli, have been associated with human intestinal spirochaetosis (HIS) [Reference Hovind-Hougen1, Reference Trott2]. The clinical significance of HIS is largely unknown. In Western countries, B. aalborgi seems to be more common with reported prevalences of for example, 7·9% [Reference Brooke, Riley and Hampson3] or 70% of submitted cases of HIS [Reference Kraatz4]. Brachyspira pilosicoli is more frequent in developing countries with reported prevalences of 15–23% [Reference Trott2, Reference Brooke, Riley and Hampson3, Reference Margawani5]. Further, B. pilosicoli and the intracellular rod Lawsonia intracellularis are major causes of enteric disease in young, growing pigs with 32% and 48%, respectively, of the herds being infected [Reference Jacobson6, Reference Jacobson7]. The infection causes similar clinical signs and the microbes often occur concomitantly. L. intracellularis have been isolated in a wide range of other animal species, e.g. pig, hamster, horse, guinea pig, dog, lamb, calf, ferret, fox, deer, rabbit, rat, mouse, ratites, wild boar, wolf, giraffe, hedgehog, and primates. The broad host range raises the question whether natural cross-species transmission might occur. L. intracellularis belongs to the Desulfovibrionaceae family and in patients with ulcerative colitis an increased carriage of closely related bacteria has been demonstrated. The microbe causes proliferative enteropathy, characterized by crypt hyperplasia of immature cells. The lesions are morphologically similar to those found in patients with coeliac disease and hypotheses regarding a similar aetiology have been proposed. However, the bacterium has never been reported in humans [Reference Cooper and Gebhart8Reference Smith10].

The aim of the present study was to investigate the occurrence of Brachyspira species and L. intracellularis in faeces from children living on European pig farms and compare the findings to those in children not living on pig farms.

The study was conducted as part of a cross-sectional study on factors characteristic of anthroposophic and farming populations, focusing on children from these groups. The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board, Stockholm, Sweden. Five European countries participated and 60 of the children included in the study were living on pig farms. Seven children were from Austria, 14 from Germany, 14 from The Netherlands, nine from Sweden and 16 from Switzerland. The mean age was 9 years (range 6–14 years). On average, each farm kept 12 pigs. All children had been in contact with the pigs. Moreover, 60 children of similar age and from the same geographic areas, but not living on pig farms, were included as controls in the present study. Of these, 30 were living on farms keeping other livestock than pigs, and 30 children were living in the same geographic areas but not on farms. Stool samples were collected in insulated bags, transported on ice and stored in a refrigerator (−80°C) until required for processing. DNA was prepared from faeces by the use of a commercial kit (QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini kit; Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The detection of Brachyspira spp. were performed as described by Kraatz et al. [Reference Kraatz4]. Genus-specific primers targeting 16S rDNA were used in PCR and species determination was performed by sequencing of the PCR amplicons. Demonstration of L. intracellularis was carried out by PCR using specific primers directed to chromosomal DNA according to Jones et al. [Reference Jones11]. An internal control (mimic) was included in each tube to detect PCR inhibition. The sensitivity to detect the mimic in faecal sample preparations was 102 mimics per PCR [Reference Jones11Reference Jacobson, Englund and Ballagi-Pordány13].

Two samples, one from a 12-year-old boy living on a pig farm and one from a 9-year-old girl not living on a farm, both from Switzerland, were found positive for B. aalborgi by PCR and sequencing. In both children, strains similar to the type strain, strain W1 and a clone designated Hcc33 (GenBank accession numbers Z22781, AF200693, and AF228813, respectively) were identified. None of the children had been absent from school because of illness or treated with antibiotics during the last 3 months prior to sampling. Neither Brachyspira pilosicoli or L. intracellularis was detected in any sample. In one sample from a child living on a pig farm and in three samples from children in the control group the PCR was inhibited, as judged by the absence of the mimic amplicon. The mimic was visualized in the negative controls included.

B. aalborgi is generally the most common Brachyspira species found in Western societies [Reference Hampson14]. This is in accordance with the present study, where only B. aalborgi was isolated. The clinical significance of the infection in humans has not been clarified [Reference Brooke, Riley and Hampson3, Reference Munshi15]. In the present study, no illness was recorded in the infected children. Further, it was not possible to relate the infection to husbandry. Isolates of B. aalborgi has been demonstrated in humans, non-human primates and opossums [Reference Duhamel16] and the ability to colonize might be determined by indigenous factors such as body temperature. Although commonly found in several animal species, it has not been possible to relate findings of B. pilosicoli to the keeping of pigs [Reference Trott2]. Human isolates have, however, previously been shown to cause disease in pigs and chickens in experimental challenge studies and cross-species transmission may occur naturally [Reference Trott, McLaren and Hampson17, Reference Trott18]. In the present study, no samplings were performed in the pig herds and the occurrence of these bacteria in the herds is therefore unknown. Hence, it is not possible to draw any conclusions regarding the risk for children living on pig farms to contract these diseases.

The microbe L. intracellularis have a very broad host range, including non-human primates, and the infection does not seem to be related to the host's body temperature. Experimentally, cross-species transmission has been demonstrated in pig, horse, hamster and mice [Reference Gebhart19]. Hence, it does not seem unlikely that this microbe would also be capable of infecting humans. However, in the present study the bacterium was not detected. It is possible that children living under poor hygienic circumstances, in close contact with highly infected faeces, would have been a more suitable target in this respect.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The work was supported by grants from the European Union QLRT 1999-01391 and by funding from the Swedish Foundation for Health Care Science and Allergy Research. Thanks are due to Dr Lars Engstrand at the Department of Infectious Diseases, Solna, for allowing us the use of their facilities.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Hovind-Hougen, K, et al. Intestinal spirochaetosis: morphological characterization and cultivation of the spirochete Brachyspira aalborgi gen. nov., sp. nov. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1982; 16: 11271136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Trott, DJ, et al. The prevalence of Serpulina pilosicoli in humans and domestic animals in the Eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea. Epidemiology and Infection 1997; 119: 369379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Brooke, CJ, Riley, TV, Hampson, DJ. The prevalence of intestinal spirochaetes in Western Australians. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Colonic Spirochaetal Infections in Animals and Humans. Eddlestone, Scotland, UK, 2003, p. 7.Google Scholar
4. Kraatz, W, et al. Human intestinal spirochetosis diagnosed with colonoscopy and analysis of partial 16S rDNA sequences of involved spirochetes. Animal Health Research Reviews 2001; 2: 111116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Margawani, KR, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and molecular epidemiology of Brachyspira pilosicoli in humans on the island of Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Medical Microbiology 2004; 53: 325332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Jacobson, M, et al. Diarrhoea in the growing pig – a comparison of clinical, morphological and microbial findings between animals from good and poor performance herds. Research in Veterinary Science 2003; 74: 163169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Jacobson, M, et al. The prevalence of Brachyspira spp. and Lawsonia intracellularis in Swedish swine herds and in the wild boar population. Journal of Veterinary Medicine B 2005; 52: 386391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Cooper, DM and Gebhart, CJ. Comparative aspects of proliferative enteritis. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 1998; 212: 14461451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Pitcher, MCL, et al. Ulcerative colitis and porcine proliferative enteropathy: a common bacterial etiology? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterology Association 1995; 108: A894.Google Scholar
10. Smith, DGE, et al. Gamma interferon influences intestinal epithelial hyperplasia caused by Lawsonia intracellularis in mice. Infection and Immunity 2000; 68: 67376743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Jones, GF, et al. Enhanced detection of intracellular organism of swine proliferative enteritis, ileal symbiont intracellularis, in feces by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993; 31: 26112615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Jacobson, M, et al. Routine diagnostics of Lawsonia intracellularis performed by PCR, serological and post mortem examination, with special emphasis on sample preparation methods for PCR. Veterinary Microbiology 2004; 102: 189201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Jacobson, M, Englund, S, Ballagi-Pordány, A. The use of a mimic to detect polymerase chain reaction-inhibitory factors in feces examined for the presence of Lawsonia intracellularis. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2003; 15: 268273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Hampson, DJ. Colonic spirochaetal infections of medical importance. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Colonic Spirochaetal Infections in Animals and Humans. Eddlestone, Scotland, UK, 2003, p. 5.Google Scholar
15. Munshi, MA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for Brachyspira aalborgi colonisation in Bali. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Colonic Spirochaetal Infections in Animals and Humans. Eddlestone, Scotland, UK, 2003, p. 8.Google Scholar
16. Duhamel, GE. Comparative pathology and pathogenesis of naturally acquired and experimentally induced colonic spirochetosis. Animal Health Research Reviews 2001; 2: 317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Trott, DJ, McLaren, AJ, Hampson, DJ. Pathogenicity of human and porcine intestinal spirochetes in on-day-old specific-pathogen-free chicks: an animal model of intestinal spirochetosis. Infection and Immunity 1995; 63: 37053710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Trott, DJ, et al. Population genetic analysis of Serpulina pilosicoli and its molecular epidemiology in villages in the eastern Highlands of Papua New Guinea. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1998; 48: 659668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Gebhart, CJ. Lawsonia intracellularis: overview and research update. In Proceedings of the 1st Novartis Animal Healthcare European Swine Ileitis/Colitis Workshop. Alpbach, Austria, 2004, pp. 15.Google Scholar