Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:48:43.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of two Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin-binding aminopeptidase N from Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

Shaozhen Wang
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China CAS Key Laboratory of Insect Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
Yajie Guo
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Ecological Forests, Fujian Province University, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China Asian Research Center for Bioresource and Environmental Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 188-0002, Japan
Yunzhu Sun
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Ecological Forests, Fujian Province University, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China
Mingqing Weng
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Ecological Forests, Fujian Province University, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China
Qiliao Liao
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China
Ru Qiu
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China
Shuangquan Zou
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China
Songqing Wu*
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Ecological Forests, Fujian Province University, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350000, China State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 350002
*
Corresponding author: Songqing Wu; Email: dabinyang@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus is a quarantine pest that mainly damages plants in tropical regions, which are essential economic resources. Cry3Aa has been used to control coleopteran pests and is known to be toxic to R. ferrugineus. The binding of the Cry toxin to specific receptors on the target insect plays a crucial role in the toxicological mechanism of Cry toxins. However, in the case of R. ferrugineus, the nature and identity of the receptor proteins involved remain unknown. In the present study, pull-down assays and mass spectrometry were used to identify two proteins of aminopeptidase N proteins (RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b) in the larval midguts of R. ferrugineus. Cry3Aa was able to bind to RfAPN2a (Kd = 108.5 nM) and RfAPN2b (Kd = 68.2 nM), as well as midgut brush border membrane vesicles (Kd = 482.5 nM). In silico analysis of both RfAPN proteins included the signal peptide and anchored sites for glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol. In addition, RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b were expressed in the human embryonic kidney 293T cell line, and cytotoxicity assays showed that the transgenic cells were not susceptible to activated Cry3Aa. Our results show that RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b are Cry3Aa-binding proteins involved in the Cry3Aa toxicity of R. ferrugineus. This study deepens our understanding of the action mechanism of Cry3Aa in R. ferrugineus larvae.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Rhynchophorus ferrugineus is quarantined internationally and threatens plants in tropical areas that are essential economic resources, such as Phoenix canariensis, Cocos nucifera and Areca catechu (Dembilio et al., Reference Dembilio, Jacas and Llácer2009; Huang, Reference Huang2013). R. ferrugineus is a swarming trunk borer with a long larval phase that is mainly concealed in the xylem and phloem of palm trees, destroying the internal tissues (Llácer et al., Reference Llácer, Dembilio and Jacas2010). Currently, it has invaded Oceania, Asia, Africa, the United States, and the area covered by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, causing severe economic loss and ecological damage (Al-Ayedh, Reference Al-Ayedh2008; Bozbuga and Hazir, Reference Bozbuga and Hazir2008). Currently, chemical pesticides are mostly used to control R. ferrugineus; however, the dangers of chemical pesticides to the environment, humans and animals, as well as the evolution of pest resistance, have restricted their usage (Han et al., Reference Han, Zhou, Zhong and Huang2013; Chen, Reference Chen2016). The management of R. ferrugineus is gradually transitioning to the use of ecologically friendly microbial insecticides that are safe for humans and animals.

Bacillus thuringiesis is a ubiquitous gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium with insecticidal activity against over 3000 larvae of different insect orders, accounting for 2% of the insecticidal market (Schnepf et al., Reference Schnepf, Crickmore, van Rie, Lereclus, Baum, Feitelson, Zeigler and Dean1998; Bravo et al., Reference Bravo, Likitvivatanavong, Gill and Soberón2011). During spore formation, B. thuringiesis produces toxins from parasporal crystals, mainly Cry and Cyt crystals (Bravo et al., Reference Bravo, Gill and Soberón2007). The Cry family has broader insecticidal activity than the anti-dipteran properties of Cyt toxins. Cry3, Cry7 and Cry8 were found to be active against Coleopteran larvae (Ibrahim et al., Reference Ibrahim, Griko, Junker and Bulla2010; Crickmore et al., Reference Crickmore, Berry, Panneerselvamb, Mishra, Connor and Bonning2021). Cry3Aa was the first toxin found to be toxic to Coleoptera and was weakly toxic to R. ferrugineus (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Sun, Liao, Carballar-Lejarazú, Sheng, Wang, Zhou, Zhang and Wu2021). Therefore, their field applications are limited. The mechanism-based modification of existing Cry toxins is one of the most crucial techniques for developing highly virulent toxins for non-Bt target insects (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Zhao, Yuan, Hu and Lu2011). Therefore, understanding the action mechanisms of non-Bt target toxins is critical.

The mode of action of Cry toxins has been extensively studied. Once ingested by the target insect, crystals are dissolved in the intestinal fluid and activated by digestive enzymes. The activated toxin then binds to receptors on midgut brush border membrane vesicles (BBMVs), oligomerizes, and is inserted into the cell membrane, finally causing insect death Adang et al. (Reference Adang, Crickmore and Jurat-Fuentes2014). Binding receptors are necessary for the toxin to exert its virulence throughout the process (Bravo et al., Reference Bravo, Gómez, Porta, García-Gómez, Rodriguez-Almazan, Pardo and Soberón2013). Midgut-binding receptor species of Cry toxins have been identified in major agroforestry pests, including cadherin-like proteins, aminopeptidase N (APN), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and the ABC transporter family (Soberón et al., Reference Soberón, Portugal, Garcia-Gómez, Sánchez, Onofre, Gómez, Pacheco and Bravo2018; Sato et al., Reference Sato, Adegawa, Li, Tanaka and Endo2019). Many Coleopteran receptors for Cry3Aa have been identified, including the ABCB transporter from Leptinotarsa decemlineata, APN from Monochamus alternatus and TmCad1 from Tenebrio molitor (Fabrick et al., Reference Fabrick, Oppert, Lorenzen, Morris, Oppert and Jurat-Fuentes2009; Guo et al., Reference Guo, Carballar-Lejarazú, Sheng, Fang, Wang, Liang, Hu, Wang, Zhang and Wu2020; Güney et al., Reference Güney, Cedden, Hänniger, Heckel, Coutu, Hegedus, Mutlu, Suludere, Sezen, Güney and Toprak2021). Moreover, it is feasible to develop receptor action models using exogenous eukaryotic expression systems. For example, human embryonic kidney 293T cells (HEK293T) expressing BtR175b from Bombyx mori showed swelling and death after treatment with Cry1Aa, indicating that this receptor is indispensable (Tsuda et al., Reference Tsuda, Nakatani, Hashimoto, Ikawa, Matsuura, Fukada, Sugimoto and Himeno2003). However, the Cry3Aa-binding receptor in the midgut of R. ferrugineus remains unknown.

Therefore, in this study, potential Cry3Aa-binding proteins on BBMVs from R. ferrugineus were preliminarily screened using ligand blotting, pull-down assays and mass spectrometry analyses. Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were performed to determine the ability of Cry3Aa to bind to RfAPNs. An in vitro validation environment was established to confirm the function of RfAPNs using the MTT assay and morphological observations. This study elucidated the toxicological mechanism of the Cry3Aa toxin in R. ferrugineus larvae and provided a theoretical basis for biological control.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing and cell line

The larvae of R. ferrugineus were maintained in the Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management in Ecological Forests, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, at 28°C and 70% humidity with 12-h light/12-h dark cycles. HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (Biological Industries, Beit-Haemek, Israel) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Beit-Haemek, Israel) in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C.

Extraction of BBMVs from the midgut

BBMVs from the three-instar larvae of R. ferrugineus were extracted using a previously published method (Wolfersberger et al., Reference Wolfersberger, Luethy, Maurer, Parenti, Sacchi, Giordana and Hanozett1987). Briefly, a sample of second instar larvae midgut (0.1 g) was homogenized in 500 μl of pre-chilled Buffer A (0.3 mol l−1 mannitol, 5 mM ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid, 17 mmol l−1 Tris–HCl, pH 7.5) with 5 μl of 1 mmol l−1 phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) protease inhibitor. The homogenate was transferred to a new tube, and an equal volume of 24 mM MgCl2 was added, followed by incubation on ice for 15 min. Thereafter, it was centrifuged at 4°C, 2500 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was stored in a new tube, and the precipitate was resuspended in 500 μl of Buffer A containing 5 μl of PMSF. This procedure was repeated three times. The supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 30,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of Buffer A containing PMSF to obtain solubilized BBMV proteins. The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), and the extractive quality was analysed using SDS–PAGE.

Cry3Aa toxin preparation

The glutathione-S-transferase (GST)-Cry3Aa protein was purified for the ligand blot and pull-down assay using the pGEX-KG-Cry3Aa Escherichia coli BL21 strain stored in the laboratory. First, the bacteria were incubated in Luria–Bertani medium containing 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin until the OD600 reached 0.6. Isopropyl-β-d-galactopyranoside was then added (to a final concentration of 0.8 mM) and cultured in a shaker at 16°C for 48 h. The E. coli cells were collected following centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C, followed by resuspension using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer (2.7 mmol l−1 KCl, 140 mmol l−1 NaCl, 1.8 mmol l−1 KH2PO4, 10 mmol l−1 Na2HPO4, pH 7.3) and centrifugation again at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Ultrasonic cell disruption was performed using a mixture of ice and water. Cry3Aa was purified from the supernatant using Glutathione Sepharose 4 B (G.E. Healthcare, Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer's instructions.

A Cry3Aa crystal protein was extracted from the B. thuringiensis pHT304-Cry3Aa BMB171 stored in our laboratory. In brief, the bacteria were cultured in a pericyte medium (2 g l−1 yeast extract, 10 g l−1 tryptone, 1 g l−1 KH2PO4, 0.02 g l−1 FeSO4⋅7H2O, 0.3 g l−1 MgSO4⋅7H2O, 0.02 g l−1 MnSO4⋅7H2O, 0.02 g l−1 ZnSO4⋅7H2O, pH 7.0) for 60 h at 30°C. The cell pellet was collected after centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C and washed three times with 1 mol l−1 NaCl and double-distilled water. Purified inclusions were solubilized with solution I (50 mmol l−1 Na2CO3, 10 mmol l−1 dl-dithiothreitol, pH 11) for 4 h at 4°C. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, the insoluble materials were removed. Crystal protein was obtained from the supernatant by adjusting the pH to 4.3 with acetic acid and centrifuging at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. The protein was washed with double-distilled water three times, solubilized in 50 mmol l−1 NaHCO3 (pH 10.0) and stored at −80°C for future analysis. Protein concentrations were measured using the Bradford assay (Sangon).

Ligand blot assay for BBMVs

BBMVs (20 μg) were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA USA) (200 mA, 80 min). The membrane was blocked in Tris buffer saline (TBST; 20 mmol l−1 Tris–HCl, 150 mmol l−1 NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.4) containing 5% skim milk powder overnight at 4°C. After washing three times with TBST, the membrane was probed with 20 μg ml−1 Cry3Aa protein in TBST at 4°C for 3 h. Unbound proteins were removed by washing the membrane three times. A primary rabbit polyclonal antibody specific to Cry3Aa (1:2000 dilution) was used to incubate the membrane at 37°C for 1 h, followed by incubation with a secondary goat antirabbit IgG antibody conjugated with DyLight 488 (1:5000; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA). Immunoreactive bands to Cry3Aa were detected using a Syngene GBOX-CHEMI-XT4 system (Syngene, Cambridge, UK). The Cry1Ac toxin was used as a negative control because Coleopteran insects are not susceptible to Cry1Ac and lack functional receptors for the toxin (de Oliveira et al., Reference de Oliveira, Negri, Hernández-Martínez, Basso and Escriche2023).

Pull-down assay and mass spectrometry

A pull-down assay was conducted to screen Cry3Aa-binding proteins in BBMVs as described by Guo et al. (Reference Guo, Carballar-Lejarazú, Sheng, Fang, Wang, Liang, Hu, Wang, Zhang and Wu2020). In brief, 40 μl of GST-Cry3Aa-Glutathione Sepharose 4B was incubated in 200 μg BBMVs at 4°C for 1 h with gentle rocking. Unbound proteins were removed by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The beads were washed ten times using PBS and 1 mol l−1 NaCl, and then washed with PBS to reduce the concentration of NaCl. Finally, the proteins were denatured with 50 μl of SDT lysis buffer (2% SDS, 100 mmol l−1 DTT, 100 mmol l−1 Tris–HCl, pH 7.6) at 100°C and analyzed using 10% SDS–PAGE. GST-Cry1Ac-binding BBMVs were used as negative controls, using the same procedure. The separated bands were processed for mass spectrometry using an Orbitrap-Fusion-Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The obtained sequences were compared with the R. ferrugineus larval transcriptome database (PRJNA933083) to identify putative binding proteins.

Protein structures and docking simulation

To determine the structural features of the proteins, we predicted the O- and N-glycosylation sites, the signal peptide and the three-dimensional model structures using NetOGlyc v1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetOGlyc/), NetNGlyc v1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/), SignalP-6.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP) and SWISS-MODEL (https://www.swissmodel.expasy.org/) software. To investigate the interaction between Cry3Aa and RfAPNs, Dock Proteins (ZDOCK) software was used to analyse molecular docking using Discovery Studio 2016 (Chen and Weng, Reference Chen and Weng2002). In addition, homology analyses of RfAPNs were performed using the NCBI protein–protein BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). The retrieved APN protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW. Neighbour-joining trees were constructed and adjusted using MEGA X software and Evolview v3 (Kumar S et al., Reference Kumar, Stecher, Li, Knyaz and Tamura2018; Subramanian et al., Reference Subramanian, Gao, Lercher, Hu and Chen2019).

Expression constructs

We obtained full-length cDNA sequences of Rfapn2a and Rfapn2b from the mass spectrometry results. After gene synthesis (Synbio Technologies, Suzhou, China), the Rfapn2a coding sequence (CDS) was amplified using specific primers (forward primer: 5′-ATCTGGTTCCGCGTggatccATGGATTACATTTTGGGATTG-3'; reverse primer: 5′-CCACCGGAAATTCCCGggatccTTATTTCTTGATAATTAAAAC-3'). The Rfapn2b gene was obtained by digestion with the restriction enzymes BamHI and SalI. The products were purified using an E.Z.N.A.® Gel Extraction Kit (OMEGA, Norcross, Georgia, USA). The two fragments were inserted into pGEX-KG, and E. coli BL21 was transformed. The expression and purification of recombinant RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b proteins were conducted similarly to those of GST-Cry3Aa. Simultaneously, the proteins were biotinylated using the EZ-Link™ NHS-Biotin (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following manufacturer's instructions. Next, Rfapn2a and Rfapn2b were amplified using a PCR with specific primers (listed in Table S1) and infusion-cloned into the pQCMV eukaryotic expression vector encoding the FLAG + EGFP epitope tags at the KpnI site. The constructed plasmids were transformed into E. coli DH5α.

Western blotting and far-western blotting

For western blot analysis, purified Cry3Aa toxins (73 kDa) and biotinylated APN proteins (134 kDa) were separated using 10% SDS–PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in PBST (8 mmol l−1 Na2HPO4⋅12H2O, 0.136 mol l−1 NaCl, 2 mmol l−1 KH2PO4, 2.6 mmol l−1 KCl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.4) at 4°C overnight. After washing three times with PBST, the membranes with biotinylated APNs were incubated with streptavidin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (1:3000 dilution, Bioss, Beijing, China) for 1 h and then visualized using ECL chemiluminescence kits (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) according to manufacturer's protocol. The membrane with Cry3Aa was incubated with a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against Cry3Aa (1:2000), followed by incubation with a secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with DyLight 488 (1:5000). Binding was detected using the GBOX-CHEMI-XT4 system (Syngene).

As reported previously, protein–protein interactions were analyzed using far-western blotting (Einarson et al., Reference Einarson, Pugacheva and Orlinick2007). Purified RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b were separated using 10% SDS–PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore). After overnight incubation with blocking buffer (5% skim milk in PBST) at 4°C, the membrane was probed with purified Cry3Aa in PBST containing 0.1% BSA at 25°C for 2 h. Unbound proteins were removed by washing three times with PBST. The membrane was then incubated with a primary rabbit polyclonal antibody against Cry3Aa (1:2000) and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with DyLight 488 (1:5000). Antibody binding was visualized using the GBOX-CHEMI-XT4 system (SynGene). Similarly, Cry3Aa was transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore) and probed with purified biotinylated RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b proteins. The binding of interacting proteins was detected using the biotin antibody streptavidin/horseradish peroxidase (1:3000).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

To confirm the binding affinities of Cry3Aa to BBMVs and RfAPNs, ELISA were performed as previously reported (PéRez et al., Reference PéRez, Fernandez, Sun, Folch, Gill, Soberó and Bravo2005). The ELISA plates were coated with 4 μg well−1 of purified BBMVs, RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b proteins diluted in 0.05 mol l−1 Na2CO3 at 4°C overnight, washed with PBST three times and then incubated with blocking buffer (PBST, 5% skim milk) for 2 h at 37°C. After washing with PBST, Cry3Aa protein with gradient concentrations (0–2560 nM) in 100 μl of PBST were transferred to the BBMVs-coated plates, and 0–1280 nM Cry3Aa were transferred to the RfAPNs-coated plates and then incubated at 37°C for 2 h. Unbound proteins were removed and the plates were washed three times with PBST. Bound Cry3Aa was detected by incubation with primary rabbit polyclonal Cry3Aa antibody (1:2000 dilution) for 2 h and secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody conjugated with HRP (1:3000) for 1.5 h. TMB chromogen solution (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) was used under dark conditions in each well and kept at 37°C for 15 min, and 2 mol l−1 H2SO4 was applied to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a Multiskan FC microplate reader (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8 and SPSS 22 with a one-way ANOVA. The concentration corresponding to the half-maximal absorbance was considered the dissociation constant (Batool et al., Reference Batool, Alam, Jin, Xu, Wu, Wang, Huang, Guan, Yu and Zhang2019).

Expression of RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b in HEK293T cells

HEK293T cells were cultured in a 6-well plate at approximately 60% confluence and transfected with pQCMV, pQCMV-Rfapn2a and pQCMV-Rfapn2b plasmids using a calcium phosphate precipitation protocol, as described by Wang et al. (Reference Wang, Zuo, Wang, Gu, Yoshizumi, Yang, Yang, Liu, Liu and Han2016). Briefly, for each transfection, 2 μg endotoxin-free plasmid DNA was mixed with 2.5 mol l−1 CaCl2 (1/20 of total volume) and 2 × HeBS (250 mmol l−1 NaCl, 10 mmol l−1 KCl, 1.5 mmol l−1 Na2HPO4, 12 mmol l−1 dextrose and 50 mmol l−1 HEPES pH 7.5, pH adjusted to 7.05) and kept at room temperature for 5 min. The medium was discarded, and the DNA mixture was gently added to each well. Next, 2 ml of medium containing 25 μM chloroquine was added to each well. After incubation at 37°C overnight, the medium was changed to a fresh medium without chloroquine and placed for 24 h to harvest cells for total RNA extraction. Real time (RT)-PCR was used to confirm the transfection results, and the primers used to amplify the cDNA fragments are listed in Table S1.

Cytotoxicity assays

The Cry3Aa crystal protoxin was activated using trypsin at a trypsin/protoxin ratio of 1/30 (w/w) at 37°C for 4 h. The activated toxin was dialyzed with PBS (Biological Industries Beit-Haemek, Israel) using Amicon® Ultra centrifugal filters (10 kDa, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) for the cell viability assay, according to manufacturer's instructions. The HEK293T cells were cultured in 96-well plates. Until the HEK293T cells reached 60% confluence, the expression vectors for EGFP, RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b were transfected as described above. Each well was then filled with a series of concentrations of activated Cry3Aa (0, 12, 25, 50, 100 and 200 μg ml−1) diluted in 100 μl of the culture medium. Three replicates were used for each cell line. After 6 h of incubation at 37°C, 10 μl of 5 mg ml−1 MTT was added and incubated for 4 h. 100 μl of formazan solution was added and kept at 37°C incubator for 4 h to dissolve the crystal. The absorbance was measured at 570 nm. All values were calculated for control cells (considered 100%). To observe morphological changes, the transfected cells were cultured in a 24-well plate and incubated for 6 h with 200 μM Cry3Aa solubilized in PBS (pH 7.4). Cells were incubated with PBS as a control. The cells were visualized and images were obtained using an inverted fluorescence microscope (TS-100; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

Binding of Cry3Aa to R. ferrugineus BBMVs

BBMVs from R. ferrugineus larvae were extracted, and the GST-Cry3Aa protein was purified from the pGEX-KG-Cry3Aa E. coli BL21 strain (fig. 1a). Compared to Cry1Ac, which is non-toxic to Coleoptera, Cry3Aa was able to bind specifically to several proteins (~70, 100, 135 and 180 kDa) on R. ferrugineus BBMVs (figs. 1b, c and S1). ELISA results showed that BBMVs binding positively correlated with the concentration of Cry3Aa, and the binding ability was saturated after treatment with 640 nM Cry3Aa (Kd = 482.5 nM). In addition, compared with Cry3Aa at 0 nM, the protein-bound OD450 of BBMVs treated with different concentrations of Cry3Aa showed significant differences (fig. 1d).

Figure 1. Cry3Aa toxin binding to the BBMVs of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. (a and b) SDS–PAGE analysis of extraction of BBMVs, GST-Cry3Aa and GST-Cry1Ac. (c) Ligand blot analysis of Cry3Aa and Cry1Ac toxin to BBMVs, Cry1Ac toxin was used as a control. (d) The binding of Cry3Aa toxin to BBMVs was detected in the presence of increasing concentrations of Cry3Aa. Each point represents the mean of three independent measurements presented as OD450 ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and the lines represent the nonlinear regression for one-site binding. * Designates statistical significance at P < 0.05.

Identification of Cry3Aa-binding proteins in R. ferrugineus larvae

A pull-down assay was performed to identify the Cry3Aa-binding proteins in the midgut of R. ferrugineus larvae, and the protein bands were analyzed by mass spectrometry (fig. 2a). Three protein types were able to bind to the Cry3Aa toxin: APN (RfAPN2a (Cluster-7879.9674) and RfAPN2b (Cluster-7879.8243), V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit and GTP-binding protein (fig. 2b). A phylogenetic tree analysis revealed that the complete APN sequences obtained from GenBank formed eight clusters, and both RfAPNs clustered in APN2 (Class 2) (fig. 3). Bioinformatics analysis predicted that RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b had N-terminal signal peptides (Fig. S2). In addition, they contained multiple potential N-glycosylation and O-glycosylation sites, particularly RfAPN2a (Fig. S2).

Figure 2. Protein pull-down and identification of Cry3Aa-binding proteins. (a) Cry3Aa toxin pull-down assays from Rhynchophorus ferrugineus BBMVs, Cry1Ac toxin was used as a control. (b) Mass spectrometry identification of the Cry3Aa-binding proteins from BBMVs.

Figure 3. Neighbour-joining distance-based phylogenetic tree of APN proteins. The accession numbers of each amino acid sequence were indicated. Species abbreviations are as follows: Ha, Helicoverpa armigera; On, Ostrinia nubilalis; Se, Spodoptera exigua; Cs, Chilo suppressalis; Px, Plutella xylostella; Tn, Trichoplusia ni; Hc, Hyphantria cunea; Ms, Manduca sexta; Aj, Achaea janata; Cm, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis; Bm, Bombyx mori; Hv, Heliothis virescens; Al, Athetis lepigone; Pi, Plodia interpunctella; Tl, Telchin licus licus; Ep, Epiphyas postvittana.

To investigate the interaction of Cry3Aa with the RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b proteins of R. ferrugineus, molecular docking of Cry3Aa with the two binding proteins showed that Cry3Aa was able to bind to both RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b through two distinct but partially overlapping interfaces (Fig. S3). The binding sites in Cry3Aa were concentrated in domains II and III (fig. 4a, c). In addition, the predicted binding sites for Cry3Aa were mainly 300–600 amino acid residues for RfAPN2a and 0–200 amino acid residues for RfAPN2b (fig. 4b, d). We found that N62, D63, N515 and N545 in RfAPN2a and N77-T82 in RfAPN2b were not only glycosylation sites but also docking sites. And based on the interaction data, the area of contact interface between Cry3Aa and RfAPN2b was 750.98 Å2, slightly greater than that between Cry3Aa and RfAPN2a (701.12 Å2).

Figure 4. Molecular docking analysis of Cry3Aa with RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b. (a) Binding sites of Cry3Aa to RfAPN2a. (b) Binding sites of RfAPN2a to Cry3Aa. (c) Binding sites of Cry3Aa to RfAPN2b. (d) Binding sites of RfAPN2b to Cry3Aa. Yellow amino acid residues are the binding sites.

Characterization of binding between Cry3Aa and recombinant RfAPNs

To test the binding ability of Cry3Aa to RfAPNs, the Cry3Aa crystal protein from B. thuringiesis acrystalliferous strain BMB171, encoding the cry3Aa gene, was purified with a molecular weight of 73 kDa (fig. 5a, b). And we cloned full-length Rfapn2a1 (2919 bp) and Rfapn2b (2868 bp) genes into a pGEX-KG vector and transformed them into E. coli BL21 competent cells. The purified GST-RfAPN2a and GST-RfAPN2b fusion proteins had molecular weights of 134 kDa (fig. 5c–e). The 134 kDa bands of RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b were checked and observed using a rabbit polyclonal antibody specific to Cry3Aa after the membranes were probed with the Cry3Aa toxin (fig. 5f, h). Similarly, the 73 kDa Cry3Aa was detected by the streptavidin antibody after blotting with biotinylated RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b (fig. 5g, i). Furthermore, ELISA results showed that more Cry3Aa bound to the immobilized RfAPNs with increasing concentrations of the Cry3Aa protein. The binding ability of RfAPN2a with Cry3Aa became saturated after treatment with 320 nM Cry3Aa (Kd = 108.5 nM), whereas that of the RfAPN2b protein was 160 nM (Kd = 68.2 nM). Compared to 0 nM Cry3Aa, the protein-bound OD450 of RfAPNs with different concentrations of Cry3Aa was significantly different (fig. 6).

Figure 5. The interactions between Cry3Aa and recombinant RfAPNs. (a and b) SDS–PAGE and western blot analysis of the Cry3Aa crystal protein. (c, d and e) SDS–PAGE and western blot analysis of the GST-RfAPN2a and GST-RfAPN2b fusion proteins. (f) Cry3Aa was detected by far-western blot after probing with RfAPN2a. (g) RfAPN2a was detected by far-western blot after probing with Cry3Aa. (h) Cry3Aa was detected by far-western blot after probing with RfAPN2b. (i) RfAPN2b was detected by far-western blot after probing with Cry3Aa. The red arrow indicates the size of the target protein.

Figure 6. Binding affinity of Cry3Aa toxin to RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. The specific binding of Cry3Aa toxin to RfAPN2a (a) and RfAPN2b (b) was determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of Cry3Aa toxin. Each point represents the mean of three repeated measurements OD450 ± SEM, and the curves are a four-parameter fitting curve. An asterisk indicates a significant difference at P < 0.05.

Cytotoxic effects of Cry3Aa on RfAPN2a or RfAPN2b-expressing HEK293T cells

Rfapn2a and Rfapn2b were transfected into HEK293T cells and the expressed proteins (Fig. S4). MTT assays indicated that the survival rate of all cells decreased with an increase in the concentration of Cry3Aa, but the difference was not significant. When the Cry3Aa concentration reached 200 μg ml−1, the survival rates of cells expressing EGFP and RfAPNs were approximately 85% (fig. 7a). After incubation with 200 g ml−1 Cry3Aa for 2 h, although the cells expressing RfAPN2a or RfAPN2b showed slight deformation, neither the control nor the RfAPN-expressing cells showed significant cell swelling or fragmentation compared to the cells not incubated with the activated toxin (fig. 7b).

Figure 7. Effect of the trypsin-activated Cry3Aa toxin on cell viability. (a) Detection of transfected cells activity treated with Cry3Aa toxin by MTT assay. Each point represents the mean of three repeated measurements ± SEM. (b) Morphological changes of 293T cells treated with 200 μg ml−1 Cry3Aa. EGFP-293T refers to 293T cells transfected with the pQCMV vector. APN2a-293T refers to cells expressing RfAPN2a; APN2b-293T refers to cells expressing RfAPN2b. Ex 470 refers to the observation of cells under 470 nm excitation light.

Discussion

Binding to specific receptors on BBMVs is crucial for the toxin to exert toxicity (Melo et al., Reference Melo, Soccol and Soccol2016). Many Cry3Aa receptors have been identified in Coleopteran pests, including APN from M. alternatus and cadherin from T. molitor (Fabrick et al., Reference Fabrick, Oppert, Lorenzen, Morris, Oppert and Jurat-Fuentes2009; Guo et al., Reference Guo, Carballar-Lejarazú, Sheng, Fang, Wang, Liang, Hu, Wang, Zhang and Wu2020). However, before this study, no Cry3Aa toxin receptor had been identified in the midgut of R. ferrugineus. Therefore, the binding proteins of Cry3Aa in R. ferrugineus, including the V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit, the GTP-binding protein and APN, were identified using pull-down assays. V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunits play essential roles in ATPase assembly and regulation of catalytic activity (Forgac, Reference Forgac1999). The V-type proton ATPase catalytic subunit in M. alternatus has also been found to bind to the Cry3Aa toxin; however, the mechanism of this interaction is still unclear (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Carballar-Lejarazú, Sheng, Fang, Wang, Liang, Hu, Wang, Zhang and Wu2020). GTP-binding proteins are peripheral proteins anchored to the plasma membrane by fatty acid chains (Ridley and Hall, Reference Ridley and Hall1992). They regulate growth factors and activate NADPH oxidase (Abo et al., Reference Abo, Pick, Hall, Totty, Teahan and Segal1991; Ridley et al., Reference Ridley, Paterson, Johnston, Diekmann and Hall1992). Notably, APN, a membrane protein that was first identified as a Cry receptor, is essential for Cry toxins to act on lepidopteran and dipteran pests (Takesue et al., Reference Takesue, Yokota, Miyajima, Taguchi and Takesue1992; Batool et al., Reference Batool, Alam, Jin, Xu, Wu, Wang, Huang, Guan, Yu and Zhang2019; Sun et al., Reference Sun, Yang, Jin, Liu, Zhou, Qiu, Lin and Ma2020). However, few studies have been conducted on the binding of Cry to APNs in Coleoptera. In this study, we identified two APN-binding APN proteins Cluster-7879.9674 (RfAPN2a) and Cluster-7879.8243 (RfAPN2b), belonging to the APN2 family. The dissociation constant (Kd) of activated Cry3Aa toxin to RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b was 108.5 and 68.2 nM, which is higher than Cry3Aa toxin to APN in M. alternatus (57 nM) (Guo et al., Reference Guo, Carballar-Lejarazú, Sheng, Fang, Wang, Liang, Hu, Wang, Zhang and Wu2020). These results indicated that RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b were the binding proteins of Cry3Aa toxin in the BBMVs of R. ferrugineus.

Cry toxins bind to APN receptors via a glycosylation-mediated pathway; for example, Cry1Ac binds specifically by recognizing different GalNAc sites on the receptors of M. sexta, Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa armigera, indicating the importance of glycosylation site (Luo et al., Reference Luo, Sangadala, Masson, Mazza, Brousseau and Adang1997; Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Lee, Valaitis, Curtiss and Dean2000). Bioinformatics analyses showed that both RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b had potential N- and O-glycosylation sites, which may be relevant for susceptibility to toxins. In addition, molecular docking results showed that Cry3Aa-binding sites were located in domains II and III. Domain II is involved in midgut receptor recognition, irreversible binding and membrane insertion, whereas domain III recognizes and binds to the receptor glycosylation sites (de Maagd et al., Reference de Maagd, Bakker, Masson, Adang, Sangadala, Stiekema and Bosch1999; Pardo-López et al., Reference Pardo-López, Soberón and Bravo2013).

The mechanism of action underlying Cry toxicity is highly complex and two models have been proposed to explain it: the sequential binding model and the signalling pathway model (Vílchez, Reference Vílchez2020). According to the sequential binding model, the activated toxin reversibly binds to the APN and ALP receptors. Then, the binding to the extracellular cadherin-like receptor is facilitated with high affinity to promote helix α1 proteolysis and form pre-pore toxin oligomers (Gómez et al., Reference Gómez, Sánchez, Miranda, Bravo and Soberón2002; Pacheco et al., Reference Pacheco, Gómez, Arenas, Saab-Rincon, Rodríguez-Almazán, Gill, Bravo and Soberón2009). Oligomers display a high affinity for APN and ALP, leading to pore formation in membrane lipid rafts and osmotic cell death (Bravo et al., Reference Bravo, Gómez, Conde, Muñoz-Garay, Sánchez, Miranda, Zhuang, Gill and Soberón2004). Furthermore, this model is supported by the finding that Cry toxins can still form oligomers in vitro without cadherin after removing helical α1 (Mario et al., Reference Mario, Liliana, Idalia, Isabel, Bruce and Alejandra2007). In the signalling pathway model, APN and cadherin proteins are often considered functional receptors, and after proteolytic activation, the toxin binds with high affinity to them, activating Mg2+-dependent cell apoptosis (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Candas, Griko, Rose-Young and Bulla2005, Reference Zhang, Hua, Andacht and Adang2008; Vachon et al., Reference Vachon, Laprade and Schwartz2012). Therefore, APN receptors are indispensable in both Cry toxin models. In R. ferrugineus, RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b were expressed in HEK 293T cells, and cytotoxicity assays showed that the transgenic cells were not susceptible to activated Cry3Aa. This phenomenon has been previously observed for a Heliothis virescens cadherin-like protein that binds Cry1Fa to S2 cells but does not promote cytotoxicity (Jurat-Fuentes and Adang, Reference Jurat-Fuentes and Adang2006). These results suggest that Cry3Aa is not functional when binding to RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b alone and needs to interact with other midgut receptors to enhance the binding affinity in R. ferrugineus to effectively exert toxicity. However, in contrast to our conclusion, Wolfersberger (Reference Wolfersberger1990) reported that Cry1Ac was less toxic to gypsy moth larvae than Cry1Ab despite having a relatively stronger binding affinity to the receptors on BBMVs, which was correlated with the kinetics of reversible and irreversible binding (Wolfersberger, Reference Wolfersberger1990; Liang et al., Reference Liang, Patel and Dean1995). Therefore, further investigations are necessary to clarify the precise mechanism of action of Cry3Aa in R. ferrugineus.

Furthermore, modified Cry3Aa toxins can be used to control R. ferrugineus. It is likely that a Cry1Ac-garlic lectin fusion toxin was synthesized and could bind to more receptors on the BBMVs of H. armigera, leading to a 30-fold increase in insecticidal activity (Tajne et al., Reference Tajne, Boddupally, Sadumpati, Vudem and Khareedu2013). We also found that the glycosylation and docking sites partially overlapped in RfAPNs. These binding sites could be further cloned or mutated to explore the binding mechanism between Cry3Aa and its receptors in R. ferrugineus (Kaur et al., Reference Kaur, Sharma, Gupta, Kalita and Bhatnagar2014). Therefore, modifying Cry3Aa to enhance the binding ability to the receptors in R. ferrugineus to induce toxicity is a feasible approach. Overall, this study demonstrates that RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b are putative Cry3Aa-binding proteins in R. ferrugineus and further provide a reasonable basis for controlling R. ferrugineus using B. thuringiesis.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000299.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers U1905201 and 32171805); National Key R & D Program of China (grant number 2021YFD1400900); National Major Emergency Science and Technology Program of China (grant number ZD202001); Forestry Key Program of Science and Technology in Fujian Province (grant number 2021FKJ03); Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (grant number 2021J01056); Forestry Programs of Science and Technology in Fujian Province (grant number Mincaizhi [2020] 601); Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province (grant number 2018N5002); Forestry Science Research Project of Fujian Forestry Department (grant number Minlinke [2017] 03); Forestry Peak Discipline Construction Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (grant number 72202200205); Forest Science Peak Project of College of Forestry, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (grant number 71201800720); and Undergraduate Training Program for Innovation and Entrepreneurship of China (grant numbers 202210389029, X202210389174 and X202210389176).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally.

References

Abo, A, Pick, E, Hall, A, Totty, N, Teahan, CG and Segal, AW (1991) Activation of the NADPH oxidase involves the small GTP-binding protein p21rac1. Nature 353, 668670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adang, MJ, Crickmore, N and Jurat-Fuentes, JL (2014) Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxins and mechanism of action. Advances in Insect Physiology 47, 3987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Ayedh, H (2008) Evaluation of date palm cultivars for rearing the red date palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Florida Entomologist 91, 353358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batool, K, Alam, I, Jin, L, Xu, J, Wu, C, Wang, J, Huang, E, Guan, X, Yu, XQ and Zhang, L (2019) CTLGA9 interacts with ALP1 and APN receptors to modulate Cry11Aa toxicity in Aedes aegypti. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 67, 88968904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bozbuga, R and Hazir, A (2008) Pests of the palm (Palmae sp.) and date palm (Phoenix dactylifera) determined in Turkey and evaluation of red palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 38, 127130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, A, Gómez, I, Conde, J, Muñoz-Garay, C, Sánchez, J, Miranda, R, Zhuang, M, Gill, SS and Soberón, M (2004) Oligomerization triggers binding of a Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab pore-forming toxin to aminopeptidase N receptor leading to insertion into membrane microdomains. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Biomembranes 1667, 3846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bravo, A, Gill, SS and Soberón, M (2007) Mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry and Cyt toxins and their potential for insect control. Toxicon 49, 423435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bravo, A, Likitvivatanavong, S, Gill, SS and Soberón, M (2011) Bacillus thuringiensis: a story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 641, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, A, Gómez, I, Porta, H, García-Gómez, BI, Rodriguez-Almazan, C, Pardo, L and Soberón, M (2013) Evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins insecticidal activity. Microbial Biotechnology 6, 1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, L (2016) Study on aggregation pheromone core-inducer and field application of red palm weevil. China Tropical Agriculture 3, 3739.Google Scholar
Chen, R and Weng, Z (2002) Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics 47, 281294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crickmore, N, Berry, C, Panneerselvamb, S, Mishra, R, Connor, TR and Bonning, BC (2021) A structure-based nomenclature for Bacillus thuringiensis and other bacteria-derived pesticidal proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 186, 107438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Maagd, RA, Bakker, PL, Masson, L, Adang, MJ, Sangadala, S, Stiekema, W and Bosch, D (1999) Domain III of the Bacillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin Cry1Ac is involved in binding to Manduca sexta brush border membranes and to its purified aminopeptidase N. Molecular Microbiology 31, 463471.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dembilio, Ó, Jacas, JA and Llácer, E (2009) Are the palms Washingtonia filifera and Chamaerops humilis suitable hosts for the red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Col. Curculionidae)? Journal of Applied Entomology 133: 565567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Oliveira, JA, Negri, BF, Hernández-Martínez, P, Basso, MF and Escriche, B (2023) Mpp23Aa/Xpp37Aa insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bacillales: Bacillaceae) are highly toxic to Anthonomus grandis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) larvae. Toxins 15, 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einarson, MB, Pugacheva, EN and Orlinick, JR (2007) Identification of protein-protein interactions with glutathione-s-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. Csh Protocols 2007, pdb.top11.Google ScholarPubMed
Fabrick, J, Oppert, C, Lorenzen, MD, Morris, K, Oppert, B and Jurat-Fuentes, J.L (2009) A novel Tenebrio molitor cadherin is a functional receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 1840118410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forgac, M (1999) Structure and properties of the vacuolar (H+)-ATPases. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274, 1295112954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, I, Sánchez, J, Miranda, R, Bravo, A and Soberón, M (2002) Cadherin-like receptor binding facilitates proteolytic cleavage of helix K-1 in domain I and oligomer pre-pore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin. FEBS Letter 513, 242246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güney, G, Cedden, D, Hänniger, S, Heckel, DG, Coutu, C, Hegedus, DD, Mutlu, DA, Suludere, Z, Sezen, K, Güney, E and Toprak, U (2021) Silencing of an ABC transporter, but not a cadherin, decreases the susceptibility of Colorado potato beetle larvae to Bacillus thuringiensis ssp. tenebrionis Cry3Aa toxin. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 108, e21834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, CH, Zhao, ST, Yuan, M, Hu, JJ and Lu, MZ (2011) Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa fused to a cellulase-binding peptide shows increased toxicity against the longhorned beetle. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 93, 12491256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Y, Carballar-Lejarazú, R, Sheng, L, Fang, Y, Wang, S, Liang, G, Hu, X, Wang, R, Zhang, F and Wu, S (2020) Identification and characterization of aminopeptidase-N as a binding protein for Cry3Aa in the midgut of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 113, 22592268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, Y, Sun, Y, Liao, Q, Carballar-Lejarazú, R, Sheng, L, Wang, S, Zhou, J, Zhang, F and Wu, S (2021) Proteolytic activation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry3Aa toxin in the red palm weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 114, 24062411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, Z, Zhou, J, Zhong, F and Huang, QL (2013) Research progress on damage and control of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences 40, 6871.Google Scholar
Huang, ZH (2013) The occurrence and biological characters of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus in Fujian, China. Advanced Materials Research 610–613, 35523555.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, MA, Griko, N, Junker, M and Bulla, LA (2010) Bacillus thuringiensis: a genomics and proteomics perspective. Bioengineered Bugs 1, 3150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, JL, Lee, MK, Valaitis, AP, Curtiss, A and Dean, DH (2000) Bivalent sequential binding model of a Bacillus thuringiensis toxin to gypsy moth Aminopeptidase N receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry 275, 1442314431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jurat-Fuentes, JL and Adang, MJ (2006) The Heliothis virescens cadherin protein expressed in Drosophila S2 cells functions as a receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A but not Cry1Fa toxins. Biochemistry 45, 96889695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, R, Sharma, A, Gupta, D, Kalita, M and Bhatnagar, RK (2014) Bacillus thuringiensis toxin, Cry1C interacts with 128HLHFHLP134 region of aminopeptidase N of agricultural pest, Spodoptera litura. Process Biochemistry 49, 688696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, S, Stecher, G, Li, M, Knyaz, C and Tamura, K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology Evolution 35, 15471549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, Y, Patel, S and Dean, D (1995) Irreversible binding kinetics of Bacillus thuringiensis CryIA δ-Endotoxins to gypsy moth brush border membrane vesicles is directly correlated to toxicity. Journal of Biology Chemistry 270, 2471924724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llácer, E, Dembilio, O and Jacas, JA (2010) Evaluation of the efficacy of an insecticidal paint based on chlorpyrifos and pyriproxyfen in a microencapsulated formulation against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 402408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, KE, Sangadala, S, Masson, L, Mazza, A, Brousseau, R and Adang, MJ (1997) Mediating specific Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A-endotoxin binding and pore formation. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 27, 735743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mario, S, Liliana, PL, Idalia, L, Isabel, G, Bruce, ET and Alejandra, B (2007) Engineering modified Bt toxins to counter insect resistance. Science (New York, N.Y.) 318, 16401642.Google Scholar
Melo, ALDA, Soccol, VT and Soccol, CR (2016) Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 36, 317326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pacheco, S, Gómez, I, Arenas, I, Saab-Rincon, G, Rodríguez-Almazán, C, Gill, SS, Bravo, A and Soberón, M (2009) Domain II loop 3 of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin is involved in a “Ping Pong” binding mechanism with Manduca sexta aminopeptidase-N and cadherin receptors. Journal of Biology Chemistry 284, 3275032757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo-López, L, Soberón, M and Bravo, A (2013) Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection. FEMS Microbiology Review 37, 322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PéRez, C, Fernandez, LE, Sun, J, Folch, JL, Gill, SS, Soberó, M and Bravo, A (2005) Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cyt1Aa synergizes Cry11Aa toxin by functioning as a membrane-bound receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 102, 1830318308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, AJ and Hall, A (1992) The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell 70, 389399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ridley, AJ, Paterson, HF, Johnston, HF, Diekmann, D and Hall, A (1992) The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell 70, 401410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, R, Adegawa, S, Li, X, Tanaka, S and Endo, H (2019) Function and role of ATP-binding cassette transporters as receptors for 3D-cry toxins. Toxins 11, 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnepf, E, Crickmore, N, van Rie, J, Lereclus, D, Baum, J, Feitelson, J, Zeigler, DR and Dean, DH (1998) Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 62, 775806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soberón, M, Portugal, L, Garcia-Gómez, BI, Sánchez, J, Onofre, J, Gómez, I, Pacheco, S and Bravo, A (2018) Cell lines as models for the study of Cry toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 93, 6678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subramanian, B, Gao, S, Lercher, MJ, Hu, S and Chen, WH (2019) Evolview v3: a webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Research 47, W270W275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, Y, Yang, P, Jin, H, Liu, H, Zhou, H, Qiu, L, Lin, Y and Ma, W (2020) Knockdown of the aminopeptidase N genes decreases susceptibility of Chilo suppressalis larvae to Cry1Ab/Cry1Ac and Cry1Ca. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 162, 3642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajne, S, Boddupally, D, Sadumpati, V, Vudem, DR and Khareedu, VR (2013) Synthetic fusion-protein containing domains of Bt Cry1Ac and Allium sativum lectin (ASAL) conferred enhanced insecticidal activity against major lepidopteran pests. Journal of Biotechnology 171, 7175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takesue, S, Yokota, K, Miyajima, S, Taguchi, R and Takesue, Y (1992) Partial release of aminopeptidase N from larval midgut cell membranes of the silkworm, Bombyx mori, by phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 102, 711.Google ScholarPubMed
Tsuda, Y, Nakatani, F, Hashimoto, K, Ikawa, S, Matsuura, C, Fukada, T, Sugimoto, K and Himeno, M (2003) Cytotoxic activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry proteins on mammalian cells transfected with cadherin-like Cry receptor gene of Bombyx mori (silkworm). Biochemical Journal 369, 697703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vachon, V, Laprade, R and Schwartz, JL (2012) Current models of the mode of action of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins: a critical review. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 111, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vílchez, S (2020) Making 3D-cry toxin mutants: much more than a tool of understanding toxins mechanism of action. Toxins 12, 600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Zuo, Z, Wang, X, Gu, L, Yoshizumi, T, Yang, Z, Yang, L, Liu, Q, Liu, W and Han, YJ (2016) Photoactivation and inactivation of Arabidopsis cryptochrome 2. Science (New York, N.Y.) 354, 343347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfersberger, M (1990) The toxicity of two Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins to gypsy moth larvae is inversely related to the affinity of binding sites on midgut brush border membranes for the toxins. Experientia 46, 475477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfersberger, M, Luethy, P, Maurer, A, Parenti, P, Sacchi, FV, Giordana, B and Hanozett, GM (1987) Preparation and partial characterization of amino acid transporting brush border membrane vesicles from the larval midgut of the cabbage butterfly (Pieris brassicae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 86, 301308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X, Candas, M, Griko, NB, Rose-Young, L and Bulla, LA (2005) Cytotoxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin depends on specific binding of the toxin to the cadherin receptor BT-R1 expressed in insect cells. Cell Death & Difference 12, 14071416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R, Hua, G, Andacht, TM and Adang, MJ (2008) A 106-kDa aminopeptidase is a putative receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry11Ba toxin in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Biochemistry 47, 1126311272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Cry3Aa toxin binding to the BBMVs of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. (a and b) SDS–PAGE analysis of extraction of BBMVs, GST-Cry3Aa and GST-Cry1Ac. (c) Ligand blot analysis of Cry3Aa and Cry1Ac toxin to BBMVs, Cry1Ac toxin was used as a control. (d) The binding of Cry3Aa toxin to BBMVs was detected in the presence of increasing concentrations of Cry3Aa. Each point represents the mean of three independent measurements presented as OD450 ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and the lines represent the nonlinear regression for one-site binding. * Designates statistical significance at P < 0.05.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Protein pull-down and identification of Cry3Aa-binding proteins. (a) Cry3Aa toxin pull-down assays from Rhynchophorus ferrugineus BBMVs, Cry1Ac toxin was used as a control. (b) Mass spectrometry identification of the Cry3Aa-binding proteins from BBMVs.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Neighbour-joining distance-based phylogenetic tree of APN proteins. The accession numbers of each amino acid sequence were indicated. Species abbreviations are as follows: Ha, Helicoverpa armigera; On, Ostrinia nubilalis; Se, Spodoptera exigua; Cs, Chilo suppressalis; Px, Plutella xylostella; Tn, Trichoplusia ni; Hc, Hyphantria cunea; Ms, Manduca sexta; Aj, Achaea janata; Cm, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis; Bm, Bombyx mori; Hv, Heliothis virescens; Al, Athetis lepigone; Pi, Plodia interpunctella; Tl, Telchin licus licus; Ep, Epiphyas postvittana.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Molecular docking analysis of Cry3Aa with RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b. (a) Binding sites of Cry3Aa to RfAPN2a. (b) Binding sites of RfAPN2a to Cry3Aa. (c) Binding sites of Cry3Aa to RfAPN2b. (d) Binding sites of RfAPN2b to Cry3Aa. Yellow amino acid residues are the binding sites.

Figure 4

Figure 5. The interactions between Cry3Aa and recombinant RfAPNs. (a and b) SDS–PAGE and western blot analysis of the Cry3Aa crystal protein. (c, d and e) SDS–PAGE and western blot analysis of the GST-RfAPN2a and GST-RfAPN2b fusion proteins. (f) Cry3Aa was detected by far-western blot after probing with RfAPN2a. (g) RfAPN2a was detected by far-western blot after probing with Cry3Aa. (h) Cry3Aa was detected by far-western blot after probing with RfAPN2b. (i) RfAPN2b was detected by far-western blot after probing with Cry3Aa. The red arrow indicates the size of the target protein.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Binding affinity of Cry3Aa toxin to RfAPN2a and RfAPN2b of Rhynchophorus ferrugineus. The specific binding of Cry3Aa toxin to RfAPN2a (a) and RfAPN2b (b) was determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of Cry3Aa toxin. Each point represents the mean of three repeated measurements OD450 ± SEM, and the curves are a four-parameter fitting curve. An asterisk indicates a significant difference at P < 0.05.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Effect of the trypsin-activated Cry3Aa toxin on cell viability. (a) Detection of transfected cells activity treated with Cry3Aa toxin by MTT assay. Each point represents the mean of three repeated measurements ± SEM. (b) Morphological changes of 293T cells treated with 200 μg ml−1 Cry3Aa. EGFP-293T refers to 293T cells transfected with the pQCMV vector. APN2a-293T refers to cells expressing RfAPN2a; APN2b-293T refers to cells expressing RfAPN2b. Ex 470 refers to the observation of cells under 470 nm excitation light.

Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 1
Download undefined(File)
File 339.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 2
Download undefined(File)
File 15 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 3
Download undefined(File)
File 300.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 4
Download undefined(File)
File 304.7 KB