Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:08:40.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size-dependent filtration efficiencies of face masks and respirators for removing SARS-CoV-2–laden aerosols

Part of: SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2020

Yumeng Liu  and
Bin Zhao Open the ORCID record for Bin Zhao [Opens in a new window]
Yumeng Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Building Science, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Bin Zhao*
Affiliation:
Department of Building Science, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China Beijing Key Laboratory of Indoor Air Quality Evaluation and Control, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
*
Author for correspondence: Bin Zhao, E-mail: binzhao@tsinghua.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Letter to the Editor
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 42 , Issue 7 , July 2021 , pp. 906 - 907
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© 2020 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved

To the Editor—A recent article by Liu et alReference Liu, Ning and Chen1 reports that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was detected in the air in hospital areas occupied by inpatients, medical staff, and the public. Their study reported the size distribution of SARS-CoV-2–laden aerosols, which makes it possible to evaluate the filtration efficiencies required for face masks and respirators. The use of face masks and respirators has been recommended for protecting healthcare workers and the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic because SARS-CoV-2 is widely distributed in the air of Wuhan hospitals2,Reference Guo, Wang and Zhang3 and the virus can remain viable in aerosols for several hours.Reference van Doremalen, Bushmaker and Morris4 However, the size-dependent filtration efficiencies of face masks and respirators for removing SARS-CoV-2–laden aerosols have not yet been reported.

The study by Liu et alReference Liu, Ning and Chen1 reported that SARS-CoV-2 occurs most commonly in aerosols in the submicron (0.25–1.0 μm) and supermicron (>2.5 μm) ranges. We reviewed the measured filtration efficiencies of different masks and respirators reported by Konda et alReference Konda, Prakash, Moss, Schmoldt, Grant and Guha5 and compared them to sizes of SARS-CoV-2–laden aerosols (Fig. 1). The N95 respirator and surgical mask show a high filtration efficiency of >60% for aerosols in the submicron range and almost 100% for aerosols in the supermicron range. The filtration efficiency of cloth masks is much lower (<50%). Therefore, for healthcare workers facing a high risk of opportunistic airborne infection, an N95 respirator or surgical mask is sufficient to defend against SARS-CoV-2. For people at low risk of infection, a homemade cloth face mask is a suitable alternative if there are shortages of face masks and respirators, provided that the correct fabrics are used.Reference Konda, Prakash, Moss, Schmoldt, Grant and Guha5 Importantly, any leakage from the edges of the face mask may result in a significant decrease in filtration efficiency,Reference Steinle, Sleeuwenhoek and Mueller6 so face masks must fit correctly to be effective.

Fig. 1. Filtration efficiencies of an N95 respirator, a surgical mask, and a cloth mask. The filtration efficiencies are combined from Konda et al.Reference Konda, Prakash, Moss, Schmoldt, Grant and Guha5 The cloth mask is made of double-layered quilter’s cotton with a thread-count of 80 threads per inch, which is often used in do-it-yourself masks. The flow rate was 1.2 cubic feet per minute (CFM), which represents human respiration rates at rest. The graph lines represent the mean values, and the shaded areas represent the standard error of 7 experiments.

With the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous findings have shown the protective effect of wearing face masks,Reference Chu, Akl and Duda7 which increases public recognition of the need for them. Considering the limited supplies of face masks, the rational use different types of face masks or respirators depending on the pandemic severity and context of use has been advised.8 In the meantime, the size-dependent filtration efficiencies for SARS-CoV-2–laden aerosols reported here can be used to inform policies on the use of face masks.

Acknowledgments

Financial support

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 52041602 and 51521005).

Conflict of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Liu, Y, Ning, Z, Chen, Y, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two Wuhan hospitals. Nature 2020;582:557–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. Rapid Expert Consultation on the Possibility of Bioaerosol Spread of SARS-CoV-2 for the COVID-19 Pandemic (April 1, 2020). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020.Google Scholar
Guo, Z, Wang, Z, Zhang, S, et al. Aerosol and surface distribution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in hospital wards, Wuhan, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2020;26:1583–1591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Doremalen, N, Bushmaker, T, Morris, DH, et al. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1564–1567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konda, A, Prakash, A, Moss, GA, Schmoldt, M, Grant, GD, Guha, S. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano 2020;14:6339–6347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steinle, S, Sleeuwenhoek, A, Mueller, W, et al. The effectiveness of respiratory protection worn by communities to protect from volcanic ash inhalation. Part II: Total inward leakage tests. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2018;221:977–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chu, DK, Akl, EA, Duda, S, et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2020;395:1973–1987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Advice on the use of masks in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance. World Health Organization website. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332293. Published 2020. Accessed July 1, 2020.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Filtration efficiencies of an N95 respirator, a surgical mask, and a cloth mask. The filtration efficiencies are combined from Konda et al.5 The cloth mask is made of double-layered quilter’s cotton with a thread-count of 80 threads per inch, which is often used in do-it-yourself masks. The flow rate was 1.2 cubic feet per minute (CFM), which represents human respiration rates at rest. The graph lines represent the mean values, and the shaded areas represent the standard error of 7 experiments.