Introduction
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) has been considered as a possibility for molecular electronics. Because DNA is able to recognize other molecules—other strands of DNA—and because it binds together with similar DNA strands in a very unique way, scientists have suggested the possibility of using DNA as an electronic circuit without having to build in any other circuitry. The DNA would bind with other similar DNA strands that it recognizes and then use the connecting properties of the DNA to create a self-assembled biological wire for electrical conduction. Until recently, uncertainty existed about whether DNA could conduct at all, and if it could, how well it could conduct. Scientific speculations ranged from DNA being a superconductor to a complete insulator. Recent research, however, by Dr. Sidney R. Cohen in collaboration with Dr. Ron Naaman and Dr. Claude Nogues of the Weizmann Institute of Science, Scanned Probe Microscopy Unit, in Rehovot, Israel, aided by the enabling technologies of ultra-high-resolution microscopy and negative-stiffness vibration isolation, has shed new light on the electrical transport properties of DNA, focusing on the capacity of single molecules of DNA to transport current along individual strands.
DNA Measurement Challenges
DNA is a nucleic acid that contains the genetic instructions used in the development and functioning of all known living organisms and some viruses. The main role of DNA molecules is the long-term storage of information. DNA nanotechnology uses the unique molecular-recognition properties of DNA to create self-assembling branched DNA complexes with useful properties.
To measure the electronic properties of DNA, Dr. Cohen and his staff needed to connect an electrode to the end of a DNA molecule, which is only a few nanometers in length, using an AFM (atomic force microscope) [Reference Nogues1, Reference Cohen and Bitler2]. One difficulty in measuring something this small is ensuring that a good electrical contact is made to the molecule—the researcher wants to measure the electrical properties of the molecule, not the quality of the connection. To facilitate this bio-molecular connection, the lab attached a bio-link, a gold electrode, to a single strand of DNA, and then attached a very small gold ball (10 to 20 nanometers in size) to a complementary DNA strand, after which these two strands were hybridized (linking of the two single strands, aided by genetic similarity between corresponding DNA sequences) as shown in Figure 1. If the strands are complementary, their matching cousin on the other strand will form a double-strand. Single strands of DNA do not conduct electricity. The double-strand does conduct for certain configurations.
Figure 1: Schematic of the measuring system. DNA oligomer is attached to a gold electrode below and hybridizes with a DNA attached to a gold nanoparticle, which then forms the upper electrode for the double-stranded DNA. Current is measured by applying a bias between upper and lower electrodes with placement controlled by the AFM tip. Modified from a figure in [Reference Nogues1].
DNA molecules are very easily destroyed. Hooking up these gold connectors and balls at the nano level without tearing them off or burning them out is quite challenging (Figure 2). This preparation method, developed by Dr. Nogues, is critical and somewhat time-consuming but is a fundamental aspect of this research model. Using an AFM, with the DNA double-strand displayed on a flat surface, the researchers could then locate the gold ball, put the AFM tip on top of the ball, flow a current through the double-strand, and view the current voltage characteristics (Figure 3).
Figure 2: AFM image of gold nanoparticles bound from below to the double-stranded DNA [Reference Nogues1].
Figure 3: Current versus voltage curves for DNA strands with different concentrations of the guanine-cytosine (GC) base pair, which releases electrons more readily than the thymine-adenine (AT) base pairs. Higher numbers of GC pairs are increasingly electron rich.
Electron Transport Properties of DNA
Dr. Cohen explains, “There are two possibilities when we talk about electrons flowing through a DNA molecule. We can break it down into two different kinds of electron transport. One is called a ‘tunneling process,’ where the electron effectively shoots through the molecule without caring too much about the internal structure of the molecule. The other is called a ‘hopping process,’ where the electron actually resides for small periods of time in certain positions along the molecule. In this case the electron will be affected by temperature. DNA consists of a sequence of base pairs. We found that variations in both the sequence and the composition of a strand's base pairs can also affect the progress of electron transport through the strand. Similarly, bases which are electron-rich have better electron conductivity than those which have fewer available electrons [Figure 3]. This is not solely academic; electronic behavior of DNA is very closely related to function. There are electrochemical processes, which are mediated by these DNA biological molecules. For instance, radiation damage, and mutation—how does the DNA deal with an extra electron or an absence of an electron located somewhere along its chain?” [Reference Cohen3]
The characteristics of electron conductivity in DNA also have implications in molecular electronics, which is trying to achieve devices that, instead of working on the standard silicon circuitry, function through innocuous molecules. Because of DNA's facility to bind with similar types of DNA molecules, it is not necessary to physically place each molecule in a set location. DNA put into solution can be expected to organize itself in the right way and become a predictable medium for electrons.
Vibration Isolation Critical to DNA Research
The Weizmann Institute is one of the few research groups in the world that has actually managed to measure the electrical transport pro-perties of a single molecule of DNA. One of the chal-lenges that presents itself in nanoscale research is vibration isolation. Every laboratory measuring and imaging at the nano-level is dealing with problems of site vibration, which compromises to a greater or lesser degree the imaging quality and data sets that are acquired through ultra-high-resolution microscopy. A critical factor in the Weizmann Institute's ability to consistently measure DNA electron structures at such extreme nano-level resolutions is the lab's use of negative-stiffness vibration isolation systems (Minus K Technology) which produced the ultra-stable environment that the AFMs needed to execute this research [Reference Ferry4, Reference Platus5].
“Any lab site is subject to vibrations from machines, vibrations of the building itself, and even from people walking around, in the range from less than 10 hertz to about 30 hertz,” says Cohen. “The lab has three separate AFM systems, each with several different modules that require very precise vibration isolation for all of our research, including our DNA electron transport studies. We have opted for negative-stiffness vibration isolation to provide the necessary low-noise environment.” [Reference Cohen3]
Negative-stiffness mechanism (NSM) isolators have the flexibility of custom tailoring resonant frequencies vertically and horizontally. They employ a completely mechanical concept in low-frequency vibration isolation. Vertical-motion isolation is provided by a stiff spring that supports a weight load, combined with an NSM. The net vertical stiffness is made very low without affecting the static load-supporting capability of the spring. Beam-columns connected in series with the vertical-motion isolator provide horizontal-motion isolation. The horizontal stiffness of the beam-columns is reduced by the “beam-column” effect. A beam-column behaves as a spring combined with an NSM. The result is a compact passive isolator capable of very low vertical and horizontal natural frequencies and very high internal structural frequencies (Figure 4).
Figure 4: Schematic of a negative-stiffness vibration isolator.
“We tried air tables, but they did not do very well for us with the horizontal vibrations,” continues Cohen. “Then we compared active systems to the negative-stiffness isolator, measuring the frequency spectrum up to about 100 hertz, and the active systems did not perform as well as the negative-stiffness isolator.” [Reference Cohen3]
Transmissibility with negative-stiffness is substantially improved over air systems, which can make vibration isolation problems worse since they have a resonant frequency that can match that of floor vibrations. Transmissibility is a measure of the vibrations that transmit through the isolator relative to the input vibrations. The NSM isolators, when adjusted to 0.5 Hz, achieve 93 percent isolation efficiency at 2 Hz, 99 percent at 5 Hz, and 99.7 percent at 10 Hz. NSM transmissibility is also improved over active systems.
Conclusion
The measurement of electron transport through DNA molecules by AFM is one more step toward DNA-related electronic devices. Negative-stiffness vibration isolation was an essential component of the AFM system.
