Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:32:37.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Approach to Super-Resolution Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2015

Stephen W. Carmichael*
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905

Abstract

Type
Carmichael’s Concise Review
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2015 

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded last year for the development of super-resolved fluorescence microscopy, which is now an established method in the armamentarium of microscopists. However the specialized microscopes for super-resolution remain expensive and complicated to use. Fei Chen, Paul Tillberg, and Edward Boyden have developed an entirely new approach to super-resolution [Reference Chen1]. Instead of using an instrument that can resolve objects smaller than the diffraction limit described by Ernst Abbe, Chen et al. decided to make the object of study larger so that a diffraction-limited microscope can image a structure that could only be otherwise imaged by electron microscopy or super-resolution microscopy.

Chen et al. discovered that by synthesizing a swellable polymer network within a specimen, it can be expanded, resulting in a physical magnification of four- to five-fold. The other key was the development of specific labels that could be applied to the specimen and then covalently anchored to the polymer network. These labels (for example, anti-tubulin to label microtubules) originally would be spaced below the diffraction limit, but they are then isotropically separated when the polymer network swells and can be optically resolved with a diffraction-limited microscope.

Chen et al. first set out to see whether a well-known property of polyelectrolyte gels—namely that dialyzing them in water causes expansion of the polymer network into extended confirmations—could be performed in a biological sample. They infused sodium acrylate, a monomer used to produce superabsorbent materials, along with other monomers, cross-linkers, and an accelerant into chemically fixed and permeabilized specimens that had been labeled. The specimen-polymer composite was treated with protease to digest the specimen but left the labels bound to the polymer. Dialysis with water then resulted in a 4.5-times linear expansion. Quantitative measurements and statistical analysis determined that the spatial error was less than 1%. They also determined that the fluorescent label targeted to a biomolecule of interest remained covalently anchored to the polymer network. Because the biologic specimen had been swelled, the object was mostly water and scattering was eliminated. The entire process of labeling, gelation, digestion, expansion, and imaging is called expansion microscopy (ExM).

Chen et al. performed ExM to examine microtubules in fixed human embryonic kidney cells. With confocal laser scanning microscopy they compared pre- and post-ExM images and found them to be visually indistinguishable, suggesting that ExM caused practically no distortion. They also compared pre-ExM samples examined with a super-resolution structured illumination microscope to post-ExM specimens examined with a confocal microscope and showed that microtubule networks were more sharply resolved by ExM. They then examined mouse brain tissue (Figure 1) and found the post-ExM measurement errors were only 2 to 4%. Labeling for pre- and post-synaptic molecules showed that ExM enables multiscale imaging and visualization of nanoscale features within volumes relevant to understanding neural circuits.

Figure 1 A volume-rendered image from CA1 layer of the mouse hippocampus showing neurons (expressing cytosolic yellow fluorescent protein in green), presynaptic elements (stained with anti-Bassoon, blue), and postsynaptic elements (stained with anti-Homer1, red). The scale bar in the X direction is 13.5 μm, Y is 7.3 μm, and Z is 2.8 μm.

This new technique offers great promise. Chen et al. suggest that by tuning the material properties of the ExM polymer, such as the density of cross-links, yet higher effective resolutions may be possible!

References

[1]Chen, Fet al.,Science 347 (2015) 543548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] The author gratefully acknowledges Dr. Edward Boyden for reviewing this article.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1 A volume-rendered image from CA1 layer of the mouse hippocampus showing neurons (expressing cytosolic yellow fluorescent protein in green), presynaptic elements (stained with anti-Bassoon, blue), and postsynaptic elements (stained with anti-Homer1, red). The scale bar in the X direction is 13.5 μm, Y is 7.3 μm, and Z is 2.8 μm.