Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:01:58.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacteria as potential biocontrol agents for managing purple witchweed (Striga hermonthica) in grain sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2024

Nadia Yasseen Osman
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Researcher, Environment, Natural Resources and Desertification Research Institute, National Center for Research, Khartoum, Sudan
Muhammad Saiful Ahmad-Hamdani
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Siti Nurbaya Oslan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Dzarifah Mohamed Zulperi
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Amalia Mohd Hashim
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
Noor Baity Saidi*
Affiliation:
Ph.D Student, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Associate Professor, Laboratory of Sustainable Agronomy and Crop Protection, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
*
Corresponding author: Noor Baity Saidi; Email: norbaity@upm.edu.my
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Purple witchweed [Striga hermonthica (Delile) Benth.], a highly destructive parasitic weed, poses a significant threat to sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] cultivation. This hemiparasitic plant intrudes its root system into the host plant, leading to substantial yield losses, particularly in susceptible genotypes. In the pursuit of eco-friendly solutions, the biocontrol approach has gained attention as a potential management strategy for Striga. In this study, 13 bacterial strains belonging to the genera Bacillus, Gluconobacter, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces were investigated in vitro for their efficiency in controlling the early-stage development of Striga. Among the tested strains, Streptomyces morookaensis NRRL B-12429 demonstrated significant inhibition of Striga seed germination and radicle elongation at 54.36% and 61.84%, respectively, when applied to preconditioned seeds with a synthetic germination stimulant. The effect of S. morookaensis on the inhibition of Striga seed germination was more pronounced in the presence of the host plant, sorghum, at 62.35%. However, biopriming of sorghum seeds with S. morookaensis did not enhance the inhibitory effects on Striga seed germination but resulted in a greater reduction in radicle elongation at 74.64% compared with non-primed seeds. Additionally, the biopriming with S. morookaensis promoted the growth of shoots and roots of germinating sorghum, regardless of the presence of Striga seeds. These findings highlight the potential of S. morookaensis strain NRRL B-12429 as a viable candidate for biocontrol agent applications in sorghum cultivation. Further exploration and investigation of its biocontrol capabilities can provide valuable insights for sustainable management practices against Striga infestations.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] is a C4 grass crop with high drought, heat, and salinity tolerance. It is considered a top 10 global crop in terms of acreage and is mainly utilized for human food, animal feed, forage, and fodder. Sorghum is also an important source of fiber and feedstock for biofuel production (Gladman et al. Reference Gladman, Hufnagel, Regulski, Liu, Wang, Chougule, Kochian, Magalhães and Ware2022; Noort et al. Reference Noort, Renzetti, Linderhof, du Rand, Marx-Pienaar, de Kock, Magano and Taylor2022). Sorghum is grown on different continents, including North America, Africa, Asia, and Australia (Ostmeyer et al. Reference Ostmeyer, Bahuguna, Kirkham, Bean and Jagadish2022). Although wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) remain essential components of diets in Asia, sorghum is considered among the important staple food in Africa (FAO 2021). Millions of people in the semiarid tropic of Africa rely on sorghum as their primary source of food (Abay et al. Reference Abay, Abdelfattah, Breisinger and Siddig2022; Gwatidzo et al. Reference Gwatidzo, Rugare, Mabasa, Mandumbu, Chipomho and Chikuta2020). However, sorghum production in sub-Saharan Africa is highly affected by purple witchweed [Striga hermonthica (Delile) Benth.], a root-parasitic weed (Begna Reference Begna2021). Striga hermonthica (Striga) causes sorghum grain yield losses ranging from 20% to 80% in Africa that can reach 100% under severe infection, resulting in field abandonment, which further complicates food security (Gwatidzo et al. Reference Gwatidzo, Rugare, Mabasa, Mandumbu, Chipomho and Chikuta2020; Yilma and Bekele Reference Yilma and Bekele2021).

Striga hermonthica, belonging to the Orobanchaceae family, is one of the most noxious parasitic weeds within the Striga genus. It is an obligate hemiparasite that attacks the host plant by attaching a small sucker root system to the host plant root (Osman et al. Reference Osman, Hamdani, Oslan, Zulperi and Saidi2023; Sibhatu Reference Sibhatu2016). Striga hermonthica spreads rapidly due to its ability to produce 10,000 to 500,000 seeds per plant, which can survive in soils for 15 to 20 yr under optimum conditions (David et al. Reference David, Ayangbenro, Odhiambo and Babalola2022). To germinate, the dormancy of S. hermonthica seeds must first be disrupted by a warm and moist stratification period (conditioning period) of around 10 d. Following the conditioning period, the seeds will germinate in response to germination stimulants present in root exudates of both host and non-host plants. The stimulants include dihydroquinones, ethylene, and sesquiterpene lactones (Mwangangi et al. Reference Mwangangi, Büchi, Haefele, Bastiaans, Runo and Rodenburg2021). Sorghum secretes strigolactone into the soil as one strategy to counter abiotic stress by promoting spore germination and hyphal branching of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Kawa et al. Reference Kawa, Taylor, Thiombiano, Musa, Vahldick, Walmsley, Bucksch, Bouwmeester and Brady2021). However, strigolactone also triggers the germination of Striga seeds, leading to increased opportunity for Striga infestation in poor-fertility soil (Kawa et al. Reference Kawa, Taylor, Thiombiano, Musa, Vahldick, Walmsley, Bucksch, Bouwmeester and Brady2021; Kountche et al. Reference Kountche, Jamil, Yonli, Nikiema, Blanco-Ania, Asami, Zwanenburg and Al-Babili2019). The germinated Striga seeds will form a host–parasite attachment with the roots of their hosts, depriving the host plants of water, carbon, and essential nutrients (Stanley et al. Reference Stanley, Menkir, Ifie, Paterne, Unachukwu, Meseka, Mengesha, Bossey, Kwadwo, Tongoona, Oladejo, Sneller and Gedil2021).

Several methods for controlling Striga have been applied and adopted, including the use of resistant or tolerant host varieties, crop rotation, application of soil enhancers, soil fumigation, hand pulling of emerged Striga, and using biological control agents (BCA) (Osman et al. Reference Osman, Hamdani, Oslan, Zulperi and Saidi2023; Sibhatu Reference Sibhatu2016). Among those methods, using BCA is the most promising approach for managing Striga infestation because of their specific mode of action, environmental friendliness, and cost-effectiveness. In addition, the increasing awareness in weed control of targeting only unwanted species and conserving environmentally sensitive or degradation-prone areas for healthier and sustainable cropping systems supports the use of BCA to control Striga, particularly for resource-poor farmers (Bekele Reference Bekele2020; Osman et al. Reference Osman, Hamdani, Oslan, Zulperi and Saidi2023). BCA can affect Striga directly by interfering with its life cycle or indirectly by affecting soil nutrient availability, changing plant physiology and root signals, or inducing resistance in the host plants against Striga infections (Masteling et al. Reference Masteling, Lombard, de Boer, Raaijmakers and Dini-Andreote2019). Various bacterial genera have been reported to control Striga at varying efficiency levels, such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, Burkholderia, and Streptomyces (Masteling et al. Reference Masteling, Lombard, de Boer, Raaijmakers and Dini-Andreote2019; Mounde et al. Reference Mounde, Anteyi and Rasche2020; Oyi and Frank Reference Oyi and Frank2020). However, considering the huge potential of BCA and their various modes of action, studies on the bioherbicidal potential of microbes on Striga are still relatively limited.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of several beneficial bacteria on the early development stage of Striga seeds. The direct bioherbicidal effects of the selected beneficial bacteria on Striga seed germination and radicle elongation were screened in vitro in response to synthetic germination stimulant rac-GR24 and in planta in the presence of the host plant, sorghum. To investigate the indirect effects of the beneficial bacteria on sorghum in the early growth stage and on Striga seed germination, the bacterial candidate with the highest bioherbicidal activity was used to prime the sorghum seeds before germination in the presence and absence of Striga.

Materials and Methods

Biological Materials

Bacterial strains used in this study were Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NRRL B-942, Bacillus atrophaeus NRRL B-363, Bacillus subtilis NRRL B-14322, B. subtilis NRRL B-1471, B. subtilis NRRL B-59273, Bacillus velezensis NRRL B-1580, B. velezensis NRRL B-23789, Pseudomonas fluorescens NRRL B-2322, P. fluorescens NRRL B-1029, Gluconobacter asaii NRRL B-4241, Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PA1 5, Gluconacetobacter xylinus NRRL B-758, and Streptomyces morookaensis NRRL B-12429. All bacterial strains were selected randomly from the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection (Northern Regional Research Laboratory [NRRL]), Peoria, IL, USA. However, they all have been reported as having beneficial effects on other plants or disease-suppression effects against various pathogens.

Striga hermonthica seeds were collected from Striga-infected sorghum fields at Gezira station, Sudan, in 2019. The seeds of sorghum cultivar ‘Abu70’ were obtained from the Arab Sudanese Seeds Company, Khartoum, Sudan, and used as a host crop in this study.

Bacterial Culture and Inoculum Preparation

Luria-Bertani agar and broth (Miller) (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) were used for growing Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. Mannitol agar and broth (yeast extract, 5.0 g; peptone, 3.0 g; mannitol, 25.0 g; distilled water, 1,000 ml with or without agar, 15.0 g, pH 6.5) were used to grow Gluconacetobacter spp. Starch casein broth and agar (soluble starch, 10.0 g; casein, 0.3 g; KNO3, 2.0 g; NaCl, 2.0 g; K2HPO4, 2.0 g; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05 g; CaCO3, 0.02 g; FeSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g; distilled water, 1,000 ml; agar, 20.0 g agar or without agar; pH 7.0) were used to grow Streptomyces morookaensis. All bacterial strains were incubated at 30 C for 24 h, except S. morookaensis, which was incubated for 5 d. A serial 10-fold dilution was prepared from the stock culture, and a third dilution with colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU ml−1) ranging from 105 to 106 was used in all the experiments.

Surface Disinfection of Plant Materials

Striga seeds were surface disinfected using ethanol and sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) according to the method described by Daffalla et al. (Reference Daffalla, Hassan, Osman, Eltayeb, Dagash and Gani2014). The seeds were soaked in 70% ethanol for 2 min and rinsed three times with sterilized double-distilled water (ddH2O). Then the seeds were submerged in 1% NaOCl solution for 3 min with continuous stirring and thoroughly washed with ddH2O six times. Floating seeds and debris were thrown away. The remaining seeds were placed on sterile filter paper and air-dried in a laminar flow hood without UV before being stored in sterilized vials at room temperature until used. Sorghum seeds were surface sterilized with 1% NaOCl for 6 min and thoroughly rinsed with sterile ddH2O six times. Unless otherwise stated, all filter papers used in this study were Whatman No. 4 (Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA).

Conditioning of Striga Seeds

The Whatman (GF/C) glass fiber filter papers (Cytiva) were cut into 8-mm-diameter disks and placed on two layers of 90-mm filter paper in a 90-mm petri dish. For conditioning with water, the filter papers were moistened with 5 ml of sterile ddH2O. Approximately 25 Striga seeds were sprinkled on each disk. Subsequently, the petri dish containing the disk was sealed with Parafilm® (Evergreen Engineering & Resources, Selangor, Malaysia), covered with a black plastic bag, and incubated at 30 C for 8 d (Gafar et al. Reference Gafar, Hassan, Rugheim, Osman, Mohamed, Abdelgani and Babiker2015). Striga seeds were treated with 5 ml of the third dilution of bacterial culture instead of water for conditioning with bacterial culture and incubated as described above.

Screening of Bacterial Strains for Inhibitory Activities against Striga

Bacterial cultures were applied during conditioning as described above or as a treatment for water-conditioned Striga seeds. For the latter, the discs containing water-conditioned Striga seeds were dried off from excessive moisture on a filter paper and transferred to a new petri dish lined with another filter paper. Five milliliters of the third dilution of a bacterial culture were added to the petri dish and incubated for 24 h at 30 C in the dark. The next day, the bacterial-treated disks were dried of excessive moisture and transferred to another petri dish with a strip of moistened filter paper in the middle to maintain moisture. A total of 20 µl of the synthetic germination stimulant, rac-GR24 (Chiralix, Nijmegen, Netherlands) at 0.034 µM, was added to each disk. The setup was incubated at 30 C for 24 h in the dark. Afterward, the germinated seeds were observed using a trinocular stereomicroscope, and the germination data were recorded. The radicle elongation from the germinated seed was measured using S-EYE microscope camera software (Setup-1.6.0.11, Hayear Electronics, Shenzen, China). The percentage of Striga seed germination (GR) was calculated using Equation 1 (Kountche et al. Reference Kountche, Jamil, Yonli, Nikiema, Blanco-Ania, Asami, Zwanenburg and Al-Babili2019):

([1]) $${\rm {GR}\%} = (N_{gs}/N_{ts}) \times 100$$

where N gs is the number of germinated seeds per disk, and N ts is the total number of seeds per disk.

The inhibition of germination percentage (IGP) was calculated according to Equation 2 (Gao et al. Reference Gao, Zhu, Wang and Li2021):

([2]) $${\rm{IGP = }}{{{\rm{(GP control - GP treatment)}}} \over {{\rm{GP control}}}}{\rm{ \times 100}} $$

where GP control is the germination percentage of Striga seeds treated with uninoculated culture medium as control, and GP treatment is the germination percentage of Striga seeds treated with bacterial culture. The same formula was used to calculate the radicle elongation in germinated seeds and the inhibition percentage of radicle root elongation by replacing the germination data with the radicle length. The experiment was performed in six replicates.

In Vitro Striga Seed Germination Assay against Selected Bacterial Strains in the Presence of Sorghum

Bacterial strains showing the highest inhibition of Striga seed germination and radicle elongation during the screening stage (B. atrophaeus, B. velezensis NRRL B-1580, G. asaii, and S. morookaensis) were selected for the Striga seed germination assay in the presence of the host plant, sorghum. The sorghum seeds were pre-germinated on two layers of moistened filter paper in petri dishes. The petri dishes were covered with a black plastic bag and incubated at 30 C for 24 h. The Striga seed germination assay was carried out according to the method described by Mohamed et al. (Reference Mohamed, Housley and Ejeta2010) with some modifications. For this germination assay, the Striga seeds were either preconditioned in water or conditioned in bacterial culture or only in culture medium (control). The seeds (water conditioned and unconditioned) were sprinkled separately on 0.5% semisolid water agar in petri dishes. To condition the seeds with bacterial culture or only the culture medium, the solutions were mixed with 0.001% water agar before being poured on top of the Striga seeds and left to solidify. The water-conditioned seeds were topped with only 0.001% water agar. After that, one germinated sorghum seed was placed at the edge of each petri dish, and the radicle was allowed to penetrate the gel. The petri dishes were then covered and incubated at 30 C for 7 d in the dark. A total of three replicates were set up for each treatment. Striga seed germination and radicle elongation were observed and calculated as described previously.

In Vitro Germination of Bioprimed Sorghum Seeds

Surface-disinfected sorghum seeds were directly immersed in S. morookaensis culture or uninoculated culture medium as a control for 1 h, then dried on sterile filter paper in a laminar-flow cabinet without UV for 3 h. Subsequently, the seeds were transferred to a petri dish lined with a moistened double layer of filter paper. Then, the petri dish was covered and placed in a dark chamber incubator at 30 C for 24 h for seed germination. The primed sorghum seeds were used in the germination assay as described above, using only water agar to cover the water-conditioned Striga seeds. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Statistical Analysis

Data collected from each experiment were analyzed with the SPSS software package (v. 25.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Statistically significant differences between the mean values were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. The means were further analyzed using Tukey’s test at a 95% confidence interval.

Results and Discussion

Effects of Bacterial Strains on Striga Seed Germination and Radicle Elongation in Response to Synthetic Germination Stimulant rac-GR24

The inhibitory effects of 13 bacterial strains on germination and radicle elongation were assessed on water-conditioned Striga seeds or as a treatment during the conditioning period. Regardless of the treatment conditions, all bacterial strains significantly reduced Striga germination. The inhibitory effects were more prominent when the bacteria were applied to water-conditioned seeds compared with direct application during the conditioning period. In Striga, the initial conditioning period is similar to the imbibition phase in non-parasitic plants (Yap and Tsuchiya Reference Yap and Tsuchiya2023). The seed permeability and the imbibition rate are influenced by seed coat pigmentation, whereby seeds with less pigmentation have faster water uptake (Waskow et al. Reference Waskow, Howling and Furno2021). Bar-Nun and Mayer (Reference Bar-Nun and Mayer2002) reported that conditioning of Egyptian broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers.) seeds in water increased the permeability of the cell wall, leading to a leakage of phenolic compounds from the seeds. The seed coat of parasitic weed is usually dark and opaque and becomes permeable only when sufficient water accumulates (Daniel et al. Reference Daniel, Gressel and Musselman2013). Hence, the increased permeability of Striga seeds after conditioning could explain the greater inhibition of germination, as it allows more molecules to pass through compared with unconditioned seeds (Niemann Reference Niemann2013). In the present study, the highest percentage of germination inhibition was recorded for S. morookaensis, which was applied to water-conditioned seeds at 54.36%. This is followed by B. velezensis NRRL B-1580, B. atrophaeus, and B. subtilis NRRL B-59273 at 53.48%, 52.49%, and 50.18%, respectively (Table 1). Streptomyces morookaensis was among the highest inhibitors of Striga seed germination when applied during the conditioning period at 41.51%, with only a minor difference from G. asaii at 41.74%. The germination percentage for Striga seeds in response to synthetic germination stimulant rac-GR24 in the presence and absence of bacteria is provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Table 1. Inhibition of Striga seed germination in response to rac-GR24

a Values are the mean of six replicates; plus/minus sign (±) indicates standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. The four highest percentages of germination inhibition are in bold type.

Similar inhibitory effects were observed for Striga’s radicle elongation, whereby the effects of the bacterial treatment were stronger when applied to water-conditioned Striga seeds. The highest percentage of radicle elongation inhibition was recorded for B. atrophaeus at 62.71% when applied to water-conditioned seeds, followed by S. morookaensis at 61.84%, B. velezensis NRRL B-1580 at 54.92%, and G. asaii at 52.60% (Table 2). The Striga radicle elongation in response to synthetic germination stimulant rac-GR24 in the presence and absence of bacteria is provided in Supplementary Table S2. An earlier study by Neondo et al. (Reference Neondo, Alakonya and Kasili2017) showed that bacterial isolates belonging to Bacillus, Streptomyces, and Rhizobium genera caused Striga seed decay by producing enzymes such as xylanases and pectinase that act directly on seeds by decomposing organic matter. Bacillus atrophaeus is one of the Bacillus species known to cause decay in Striga seeds through the action of such compounds (Bekele Reference Bekele2020). Mounde et al. (Reference Mounde, Anteyi and Rasche2020) reported that the Bacillus stains in the study produce indole acetic acid (IAA), which was responsible for the inhibition of Striga seed germination. The inhibition mechanism of IAA could possibly be mediated through enhancing the Abscisic acid-biosynthesis pathway leading to induction of dormancy and inhibition of germination (Shuai et al. Reference Shuai, Meng, Luo, Chen, Zhou, Dai, Qi, Du, Yang, Liu, Yang and Shu2017).

Table 2. Inhibition of Striga radicle elongation in germinated seeds

a Values are the mean of six replicates; plus/minus sign (±) indicates standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test. The four highest percentages of radicle elongation inhibition are in bold type.

On the other hand, the genomic analysis of B. velezensis NRRL B-1580 showed that it contains a specific cluster of genes related to the biosynthesis of various secondary metabolites, such as surfactin, bacillibactin, and polyketides (Rabbee et al. Reference Rabbee, Hwang and Baek2023; Zhao et al. Reference Zhao, Shao, Jiang, Shi, Li, Huang, Rajoka, Yang and Jin2017). He et al. (Reference He, Li, Luo, Zhou, Zhao and Xu2022) were the first to report on the bioherbicidal potential of B. velezensis NRRL B-1580 through the inhibition of O. aegyptiaca seed germination. Although the mechanism is still unclear, the effects of the inhibition were attributed to diketo-piperazine–type metabolites from B. velezensis NRRL B-1580. It is tempting to speculate that the observed inhibitory effects from B. velezensis NRRL B-1580 in the current study could also be related to the same type of metabolites. Gluconobacter asaii is an acetic acid bacterium that produces acetic acid during sugar fermentation. Previously, Gafar et al. (Reference Gafar, Hassan, Rugheim, Osman, Abdelgani and Babiker2018) reported a significant inhibitory effect of acetic acid on Striga seed germination. Acetic acid is a contact herbicide and recommended as an environmentally friendly control method for weeds (Duke et al. Reference Duke, Pan, Bajsa-hirschel and Boyette2022; Owen Reference Owen2002; Webber et al. Reference Webber, White, Shrefler and Spaunhorst2018). Another possible explanation for the inhibitory effect of G. asaii is via IAA, as Gluconoacetobacter spp. are known to produce a high level of IAA (AbdelRazek and Yaseen Reference AbdelRazek and Yaseen2020).

Streptomyces is a major group of soil microbes with potent bioherbicidal activity. Bilanaphos and glufosinate ammonium are commercially available bioherbicides formulated using metabolites from Streptomyces (Bo et al. Reference Bo, Kim, Kim, Sin, Kim, Khaitov, Ko, Park and Choi2019). In addition, some antibiotics from Streptomyces have been developed as bioherbicides, including blasticidin, nigericin, hydantocidin, geldanamycin, and nojirimycin (Harada et al. Reference Harada, Kurono, Nagasawa, Oda, Nasu, Wakabayashi, Sugimoto, Matsuura, Muranaka, Hirata and Okazawa2017; Li et al. Reference Li, Wu, Deng, Zabriskie and He2013; Nakajima et al. Reference Nakajima, Itoi, Takamatsu, Kinoshita, Okazaki and Kawakubo1991; Won et al. Reference Won, Kim, Choi, Oh, Shinogi and Park2016). The Streptomyces strain producing nojirimycin has the ability to suppress seed germination and radicle lengthening in parasitic weeds by inhibiting β-glycosidase, an important enzyme in the early stage of parasitic weed germination (Harada et al. Reference Harada, Kurono, Nagasawa, Oda, Nasu, Wakabayashi, Sugimoto, Matsuura, Muranaka, Hirata and Okazawa2017; Wakabayashi Reference Wakabayashi2015). In another study, Chen et al. (Reference Chen, Xue, McErlean, Zhi, Ma, Jia, Zhang and Ye2016) revealed that the culture filtrate of Streptomyces enissocaesilis significantly reduced the germination rate of a parasitic weed, sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.)

In Vitro Effects of Bacterial Strains on Striga Seed Germination in the Presence of Sorghum

Based on screening results with rac-GR24, four bacterial strains with the highest inhibition of germination and radicle elongation percentage in water-conditioned Striga seeds were selected and used in the Striga germination assay in response to a natural germination stimulant from the host plant, sorghum. Treatment of water-conditioned seeds with bacterial culture also resulted in a higher reduction of Striga seed germination in comparison to the treatment applied during conditioning. Streptomyces morookaensis showed the highest germination inhibition percentage in both treatments (60.68% and 62.35%) (Table 3). Unfortunately, the inhibition data show no statistically significant differences between treatments. The germination percentage for Striga seeds in response to natural germination stimulant from the host plant sorghum in the presence and absence of bacteria is provided in Supplementary Table S3.

Table 3. Inhibition of Striga seed germination in the presence of sorghum

a Values are the mean of three replicates $$ \pm {\rm{\;}}$$ standard error. Same letters indicate nonsignificant differences at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test.

The widely studied S. morookaensis strain Sm4-1986 is reported to produce IAA and siderophores (Zhu et al. Reference Zhu, Tian and Li2021). In the study, siderophores were associated with the antagonistic activity against the banana (Musa acuminata Colla) pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Strikingly, the iron-binding potential from siderophores has also been manipulated to produce a broad-spectrum herbicide (Witschel Reference Witschel2009). The same strain also produced bioactive compounds such as harziandione, streptimidone derivative, phenole, and xerucitrinin (Wu et al. Reference Wu, Zhu, Zhang, Wang, Li, Hu and Tan2022). Interestingly, diterpene harziandione is also produced by Trichoderma harzianum, which has been shown to significantly inhibit S. hermonthica germination and haustorium initiation (Azarig et al. Reference Azarig, Hassan, Rugheim, Ahmed, Abakeer, Abusin and Abdelgani2020). Streptomyces morookaensis is also known to produce antibiotic blastocidin (Nishimura et al. Reference Nishimura, Matsuo and Sugiyama1995), which is highly selective for dicots (Kao-Kniffin et al. Reference Kao-Kniffin, Carver and DiTommaso2013).

In Vitro Effects of Sorghum Biopriming with Streptomyces morookaensis on Striga Seed Germination and Radicle Elongation

Sorghum seeds were bioprimed with S. morookaensis to investigate the potential of colonized sorghum seeds to inhibit Striga seed germination and radicle elongation. Figures 1 and 2 show that biopriming with S. morookaensis imposed a stronger inhibitory effect than when applied to Striga seeds directly in water agar. The inhibition of Striga seed germination was recorded at 59.83% with bioprimed sorghum compared with only 36.56% with the non-bioprimed sorghum. Meanwhile, the effects of biopriming on Striga radicle elongation differ significantly by more than 10% in the presence of bioprimed sorghum. The inhibition action may occur indirectly via reprogramming of seed germination signaling pathways, leading to reduced germination or radicle malformation.

Figure 1. Biopriming of sorghum with Streptomyces morookaensis induced higher inhibition percentage of Striga seed germination and radicle elongation. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean calculated from three replicates. Asterisk indicates a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA.

Figure 2. Elongation of Striga radicle in the presence of sorghum. (A) Non-bioprimed and (B) bioprimed sorghum. SR, sorghum root.

In Vitro Effects of Biopriming with Streptomyces morookaensis on Sorghum Shoot and Root Lengths

To determine whether the colonization of sorghum seed with S. morookaensis was able to promote sorghum growth, the shoot and root lengths of the germinated sorghum seedlings were measured in the presence or absence of Striga (Figure 3). The results show that biopriming with S. morookaensis increased the length of shoot and root of the germinated sorghum seedlings in either condition. Interestingly, the presence of Striga further increased sorghum root length regardless of the biopriming treatment. Biopriming of seeds before germination allows the beneficial bacteria to enter or adhere to the seeds from the beginning. It is considered an attractive, cost-effective approach to improve seed germination rates under hostile environmental conditions and to activate plant defense mechanisms at early stages of plant development (Lastochkina et al. Reference Lastochkina, Garshina, Ivanov, Yuldashev, Khafizova, Allagulova, Fedorova, Avalbaev, Maslennikova and Bosacchi2020; Mahmood et al. Reference Mahmood, Turgay, Farooq and Hayat2016). Furthermore, biopriming of seeds with bacteria is proven to promote crop productivity and growth (Chakraborti et al. Reference Chakraborti, Bera, Sadhukhan and Dutta2022; Sharifi et al. Reference Sharifi, Khavazi and Gholipouri2011) and increases plant resilience under adverse conditions (Fiodor et al. Reference Fiodor, Ajijah, Dziewit and Pranaw2023). The ability of Streptomyces to secrete phytohormones that stimulate plant growth has been shown for Streptomyces sp. CLV45 and Streptomyces alfalfae 11F that produce IAA and/or siderophores (Pang et al. Reference Pang, Solanki and Wang2022).

Figure 3. Sorghum biopriming with Streptomyces morookaenis promotes shoot and root growth. Striga represents S. hermonthica. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean calculated from three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test.

In summary, this study has confirmed the potential of several beneficial bacterial strains to suppress Striga infestation by affecting germination and radicle elongation, especially in conditioned seeds. Among the tested strains, S. morookaenis showed the highest reduction in Striga seed germination and radicle elongation regardless of seed conditioning status. The inhibitory effects were higher when the sorghum seeds were bioprimed with S. morookaenis before germination in the presence of Striga. Biopriming of sorghum seeds also promoted its growth. These findings provide significant insights into Striga management. In line with the goal of sustainability in weed management, the future of Striga management strategies is expected to rely heavily on biomolecules or microbes that can inhibit germination or suppress the growth of the parasitic plant. However, it is essential to examine the compatibility of the candidate bacteria with the host, consider a suitable inoculum medium, consistency of their inhibitory effects, and the maintenance of their activities in infested soil by conducting field experiments under different environmental conditions to ensure optimum suppression effects.

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.42

Acknowledgment

We thank the late Abdelgabar Elteb Babker, the director of the Striga project in Sudan, for his great help in collecting S. hermonthica and sorghum seeds and with deep sorrow for losing him.

Funding statement

NYO received a scholarship from OWSD (Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World) and SIDA (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency) and was awarded the University Consortium Student Thesis Grant for Research Activities from Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA). The project is funded by a research grant from Universiti Putra Malaysia (GP-IPS/2022/9734800).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Debalin Sarangi, University of Minnesota

References

Abay, KA, Abdelfattah, L, Breisinger, C, Siddig, K (2022) Evaluating cereal market (dis)integration in less developed and fragile markets: the case of Sudan. Food Policy 114:102399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AbdelRazek, GM, Yaseen, R (2020) Effect of some rhizosphere bacteria on root-knot nematodes. Egypt J Biol Pest Control 30:140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azarig, MA, Hassan, MM, Rugheim, AME, Ahmed, MM, Abakeer, R, Abusin, RM, Abdelgani, ME (2020) Impact of Trichoderma harzianum and bacterial strains against Striga hermonthica in sorghum. Ann Plant Sci 9:40494058 Google Scholar
Bar-Nun, N, Mayer, AM (2002) Composition of and changes in storage compounds in Orobanche aegyptiaca seeds during preconditioning. Isr J Plant Sci 50:278279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begna, T(2021) Effect of Striga species on sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L Moench) production and its integrated management approaches. Int J Res Stud Agric Sci 7:1022 Google Scholar
Bekele, M (2020) The importance of microorganisms in depleting Striga seed banks to enhance sorghum productivity: a review. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 7:107115 Google Scholar
Bo, AB, Kim, JD, Kim, YS, Sin, HT, Kim, HJ, Khaitov, B, Ko, YK, Park, KW, Choi, JS (2019) Isolation, identification and characterization of Streptomyces metabolites as a potential bioherbicide. PLoS ONE 14:e0222933 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chakraborti, S, Bera, K, Sadhukhan, S, Dutta, P (2022) Plant stress bio-priming of seeds: plant stress management and its underlying cellular, biochemical and molecular mechanisms. Plant Stress 3:100052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J, Xue, QH, McErlean, CSP, Zhi, JH, Ma, YQ, Jia, XT, Zhang, M, Ye, XX (2016) Biocontrol potential of the antagonistic microorganism Streptomyces enissocaesilis against Orobanche cumana. BioControl 61:781791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daffalla, HM, Hassan, MM, Osman, MG, Eltayeb, AH, Dagash, YI, Gani, MEA (2014) Effect of seed priming on early development of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Int Sch Res Notices 2014:8 Google ScholarPubMed
Daniel, MJ, Gressel, J, Musselman, LJ, eds (2013) Parasitic Orobanchaceae: Parasitic Mechanisms and Control Strategies. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer. 513 pGoogle Scholar
David, OG, Ayangbenro, AS, Odhiambo, JJ, Babalola, OO (2022) Striga hermonthica: a highly destructive pathogen in maize production. Environ Challenges 8:100590 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, SO, Pan, Z, Bajsa-hirschel, J, Boyette, CD (2022) The potential future roles of natural compounds and microbial bioherbicides in weed management in crops. Adv Weed Sci 40:113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2021) Cereals. Pages 124–137 in OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021–2030. https://www.fao.org/3/cb5332en/Cereals.pdf. Accessed: May 24, 2023Google Scholar
Fiodor, A, Ajijah, N, Dziewit, L, Pranaw, K (2023) Biopriming of seed with plant growth-promoting bacteria for improved germination and seedling growth. Front Microbiol 14:1142966 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gafar, N, Hassan, M, Rugheim, A, Osman, A, Mohamed, I, Abdelgani, M, Babiker, A (2015) Evaluation of endophytic bacterial isolates on germination and haustorium initiation of Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth. Intl J Farm Alli Sci 4:302308 Google Scholar
Gafar, NY, Hassan, MM, Rugheim, AME, Osman, AG, Abdelgani, ME, Babiker, AGT (2018) Influence of acetic acid, pH and buffers on Striga hermonthica seeds germination. J Agric Vet Sci 11:7478 Google Scholar
Gao, Y, Zhu, M, Wang, H, Li, S (2021) Dynamic changes to endogenous germination inhibitors in Cercis chinensis seeds during dormancy release. HortScience 56:557562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladman, N, Hufnagel, B, Regulski, M, Liu, Z, Wang, X, Chougule, K, Kochian, L, Magalhães, J, Ware, D (2022) Sorghum root epigenetic landscape during limiting phosphorus conditions. Plant Direct 6:117 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gwatidzo, VO, Rugare, JT, Mabasa, S, Mandumbu, R, Chipomho, J, Chikuta, S (2020 ) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes for pre- and post-attachment resistance against witchweed (Striga asiatica L. Kuntze). Int J Agron 2020:116 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harada, K, Kurono, Y, Nagasawa, S, Oda, T, Nasu, Y, Wakabayashi, T, Sugimoto, Y, Matsuura, H, Muranaka, S, Hirata, K, Okazawa, A (2017) Enhanced production of nojirimycin via Streptomyces ficellus cultivation using marine broth and inhibitory activity of the culture for seeds of parasitic weeds. J Pestic Sci 42:166177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, W, Li, Y, Luo, W, Zhou, J, Zhao, S, Xu, J (2022) Herbicidal secondary metabolites from Bacillus velezensis JTB8-2 against Orobanche aegyptiaca. AMB Express 12(1):52 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kao-Kniffin, J, Carver, SM, DiTommaso, A (2013) Advancing weed management strategies using metagenomic techniques. Weed Sci 61:171184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawa, D, Taylor, T, Thiombiano, B, Musa, Z, Vahldick, HE, Walmsley, A, Bucksch, A, Bouwmeester, H, Brady, SM (2021) Characterization of growth and development of sorghum genotypes with differential susceptibility to Striga hermonthica. J Exp Bot 72:79707983 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kountche, BA, Jamil, M, Yonli, D, Nikiema, MP, Blanco-Ania, D, Asami, T, Zwanenburg, B, Al-Babili, S (2019) Suicidal germination as a control strategy for Striga hermonthica (Benth.) in smallholder farms of sub-Saharan Africa. Plants People Planet 1:107118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lastochkina, O, Garshina, D, Ivanov, S, Yuldashev, R, Khafizova, R, Allagulova, C, Fedorova, K, Avalbaev, A, Maslennikova, D, Bosacchi, M (2020) Seed priming with endophytic Bacillus subtilis modulates physiological responses of two different Triticum aestivum L. Cultivars under drought stress. Plants 9:120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L, Wu, J, Deng, Z, Zabriskie, TM, He, X (2013) Streptomyces lividans blasticidin S deaminase and its application in engineering a blasticidin S-producing strain for ease of genetic manipulation. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:23492357 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahmood, A, Turgay, OC, Farooq, M, Hayat, R (2016) Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92:114 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masteling, R, Lombard, L, de Boer, W, Raaijmakers, JM, Dini-Andreote, F (2019) Harnessing the microbiome to control plant parasitic weeds. Curr Opin Microbiol 49:2633 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohamed, AH, Housley, TL, Ejeta, G (2010) An in vitro technique for studying specific Striga resistance mechanisms in sorghum. Afr J Agric Res 5:18681875 Google Scholar
Mounde, LG, Anteyi, WO, Rasche, F (2020) Tripartite interaction between Striga spp., cereals, and plant root-associated microorganisms: a review. CAB Rev 15:117 Google Scholar
Mwangangi, IM, Büchi, L, Haefele, SM, Bastiaans, L, Runo, S, Rodenburg, J (2021) Combining host plant defence with targeted nutrition: key to durable control of hemiparasitic Striga in cereals in sub-Saharan Africa? New Phytol 230:21642178 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakajima, M, Itoi, K, Takamatsu, Y, Kinoshita, T, Okazaki, T, Kawakubo, K (1991) Hydantocidin: a new compound with herbicidal activity from Streptomyces hygroscopicus . J Antibiot 44:293300 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neondo, JO, Alakonya, AE, Kasili, RW (2017) Screening for potential Striga hermonthica fungal and bacterial biocontrol agents from suppressive soils in western Kenya. BioControl 62:705717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemann, S (2013) Seed Coat Permeability of Active Ingredients. Ph.D dissertation. Würzburg, Germany: Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg.162 pGoogle Scholar
Nishimura, M, Matsuo, H, Sugiyama, M (1995) Blasticidin S-producing Streptomyces morookaensis possesses an enzyme activity which hydrolyzes puromycin FEMS Microbiol Lett 132:95100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noort, MWJ, Renzetti, S, Linderhof, V, du Rand, GE, Marx-Pienaar, NJMM, de Kock, HL, Magano, N, Taylor, JRN (2022) Towards sustainable shifts to healthy diets and food security in sub-Saharan Africa with climate-resilient crops in bread-type products: a food system analysis. Foods 11:135 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osman, NY, Hamdani, MS, Oslan, SN, Zulperi, DM, Saidi, NB (2023) Biological control strategies of purple witchweed, Striga hermonthica : a review. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 46:177195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostmeyer, TJ, Bahuguna, RN, Kirkham, MB, Bean, S, Jagadish, SVK (2022) Enhancing sorghum yield through efficient use of nitrogen—challenges and opportunities. Front Plant Sci 13:111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, MD (2002) Acetic acid (vinegar) for weed control revisited. Integrated Crop Management News. Paper 1837. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/handle/20.500.12876/18124. Accessed: September 4, 2023Google Scholar
Oyi, W, Frank, A (2020) Role and in vivo localization of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. strigae and Bacillus subtilis in an integrated Striga hermonthica biocontrol system. PhytoFrontiers 1:5161 Google Scholar
Pang, F, Solanki, MK, Wang, Z (2022) Streptomyces can be an excellent plant growth manager. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 38:112 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rabbee, MF, Hwang, BS, Baek, KH (2023) Bacillus velezensis: a beneficial biocontrol agent or facultative phytopathogen for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy 13:840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifi, RS, Khavazi, K, Gholipouri, A (2011) Effect of seed priming with plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on dry matter accumulation and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Int Res J Biochem Bioinformatics 1:7683 Google Scholar
Shuai, H, Meng, Y, Luo, X, Chen, F, Zhou, W, Dai, Y, Qi, Y, Du, J, Yang, F, Liu, J, Yang, W, Shu, K (2017) Exogenous auxin represses soybean seed germination through decreasing the gibberellin/abscisic acid (GA/ABA) ratio. Sci Rep 7:111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibhatu, B (2016) Review on Striga weed management. SSR Inst Int J Life Sci 2:110120 Google Scholar
Stanley, AE, Menkir, A, Ifie, B, Paterne, AA, Unachukwu, NN, Meseka, S, Mengesha, WA, Bossey, B, Kwadwo, O, Tongoona, PB, Oladejo, O, Sneller, C, Gedil, M (2021) Association analysis for resistance to Striga hermonthica in diverse tropical maize inbred lines. Sci Rep 11:114 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wakabayashi, T (2015) Searching for Potential Targets in Selective Control of Root Parasitic Weeds in Orobanchaceae. Ph.D dissertation. Osaka, Japan: Department of Biotechnology, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University. 92 pGoogle Scholar
Waskow, A, Howling, A, Furno, I (2021) Mechanisms of plasma-seed treatments as a potential seed processing technology. Front Phys 9:123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, CL III, White, PM Jr, Shrefler, JW, Spaunhorst, DJ (2018) Impact of acetic acid concentration, application volume, and adjuvants on weed control efficacy. J Agric Sci 10:16 Google Scholar
Witschel, M (2009) Design, synthesis and herbicidal activity of new iron chelating motifs for HPPD-inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 17:42214229 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Won, OJ, Kim, YT, Choi, JS, Oh, TK, Shinogi, Y, Park, KW (2016) Herbicidal activity and mode of action of Streptomyces scopuliridis metabolites. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ 61:4751 Google Scholar
Wu, GY, Zhu, ZY, Zhang, X, Wang, MM, Li, JX, Hu, YJ, Tan, HB (2022) Chemical constituents from the Streptomyces morookaensis strain Sm4-1986. Nat Prod Res 36:36813688 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yap, JX, Tsuchiya, Y (2023) Gibberellins promote seed conditioning by up-regulating strigolactone receptors in the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica . Plant Cell Physiol 64:10211033 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yilma, G, Bekele, M (2021) The role of soil bacteria in the control of parasitic Striga hermonthica weed. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 8:15 Google Scholar
Zhao, H, Shao, D, Jiang, C, Shi, J, Li, Q, Huang, Q, Rajoka, M, Yang, H, Jin, M (2017) Biological activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101:59515960 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Z, Tian, Z, Li, J (2021) A Streptomyces morookaensis strain promotes plant growth and suppresses Fusarium wilt of banana. Trop Plant Pathol 46:175185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Inhibition of Striga seed germination in response to rac-GR24

Figure 1

Table 2. Inhibition of Striga radicle elongation in germinated seeds

Figure 2

Table 3. Inhibition of Striga seed germination in the presence of sorghum

Figure 3

Figure 1. Biopriming of sorghum with Streptomyces morookaensis induced higher inhibition percentage of Striga seed germination and radicle elongation. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean calculated from three replicates. Asterisk indicates a significant difference at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Elongation of Striga radicle in the presence of sorghum. (A) Non-bioprimed and (B) bioprimed sorghum. SR, sorghum root.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Sorghum biopriming with Streptomyces morookaenis promotes shoot and root growth. Striga represents S. hermonthica. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean calculated from three replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05, as determined by ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test.

Supplementary material: File

Osman et al. supplementary material

Osman et al. supplementary material
Download Osman et al. supplementary material(File)
File 135.9 KB