Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 13 - John Taylor Coleridge and English Criminal Law

  • Edited by Michael Lobban, London School of Economics and Political Science, Ian Williams, University College London
  • Book:
    Networks and Connections in Legal History
    Published online:
    10 August 2020
    Print publication:
    03 September 2020, pp 307-333

  • Summary

    This chapter examines how the networks and connections of John Taylor Coleridge, Justice of the King’s Bench (1835-1858), shaped his approach to criminal law. Coleridge’s career coincided with a period of significant reform: the ‘bloody code’ collapsed and a sustained attempt was made to rationalize the criminal law. Judges’ resistance to these reforms prompted contemporaries to criticize the judiciary for being insular and narrowly reactionary in approach. Coleridge was cited as an exemplar of the severe and illiberal judge. This chapter draws upon his extensive private papers to offer a more nuanced view, which accommodates a range of influences. These included the conservative philosophy of his uncle, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and a network of connections to leading figures in contemporary religious, political and literary debates. In tracing these seams of influence into Coleridge’s work, the chapter aims to illuminate a judicial perspective on a transformative period in criminal law history