We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Edited by
Uta Landy, University of California, San Francisco,Philip D Darney, University of California, San Francisco,Jody Steinauer, University of California, San Francisco
Only a few kinds of interventions account for most of the reductions in maternal mortality rates over the past 20 years.These are directed at the most important causes of maternal deaths worldwide.Unsafe abortion remains among the three leading causes in countries where access to safe abortion is restricted by law or tradition, notably in Africa and Latin America.Reduction of maternal deaths from unsafe abortion depends on adequate training of doctors and nurses to provide it.Several chapters in this book describe national programs to reduce maternal mortality that incorporated abortion training into both basic and post graduate education of health care providers.This chapter provides the rationale for training in safe abortion to reduce maternal mortality and the key components of successful efforts.
Edited by
Uta Landy, University of California, San Francisco,Philip D Darney, University of California, San Francisco,Jody Steinauer, University of California, San Francisco
Physician approval or condemnation, advocacy or opposition, to abortion have often determined whether women can avoid the complications of unsafe abortion and, sometimes, early death.In the USA organized medicine’s early opposition to abortion outlawed it.A century later, obstetricians recognized the importance of abortion to public health.They fought to end restrictions, eventually making abortion legal in several states. At first, individual physicians violated restrictive laws, risking jail and their medical licenses.Colleagues soon supported this “civil disobedience” and influenced their professional organizations, first the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists then the American Medical Association, to take political action in support of abortion law reform.In many other nations, physicians advocated locally and through global organizations like WHO and FIGO for safe abortion to reduce maternal mortality.At medical schools, students insisted that their curriculums include contraception and abortion founding Medical Students for Choice to support advocacy for safe abortion despite official opposition at some schools.Those who planned careers in women’s health sought post graduate residency training that included abortion and became political adversaries of abortion bans in conservative states.
This chapter summarizes the clinical management of obesity in pregnancy, based on evidence where it exists, and highlights the areas where further research is needed. Obese women who are pregnant are recognized as a high-risk group by both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) and should therefore be referred for appropriate antenatal care. All obese women should receive a dietary assessment and nutritional counseling. Obstetric ultrasound is used widely in the developed world for pregnancy dating, detection of higher order pregnancies and fetal anomaly, and estimation of fetal growth. Obesity is a well-recognised risk factor for gestational diabetes mellitus, and pre-gestational diabetes is more prevalent in obese women. It has long been recognized that hypertensive disorders are more prevalent in the obese population. The anesthetist plays an important role in the care of the obese parturient.
This chapter summarizes current data on the maternal and fetal effects of nonobstetrical surgeries during pregnancy, including anesthesia, diagnostic and therapeutic management, laparoscopy, and the common general surgical pathologies found in the pregnant patient. Changes in maternal physiology during pregnancy due to gestational hormones and mechanical effects of the increasingly gravid uterus have an impact on anesthesia during nonobstetrical surgery. The American College for Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) concluded that although there are no data to support specific recommendations for nonobstetrical surgery and anesthesia in pregnancy, it is important for physicians to obtain obstetric consultation before surgery. The fetal loss rate is significantly greater for pregnant patients undergoing appendectomy when compared to other surgical procedures during pregnancy. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses in pregnancy is a safe and effective procedure compared to traditional surgery.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.